Home > Holodomor
| Ukrainophobia
| Demjanjuk
| d&d (Furman, Odynsky, Katriuk) | Zuzak Letters |
Washington Post | 06Jan2010 | John Pancake, [2] UABA response, [3] UABA (ukr), [4] Pancake (ukr)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/05/AR2010010503610.html
In Ukraine, movement to
honor members of WWII underground sets off debate
[W.Z.
2015.06.21: This article by John Pancake was published at the
beginning of the Viktor Yanukovych era (2010-2014), which proved to be
such a disaster for Ukraine. It was the beginning of an all out attack
on Ukraine's independence, which fortunately was stymied by the
Euromaidan "Revolution of Dignity" from 30Nov2013 to 22Feb2014 when
Yanukovych fled the country. (We note that in this article, John-Paul
Himka is allotted 3 paragraphs to spout his
poison; rabbis Dukhovny and Bleich continue repeating their
accusations despite Moses Fishbein's article "The Jewish Card in Russian special operations against Ukraine".) The Ukrainian American Bar Association wrote a rebuttal
to Mr. Pancake's defamation of the
UPA, in particular, and the Ukrainian Independence Movement, in
general, but, unfortunately, the Washington Post declined to publish
it. Today, 5.5 years later, the Ukrainophobes are still attacking the
UPA and the Ukrainian Independence Movement, while Vladimit Putin with
his $300 million propaganda machine and troll army is doing everything
possible to destroy Ukraine. Should not these Ukrainophobes be labelled
as Putin's collaborators?
For
the historical record, we are archiving these two articles, as well as
Ukrainian-language translations thereof, in the Ukrainophobia section
of our website.]
LVIV, UKRAINE -- In World War II, members of the Ukrainian
underground fought to make their vision of an independent nation real.
They battled Hitler and Stalin. Ultimately they lost, and the Soviets
took control of most of Eastern Europe after the war.
The Ukrainians finally achieved independence when the Soviet
Union collapsed in 1991. Now many in this fledgling nation would like
to formally recognize those earlier nationalists -- the "brave
defenders of the Motherland," as President Viktor Yushchenko has called
them. Newly introduced legislation would honor members of the
underground and provide them with benefits accorded to war veterans.
But the movement to pay tribute to the insurgent fighters has set off a
national debate about exactly what happened more than six decades ago.
Many say the underground collaborated with the Nazis, killed thousands
of Jews and perpetrated a campaign of ethnic cleansing against Poles.
The legacy of the underground flows through Ukrainian culture today.
Its best-known banner -- a red-and-black flag -- is seen at the rallies
of nationalist politicians. In this western Ukrainian city, where the
insurgency was active, members of the underground are buried in
elaborate marble tombs in a historic cemetery. Street vendors sell
memorabilia commemorating the resistance. There is even an
underground-themed restaurant outfitted as a bunker. In one corner,
diners can do target practice using a picture of Stalin.
While those involved in the debate over the underground are somewhat
polarized, they agree on one thing: It's complicated.
To begin with, the underground was made up of many factions,
subfactions and rivals. In hindsight, some look better than others.
Meanwhile, for the majority of Ukrainian families, the experience of
"the Great Patriotic War" was fighting with the Red Army to defend the
homeland. Some descendants of Red Army soldiers view members of the
underground as traitors.
The effort to recognize the insurgents also is taking place against the
backdrop of centuries of persecution of Jews in Ukraine, where pogroms
were common.
The Cossack chieftain Bogdan Khmelnytsky, whose statue stands in the
Ukrainian capital, fought for independence during the 17th century. But
he also presided over the killings of tens of thousands of Jews, said
Rabbi Alexander Dukhovny, head of the Religious Union for Progressive
Jewish Congregations of Ukraine. "Was he a hero or an anti-hero? Even
after 350 years, it is difficult to know," Dukhovny said.
Considerable research on the underground is underway in Ukraine and
Canada, a center of the Ukrainian diaspora.
One of the key figures involved in the research is Peter J. Potichnyj.
Born in a Ukrainian family in a village in what was then eastern
Poland, Potichnyj experienced the horrors of the war firsthand. Soviet
secret police executed his father. Poles massacred most of the people
in his village.
In 1945, at age 14, he joined the Ukrainian Insurgent Army, or UPA, and
fought against the Soviets until 1947. He eventually became a historian
at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, and helped edit 77 volumes
about the Ukrainian underground.
Potichnyj, 79, said that although the underground may have had brief
strategic alliances with the Germans, it was mostly fighting the
Soviets. He said much of the anti-underground talk these days is
orchestrated from Russia.
"You know the Russians don't want to admit there were people fighting
them -- not because they were cooperating with the Germans but because
they were fighting for their own culture and the liberation of their
own countries," he said.
As for the killings of Jews and Poles, Potichnyj argues that no matter
where guerrillas fight for liberation, it's a messy affair. The Poles
provoked the Ukrainians, he said.
"With respect to Jews," he said, "obviously, in the situation there
must have taken place some killing of the Jews, although in 1943, when
the UPA was quite strong, there were hardly any Jews left because the
Germans had, unfortunately, killed them all off. But there were some
remnants, and the remnants were either working with the Ukrainian
underground or they were working with the Soviets." Those allied with
the Red partisans were obviously enemies of the underground, he said.
Potichnyj said the underground made a terrible mistake in not
condemning the Germans' efforts to exterminate the Jews. But he
strongly denies that there is any document showing that the underground
ordered the "systematic" killing of Jews.
John-Paul Himka, a historian at the University of Alberta, believes
there was a systematic killing of Jews in some Ukrainian areas. Himka
has written extensively on the Holocaust and Ukrainian history. He said
he has read hundreds of accounts, composed in different places and at
different times, of Jews who survived; many mention killings by the
Ukrainian militia.
Of the plan to honor UPA fighters, he says: "This is really a problem
area because they killed so many people, civilians." In addition to
Jews, he said, they killed 60,000 to 100,000 Poles, as well as
political opponents, Orthodox clergymen, teachers of Russian and many
prisoners of war from eastern Ukraine. He estimates that UPA fighters
killed several thousand Jews, "but perhaps the number was much higher."
"Although what UPA did to the Jews may not have been, in the larger
scheme of things, a major contribution to the Holocaust, it remains a
large and inexpugnable stain on the record of the Ukrainian national
insurgency," he said.
Olexiy Haran, a professor of comparative politics at the University of
Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, said Russian "propaganda" distorted the extent of
the atrocities. The Ukrainian insurgents were fighting for
independence, he insists.
"I believe that these people deserve to be veterans, maybe with the
exception of those who committed crimes," he said. "This was guerrilla
warfare, and it's difficult to imagine guerrillas without atrocities."
Many academics say the debate over the underground is part of a larger
tug of war over Ukraine's national identity. Russia ruled most of what
is now Ukraine for more than three centuries. But relations between the
countries have been testy, and since Yushchenko's election in late
2004, Ukraine has distanced itself from Russia while moving toward the
West.
Yaakov Bleich, whose title is chief rabbi of Ukraine, said of
Yushchenko's effort to legitimize the insurgents: "His goals are noble;
the means stink."
"What I mean is that we all understand that Yushchenko is trying to
build up national pride, and we all understand that that is needed,"
Bleich said. "After 350 years that the Ukrainian people were
subjugated, they have to rebuild national pride.
"But should we take things that are controversial -- heroes that are
still of questionable repute -- and use them to do that?" he said. "At
this point you have people out there living today [who suffered], and
the image is one that would hurt people. The Ukrainian insurgents
fought alongside the fascists. And maybe their intentions were good,
but I will say that the road to hell is paved with good intentions."
-- Special to The Washington Post
[2]
To Washington Post | 22Jan2010 | Victor Rud [Not published]
UKRAINIAN AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
January 22, 2010
The Washington Post
1150 15th St. NW
Washington, DC 20071
RE: John Pancake’s UPA Article of January 6, 2010
Dear Sir / Madam,
As an organization of practicing attorneys and jurists, we have over
many years encountered the unchallenged acceptance of Soviet (and now
Russian) disinformation
campaigns concerning Ukraine. John Pancake’s article about the
Ukrainian underground during
World War II (January 6, 2010) unwittingly, but no less unfortunately,
lends credibility to
those efforts.
The issue is not merely one of historical accuracy. Russia re-catalyzed
the disinformation campaigns after Ukraine declared independence and,
even more, after
Ukraine struck firmly on a democratic path and integration with the
rest of Europe in the wake of
the Orange Revolution five years ago. The trajectory of that path may
be reversing, in which case
the implications for the security of the rest of Europe and the United
States will be profound.
As stated by Sherman Garnett of the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace: ”Whether Russian led
integration on the territory of the former USSR will pose a serious,
long-term military
challenge to the West, depends in large part on the role that Ukraine
plays or is compelled to play.”
Although the article begins by recognizing Ukrainian opposition to both
Hitler and Stalin, it references the Ukrainian Insurgent (Povstans’ka)
Army (“UPA”) and
concludes by quoting Rabbi Bleich’s allegation that “[t]he Ukrainian
insurgents fought alongside
the fascists. And maybe their intentions were good, but I will say that
the road to hell is paved
with good intentions.” By ending on such a note, The Post
necessarily accedes to the consequent imagery
of the UPA as a Hitler ally, seemingly roaming the countryside with no
purpose other than to
indiscriminately kill Poles and Jews.
The labeling of the UPA as “fascist” has repeatedly been shown to be a
Soviet-era fabrication, but that accusation is still frequently revived
today by
those who are not aware of the fabrication, or those intent on
compromising a democratic Ukraine
independent of Russian rule. The falsification was documented, yet
again, with the declassification
of KGB archives in Ukraine by President Yushchenko. A recent study, The Jewish Card In
Russian
Special Operations Against Ukraine, was presented by Moses
Fishbein, at University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign, 24-27 June 2009 (available on the website
http://www.vaadua.org/VaadENG/News%20eng-2009/fishbeyn2.htm),
which concluded as follows:
Russia’s special services
are seeking to destabilize the situation in
Ukraine, undermine its sovereignty and independence, create a negative
image of
this country, block its integration into European and Euro-Atlantic
structures, and
turn Ukraine into a dependent and manipulated satellite. In their
special operations
against Ukraine they attribute exceptional importance to the “Jewish
card.”
A voluminous historical record establishes that the UPA
uncompromisingly battled Nazi Germany. Simultaneously and against
impossible odds, the UPA battled
Hitler’s erstwhile coconspirator, Stalin, well into the 1950’s. The
declared position of the Organization
of Ukrainian Nationalists (“OUN”), whose military arm was the UPA, was
clear: “The
OUN is resolutely fighting against both internationalist and fascist
national-socialist
programs and political concepts, for they are the tools of imperialist
policies of conquest. Thus, we
are opposed both to Russian-Bolshevik communism and to German National
Socialism”
The image created by many of the statements in Mr. Pancake’s article
should be assessed against the following: Writing in the January 27,
1945 issue of The
Saturday Evening Post, Edgar Snow wrote about World War
II: “The whole titanic struggle, which some
are so apt to dismiss as ‘the Russian glory,’ was first of all a
Ukrainian war. No fewer than
10,000,000 people had been lost to Ukraine since 1941. ***No single
European country suffered deeper
wounds to its cities, its industry and its humanity.” Decades later,
with all the evidence in,
the University of London’s Norman Davies, the world’s pre-eminent
historian of Europe, confirmed
that the country most savaged by Nazi Germany was Ukraine. More
Ukrainian civilians
were
killed than the total military
deaths of the United States, Canada, the British Commonwealth, France,
Germany and Italy, combined. An additional more than 2 million
Ukrainians were deported as
slave laborers to Germany.
Hitler’s invasion of the Soviet Union was history’s largest military
operation, with more than 3,200,000 German Hungarian, Rumanian,
Italian, Finnish, Spanish and
Slovakian forces (compare D Day with a total of 132,000 Allied troops).
Ukraine was both the
prize and the crucible. Hitler told Carl Burckhardt, the League of
Nations High Commissioner, “I need
the [sic] Ukraine, so that nobody can ever starve us out again, as they
did in the last war.”
Following Moscow’s 1932-33 man-made famine in Ukraine that scythed
millions of innocents out of
existence, Hitler planned a repeat, as set forth in a report of the
German Economic Armament Staff,
dated December 2, 1941. In the same month, Walther Funk, the German
Minister of the Economy and
president of the Reichsbank, declared in Prague that Ukraine, “this
promised colonial
land,” had become accessible to “European” exploitation.
As a result, Ukraine was one of the few countries in all of Nazi
occupied Europe to be ruled directly from Berlin. It had no Nazi or
fascist party like the Iron
Guard in Romania, the Arrow Cross Party in Hungary, or the smaller but
no less fanatic fascist
parties in Belgium, Norway, Denmark and Holland. Ukraine had no puppet
government as did Quisling’s
Norway or Petain’s Vichy France. To the very contrary, upon Germany’s
invasion of the
Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, Ukrainians promptly (June 30) declared
an independent government,
refusing to ally with Hitler. The Germans considered this to be a coup d’état and
reacted
instantly, arresting the Ukrainian leadership, which was sent to the
Sachsenhausen concentration
camp. An Einsatzkommando C/5 Order stated: “It has been established
with
certainty that the Bandera Movement [OUN] is preparing an uprising in
the Reichscommissariat,
whose ultimate objective is to create an independent Ukraine. All
functionaries of the Bandera
Movement are to be immediately arrested and, after a thorough
interrogation, secretly
liquidated as pillagers.” In the ensuing period of Nazi occupation,
Ukrainians, whether or not members
of the insurgency, were tortured, massacred, and condemned to
Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Treblinka,
Sobibor, Belsen and Dachau. There, the Nazis refused to identify them
as Ukrainians, but
only as Russians or Poles.
That in the midst of this carnage there were instances of collaboration
and anti-Semitism (meaning invidious actions based on one’s
identification as a Jew (or a
Pole) and not because one was an enemy combatant) is tragic, but it was
not unique to Ukraine.
Such instances, however, did not reflect the UPA’s purpose or conduct.
Indeed, Jews became members
of the UPA, some as officers.
To attribute the kind of behavior that the article does to the UPA,
whether sourced as “eyewitness” reports or otherwise, is a matter that
should be examined
with more than the usual diligence, and not only because of the
demonstrable disinformation. One
particularly effective tactic of Stalin’s NKVD units was masquerading
as the UPA and
committing the very atrocities against Jews and Poles that the article
lays at the feet of the UPA.
Such NKVD tactics were even more extensively implemented against the
local Ukrainian population to
alienate the sole
source of UPA support. This was a repeat of tactics employed by Leon
Trotsky as
head of the Red Army in Russia’s conquest of Ukraine in 1918-1920.
One may ask: “Doesn’t Moscow have anything better to do?” No, it does
not. The dissolution of the USSR is bemoaned as “the greatest
geopolitical
catastrophe” of the 20th century, Stalin is being rehabilitated as an
“efficient manager,” and a
wholesale rewriting of Soviet era history in Russian schools is well
underway. Ukraine remains the
linchpin to the process, just as it was both in the formation of the
USSR and also in its fall. Zbigniew
Brzezinski noted that “It cannot be stressed strongly enough that
without Ukraine, Russia ceased
to be an empire, but with Ukraine suborned and then subordinated,
Russia automatically becomes an
empire.” This has been a constant. “If we lose Ukraine,” said Lenin,
“we lose our head.” On
August 11, 1932, Stalin wrote to his executioner in Ukraine, Lazar
Kaganovich: “Things in Ukraine are
terrible... If we don’t make an effort to improve the situation in
Ukraine, we may lose Ukraine. . .
Give yourself the task of transforming Ukraine into truly a fortress of
the USSR. . .Without
these and similar measures. . . I repeat -- we can lose Ukraine.” In
the ensuing months of 1932-33, millions
of Ukrainians were murdered in history’s first man-made famine.
Regrettably, given The
Post’s stature and apparent credibility, Mr.
Pancake’s article -- despite "good intentions" -- will be cited in
predictable quarters with
satisfaction. We urge that both Mr. Pancake and The Washington Post
revisit this issue.
Sincerely yours,
[Signature]
Victor Rud, Chairman
Foreign Affairs & Human Rights Committee
[email protected]
/ 1-201-906-3254
CC: John Pancake
[3]
Ukrainian-language version published in
"Амеріка" -- Філядельфія,
ПА, субота, 17 квітня 2010
with the title
Українська
Амеріканська Асоціяція Адвокатів відповіла газеті "Вашінґтон Пост"
[... rud20100417Amerika.pdf
...]
[4]
Ukrainian-language translation of article by John Pancake in 06Jan2010
issue of the Washington Post
Washington Post | 06Jan2010 | John Pancake
В Україні рух в честь учасників підпільної організації Другої Світової
Війни почав дебати.
Джон Пенкейк
Спеціально для “The Washington Post”
Середа, 6 січня 2010; Ф07
Львів, Україна
-- У Другій Світовій Війні члени української підпільної організації
боролися задля становлення свого образу незалежної нації. Вони воювали
з Гітлером та Сталіном. В кінцевому підсумку вони програли, і, після
війни, члени Радянського Союзу взяли під свій контроль більшу частину
східної Європи.
Врешті-решт, українці досягли незалежності коли у 1991 Радянський Союз
розпався. Зараз багато людей з цієї молодої нації хотіли б офіційно
визнати цих ранніх націоналістів – «сміливих захисників Батьківщини» ,
як назвав їх Президент Віктор Ющенко. Нововведене
законодавство буде вшановувати підпільників та надавати їм пільги
ветеранів війни.
Але рух в шану повстанцям почав загальнонаціональні дискусії щодо того,
що ж насправді відбувалось більш ніж 60 років тому. Говорять, що вони
співпрацювали з нацистами, вбили тисячі євреїв та чинили антиетнічну
кампанію проти поляків.
Спадок підпільної організації протікає через українську культуру й до
сьогодні. Найвідоміше їх знамено, червоно-чорний прапор, можна побачити
на мітингах націоналістичних політиків. У цьому місті західної України,
де повстання було активним, учасники підпільної організації поховані в
гарні мармурові могили на історичному цвинтарі. Вуличні торговці
продають пам’ятки в ознаменування опору. Існує навіть ресторан з
тематикою підпільної організації обладнаний як бункер. В одному куті,
клієнти можуть попрактикувати стрільбу, мішенню якої є фотокартка
Сталіна.
Хоч в тих, хто залучений у дебати щодо повстанців думки розділяються, в
одному вони згідні: це складно.
Почнемо з того,що підпільна організація була зроблена з багатьох
фракцій, підфракцій та конкурентів. Розглянувши ближче, дехто виглядає
кращим за інших. Тим часом,для більшості українських сімей,
досвід «Великої Вітчизняної Війни» боровся з Червоною Армією
задля захисту Батьківщини. Деякі нащадки солдатів Червоної Армії
вважають підпільників зрадниками.
Зусилля задля визнання повстанців також відбувається на тлі
багатовікового переслідування євреїв в Україні, де були розповсюдженими
погроми.
Отаман Богдан Хмельницький, чия статуя височіє у столиці України,
боровся задля незалежності протягом XVII століття. Він також
здійснював контроль над десятьма тисячами євреїв, сказав
Олександр Духовний, голова Релігійної Союзу прогресивних єврейських
громад в Україні. «Був він героєм чи антигероєм? Навіть через 350
років, складно сказати»,- говорив Духовний.
Значні дослідження щодо учасників підпільної оргінізації відбуваються в
Україні та Канаді, центрі української діаспори.
Однією з головних фігур, залучених в дослідження є Петро Потічний.
Народжений в українській родині в селі, пізніше ставше частиною східної
польщі, Потічний зазнав всіх жахів війни безпоссередньо.
Секретна міліція Союзу стратила його батька. Поляки знищили більшість
жителів його села.
У 1945, у віці 14 років, він приєднався до Української повстанської
армії (УПА), і боровся проти Радянського Союзу до 1947. В кінцевому
підсумку він став істориком у МакМастер Університеті в Хамільтоні,
Онтаріо, та допомагав у публікації 77 томів про українських
підпільників.
Потічний, в віці 79 років, сказав,що хоча підпільники і могли
мати короткі стратегічні альянси з німцями, в більшості своїй вони
боролися з Союзом. Сказав він щодо анти-підпільницької
розмови організованої з Росії.
«Знаєте, росіяни не хочуть визнати, що існували люди,які боролись з
ними – не тому що вони співпрацювали з німцями,а тому що вони боролися
за свою власну культуру та визволення їх власних країн»,- сказав він.
Щодо вбивства євреїв та поляків, Політичний переконує,що незважаючи на
те, що партизани боролися за визволення, все це безладна справа. Він
казав, що поляки провокують українців.
«З повагою до євреїв,- говорив він,- очевидно, повинно було статися
якесь вбивство євреїв, незважаючи на те,що в 1943, коли УПА була досить
сильною, навряд чи залишились якісь євреї, тому що німці, на жаль,
вбили їх всіх. Але дехто все-таки залишився, і вони або працювали з
українськими підпільниками, або з Радянський Союзом». Ті,що
співпрацювали з Червоними партизанами,були,очевидно,ворогами
підпільників.
Потічний говорив,що підпільники зробили надзвичайну помилку не
засудивши намагання німців знищити євреїв. Проте він рішуче
заперечує існування будь-якого документу , що підпільники наказали
«систематичне» вбивство євреїв.
Джон-Пол Хімка, історик при Університеті Альберти, вірить,що в деяких
українських областях й насправді були систематичні вбивства євреїв.
Хімка докладно написав про голокост та історію України. Він
казав,що перечитав сотні облікових записів, створених у різних місцях
та в різні часи, про євреїв, які вижили; багато з них згадують вбивства
українською міліцією.
У проекті вшанування бійців УПА, він зазначає: «Це дійсно проблемна
територія,тому що вони знищили так багато людей, цивільних
осіб.» В додаток до євреїв, говорив він, вони вбили від 60000
до 100000 поляків, а також політичних супротивників, православне
духовенство,вчителів Росії та безліч військовополонених зі східної
України. Він оцінює УПА, як вбивців кількох тисяч євреїв, «але
кількість можливо й значно більша».
«Хоча те,що УПА зробило євреям могло і не бути, у більш детальному
розгляді, основним внеском в голокост, вона залишається
великою і неприступною плямою на репутації української національної
армії повстанців», - сказав він.
Олексій Харан, професор порівняльної політики при
Університеті в Києво-Могилянській Академії, говорив, що російська
пропаганда спотворила масштаб злодіянь. Він наголошує, що українські
повстанці боролися за незалежність.
«Я вірю,що ці люди заслуговують бути ветеранами, можливо за винятком
тих, хто вчинив злочин»,- сказав він. «Це була війна партизанів, і
досить складно уявити партизанів без жорстокості».
Велика кількість академіків говорять,що дебати щодо підпільників є
частиною значнішого зусилля війни проти української національної
індивідуальності.Більше трьох тисячоліть Росія керує тою більшістю з
того,що є зараз Україною. Проте стосунки між країнами були запальними,
і з тих часів, як Ющенко став президентом в кінці 2004, Україна тримає
дистанцію від Росії і крокує до заходу.
Яков Блейх, головний равин України, сказав щодо зусиль Ющенка узаконити
повстанців: «Його цілі благородні; можливості нікчемні».
«Я маю на увазі те,що ми всі повинні зрозуміти,що Ющенко намагається
створити національну гордість, і ми всі роозуміємо,що це якраз те, що
потрібно», - Говорив Блейх.- «Через 350 років,що українці були
підкорені,
вони повинні відновити українську гордість».
«Але чи повинні ми прийняти це спірне питання –
використовувати героїв з сумнівною репутацією в цих цілях?» сказав він.
«На цьому етапі є люди які живуть саме зараз (які страждали), та образ
який завдавав болю. Поряд українські повстанці, які боролися з
фашистами. І можливо їх наміри були гарними, та я б сказав,що дорога в
пекло прокладена благими намірами».