HOME  DISINFORMATION  ENGINEERED
Excerpts from the Jews NOT Zionists web site
"It is openly stated in the books written by the founders of Zionism that the means by which they planned to establish a state was by instigating anti-Semitism, and undermining the security of the Jews in all the lands of the world, until they would be forced to flee to their state.  And thus they did." — Jews NOT Zionists
American Orthodox-Jews led by Rabbi Moshe Ber Beck in a miniature demonstration at Central Park, New York.  The demonstration took place whilst many Jews were unfortunately celebrating a day which they call Yom Ha'atzma'ut — that sad day in the Jewish calendar when Jews accepted Palestine and took jurisdiction over it.    Photo and caption from Naturei Karta web site at www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Bunker/5750/orthodox.html.

Introduction to the Jews NOT Zionists Excerpts

The excerpts below are all taken from the Jews NOT Zionists web site.  The underlined headings within each box below are in fact links which when clicked will take the reader to the original, and complete, article from which the excerpt is taken.  The Jews NOT Zionists web site features on its home page the following photograph of seven members of the Neturie Karta International Orthodox Jewish Community meeting with Nation of Islam minister Louis Farrakhan:

External link to the Jews NOT Zionists web site home page

The Jews NOT Zionists web site proposes that the the solution to urgent predicaments faced today by the Jewish people lies in returning to a closer adherence to the Torah.  Whether this is indeed the optimal solution is a question that is not of relevance to the Ukrainian Archive at the moment, and so is not discussed or even commented on at this time.  What is relevant, and what is featured in the excerpts below, is the further support that is provided by Jews NOT Zionists for conclusions most of which have long been promoted on the Ukrainian Archive:

(1) Among those most guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity today are Jews, from which conclusion some Jews today deflect attention by accusing non-Jews of war crimes and crimes against humanity, even when they are forced to do so gratuitously, as was done by Morley Safer in his 60 Minutes broadcast, The Ugly Face of Freedom.

(2) Among the closest collaborators of Hitler's Nazis were Jews, from which conclusion some Jews today deflect attention by blaming non-Jews for such collaboration, even when such blame is gratuitous.  Support for this thesis can be found on the Ukrainian Archive in Lubomyr Prytulak's letters to Canadian Justice Minister, Anne McLellan, regarding Jewish war crimes and regarding The Jewish Ghetto Police.

(3) Among the foremost goals of Zionists is to increase emigration to Israel, in the service of which the magnification of existing anti-Semitism, and the incitement of fresh anti-Semitism, are indispensible tools.  Israeli agents bombing synagogues and throwing hand grenades at Jews so as to make them believe that non-Jews wish them gone would fall under the heading of magnifying existing anti-Semitism.  This topic is introduced on the Ukrainian Archive in The Plundering of Ukraine (a preliminary overview), and some documentation for Israeli readiness to induce Jews to emigrate to Israel by bombing them has been presented in Akiva Orr: Stampede the Jews to Israel.

(4) Jews sometimes hold others to blame for failing to afford their people sanctuary during the Holocaust, whereas it can be seen that Zionists encouraged such closed-door policies, and engineered them where they did not exist.

(5) Although the Western world prides itself on enjoying freedom of the press, on Jewish questions its press submits to a censorship which approaches that which might be found in totalitarian states.  Ukrainian Archive postings indicating that the existing Jewish strangulation of the press may be a first step toward an even broader, and more sinister, control of the flow of information can be found at Kenneth Hilborn: Chilling effect on research and debate, and in Lubomyr Prytulak's letter to Sol Littman questioning him on his Juvenile tactics and totalitarian goals.

(6) Sins which it is easy to attribute to Jews generally or collectively are in fact committed by a small number of Jewish leaders who are as ruthless in victimizing the Jewish people as they are in victimizing non-Jews.  Somewhat relevant to the topic of a tiny minority of Jews engaged in harmful activities which damage the reputation of all Jews can be found in the Ukrainian Archive's discussion of Warsaw's Alphonsenpogrom of 1905.

(7) Middle East demographics alone doom the State of Israel to an early demise — the low Jewish birth rate, coupled with an emigration from Israel of the best and brightest, guarantee a progressive national enfeeblement which no accumulation of weaponry can compensate, and which poses for the rest of the world two problems: (1) how to divest a shrinking and disintegrating Israel of its hundreds of nuclear weapons, and (2) to which unhappy land to direct a fleeing Israeli population burdened with habits of employing oppression and violence to rule over neighboring non-Jews.  Among the earliest proponents of such speculations was the American novelist Philip Roth, as can be seen on the Ukrainian Archive in his discussion of the concept of Diasporism.

(8) The policy of draining the Slavic world of its brains has contributed toward its impoverishment and destabilization, and has benefitted Israel only briefly, as the best of any brains shipped to Israel will make only a temporary stop there, and will end up resident in the United States or some other Western country.  In the short term, the benefit of this brain drain to the United States and to the West is to accelerate their economic growth; in the long term, the loss to the United States and to the West will be to share the planet with nuclearized nations that are poor, unstable, and vengeful.

(9) The United States support of Israel guarantees that the United States will attract retaliatory strikes, which the perpetrators of the strikes — victims of American-Israeli terror — will view as warfare, and the American-Israeli perpetrators of terror will view as terrorism.  However, in a world of mismanaged nuclear arsenals, the retaliation of the oppressed could conceivably escalate to the destruction of an American city in a nuclear detonation, and in a world in which biological expertise cannot be contained, the retaliation of the oppressed could conceivably escalate into the loss of millions of American lives in a smallpox attack.  Exposing Americans to such dangers in return for the benefit of briefly maintaining an American colonial outpost in the Middle East may strike some observers as rash and inadvisable.

(10) Ukrainians who wonder why they have been selected for victimization by Jews directly, and by the Canadian and American governments responding to Jewish pressure, must come to realize that they themselves have set up a precondition necessary to such harassment — which is their own lack of courage to boldly proclaim the truths whose dissemination would guarantee them exemption from such harassment, truths such as those listed in the present ten introductory points.


Excerpt from

And What About the Jews?


The Israelis are very much concerned with their security,
the Arab countries demand the return of occupied lands,
the Palestinians assert their right for self-determination,
but what about the needs and rights of the Jews?

Those Jews in the Holy Land in particular

who have always rejected the concept of a Zionist state
who have protested the use of the sacred name of ISRAEL by that state
whose ancestors lived peacefully there before the intrusion of Zionism
who in accordance with a rabbinical ban have refused to take part in any Israeli election
who in accordance with a rabbinical ban have stopped visits to the Western Wall since the Zionist occupation of the Holy City
who refused to accept Israeli citizenship
who have declared to the British mandatory regime, to the League of Nations and to the United Nations that they cannot be represented by Zionists or a Zionist government
who have in fact been "stateless persons" for a generation
who have been consistently ignored by the United Nations

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the murder by Zionist assassins of the great and dedicated Jewish statesman Professor Jacob I. De Haan zt"l in front of the Shaare Zedek hospital in Jerusalem where he had just attended the daily prayer services.  Despite frequent threats he had courageously continued to lead in the fight against Zionism.


Excerpt from

The Jews of Iraq

By Naeim Giladi


And I began to find out about the barbaric methods used to rid the fledgling state of as many Palestinians as possible.  The world recoils today at the thought of bacteriological warfare, but Israel was probably the first to actually use it in the Middle East.  In the 1948 war, Jewish forces would empty Arab villages of their populations, often by threats, sometimes by just gunning down a half-dozen unarmed Arabs as examples to the rest.  To make sure the Arabs couldn't return to make a fresh life for themselves in these villages, the Israelis put typhus and dysentery bacteria into the water wells.

Uri Mileshtin, an official historian for the Israeli Defense Force, has written and spoken about the use of bacteriological agents.  According to Mileshtin, Moshe Dayan, a division commander at the time, gave orders in 1948 to remove Arabs from their villages, bulldoze their homes, and render water wells unusable with typhus and dysentery bacteria.

Acre was so situated that it could practically defend itself with one big gun, so the Haganah put bacteria into the spring that fed the town.  The spring was called Capri and it ran from the north near a kibbutz.  The Haganah put typhus bacteria into the water going to Acre, the people got sick, and the Jewish forces occupied Acre.  This worked so well that they sent a Haganah division dressed as Arabs into Gaza, where there were Egyptian forces, and the Egyptians caught them putting two cans of bacteria, typhus and dysentery, into the water supply in wanton disregard of the civilian population.  "In war, there is no sentiment," one of the captured Haganah men was quoted as saying.

[...]

Six months later — the exact date was March 19, 1950 — a bomb went off at the American Cultural Center and Library in Baghdad, causing property damage and injuring a number of people.  The center was a favorite meeting place for young Jews.

The first bomb thrown directly at Jews occurred on April 8, 1950, at 9:15 p.m.  A car with three young passengers hurled the grenade at Baghdad's El-Dar El-Bida Café, where Jews were celebrating Passover.  Four people were seriously injured.  That night leaflets were distributed calling on Jews to leave Iraq immediately.  The next day, many Jews, most of them poor with nothing to lose, jammed emigration offices to renounce their citizenship and to apply for permission to leave for Israel.  So many applied, in fact, that the police had to open registration offices in Jewish schools and synagogues.

On May 10, at 3 a.m., a grenade was tossed in the direction of the display window of the Jewish-owned Beit-Lawi Automobile Company, destroying part of the building.  No casualties were reported.

On June 3, 1950, another grenade was tossed from a speeding car in the El-Batawin area of Baghdad where most rich Jews and middle class Iraqis lived.  No one was hurt, but following the explosion Zionist activists sent telegrams to Israel requesting that the quota for immigration from Iraq be increased.

On June 5, at 2:30 a.m., a bomb exploded next to the Jewish-owned Stanley Shashua building on El-Rashid street, resulting in property damage but no casualties.

On January 14, 1951, at 7 p.m., a grenade was thrown at a group of Jews outside the Masouda Shem-Tov Synagogue.  The explosive struck a high-voltage cable, electrocuting three Jews, one a young boy, Itzhak Elmacher, and wounding over 30 others.  Following the attack, the exodus of Jews jumped to between 600-700 per day.

Zionist propagandists still maintain that the bombs in Iraq were set off by anti-Jewish Iraqis who wanted Jews out of their country.  The terrible truth is that the grenades that killed and maimed Iraqi Jews and damaged their property were thrown by Zionist Jews.

Among the most important documents in my book, I believe, are copies of two leaflets published by the Zionist underground calling on Jews to leave Iraq. One is dated March 16, 1950, the other April 8, 1950.

The difference between these two is critical.  Both indicate the date of publication, but only the April 8th leaflet notes the time of day: 4 p.m.  Why the time of day?  Such a specification was unprecedented.  Even the investigating judge, Salaman El-Beit, found it suspicious.  Did the 4 p.m. writers want an alibi for a bombing they knew would occur five hours later?  If so, how did they know about the bombing?  The judge concluded they knew because a connection existed between the Zionist underground and the bomb throwers.

This, too, was the conclusion of Wilbur Crane Eveland, a former senior officer in the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), whom I had the opportunity to meet in New York in 1988.  In his book, Ropes of Sand, whose publication the CIA opposed, Eveland writes:

In attempts to portray the Iraqis as anti-American and to terrorize the Jews, the Zionists planted bombs in the U.S. Information Service library and in synagogues.  Soon leaflets began to appear urging Jews to flee to Israel.  ...  Although the Iraqi police later provided our embassy with evidence to show that the synagogue and library bombings, as well as the anti-Jewish and anti-American leaflet campaigns, had been the work of an underground Zionist organization, most of the world believed reports that Arab terrorism had motivated the flight of the Iraqi Jews whom the Zionists had "rescued" really just in order to increase Israel's Jewish population.

Eveland doesn't detail the evidence linking the Zionists to the attacks, but in my book I do.  In 1955, for example, I organized in Israel a panel of Jewish attorneys of Iraqi origin to handle claims of Iraqi Jews who still had property in Iraq.  One well known attorney, who asked that I not give his name, confided in me that the laboratory tests in Iraq had confirmed that the anti-American leaflets found at the American Cultural Center bombing were typed on the same typewriter and duplicated on the same stenciling machine as the leaflets distributed by the Zionist movement just before the April 8th bombing.

Tests also showed that the type of explosive used in the Beit-Lawi attack matched traces of explosives found in the suitcase of an Iraqi Jew by the name of Yosef Basri.  Basri, a lawyer, together with Shalom Salih, a shoemaker, would be put on trial for the attacks in December 1951 and executed the following month.  Both men were members of Hashura, the military arm of the Zionist underground.  Salih ultimately confessed that he, Basri and a third man, Yosef Habaza, carried out the attacks.

By the time of the executions in January 1952, all but 6,000 of an estimated 125,000 Iraqi Jews had fled to Israel.  Moreover, the pro-British, pro-Zionist puppet el-Said saw to it that all of their possessions were frozen, including their cash assets.  (There were ways of getting Iraqi dinars out, but when the immigrants went to exchange them in Israel they found that the Israeli government kept 50 percent of the value.)  Even those Iraqi Jews who had not registered to emigrate, but who happened to be abroad, faced loss of their nationality if they didn't return within a specified time.  An ancient, cultured, prosperous community had been uprooted and its people transplanted to a land dominated by East European Jews, whose culture was not only foreign but entirely hateful to them.

The Ultimate Criminals

Zionist Leaders.  From the start they knew that in order to establish a Jewish state they had to expel the indigenous Palestinian population to the neighboring Islamic states and import Jews from these same states.  Theodor Herzl, the architect of Zionism, thought it could be done by social engineering.  In his diary entry for 12 June 1885, he wrote that Zionist settlers would have to "spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country."  Vladimir Jabotinsky, Prime Minister Netanyahu's ideological progenitor, frankly admitted that such a transfer of populations could only be brought about by force.

David Ben Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, told a Zionist Conference in 1937 that any proposed Jewish state would have to "transfer Arab populations out of the area, if possible of their own free will, if not by coercion."  After 750,000 Palestinians were uprooted and their lands confiscated in 1948-49, Ben Gurion had to look to the Islamic countries for Jews who could fill the resultant cheap labor market.  "Emissaries" were smuggled into these countries to "convince" Jews to leave either by trickery or fear.

In the case of Iraq, both methods were used: uneducated Jews were told of a Messianic Israel in which the blind see, the lame walk, and onions grow as big as melons; educated Jews had bombs thrown at them.

A few years after the bombings, in the early 1950s, a book was published in Iraq, in Arabic, titled Venom of the Zionist Viper.  The author was one of the Iraqi investigators of the 1950-51 bombings and, in his book, he implicates the Israelis, specifically one of the emissaries sent by Israel, Mordechai Ben-Porat.  As soon as the book came out, all copies just disappeared, even from libraries.  The word was that agents of the Israeli Mossad, working through the U.S. Embassy, bought up all the books and destroyed them.  I tried on three different occasions to have one sent to me in Israel, but each time Israeli censors in the post office intercepted it.

British Leaders.  Britain always acted in its best colonial interests.  For that reason Foreign Minister Arthur Balfour sent his famous 1917 letter to Lord Rothschild in exchange for Zionist support in WW I.  During WW II the British were primarily concerned with keeping their client states in the Western camp, while Zionists were most concerned with the immigration of European Jews to Palestine, even if this meant cooperating with the Nazis.  (In my book I document numerous instances of such dealings by Ben Gurion and the Zionist leadership.)

After WW II the international chessboard pitted communists against capitalists.  In many countries, including the United States and Iraq, Jews represented a large part of the Communist party.  In Iraq, hundreds of Jews of the working intelligentsia occupied key positions in the hierarchy of the Communist and Socialist parties.  To keep their client countries in the capitalist camp, Britain had to make sure these governments had pro-British leaders.  And if, as in Iraq, these leaders were overthrown, then an anti-Jewish riot or two could prove a useful pretext to invade the capital and reinstate the "right" leaders.

Moreover, if the possibility existed of removing the communist influence from Iraq by transferring the whole Jewish community to Israel, well then, why not?  Particularly if the leaders of Israel and Iraq conspired in the deed.

Iraqi Leaders.  Both the regent Abd al-Ilah and his prime minister Nouri el-Said took directions from London.  Toward the end of 1948, el-Said, who had already met with Israel's Prime Minister Ben Gurion in Vienna, began discussing with his Iraqi and British associates the need for an exchange of populations.  Iraq would send the Jews in military trucks to Israel via Jordan, and Iraq would take in some of the Palestinians Israel had been evicting.  His proposal included mutual confiscation of property.  London nixed the idea as too radical.  El-Said then went to his back-up plan and began to create the conditions that would make the lives of Iraqi Jews so miserable they would leave for Israel.  Jewish government employees were fired from their jobs; Jewish merchants were denied import/export licenses; police began to arrest Jews for trivial reasons.  Still the Jews did not leave in any great numbers.

In September 1949, Israel sent the spy Mordechai Ben-Porat, the one mentioned in Venom of the Zionist Viper, to Iraq.  One of the first things Ben-Porat did was to approach el-Said and promise him financial incentives to have a law enacted that would lift the citizenship of Iraqi Jews.

Soon after, Zionist and Iraqi representatives began formulating a rough draft of the bill, according to the model dictated by Israel through its agents in Baghdad.  The bill was passed by the Iraqi parliament in March 1950.  It empowered the government to issue one-time exit visas to Jews wishing to leave the country.  In March, the bombings began.

Sixteen years later, the Israeli magazine Haolam Hazeh, published by Uri Avnery, then a Knesset member, accused Ben-Porat of the Baghdad bombings.  Ben-Porat, who would become a Knesset member himself, denied the charge, but never sued the magazine for libel.  And Iraqi Jews in Israel still call him Morad Abu al-Knabel, Mordechai of the Bombs.

As I said, all this went well beyond the comprehension of a teenager. I knew Jews were being killed and an organization existed that could lead us to the Promised Land.  So I helped in the exodus to Israel.  Later, on occasions, I would bump into some of these Iraqi Jews in Israel.  Not infrequently they'd express the sentiment that they could kill me for what I had done.

[...]

Conclusion

Alexis de Tocqueville once observed that it is easier for the world to accept a simple lie than a complex truth.  Certainly it has been easier for the world to accept the Zionist lie that Jews were evicted from Muslim lands because of anti-Semitism, and that Israelis, never the Arabs, were the pursuers of peace.  The truth is far more discerning: bigger players on the world stage were pulling the strings.

These players, I believe, should be held accountable for their crimes, particularly when they willfully terrorized, dispossessed and killed innocent people on the altar of some ideological imperative.

I believe, too, that the descendants of these leaders have a moral responsibility to compensate the victims and their descendants, and to do so not just with reparations, but by setting the historical record straight.  That is why I established a panel of inquiry in Israel to seek reparations for Iraqi Jews who had been forced to leave behind their property and possessions in Iraq.  That is why I joined the Black Panthers in confronting the Israeli government with the grievances of the Jews in Israel who came from Islamic lands.  And that is why I have written my book and this article: to set the historical record straight.

We Jews from Islamic lands did not leave our ancestral homes because of any natural enmity between Jews and Muslims.  And we Arabs — I say Arab because that is the language my wife and I still speak at home — we Arabs on numerous occasions have sought peace with the State of the Jews.  And finally, as a U.S. citizen and taxpayer, let me say that we Americans need to stop supporting racial discrimination in Israel and the cruel expropriation of lands in the West Bank, Gaza, South Lebanon and the Golan Heights.



Excerpt from

Ten Questions to the Zionists


By Rabbi Michael Ber Weissmandel ZT"L
ROSH HAYESHIVAH of YESHIVAS NITRA

  1. IS IT TRUE that in 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered all European Jews transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their property in Germany and Occupied France; on condition that:
    a) none of the deportees travel from Spain to Palestine; and
    b) all the deportees be transported from Spain to the USA or British colonies, and there to remain; with entry visas to be arranged by the Jews living there; and
    c) $1000.00 ransom for each family to be furnished by the Agency, payable upon the arrival of the family at the Spanish border at the rate of 1000 families daily.


  2. IS IT TRUE that the Zionist leaders in Switzerland and Turkey received this offer with the clear understanding that the exclusion of Palestine as a destination for the deportees was based on an agreement between the Gestapo and the Mufti.


  3. IS IT TRUE that the answer of the Zionist leaders was negative, with the following comments:
    a) ONLY Palestine would be considered as a destination for the deportees.
    b) The European Jews must accede to suffering and death greater in measure than the other nations, in order that the victorious allies agree to a "Jewish State" at the end of the war.
    c) No ransom will be paid


  4. IS IT TRUE that this response to the Gestapo's offer was made with the full knowledge that the alternative to this offer was the gas chamber.


  5. IS IT TRUE that in 1944, at the time of the Hungarian deportations, a similar offer was made, whereby all Hungarian Jewry could be saved.


  6. IS IT TRUE that the same Zionist hierarchy again refused this offer (after the gas chambers had already taken a toll of millions).


  7. IS IT TRUE that during the height of the killings in the war, 270 Members of the British Parliament proposed to evacuate 500,000 Jews from Europe, and resettle them in British colonies, as a part of diplomatic negotiations with Germany.


  8. IS IT TRUE that this offer was rejected by the Zionist leaders with the observation "Only to Palestine!"


  9. IS IT TRUE that the British government granted visas to 300 rabbis and their families to the Colony of Mauritius, with passage for the evacuees through Turkey.  The "Jewish Agency" leaders sabotaged this plan with the observation that the plan was disloyal to Palestine, and the 300 rabbis and their families should be gassed.


  10. IS IT TRUE that during the course of the negotiations mentioned above, Chaim Weizman, the first "Jewish statesman" stated: "The most valuable part of the Jewish nation is already in Palestine, and those Jews living outside Palestine are not too important".  Weizman's cohort, Greenbaum, amplified this statement with the observation "One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe".

There are additional similar questions to be asked of these atheist degenerates known as "Jewish statesmen", but for the time being let them respond to the ten questions.



Excerpt from

The Bankruptcy of Zionism


We are talking about the failure of an idea and an ideology ... because financially and politically the Zionists are still doing fine.

When the first Zionists entered the Holy Land, they ridiculed the poor, pious Jews then living there as Chaluka-Juden (welfare Jews) because they were supported in part by donations from abroad.  The Zionists were going to be different: they would work hard, become self-reliant and proudly independent.

Now, several generations later, the Zionist establishment has become the largest welfare client of the United States, to the tune of thousands of millions of dollars.  The request of the Zionist lobby command top priority on Capitol Hill and are almost automatically granted.  New York State gives subsidies of thousands of dollars per student to a Tel Aviv medical school.  New York State savings banks have received special permission to buy Zionist state bonds.  Even New York City not long ago found millions to invest in Zionist state bonds.  Politically and financially, therefore, Zionist power is still able to sway leading politicians at every level.

ALIYA IN REVERSE

Aside from that, however, Zionism is failing.  The first duty of a Zionist is "aliya," emigration to the Zionist state.  This "aliya" has almost come to a standstill.  In fact it has been reversed.  Instead of American Jews settling in the Zionist state, Israelis — hundreds of thousands of them — have moved to the United States.  And even the Jewish emigrants from the Soviet Union, who can leave only with an Israeli visa, are in ever increasing measure headed for western countries as soon as the Soviet border is behind them.  The Zionists tried to force them to go to the Zionist state but to no avail.  And the current all-out efforts by the Zionists to induce Jewish mass emigration from the U.S.A. is similarly bound to fail.


Excerpt from

The Role of Zionism in the Holocaust


It was a man possessing outstanding Judaic genius, and a level of uncontested holiness who enunciated the Jewish stance regarding Zionism.  This charismatic individual, the Rebbe of Satmar, Grand Rabbi Joel Teitelbaum, did not mince any words.  Straight to the point he called Zionism "the work of Satan," "a sacrilege" and "a blasphemy."  He forbade any participation with anything even remotely associated with Zionism and said that Zionism was bound to call the wrath of G-d upon His people.  He maintained this stance with unwavering bravery from the onset of Zionism whilst he was still in Hungary up until his death in New York where he lead a congregation numbering in the hundreds of thousands.  Grand Rabbi Teitelbaum, scion to a legacy of holy mystics and Hassidic Masters unfortunately had his prediction fulfilled.  We lost more than six million of our brothers, sisters, sons and daughters in a very horrible manner.  This, more than six million holy people had to experience as punishment for the Zionist stupidity.  The Holocaust, he wept, was a direct result of Zionism, a punishment from G-d.

IT IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE THAT ALL THE SAGES AND SAINTS IN EUROPE AT THE TIME OF HITLER'S RISE DECLARED THAT HE WAS A MESSENGER OF DIVINE WRATH, SENT TO CHASTEN THE JEWS BECAUSE OF THE BITTER APOSTASY OF ZIONISM AGAINST THE BELIEF IN THE EVENTUAL MESSIANIC REDEMPTION.

But it doesn't end there.  It wasn't enough for the Zionist leaders to have aroused the wrath of G-d.  They made a point of displaying abysmal contempt for their Jewish brothers and sisters by actively participating in their extermination.  Just the idea alone of Zionism, which the rabbis had informed them would cause havoc, was not enough for them.  They made an effort to pour fuel on an already burning flame.  They had to incite the Angel of Death, Adolf Hitler.  They took the liberty of telling the world that they represented World Jewry.  Who appointed these individuals as leaders of the Jewish People??  It is no secret that these so-called "leaders" were ignoramuses when it came to Judaism.  Atheists and racists too.  These are the "statesmen" who organized the irresponsible boycott against Germany in 1933.  This boycott hurt Germany like a fly attacking an elephant — but it brought calamity upon the Jews of Europe.  At a time when America and England were at peace with the mad-dog Hitler, the Zionist "statesmen" forsook the only plausible method of political amenability; and with their boycott incensed the leader of Germany to a frenzy.  Genocide began, but these people, if they can really be classified as members of the human race, sat back.

"No Shame"

President Roosevelt convened the Evian conference July 6-15 1938, to deal with the Jewish refugee problem.  The Jewish Agency delegation headed by Golda Meir (Meirson) ignored a German offer to allow Jews to emigrate to other countries for $250 a head, and the Zionists made no effort to influence the United States and the 32 other countries attending the conference to allow immigration of German and Austrian Jews.  [The Wall Street Journal, 02Dec76]

On Feb 1, 1940 Henry Montor executive vice-President of the United Jewish Appeal refused to intervene for a shipload of Jewish refugees stranded on the Danube river, stating that "Palestine cannot be flooded with ... old people or with undesirables."  [The Wall Street Journal, 02Dec76]

It is an historical fact that in 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered all European Jews transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their property in Germany and Occupied France; on condition that:
a) none of the deportees travel from Spain to Palestine; and
b) all the deportees be transported from Spain to the USA or British colonies, and there to remain; with entry visas to be arranged by the Jews living there; and
c) $1000.00 ransom for each family to be furnished by the Agency, payable upon the arrival of the family at the Spanish border at the rate of 1000 families daily.

The Zionist leaders in Switzerland and Turkey received this offer with the clear understanding that the exclusion of Palestine as a destination for the deportees was based on an agreement between the Gestapo and the Mufti.

The answer of the Zionist leaders was negative, with the following comments:
a) ONLY Palestine would be considered as a destination for the deportees.
b) The European Jews must accede to suffering and death greater in measure than the other nations, in order that the victorious allies agree to a "Jewish State" at the end of the war.
c) No ransom will be paid
This response to the Gestapo's offer was made with the full knowledge that the alternative to this offer was the gas chamber.

These treacherous Zionist leaders betrayed their own flesh and blood.  Zionism was never an option for Jewish salvation.  Quite the opposite, it was a formula for human beings to be used as pawns for the power trip of several desperadoes.  A perfidy!  A betrayal beyond description!

In 1944, at the time of the Hungarian deportations, a similar offer was made, whereby all Hungarian Jewry could be saved.  The same Zionist hierarchy again refused this offer (after the gas chambers had already taken a toll of millions).

The British government granted visas to 300 rabbis and their families to the Colony of Mauritius, with passage for the evacuees through Turkey.  The "Jewish Agency" leaders sabotaged this plan with the observation that the plan was disloyal to Palestine, and the 300 rabbis and their families should be gassed.

On December 17, 1942 both houses of the British Parliament declared its readiness to find temporary refuge for endangered persons.  The British Parliament proposed to evacuate 500,000 Jews from Europe, and resettle them in British colonies, as a part of diplomatic negotiations with Germany.  This motion received within two weeks a total of 277 Parliamentary signatures.  On Jan. 27, when the next steps were being pursued by over 100 M.P.'s and Lords, a spokesman for the Zionists announced that the Jews would oppose the motion because Palestine was omitted.  [The Wall Street Journal, 02Dec76]

On Feb. 16, 1943 Roumania offered 70,000 Jewish refugees of the Trans-Dniestria to leave at the cost of $50 each.  This was publicized in the New York papers.  Yitzhak Greenbaum, Chairman of the Rescue Committee of the Jewish Agency, addressing the Zionist Executive Council in Tel Aviv Feb. 18 1943 said, "when they asked me, "couldn't you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe, I said NO! and I say again, NO! ... one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance."  On Feb. 24, 1943 Stephen Wise, President of the American Jewish Congress and leader of the American Zionists issued a public refusal to this offer and declared no collection of funds would seem justified.  In 1944, the Emergency Committee to Save the Jewish People called upon the American government to establish a War Refugee Board.  Stephen Wise testifying before a special committee of Congress objected to this proposal.  [The Wall Street Journal, 02Dec76]

During the course of the negotiations mentioned above, Chaim Weizman, the first "Jewish statesman" stated: "The most valuable part of the Jewish nation is already in Palestine, and those Jews living outside Palestine are not too important."  Weizman's cohort, Greenbaum, amplified this statement with the observation "One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe."

And then, after the bitterest episode in Jewish history, these Zionist "statesmen" lured the broken refugees in the DP camps to remain in hunger and deprivation, and to refuse relocation to any place but Palestine; only for the purpose of building their State.

In 1947 Congressman William Stration sponsored a bill to immediately grant entry to the United States of 400,000 displaced persons.  The bill was not passed after it was publicly denounced by the Zionist leadership.  [The Wall Street Journal, 02Dec76]

These facts are read with consternation and unbearable shame.  How can it be explained that at a time during the last phase of the war, when the Nazis were willing to barter Jews for money, partly because of their desires to establish contact with the Western powers which, they believed, were under Jewish influence, how was it possible one asks that the self-proclaimed "Jewish leaders" did not move heaven and earth to save the last remnant of their brothers?

On Feb. 23, 1956 the Hon. J. W. Pickersgill, Minister for Immigration was asked in the Canadian House of Commons "would he open the doors of Canada to Jewish refugees."  He replied "the government has made no progress in that direction because the government of Israel ... does not wish us to do so."  [The Wall Street Journal, 02Dec76]

In 1972, the Zionist leadership successfully opposed an effort in the United States Congress to allow 20,000-30,000 Russian refugees to enter the United States.  Jewish relief organizations, Joint and HIAS, were being pressured to abandon these refugees in Vienna, Rome and other European cities.  [The Wall Street Journal, 02Dec76]

The pattern is clear!!!  Humanitarian rescue efforts are subverted to narrow Zionist interests.

There were many more shocking crimes committed by these abject degenerates known as "Jewish statesmen," we could list many more example, but for the time being let anyone produce a valid excuse for the above facts.

Zionist responsibility for the Holocaust is threefold.

1. The Holocaust was a punishment for disrespecting The Three Oaths (see Talmud, Tractate Kesubos p. 111a).
2. Zionist leaders openly withheld support, both financially and otherwise, to save their fellow brothers and sisters from a cruel death.
3. The leaders of the Zionist movement cooperated with Hitler and his cohorts on many occasions and in many ways.


Zionists Offer a Military Alliance with Hitler

It would be wishful thinking if it could be stated that the leaders of the Zionist movement sat back and ignored the plight of their dying brothers and sisters.  Not only did they publicly refuse to assist in their rescue, but they actively participated with Hitler and the Nazi regime.

Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German port of Bremerhaven.  Its stern bore the Hebrew letter for its name, "Tel Aviv," while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast.  And although the ship was Zionist owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party (Nazi) member.  Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic combination as a "metaphysical absurdity."  Absurd or not, this is but one vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide ranging collaboration between Zionism and Hitler's Third Reich.

In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a military-political alliance with wartime Germany.  The offer was made by the radical underground "Fighters for the Freedom of Israel," better known as the Lehi or Stern Gang.  Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the radical nationalist "National Military Organization" (Irgun Zvai Leumi - Etzel) over the group's attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main enemy of Zionism.

This remarkable proposal "for the solution of the Jewish question in Europe and the active participation on the NMO [Lehi] in the war on the side of Germany" is worth quoting at some length:

"The NMO which is very familiar with the goodwill of the German Reich government and its officials towards Zionist activities within Germany and the Zionist emigration program takes the view that:

1. Common interests can exist between a European New Order based on the German concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as embodied by the NMO.
2. Cooperation is possible between the New Germany and a renewed, folkish-national Jewry.
3. The establishment of the Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, and bound by treaty, with the German Reich, would be in the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of power in the Near East.

"On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that the German Reich government recognize the national aspirations of the Israel Freedom Movement mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part in the war on the side of Germany.

"This offer by the NMO could include military, political and informational activity within Palestine and, after certain organizational measures, outside as well.  Along with this the "Jewish" men of Europe would be militarily trained and organized in military units under the leadership and command of the NMO.  They would take part in combat operations for the purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front be formed.

"The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined with a positive-radical solution of the European-Jewish problem on the basis of the national aspirations of the Jewish people mentioned above, would greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all humanity.

"The cooperation of the Israel Freedom Movement would also be consistent with a recent speech by the German Reich Chancellor, in which Hitler stressed that he would utilize any combination and coalition in order to isolate and defeat England."


Original document in German Auswertiges Amt Archiv, Bestand 47-59, E224152 and E234155-58.

Complete original text published in: David Yisraeli, The Palestinian Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel: 1947) pp. 315-317.

On the basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood, National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group believed was in its own national interests.

This is just one example of the Zionist movement's collaboration with Hitler for the purpose of possibly receiving jurisdiction over a minute piece of earth, Palestine.


Excerpt from

What the Rabbis said about Zionism in the Previous Generations


Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Eherenreich once said:

"The Zionists brought us to the Holocaust.  It is well known that it was possible to redeem Jews from the Nazis with money, and save many hundreds of thousands of Jews in Hungary from the fire.  THE ZIONIST LEADERS WHO NOW SIT IN GOVERNMENT PREVENTED IT!"


Excerpt from

Why is World Jewry Opposed to the Zionist State


It is openly stated in the books written by the founders of Zionism that the means by which they planned to establish a state was by instigating anti-Semitism, and undermining the security of the Jews in all the lands of the world, until they would be forced to flee to their state.  And thus they did.  They intentionally infuriated the German people and fanned the flames of Nazi hatred, and then helped the Nazis, with trickery and deceit, to take whole Jewish communities off to the concentration camps, and the Zionists themselves admit this.  (See books Perfidy, Min Ha Meitsor, etc.).  The Zionists continue to practice this strategy today, they incite anti-Semitism and then they present themselves as the "saviors."  Here are two replies given by leaders of the Zionists during World War II, when they were asked for money to help ransom Jews from the Nazis.  Greenbaum said "One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland."  (G-d Forbid).  Weitzman said, "The most important part of the Jewish people is already in the land (of Israel) and those who are left, are unimportant."  (May we be spared).



HOME  DISINFORMATION  ENGINEERED