And Lubomyr Prytulak promptly responded:

I have never seen the host site.  Someone mentioned the address of the ad, I went right to the ad itself, I never looked around, I am unaware of who the host is.  If you think that the host provides relevant information, I could go back and look around.

To which Ed Youngblood commented:

Good to hear, personaly I feel the host site is perhaps a bit on the questionable side.

When I accused trigger-happy Ed Youngblood of packing two six shooters — one named "anti-Semitism" and the other "Holocaust denial," I underestimated him.  When these two are emptied or misfire, he still has recourse to a derringer hidden in his boot.  The derringer is "politically-incorrect source."  We have seen Ed Youngblood drawing and firing the first two of his weapons in a situation that did not call for them, and above we now see him firing the derringer in my direction.

But why shoot this derringer at me?  Is there anyone who more meticulously quotes his sources rather than paraphrasing, and who gives a full citation for each quote?  There is no mystery whatever concerning where I get my information, and yet Ed Youngblood publicly wonders whether I am depending on some site or other which I have never seen but which (I take it) is politically incorrect.

Jewish tactic?  Yes, that's what this is — a Jewish tactic.  Large bodies of writing which contain some error but also a great deal of valuable information are deemed politically incorrect, and abuse is heaped on anyone's head who draws upon any of this information, not because that information is incorrect, but simply because of who published it.  To me, this smacks of an attempt at totalitarian thought control.  I experienced this phenomenon in Auguest when I cited material by the author Walter R. Sanning, the objection being solely that his book had been published by the Institute of Historical Research — even when what Sanning said was mainstream thinking that I later went on to demonstrate was echoed by a number of both Ukrainian and Jewish sources.  If this blanket suppression of sources were a tactic that was used by Ukrainians with equal probability, then I would now (because my first preference is to give tit for tat) be impugning Ed Youngblood's statements on the grounds that they possibly were being fed to him by the Gentile-hating — if we are to believe Israel Shahak — Hassidim.  If you don't recollect what I am referring to here, please refresh your memory at:

http://www.infoukes.com/lists/politics/1997/09/0257.html

But I do not do this — that is, I do not wonder aloud what tainted sources Ed Youngblood might be relying on.  I do not ask him whether he is a Hassidic Jew.  I cannot imagine doing this.  This would be arrogant and presumptuous of me.  I address myself only to what Ed Youngblood says, and do not ask him who is feeding him his lines.

In other words, I don't pack six shooters like Ed Youngblood does, nor am I hiding a derringer.