WiZeus > Religious Affairs | Katriuk2012 | Video Links | Perfidy | Book Reviews >

cdvrua | 17Dec2012 | Ivan Patrylyak [45:26 and 43:09, Ukr]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqMQvz8rWjM    Part 1/2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzwMPz6hYbI       Part 2/2

[W.Z. This 1.5 hour lecture in Ukrainian by Ivan Patrylyak outlines the activities of OUN/UPA from the 1920s to the end of the German occupation of Ukraine during the summer of 1944. For English-language readers, we present a summary of the contents below. To understand the very complicated situation in which the Ukrainian independence movement operated, one must differentiate between several regions: Subcarpathia as part of Czechoslovakia from 1922 to 1939, the Zakerzonia strip west of the Bug and Sjan Rivers, Halychyna/Volyn which was part of Poland from 1922 to 1939 and Central/Eastern Ukraine which was incorporated within the Soviet Union from 1922 to 1991. Furthermore, during the German occupation Subcarpathia, Zakerzonia and Halychyna were under the General Gouvernment administrative structure; whereas Volyn and Central/Eastern Ukraine were in the much more brutal Reichscommissariat Ukraine administrative structure headed by the Ukrainophobe Eric Koch.

My personalized book review of SPALAKH: UPA resistance in the Bereziv region by Michailo Tomaschuk provides an excellent summary of UPA activity in the foothills of the Carpathian Mountains near Kolomyia.

Although OUN/UPA dominated the Ukrainian partisan movement in Western Ukraine, it was the Soviet partisans that dominated the partisan movement in Central/Eastern Ukraine, as indicated in our summary of Wendy Lower's book titled "Nazi Empire-Building and the Holocaust in Ukraine". Further information on the partisan movement in Ukraine can be found in the German-language book titled "Der Sowjetrussische Partisanenkrieg 1941-1944" by Eric Hesse (1969, Musterschmidt-Verlag). ]

Ivan Patrylyak: Relations between OUN-UPA and Germany (1/2)
Іван Патриляк: Стосунки між ОУН-УПА і Німеччиною (1/2)

cdvrua·40 videos

Published on 17 Dec 2012

Historian Ivan Patrylyak describes the complicated circumstances between the Ukrainian independence movement and Germany.
Історик Іван Патриляк розказує про складність реальних стосунків між українським визвольним рухом і Німеччиною.

The lecture of Ivan Patrylyak (doctor of historical studies, associate researcher of the Center for Research into the Independence Movement, department head of New History of KNU in the name of Taras Schevchenko) is titled "Myths and realities about the relations between the independence movement and Germany during Second World War".
Лекція доктора історичних наук, наукового співробітника Центру досліджень визвольного руху, доцента кафедри новітньої історії КНУ ім. Тараса Шевченка Івана Патриляка «Міфи та реальність про стосунки між українським визвольним рухом і Німеччиною в роки Другої світової війни».

This problem (perhaps the greatest in the history of 20th century Ukraine) has developed from the most varied myths and stratifications.
Ця проблема чи не найбільше в історії України ХХ століття обросла найрізноманітнішими міфами та нашаруваннями.

More details on this theme are available in the new books of Ivan Patrylyak published this year: "Victory or Death: Ukrainian independence movement from 1939-1960"  (http://www.cdvr.org.ua/node/1718)  and "Stand and Fight! Listen and Believe ...: Ukrainian nationalist underground and the partisan movement (1939-1960)"  (http://www.cdvr.org.ua/node/1693)
Детальніше про цю тему -- в нових книгах Івана Патриляка, які вийшли цього року: «Перемога або смерть»: український визвольний рух у 1939-1960-х рр.» (http://www.cdvr.org.ua/node/1718) та «Встань і борись! Слухай і вір...»: українське націоналістичне підпілля та повстанський рух (1939-1960 рр.) (http://www.cdvr.org.ua/node/1693)

Ending is here:
Закінчення тут: http://youtu.be/qzwMPz6hYbI

Source of the video:
Джерело відео: http://tvi.ua/lecture/lekciya_stosunk...


[00:00 - 01:59] - Patrylyak introduces subject of OUN-UPA during WWII. There have been thousands of various publications issued by various individuals of various political inclinations that have created a web of myths and falsehoods from which one must try to decipher the realities.

[02:00 - 03:37] - First Myth -- that the Ukrainian independence movement contacted German authorities because they were nazist and therefore the independence movement supported a nazist ideology.
- Second Myth -- that Ukrainian independence fighters entered Ukraine as an integrated part of the Hitler's army (Wehrmacht) and all their actions were approved by Germany and co-ordinated with the German army.
- Third Myth -- that the independence fighters never fought against the German occupation forces. That this is only fiction later created by emigre individuals and organizations. That all OUN-UPA actions were directed at the Soviet Union and Poland; and never against the Germans. That they were financed and armed by the Germans ... leading to the current saying "They shot at the backs of our grandfathers".

[03:38 - 09:05] - To understand the situation we must examine the interwar years dating back to the failure to establish a permanent independent Ukraine after WWI. What were the strategies and actions of the Ukrainian nationalist movement at this time? In 1923, Colonel Yevhen Konovalets (head of UVO) made attempts to contact German army authorities. This was still the Weimar Republic and long before the rise of the National Socialist Party. The terms of the Versailles Treaty were devestating for both the German and Ukrainian peoples -- perpetual debt for the Germans and Ukrainian ethnographic lands divided amongst four states. Thus, the first goal was to destroy the Versailles system. Many European states also disliked the results of the Versailles treaty -- Hungary, Italy, Lithuania -- but these were weak states. The only potentially strong state was Germany, with which Konovalets made contacts. Germany was especially interested in overturning the Versailles system.

[09:06 - 11:00] - After the Nazis came to power in January 1933, the contacts between OUN and Germany weakened, because in 1934 Germany entered into a wide-ranging agreement with Poland. All OUN emigre structures left Germany. Furthermore, in June 1934,when OUN adherents assassinated Polish interior minister Bronislaw Pieracki, Germany arrested and delivered OUN adherents (like Mykola Lebed) to the Polish police. In fact, between 1934 and 1938, there were no close contacts between OUN and Nazi Germany. In 1938, Yevhen Konovalets is assassinated [in Rotterdam by Sudoplatov], creating a crisis in the Ukrainian independence movement. Andriy Melnyk takes over as head of OUN, who was very close to Konovalets both from WWI days and by marriage -- their wives were sisters.

[11:01 - 16:45] - In 1938, Germany creates the Sudetenland crisis in Czechoslovakia, within which the Ukrainian Subcarpathian area was incorporated. Once again the German Abwehr makes contact with OUN in the context that Czechoslovakia is not respecting the human rights of its minorities. In 1919 the Czechoslovakian constitution had guaranteed autonomy to Subcarpathia, which was never implemented. In October 1938, Subcarpathia is unexpectedly granted wide-ranging autonomy, prompting Hungary to occupy parts of Subcarpathia. OUN activists flock to the "capital" Khust to form military formations -- expecting Germany to support these efforts. However, there was no support from Germany, because the world press trumpeted that Subcarpathia would be the nucleus from which Germany would eventually annex Ukraine from the Soviet Union. Next, Germany started creating its crisis with Poland, within which were millions of rebellious Ukrainians. However, in early, 1939 German diplomats begin discussing whether the Soviet Union can be an ally in the dismemberment of Poland. On 12 March 1939, Stalin publicly stated that he didn't believe that Hitler was planning to annex an elephant to a mouse (i.e. Ukraine to Subcarpathia), thus signalling Berlin that Ukraine was the paramount issue on Stalin's mind. On 15 March 1939, Germany occupied the Sudetenland and permitted Hungary to occupy Subcarpathia. This solved the Ukrainian problem and opened the floodgates for further talks between Germany and the Soviet Union. Thus, between March and September 1939, there were no contacts between OUN and the Germans, since Germany was obviously collaborating with the Soviet Union.

[16:46 - 16:52] - TV break.

[16:53 - 18:56] - The German betrayal of Subcarpathia disillusioned many OUN adherents as to German intentions. They claimed German functionaries, such as Canaris, never intended to support the Ukrainian cause. During the summer of 1939, the Germans induce Hungary and Romania to release thousands of POWs from Hungarian prisons, from whom they form a corpus of 600 soldiers -- known as the Legion of Sushko. Their initial  purpose was to provoke an anti-Polish diversion amongst Ukrainians in Poland to provide an excuse for German intervention. However, with the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact with Moscow on 23Aug1939, this was no longer necessary so this corpus was sent to Slovakia as a labour force.

[18:57 - 22:19] - Shortly after the German attack on Poland on 01Sep1939, OUN initiates uprisings amongst Ukrainians to seize control of administrative structures -- the theory of state-building from the village level as developed by Colonel Kolodzynsky, who had died in Subcarpathia. Unexpectedly, on 17Sep1939, the Soviet Red Army initiated their attack, which was viewed by OUN as another betrayal by Germany, since they still thought Germany would tolerate some form of Ukrainian state. The Germans had expected the Soviet Union to attack simultaneously on 01Sep1939 -- they telegraph Stalin, who tells them that they are not yet ready. In reality, Stalin procrastinated to see how things developed. On 09Sep1939, the German press publicises that at his headquarters Schuller (?) discussed the establishment of an independent state in Ukraine and Belarus -- as a signal to Stalin. On 15Sep1939, the Germans contact Melnyk proposing that he form a government of the Western Ukrainian state -- which was reported in the German press. Thus, finally Stalin reacted on 17Sep1939 by occupying Western Ukraine. Once again, this disillusioned the Ukrainian independence movement as to German intentions -- first you give a candy, then you take it away.

[22:20 - 27:16] - The territory occupied by Germany was incorporated into the General Gouvernment. A strip of territory called Zakerzonia west of the Bug and Sjan Rivers was Ukrainain ethnographic territory with some 600,000 Ukrainian inhabitants, who came under German administration. An interesting development occurred -- to establish control in Western Ukraine, the Soviet authorities at first relied upon Ukrainian and Jewish collaboration against the Poles; while in Zakerzonia the Germans start tolerating Ukrainians, inviting Ukrainians to fill administrative positions and allowing the Ukrainian language to be used in these administrative institutions. (They were not going to rely on the Poles or Jews.) By January 1940, the Soviet authorities started deporting massive numbers of Poles, Jews, Ukrainians; whereas the Germans continue favouring Ukrainians in Zakerzonia in comparison to Poles and Jews. Ukrainians in this territory start feeling very comfortable. Kubiovych of the Ukrainian Central Committee wrote that the Germans gave Ukrainians a great deal at this time. For 6 million Ukrainians, the Poles had allowed barely 300 Ukrainian schools; whereas for 600,000 Ukrainians the Germans had allowed the establishment of 2,000 schools, gymnasiums, teachers' institutes, Ukrainian seminary. The Ukrainian intelligentsia came to believe that the Germans were truly friends of Ukrainians. This impression was enhanced by the belief that the alliance between Germany and the Soviet Union would not last. Especially after the unsuccessful visit of Molotov to Berlin in November 1940 to define future spheres of influence in Europe and the world, it became obvious that Germany was preparing for war. There was not even a thought that the Wehrmacht would not defeat the Red Army -- especially after comparing the disasterous Russian campaign in Finland with the easy Wehrmacht victory in France. The overwhelming belief amongst Western Ukrainian intellectuals and population was that Germany would soon liberate and allow the establishment of an independent Ukraine.

[27:17 - 29:49] - What about OUN? February 1941 is the date of the tragic split between the Melnykivtsi and the Banderivtsi. There were a myraid of reasons for this split -- personal; age differences; Melnyk had emigre support, while Bandera had local support. In January 1941, Melnyk and Bandera held talks in Italy, where Bandera proposed a diversification of the local/political orientation of OUN -- to form one headquarters in Switzerland, which would deal with the situation in Germany and Ukraine; and a reserve headquarters in Canada or the United States, which would maintain contacts with Britain and the United States. Melnyk rejected this proposition, because of likely passport problems and because the United States and Britain supported Poland and not Ukraine. This was a major reason for the split.

[29:50 - 29:55] - TV break.

[29:56 - 33:10] - The OUN-split became a reality following meetings in February (where the Banderivtsi elected their revolutionary leadership) and [27?] April 1941 (where the Banderivtsi ratified their decision at the OUN Congress in Cracow). Bandera made contact with German intelligence, such as Richard Yari and Albert [?Wilhelm?] Canaris in March 1941 to allow OUN to prepare a cadre of officers for the future Ukrainian army and to ask whether the Germans would look positively at the creation of an independent Ukrainian state. From the OUN perspective, they recalled the earlier formation of the Legion of Sushko from which they could pick their officers. After the German attack any Ukrainian deserters from the Red Army would naturally join this Ukrainian Legion. In this way, you could quickly build up a national army. At this time the Germans had not yet turned against the Ukrainians; whereas in the Soviet-occupied zone the NKVD were arresting, torturing and deporting Ukrainian nationalists. Thus, seeking German support was logical.

[33:11 - 37:01] - The April 1941 Congress had emphasized that OUN would seek support from all nations and organizations who fought against Bolshevik Moscow and were not opposed to an independent Ukraine. Germany fit into this category -- even though they had already betrayed the Ukrainians twice. How can you test German intentions? The German negotiators were elderly and experienced; whereas the OUN negotiators were young, inexperienced and brashly undiplomatic. Before the war, both Melnyk and Bandera sent their "memoranda" to the German chancellory -- those of Melnyk were simply diplomatically seeking German support; whereas those of Bandera were more brash implying that, if Germany did not support Ukrainian independence, the Ukrainian people would turn against Germany and OUN would seek English support. But the Germans did not react to this memorandum and it is not clear if it was even shown to Hitler.

[37:02 - 41:36] - OUN knew that the Ukrainian Legion had been divided into two battalions "Nachtigall" and "Roland" [formed on 25Feb1941 by Abwehr commander Wilhelm Franz Canaris]. They knew that Nachtigall would be accompanying the German army and urged its commander Shukhevych to ensure that Nachtigall reached Lviv before the Germans -- which they did by about half a day -- to be closely followed by a political spetz-group of Stetsko to declare Ukraine's independence and, thus, present a fait accompli to the Germans. (In a May 1941 memorandum, OUN ordered its adherents in the villages to support this future "declaration of independence" and to continue in their administrative posts, if the Germans supported it. If the Germans rejected it, they were to resign rather than renounce the "declaration" as invalid.)  Nachtigall reached Lviv on 30June1941, such that Stetsko was able to create a government and declare independence that evening on the radio station, which Shukyvych had seized earlier. At the meeting creating the Ukrainian government were two members of the Abwehr -- Capitain Hans Koch and Major Els zu Einhern(?). Koch (a volksdeutsche, who had served in the Galician army in 1918 and spoke Ukrainian) warned the Ukrainians not to take any risky actions without the permission of Berlin, which Stesko rejected. As Stetsko was stepping out on the balcony to read the declaration of independence to the people gathered below, Koch said from behind him, "Mr. Stetsko, you are playing with fire!" upon which Stetsko invited him to join the Ukrainian government to discuss the issue. (Very brash of the young upstart and insulting to the elderly Koch.) The declaration was read on the radio that  evening and repeated next morning. Thus, the general population thought that the Germans were tolerating this declaration.

[41:37 - 43:41] - But Berlin was in shock. Bandera, on the road from Cracow to Lviv, was detained by the Germans to explain the situation. State secretary Kunt asked him what German institutions had permitted this declaration, whereupon Bandera replied, "None. The declaration was made on my orders. We have the moral right to do so." Kunt said that only the Fuhrer had the right to do so. The Germans accused Bandera of misappropriating  2 million German marks designated for the organization of Ukrainian uprisings against the Poles, but Bandera retorted that they had, indeed, spent the money to organize the various groups dedicated to the declaration of independence. The Germans insisted that Ukraine's fate could only be determined after the war, but Bandera rejected this.

[43:42 - 45:26] - Bandera is detained on 03Jul1941 and Stetsko and his government are arrested on 11Jul1941. They are transferred to Cracow, then to Berlin under house arrest, then in September to Sachsenhausen concentration camp. There is a myth that Bandera was held in luxurious surroundings, whereas he and the others were held in the block from which prisoners were led out to be executed. They were assigned work to test out footware for German soldiers under varied conditions -- carrying heavy packs over rocks, water, etc. to see how many kilometres the footwear could withstand under heavy use. Furthermore, they were kept in complete isolation, such that they could not contact anyone in the outside world and did not know what was happening there.
[2/2]
cdvrua | 17Dec2012 | Ivan Patrylyak [45:26 and 43:09, Ukr]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqMQvz8rWjM    Part 1/2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzwMPz6hYbI       Part 2/2

Ivan Patrylyak: Relations between OUN-UPA and Germany (2/2)
Іван Патриляк: Стосунки між ОУН-УПА і Німеччиною (2/2)

cdvrua·40 videos

Published on 17 Dec 2012


[00:00 - 02:07] - Bandera and Stetsko are detained [03 and 11Jul1941] and talks are held until 17Jul1941. They are encouraged to withdraw this act [declaration of Independence], but Bandera and Stetsko stubbornly refuse. SD Gestapo sends out order to all sections of the police to arrest all Bandera agitators. On 21Jul1941, OUN issues a manifesto that their declaration of independence is a historical fact and that no one can cancel it. Thus, the Germans either have to accept it or fight against the Ukrainian people who support independence. Factually, this was a declaration of war against Germany by OUN and there was no further collaboration with the Germans.

[02:08 - 04:50] - The first period of opposition lasts from end of July 1941 to January 1942. This is a period of reorganizing the existing underground, creating underground cells in new areas and infiltrating German administrative structures. This is the period of greatest OUN losses -- massive arrests on 05Sep1941, on 15Sep1941 the second wave of arrests -- up to 3,000 people, 80% of whom end up in concentration camps. On 25Nov1941, the Germans issue a directive to all police units to arrest all Bandera adherents and, after interrogation, to execute them on the pretext of thievery. The number killed is unknown, but often they were hanged with signs attached that they were thieves. Thus, by January 1942, OUN was once again completely underground; whereas previously they had revealed themselves and operated openly.

[04:51 - 07:56] - The second stage begins in February 1942 and ends in December 1942. In February 1942, Mykoloa Lebed decided that it was necessary to prepare for a general popular uprising against the Germans. In early 1942, they were convinced that the German army would be victorious in the East and, after that, they would transfer their army to fight against the English and the United States, which would last a long time and that they would lose. They expected the Germans to leave a corpus of about 60,000 occupying soldiers, such that, when the Germans were losing the war in the West, there would be an opportunity to launch this uprising. Also in February 1942, OUN issued a directive that its forces, rather than just taking defensive actions against the Germans, could take offensive actions as a diversionary tactic.

[07:57 - 11:10] There was a dual aspect to this period, because Halychyna was under the General Gouvernment administration; whereas the area to the east was under the Reichscommissariat Ukraine administration, which was much more brutal. Originally, the OUN leadership was against a partisan war, believing that it would only lead to unneccesary loss of life. (Not the partisans of thousands, but the uprising of millions will bring us freedom. They also feared that they would lose control over the various partisan groupings.) However, in Volyn (within the Reichscommissariat) the situation was so dire that OUN activists insisted that they must react to the massive deportations of the population to Germany as Ostarbeiter. (2.4 million people from Ukraine.) Secondly, in Eastern Ukraine it was much more difficult to replace the cadres that the Germans continuously uncovered and destroyed. (Eastern Ukrainians were unfamiliar with the conspiratorial methods of OUN operatives, such that specialists from Western Ukraine had to be sent in to set up underground cells.)

[11:11 - 15:29] - In 1941, when the NKVD tried to organize a Soviet partisan movement, they failed because the population would not support them. However, by the spring of 1942 the NKVD succeeded, because the population started to hate the Germans. This was a real problem for OUN. The Germans started their drive to Stalingrad in the summer/fall of 1942. Serhii Kachynsky proposed that OUN should try to help the Red army so as to prolong the conflict and weaken both sides. They envisioned a chaotic situation resembling WWI which led to the downfall of the Russian Empire. A revolutionary uprising would be easier in these circumstances -- from a partisan army to a national army. The Polish partisans followed a similar policy.

[15:30 - 15:33] - TV break.

[15:34 - 18:19] - The first anti-German self-defensive actions by OUN occurred in May/June 1942 -- freeing Ostarbeiter from transport trains and seizing food products from agricultural enterprises. The next stage of resistance encompasses the period from December 1942 to May 1943 coinciding with increasing activity of the Ukrainian Partisan Army. They adopted the name UPA after talks with Otaman Bulba Borovets in April 1943, who first coined the term much earlier. (Even though the talks failed in other areas.)

[18:20 - 19:30] - In December 1942, German documents report increased attacks by "bandits" on German agricultural structures -- 100 attacks in Rivno area. Other documents refer to attacks by "bandits" in September 1942 in the regions of Sarnin, Kostopil, Vidvipel?, Bereza. Still other documents refer to attacks in March 1943.

[19:31 - 22:07] -  It was once believed that 08Feb1943 was the earliest UPA attack by Hryhori Perehnyak on the Volodymyr raion centre. However, this was preceded on 20Jan1943 by Perehnyak's attack on the German police column composed of a company of Vlasovites, 4 Germans and one Ukrainian police translator escorting  the Gebiets Commissar of Sarin?, who was particularly brutal to the Ukrainian populace. This Commissar and the 4 German policemen were killed, the rest withdrew back to Volodymyr. After that incident, the Germans increased their arrests in Sarin? and Volodymyr. One of the people arrested and imprisoned was an UPA member, who was later freed by Perehnyak's attack on 08Feb1943.

[22:08 - 26:48] - The UPA development was so extensive that they even issued their own currency stamped "Slava Ukraini! Slava Heroyam!" and "Slava Banderi!". Thus, in January/February 1943, UPA controlled territories into which the Germans did not enter. In March 1943, German documents reveal very extensive activity of UPA forces -- 405 attacks, many food seizures, etc.  In Volyn there are only 2 raions free from "bands". Very dangerous in Kremenets, Dubno, Kostopil, Rivno. Attacks on 21/22Mar1943 in Kremenets in which 12 Germans died. In April 1943 in the Kostopil raion already 95% of Ukrainian villages had a Ukrainian administration. On 06Apr1943, Germans led an expidition to re-establish control of roads and railways in Kremenets. From 15Mar1943 to 18Apr1943, UPA attacked a multitude of villages freeing prisoners, destroying prisons, POW camps, Ostarbeiter camps, etc. In response, the Germans launched a punitive expidition, which failed to destroy the Ukrainian partisan movement.

[26:49 - 29:48] - Russian documents report on the extensive activity and success of the Ukrainian partisans. Germans claim that their April 1943 expidition killed 1673 bandits, captured 283 prisoners, while the German losses were 252 killed and 140 wounded. (Most of the people killed were civilians.) UPA attacks increased from 57 in April to 70 in May 1943.

[29:49 - 29:54] - TV break.

[29:55 - 35:12] - The next stage of UPA opposition is from June to December 1943, which was huge on the territory of Volyn. (The Red Army returned in January 1944.) The summer of 1943 was the most bloody. On 07Jun1943, the Germans initiated a pacification campaign commanded by Brigadfuhrer Hinsler and later joined by General von den Bach Zilewsky (particularly famous for his brutality). The German force included 10,000 soldiers, 10 motorized battalions (7,000 people), 50 tanks, 27 airplanes, Hungarian forces, and 5 locomotives. A document signed by Hinsler outlines German goals in detail. However, UPA forces managed to escape north into the forests of Polissa. German documents relate that in July 1943 there were 295 attacks on German forces, 682 acts of sabotage on railroads, 119 attacks on agricultural objects and in August 1943 there were 391 attacks on German forces, 1034 diversions on railroads, 151 attacks on business institutions. This German terror provoked Ukrainian terror attacks against Germans.  Memoirs of a member of a Polish-German battalion located in Yaniv recalls that Ukrainian nationalist forces made their life hell -- about 12 people killed every month, Ukrainian attacks paralyzed their work, baracks attacked with flame throwers, can only attack isolated villages to take a few pigs and chickens. He describes an ambush on their group consisting of 20 Germans and 10 Poles from which only 6 survived. Historians estimate that about 3,000 Germans, Poles, Hungarians, Uzbeks, etc. died; whereas on the Ukrainian side about 1,500 UPA fighters died.

[35:15 -37:19] - The last stage of UPA opposition to the German occupation is from January to October 1944. This is characterized by events mostly in Halychyna, since the Germans had withdrawn from Volyn. The UPA attacks were mostly designed to acquire military weapons, although there were some military confrontations. A major battle occurred from 06 to 16Jul1944 in the raion Hornevolpaty. Polish intelligence reports state that the Germans sent in 70 military vehicles against the UPA forces and a real battle ensued. The number of Ukrainian deaths is unknown, but the Germans lost many killed and wounded. The Germans seized 2 cannons and 2 tanks, etc. By such methods, the Germans tried to retain control of Halychyna.

[37:20 - 43:09] - To summarize, all the various documents indicate that the Germans and their associates lost about 18,500 people; whereas UPA lost about 13,000 people plus about 10,000 sympathizers. Civilian deaths were about 20 to 30,000. By the end of 1943, it was obvious that the Red Army was returning to reoccupy Ukraine. This prompted two UPA members to initiate talks with the Germans in an effort to obtain weapons. OUN/UPA leadership strictly forbid such talks for fear of "Otamanization" of UPA. Antoniuk (pseudonym Sosenko) and Olinyk (pseudonym Orel) were executed for this action. After that, when the Germans made overtures for talks, the reply always was for them to talk to Bandera in Sachsenhausen. Nevertheless, in the spring of 1944 the leadership of OUN/UPA did initiate talks with the Germans via Lebid and Ivan Hryniuk in Ternopil and Lviv to induce the Germans to release Ukrainians from concentration camps; whereas the Germans wanted Ukrainians to stop their attacks on the German forces. Efforts by the Ukrainians to obtain military supplies failed. The German negotiator Dr. Witte reported to his superiors that the Ukrainians were not sincere and simply wanted to take advantage of the Germans, but that he would continue with these talks so as to neutralize and stabilize the situation. In the end, neither side trusted the other. The German occupation was about to be replaced with the Soviet occupation.
[End]