Name: cotler20040103.html
Search criteria: Irwin Cotler + Ukrainain; less than 2 years (149 articles, 891KB)
There were only 19 of 199 articles which were not found in the previous search in cotler20040101.html. These are mostly associated with the Deschenes Commission (1985) appearing in the Toronto Star (12) with David Vienneau (9) as the main author.
Time distribution: 2003(80), 2002(68), 2001(1)
(File [148c] is from 2001. Fifty files were rejected because of duplication or similarity.)
The more prolific news sources were:
The more prolific or interesting authors were:
SECTION: NEWS; Pg. A08
LENGTH: 657 words
HEADLINE: Cotler not afraid to speak his mind
BYLINE: Tonda Maccharles, Toronto Star ; Canadian Press
HIGHLIGHT:
Lawyer backed anti-terrorism bill Says he'll promote human rights
BODY:
The first thing you need to know about the new Justice Minister Irwin Cotler - renowned human rights scholar and advocate - is he will speak his mind.
The second thing you need to know about Cotler, the law professor, is that he loves lists.
So the first thing on his list yesterday was to meet with his new justice officials, but not before he spoke his mind about his new job. And that's where things got interesting.
Cotler, 63, told reporters he personally supports the marijuana decriminalization bill, a public inquiry into the Maher Arar case, and believes the same-sex marriage reference to the Supreme Court of Canada should be broadened to ask the high court to review all options including whether "civil unions" would meet the requirements of equality guaranteed in the Charter.
"As a law professor my view was that in the context of a reference, then the broadest possible options should be put before the court to allow for the broadest possible discussion and debate, and to allow for the most comprehensive and informed advisory opinion."
But as justice minister, he said, he could not respond directly. "That's not a copout, that's being a responsible minister who's about to meet his officials today, and we'll discuss it and then we'll then come forward with our position."
The press secretary to Prime Minister Paul Martin, sensing trouble, struggled to cut off reporters' persistent questions to Cotler only to give up.
Then hours later, the first question that confronted Martin at his first formal news conference as Prime Minister was whether he would expand the questions asked to the Supreme Court on the issue of gay marriage - a move almost certain to delay the high court hearing now scheduled for April.
"We will be discussing this in cabinet," said Martin, who repeated his ambiguous position that "we've got to support the Charter of Rights."
The appointment of Yale-educated Cotler, a Jewish Montrealer and a former head of the Canadian Jewish Congress, as the country's leading lawmaker is at once a thoughtful, daring move, yet perhaps a risky one.
John Asfour, past president of the Canadian Arab Federation, said Cotler's pro-Israel comments could get in the way of his job as justice minister, reported .
"Mr. Cotler and some of the Jewish lobby have supported (Israel) blindly," Asfour said in an interview.
Martin called Cotler, MP for Pierre Trudeau's old riding of Mount Royal, Thursday with the offer of a lifetime.
"He mentioned to me something to the effect that 'what do you do with a guy who has all kinds of ideas about human rights in terms of justice?'"
"I said, 'Well, I always thought human rights meant justice.' He said 'Congratulations, minister of justice,'" Cotler related with a broad grin. Cotler replaces Martin Cauchon who was dropped from cabinet.
"The protection and promotion of human rights, and amongst them minority rights, will be my guiding principle."
As a backbench MP, Cotler often issued stinging indictments of the Liberals' failure to articulate strong opposition to groups like Hezbollah - later outlawed as a terrorist organization - or to foreign regimes that abuse human rights.
He said at the time he regarded his political career as an "extended sabbatical from my career as an academic and human rights lawyer."
Cotler's credibility as a human rights expert was a trump card in the push to persuade a suspicious Canadian public of the merits of the controversial new Anti-Terrorism Act, C-36.
As a widely published law professor, now on leave from McGill, and onetime counsel to prisoners-of-conscience like Andrei Sakharov and Nelson Mandela, Cotler's backing gave the bill the boost it needed.
Cotler argued anti-terrorism laws and broader police powers are not an attack on civil liberty, but a bulwark protection against attacks on the ultimate human right to live in a secure society, free from terror.
GRAPHIC: New Minister of Justice Irwin Cotler, 63, is a former academic and human rights lawyer.
LOAD-DATE: December 13, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 2 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (660) O 28'02; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5497714
LENGTH: 529 words
HEADLINE: 'Most dramatic development in criminal law since WWII': Grit Irwin Cotler hosts Parliamentarians from around the globe on International Criminal Court
BYLINE: Ritter, Kathryn
BODY:
Liberal MP Irwin Cotler calls it "the most dramatic development in
international humanitarian and criminal law since the end of World War II
" and the "foundation stone for global justice in the 21st Century," and
next week he and some 80 Parliamentarians from around the world will meet
in Ottawa to make sure the newly-established International Criminal Court
will be fully operational by next spring.
"We want a global international justice system, and you do that by not only having an International Criminal Court that brings war criminals to justice, but where each country takes the responsibility for bringing war criminals to justice," Mr. Cotler (Mount Royal, Que.), head of the Parliamentarians for Global Action National Group, told The Hill Times.
The United States does not support the ICC, but that isn't stopping Canada and countries from around the world from establishing the ICC. It should be "fully operational" by April or May, 2003, according to a statement released by Mr. Cotler.
In Ottawa, Mr. Cotler said the Parliamentarians will talk about the importance of creating a Parliamentary Assembly for the ICC to maintain and to coordinate the support of MPs for the ICC and appropriately follow its operations.
PGA is an association of legislators promoting the resolution of various global issues including peace and democracy. The event's discussion will address the challenges and future of the recently established ICC. While some 72 countries have ratified the ICC treaty, it is not yet operational, as judges and the prosecutors have yet to be chosen. The Parliamentarians attending the PGA conference will attempt to create procedures for the nomination and election of ICC officials that are as transparent as possible, said Mr. Cotler. They also hope to gain a greater diversity of ratification. While every country in Europe has grabbed onto the idea of the ICC, very few countries in the Middle East have expressed support. The PGA also stands behind the idea of implementing domestic legislation.
This year's PGA Forum is entitled "A Parliamentary Assembly for the ICC and the Promotion of the Rule of Law."
The title reflects the association's desire to create a support system for the ICC that will ensure that all countries (including the United States) are subject to the ICC.
The U.S. has not only refused ratification of the treaty, but has gone as far to enter into bilateral agreements with other nations asking for exemption for its nationals.
"One of the main objectives of our meeting is to ensure that there will be no immunity," said Mr. Cotler.
Finally the PGA will look at what kind of financial responsibility the United States will have to the Court.
In September, Mr. Cotler had the opportunity to address the United Nations on behalf of the PGA. He concluded, "It is our responsibility to make the ICC the first building block for the new system of global justice of the 21st century, while it serves as a wake-up call -- a warning to international criminals anywhere -- that there will be no havens, no sanctuaries, for these enemies of humankind."
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: August 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 3 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(46) N 21'02 pg 5,15; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5510969
LENGTH: 925 words
HEADLINE: Israel not just a Jewish cause, says Irwin Cotler
BYLINE: Paquette, Jennifer M
BODY:
International human rights lawyer and Mount Royal MP Irwin Cotler says he
supports Israel ''not because it's a Jewish cause, but because it's a just
cause.''
The McGill law professor was speaking at Toronto's Beth Tikvah Synagogue on the 64th anniversary of Kristallnacht, Nov. 9, during Holocaust Education Week.
Giving a talk called Echoes of Kristallnacht in Our Time, Cotler evoked unsettling parallels between that period and today.
Referring to the UN World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa, shortly before Sept. 11, Cotler compared participants' de-legitimization of Israel to Nazi strategies.
He said he had eagerly anticipated addressing human rights issues in a country celebrating its release from apartheid, but left the conference in South Africa appalled, after Israel was indicted as an ''apartheid state'' in a statement comparing Palestinian resistance to ''Nazitype occupation,'' and using the term ''holocaust'' to describe Israeli rule.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
Quoting a colleague, Cotler said, ''If Sept. 11 was the Kristallnacht of terror, Durban was the Mein Kampf.''
The term Kristallnacht, meaning ''night of broken glass,'' is a euphemism that ''sanitizes'' the atrocities that occured on that day, including the death of almost 100 Jews, he said.
Sanitization of language is one of many danger signs, Cotler said, as well as ''crimes of silence.''
Cotler, who was the legal representative of former political prisoners Nelson Mandela and Natan Sharansky, said that today, as during the Nazi period, ''We are witnessing an appalling indifference in our day to the unthinkable -- ethnic cleansing -- and to the unspeakable -- genocide -- and, worst of all, to the preventable genocide in Rwanda.
''No one can say that we did not know, and so it becomes our responsibility to break down walls of indifference, to shatter conspiracies of silence.''
''Indifference,'' he said, quoting Elie Wiesel, ''always means coming down on the side of the victimizers, not the victims.''
For many, these dangers only became clear after Sept. 11. But, Cotler said, ''Sept. 11 overshadowed Durban, but Durban foreshadowed Sept. 11.''
Cotler said he believes the road to Durban was paved by Jewish silence. Jews, ''yearning for peace,'' were so deeply committed to the Oslo accords that they didn't debate these criticisms of Israel when they first began, resulting in the ''one-sided indictment'' at Durban.
Now, we must fight these views, even outside the Jewish community, he said: ''In the next six months... make 10 non-Jews better aware of the Jewish case.'' If we're uncertain whether we could make a case for Israel, we should ''go back and learn.''
We must first combat prevailing myths, Cotler said, adding that to claims justifying Palestinian ''resistance,'' we can counter that they were offered a state in 1947. Today's refugee problems are a consequence of the Arab refusal to coexist and the ensuing ''war of extermination,'' he said.
We can also educate those around us about the Arab ''teaching of contempt,'' through the education system, mosques and government, creating a cult of martyrdom and legalized hatred eerily reminiscent of Nazi Germany, he said.
Finally, he said, we should proclaim publicly that ''Israel is the prototypical aboriginal people... speaking the same language... reading the same text... sharing a sense of peoplehood across space and time'' as ancient inhabitants of the land.
Cotler discussed the global increase in anti-Israel sentiment, pointing to the recent allegations against Israel accusing it of war crimes and of violating the Geneva Convention.
''Forty per cent of United Nations Human Rights Commission resolutions in the past year were against Israel,'' and overlooked ''real violators, like China, Syria and Iran,'' he said.
Cotler said the ''new'' anti-Semitism denies Israel's equality before the law. Modern anti-Semitism has shifted, ''from Jews as individuals to Jews as a nation.''
Quoting Martin Luther King, he spoke of ''the denial to the Jewish people of a fundamental right... freely accord[ed] all other nations of the globe.''
When an unidentified man began shouting accusations of hypocrisy barely five minutes into Cotler's speech, saying Cotler had ''lambasted'' Israel in the House of Commons for human rights violations, Cotler calmly said his intention had been merely to reiterate that ''Israel... has a responsibility for any violations under international law.''
''Israel is not above the law,'' Cotler later added. But ''if individual Israelis engage in excessive practices, Israel itself holds the perpetrators accountable.'' This ''remorse and selfrestraint'' contrast with the Palestinian glorification of homicide, leading to attacks which, per capita, he said, are ''the equivalent of more than two dozen 9/11s.''
''Every single word [I'm saying here],'' he said, ''I have also said in the House of Commons. I don't just speak about this to Jewish audiences.''
For Cotler, Durban proved that Jews are a long way from equality. Yet, ''whatever 2002 may be, it is not 1942,'' he said. ''There is a Jewish state today as an antidote to Jewish powerlessness.'' And there are many ''non-Jews... who will stand with us if we are prepared to make our case...
''Despair is not only a denial of our past, but a betrayal of our future. As long as they remain our abiding vision,'' he said, ''truth and justice will prevail - Am Yisrael Chai!''
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: April 16, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 4 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 544 words
HEADLINE: How Canadians are responding to Middle East crisis
ANCHORS: PETER MANSBRIDGE
BODY:
PETER MANSBRIDGE: The crisis in the Middle East has struck a cord in this
country, but many Canadians are responding in a way you might not expect. The CBC's Eric Sorensen has the story.
ERIC SORENSEN (Reporter): This is not the image the NDP wants to promote, MP Svend Robinson confronting Israeli soldiers and demonstrating his support for the Palestinians.
JUDY WASYLYSCIA-LEIS (Manitoba NDP MP): Any perception of the NDP siding with the Palestinians on this long-standing conflict is hurtful. It's wrong.
SORENSEN: The NDP is trying to avoid taking sides on the Middle East, but so are all the federal parties, not supporting Arafat and not supporting Ariel Sharon either. Canada's political tilt towards Israel not as evident as it once was.
BRIAN MULRONEY (Former Canadian Prime Minister): I'm known, as you know, as one of the great fans of Israel.
SORENSEN: Times have changed. Today, a pro-Israeli march in Montreal is counter-balanced by a pro-Palestinian demonstration in Ottawa three days earlier. Canada's Jewish population is long established. The growth of Canada's Arab community has been more recent and so has the Arab voice. And what with the images of Israeli tanks wreaking destruction on the one hand and Israeli civilians being killed by suicide bombings on the other, Ottawa now charts a more neutral course. Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham condemns suicide bombings...
BILL GRAHAM (Minister of Foreign Affairs): Take all necessary action to prevent further terrorist attacks.
SORENSEN: ...but also criticizes Israeli military actions.
GRAHAM: Are not justifiable.
SORENSEN: That approach appears to fit with Canadian views on the Middle East. An Ipsos-Reid poll found support for the Israeli side stands at seven percent of Canadians, for the Palestinian side, six percent. For not taking either side, 79 percent. Irwin Cotler, a law professor and Jewish Member of Parliament, believes Canadians have become more neutral.
IRWIN COTLER (Law Professor): I think what Canadians are doing is they're responding a lot to the kind of competing narratives that they see expressed in the pictorial images on television and therefore they move very much to the centre and then the intensified and partisan attitudes of both sides keeps them there.
JOHN REYNOLDS (Leader of the Opposition): More fog and confusion for this government.
SORENSEN: So, while the opposition criticizes the government, they have all largely promoted the same basic policy, that Canada should push the Palestinians and Israelis to stop the violence.
STEPHEN HARPER (Canadian Alliance Leader): The polling data I've seen today suggests, I think suggests, by and large, we're on the right track.
SORENSEN: Which brings us back to the NDP and Svend Robinson.
ALEXA MCDONOUGH (NDP Leader): I have nothing more to say on that subject at the moment.
SORENSEN: Svend Robinson has been a maverick for years, but the image of him appearing to take sides in the Middle East conflict has forced a showdown between him and his leader. Alexa McDonough is under pressure to dump Robinson from his post as Foreign Affairs critic and she has scheduled a news conference on the matter for tomorrow morning. Eric Sorensen, CBC News, Ottawa.
LOAD-DATE: April 18, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 5 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (679) Mr 24'03; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5580743
LENGTH: 2090 words
HEADLINE: BQ National Congress in Montreal on April 4-6 (Record in progress)
BYLINE: Rana, F Abbas, ED
BODY:
Canadian Alliance special caucus meeting in Stratford, Ont., on April 4
MONDAY, MARCH 24, 2003
Governor General In Calgary -- Gov.-Gen. Adrienne Clarkson and her husband John Ralston Saul will be Calgary from March 23-27 kicking off their "urban focus" which is to engage citizens of Calgary in a series of dialogues and debates designed to bring people together to explore innovative approaches, initiatives and current projects that make Calgary a good place to live for all its citizens. Phone Lucie Brosseau or France Langlois at the Rideau Hall Press Office at (613) 998-0287 or (613) 993-8157.
House Sitting -- The House will remain in session until Friday, April 11 when it will take a two-week long break. For more information, please call the Government House Leader's Office at (613) 952-4930.
My Trudeau Years -- Former Trudeau official photographer Jean-Marc Carisse continues his exhibit at the National Archives in Ottawa until March 30. Located at 395 Wellington St., it's open from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Go for a whirl.
Media Club Dinner with Jim Watson -- Jim Watson, former mayor of Ottawa and currently a journalist, will speak at this dinner organized by Media Club of Ottawa at National Press Club. Time: 6 p.m. Ticket price: members $25, others $30. For further information or reservations, please call (613) 232-1837.
TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 2003
Senate Sitting -- The Senate is sitting this week. For more information, please contact the Senate Information Office at (613) 992-1149.
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 26, 2003
Canadian Alliance Caucus -- Alliance MPs will hold their national caucus meeting on March 26 at 9 a.m. in Room 308 West Block on Parliament Hill. For more information, please call Caucus Chair Werner Schmidt's office at (613) 992- 7381.
NDP Caucus -- The NDP will hold their national caucus meeting on March 26 at 9 a.m. in Room 307 West Block. For further information, please call NDP Caucus Chair Dick Proctor at (613) 992-9115.
Bloc Quebecois Caucus -- The Bloc will hold their caucus meeting on March 26 in Room 209, West Block today at 9:30 a.m. For further information, please call Bloc Caucus Chair Monique Guay at (613) 992-3257.
Liberal Caucus -- Liberals will hold their national caucus meeting on March 26 at 10 a.m. in Room 237-C, Centre Block. For more information, please call National Caucus chair Stan Keyes' office at (613) 995-1757.
PC Caucus -- The Progressive Conservatives will hold their national caucus meeting on March 26 at 10 a.m. in Room 256-S Centre Block. For further information, please call PC Caucus Chair, Norman Doyle at (613) 996-7269.
Canadian Bankers' Association Reception on the Hill -- Canadian Bankers Association's Robert W. Chisholm and Raymond J. Protti are hosting a reception on the Parliament Hill on March 26. Time: 5:30 p.m. -- 7:30 p.m. in Room 200, West Block. For RSVP please call (613) 234 - 4431 ext. 228. This event is by invitation only.
Newsmaker Breakfast-- Quebec Liberal MP Irwin Cotler, and Professor Errol Mendes will speak on the topic of "What does Bill C-36 (Anti Terrorism Act) mean to Canadians?" at this newsmaker breakfast at the National Press Club. For further information, please call (613) 233-5641.
Commemoration of the Famine/Genocide of 1932-33 in Ukraine -- The Embassy of Ukraine in Canada and the Ukrainian Canadian Congress is organizing an event to the Commemorate the Famine/Genocide of the 1932-33 in Ukraine on Wednesday, March 26 at 6:30 p.m. at the National Archives of Canada. For further information, please call Yurii Nykytiuk at (613) 230-2961.
THURSDAY, MARCH 27, 2003
Fundraiser for John Manley -- A fundraising event will be held for Minister of Finance John Manley on March 27 at $1,500 per person at Ottawa Congress Centre. For further information, please call Laura Johnson (613) 238-2022/270.
"The Sorcerer" by Gilbert & Sullivan -- The Sorcerer by Gilbert & Sullivan, will be presented at the Centrepointe Theatre from March 28-30 and April 2-5. Full of fast-paced dance, beautiful choral music, witty dialogue and spells and potions. This one is for all the family. Supporting the Children's Wish Foundation. Tickets: (613) 580-2700. For further information, please call Greg Cottingham (613) 237-3022.
2003 Spring Policy Conference -- The Ottawa Economics Association and the Canadian Association for Business Economics will hold their Spring Policy Conference on March 27-28 at the Chateau Laurier in Ottawa. For more information, call (613) 238-4831.
Seminar on Writing Well & With Precision -- Join Wendy Cherwinski and Barbara Campbell on March 27 for the art of writing well & presenting with precision. Sharpen your writing skills and learn to create persuasive presentations during a practical one-day workshop at ARC hotel located at 140 Slater St. For more information, please contact trainers Barbara Campbell and Wendy Cherwinski at [email protected]. or visit http://www.echeloncomm.ca
Dinner to Honour Dr. Michael Kaufman -- The Canadian Committee of the United Nations Development Fund for Women will host a dinner to honor Dr. Michael Kaufman nationally and internationally known for his work challenging gender stereotypes on Thursday, March 27, 2003. The dinner will be in Room 200 West Block, Parliament Hill. To reserve a ticket, call (613) 232-5751, ext. 235.
Ottawa Historical Association Event - The Ottawa Historical Association will hold its final talk in its annual series of historical presentations by some of Ottawa's best local talent. On March 27 at 8 p.m., Greg Donaghy of the Historical Section of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, will deliver the association's sixth and final lecture of the year. His talk is entitled "A Terrible Responsibility: Canada, the United States, and the Vietnam War, 1954-75." Where: The National Archives of Canada at 395 Wellington Street. For more information, contact Jo-Anne McCutcheon at (613) 244-9914 or Greg Donaghy at 992-6288.
MONDAY, MARCH 31, 2003
PC National Capital Region Fundraising Dinner -- PC Canada Fund will hold a fundraising dinner on March 31 at the National Arts Centre in Ottawa. Cost of tickets is $400 each, $4,000 for a corporate table. For further information, please contact Anita McGuire at PCHQ (613) 238-6111 or [email protected] or [email protected].
TUESDAY, APRIL 1, 2003
PC Calgary Fundraiser -- The Calgary Southeast PC Association is hosting an evening of food, fun and friendly competition. The event will be held at the Kilt and Caber Ale House, High Street in McKenzie Town at 7 p.m. Ticket price is $20. For further information, please call Claudia at (403) 225-2385 or Bob at (403) 257-4904.
FRIDAY, APRIL 4, 2003
P.E.I. Liberal Leadership Convention -- The P.E.I. Liberal Leadership Convention will be held on Friday, April 4 and April 5 in Charlottetown, P.E.I. For more information, please contact Dawn Alan, executive director/chief organizer P.E.I. Liberal Association [email protected] or call (902)368-3449.
Bloc Quebecois National Congress -- Bloc Quebecois National Congress will take place on April 4-6 at Palais des Congres in Montreal, Que. This meeting will bring together delegates from across Quebec to debate the main areas of focus that will guide political actions in the coming months. For more information, please call Dominique Ollivier, assistant director communications, at (514) 526-3000 or e-mail [email protected].
SATURDAY, APRIL 5, 2003
Annual Meeting of National Press Club -- Annual meeting of National Press Club will take place on Saturday, April 5. For further information, contact (613) 233-5641.
TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 2003
Bacon And Eggheads Breakfast -- Next Bacon and Egghead Breakfast is on Tuesday April 8, 2003 from 7:30 am - 9:00 am at Room 200, West Block on the Parliament Hill.
COST: No charge to Members of the House of Commons, Senators and Parliamentary Press Gallery members. All others$10. Pre-Registration by Wednesday, April 2 is required. Please register by contacting Donna Boag, PAGSE Coordinator, email: [email protected], or call (613) 991-6369 or fax: (613) 991-6996.
THURSDAY, APRIL 10, 2003
16th Annual Testimonial Dinner & Awards -- Each year, over 1,000 leaders from all sectors gather to pay tribute to Canadians who have made an important contribution to public policy and public management. Tickets cost $246.10 (GST included) for PPF members and $321.00 (GST included) for non-members. Tables of ten are available for $2461.00 (GST included) for PPF members and $3,210 (GST included) for non-members. For more information, contact Kelly Cyr at [email protected].
MONDAY, APRIL 11, 2003
Tory Sugar Shack Party -- L'Aile Quebecois is hosting a Sugar Shack Party, at Cabane Constantin, 1054 Arthur-Sauve Blvd. (Route 148), St-Eustache, Que. The event will feature special guests, animation, and much more! Bring a special and 'precious' object for an auction: all profits to benefit L'Aile Quebecois. Cost for tickets: adults, $50 (tax receipt); youth, $25; PC Youth, $12.50. For more information, please contact Joseph Pierre Rouleau (514) 856-1643 or (514) 349- 7411.
Nova Scotia Liberal Party Annual General Meeting -- Annual meeting of the Nova Scotia Liberal Party will take place on Friday, April 11-13 in Halifax, N.S. For further information, please send your e-mail to Anna Butland [email protected] or call (902) 429-1993.
SATURDAY, APRIL 12, 2003
Media Club of Ottawa Workshop -- The Media Club of Ottawa is organizing a workshop about how to get your book published on April 12 at NPC on Saturday, April 12. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. For further information, please call NPC (613) 233-5641.
MONDAY, APRIL 14, 2003
Quebec Election -- Quebecers will go to the polls on April 14. Parti Quebecois Premier Bernard Landry, Liberal Leader Jean Charest and Action Democratique Mario Dumont are all in the running and trying to win government.
TUESDAY, APRIL 22, 2003
Forum on Diversity and Culture -- Minister of Canadian Heritage Sheila Copps and Secretary of State (Multiculturalism) and (Status of Women) Jean Augustine will co-host the Forum on Diversity on April 22 and 23. For further information, please call (819) 997-7788 or (819) 997-9900.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 23, 2003
Mississauga Board of Trade Executive Luncheon Series -- Canadian Alliance leader Stephen Harper will attend this event on Wednesday, April, 23 in Mississauga, Ont. Time: 11:30 a.m. - 2 p.m. Cost: $45 members/$65 non-members For further information, please email: [email protected]
SATURDAY, APRIL 26, 2003
Access to Information Seminar -- The Canadian Association of Journalists will hold an access to information seminar with Dave McKie, CBC Radio News, and journalist Jim Bronskill. For further information, please send your e-mail [email protected].
MONDAY, APRIL 28 National Day of Mourning -- The National Day of Mourning
is observed in remembrance of workers killed or injured in the workplace,
or who have suffered from work-related illnesses. For further information,
please call the Human Resources Development Canada Labour Program at (819)
994-2238 or visit http://www.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca
TUESDAY, APRIL 29, 2003
Maple Leaf Dinner --Prime Minister Jean Chretien will attend a fundraising dinner for the party today in Ottawa which will take place at Ottawa Congress Centre. Ticket Price: $500. For further information, please call Jocelyn Turner at (613) 783-8449 or [email protected].
The Parliamentary Calendar is edited by F. Abbas Rana who can be reached at (613) 232-5952, ext. 204. E-mail regarding political, governmental and cultural events should be sent toattention "Parliamentary Calendar," by Wednesdays at noon. Our fax number is (613) 232-9055. We can't guarantee every event will get in, but we'll do our best.
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: November 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 6 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 8 words
HEADLINE: "We are witnessing an old-new, escalating, global and even lethal anti-Semitism."
BODY:
Irwin Cotler, a Canadian member of Parliament
LOAD-DATE: November 6, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 7 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: FEATURES; Pg. 15
LENGTH: 1256 words
HEADLINE: And justice for all...
BYLINE: Melissa Radler
HIGHLIGHT:
Newsmaker
BODY:
Irwin Cotler has long been a man with many hats, with one always reserved
for Israel. A law professor and chair of the Human Rights Program at McGill
University in Montreal, Cotler entered politics four years ago as a member of
the Liberal Party when he was elected to Parliament with 92 percent of the vote.
A member of his government's committees on Justice and Human Rights and Foreign
Affairs and International Trade, Cotler championed the passage of Canada's law
of universal jurisdiction, yet publicly opposed the politicization of Belgium's
more open- ended law, which last year targeted Ariel Sharon for prosecution.
On the Middle East, he has been an ardent defender of Israel, coining the phrase "genocide bombing" in the House of Commons last June after a particularly deadly bus bombing in Jerusalem, and criticizing his own party for its often tepid support for the Jewish homeland. In 2000, Cotler's stance on Israel was rumored to have cost him the Justice Ministry portfolio - a story he good-naturedly, and humbly, denies.
In the 1980s, Cotler was known for his involvement in anti-apartheid circles as counsel for Nelson Mandela, and in the Soviet Jewry movement as one of Natan Sharansky's staunchest defenders. More recently, Cotler, now 63, has been active in a variety of human right causes, including the defense of Egyptian democracy advocate Saad Eddin Ibrahim and peace efforts in Sri Lanka; his efforts to facilitate the aliya of 18,000 Ethiopian Jews who have been denied entry into Israel for years resulted in a recent, as yet unimplemented, Israeli cabinet decision to welcome the entire community to the Jewish state.
As a Jew, Cotler has been active in identifying what he calls the "new anti-Semitism," which he defines as having a genocidal, Israel-centric strain. "We're witnessing a new, virulent, global and even lethal anti- Semitism," he warned at a recent conference, noting that Israel is targeted with the same virulence once reserved for stateless Jews.
A long-time advocate of a two-state solution to the Middle East conflict, Cotler nonetheless argues that international justice falls on Israel's side.
"UN Secretary General Kofi Anan remarked that it cannot be that the entire world is against Israel, yet Israel is right," he remarked soon after the disastrous, 2001 UN Conference on Racism held in Durban, South Africa. "But history has shown that a minority of one can be right."
You were critical of the Bush administration's justification for the Iraq war in your March 21 Globe and Mail op-ed entitled, "Is the war in Iraq illegal? I hate Saddam Hussein as much as you do, but the law is the law." In the end, was the war justified under international law?
I have no division of opinion with the Bush administration or Tony Blair or others who see Saddam Hussein as the personification of evil - I advocated forcible humanitarian intervention in 1990 after the first genocide. The question is whether it was in conformity with international law. I think thus far the response of the Iraqi people greeting coalition soldiers as liberators and the discovery of the massive human rights violations that had been committed against them makes a case, retroactively, for humanitarian intervention, as opposed to self-defense, which is what the Bush administration argued.
What did you think of the anti-American sentiment coming out of Canada in the run-up to the war?
I think that there were a number of things that one could probably raise questions about in terms of the Canadian response. There were public and harmful utterances by members of my own party, and I think that was more problematic than the actual decision we took not to endorse the war . I think we have to more clearly reaffirm our alliance with America in the post-9-11 universe, and in the struggle against transnational terrorism, and I think we might not have made it clear that we supported the US as a matter of principle, that we regard Saddam Hussein as the personification of evil, and that the issues we had with the US were not on principle but on timing and approach.
In February, the Israeli cabinet voted to bring the Falash Mura to Israel, yet the community remains in Ethiopia. What now?
It's tragic that we have to continue to go to court to enforce the law against the government, particularly when, in this instance, the government itself has acknowledged that the Falash Mura are indeed eligible to come to Israel, as we had been arguing the entire time, under both the Law of Return and the Law of Entry.
What do you think is behind Israel's refusal to let them in, while at the same time seeking prospective immigrants from places like Russia and Argentina?
At times, it comes very close to borderline racism. I don't like to use that term, and I won't use it in the collective sense, but I think there are some people engaged in this effort who have to take a close look at their beliefs and their behavior in this regard. One is hard put to find how the situation with regard to Jews in the former Soviet Union can be validated - and I say this as someone who was very much involved in the struggle for Soviet Jewry - while the more compelling case of eligibility under the Law of Return and the Law of Entry with regard to Ethiopian Jews is disregarded.
In the end, the Falash Mura will be brought to Israel. The only question is whether they're going to be brought after a series of unnecessary deaths and suffering, or are we going to bring them to Israel with all deliberate speed, in accordance with domestic and international law. To me, this is an ongoing tragedy.
Why hasn't American Jewry taken up the issue?
Whenever you have a negotiating framework, the person who does not know their brief well tends to defer to the person who claims to know their brief well, lest protracted negotiations expose their ignorance. So I think what happened here is that they feel they don't know the dossier, and rely on what the Israeli authorities tell them is the dossier. The result is that the Ethiopian Jews continue to languish.
What are your thoughts on the road map?
I supported a two-state solution before it became fashionable to do so. Having said that, I'm somewhat concerned by the false symmetry. For example, in references made to combating incitement by Israel and the Palestinian Authority, this is a sham. You can't compare a government- sanctioned culture of hate on the one hand with individual expressions of hate in a democracy on the other. Where reference is made to the termination of violence on both sides, as a general principle that is correct, but again, it obfuscates the important moral distinction between acts of terror and civilian deaths resulting from acts of self- defense. Every death of every child, Palestinian or Israeli, is a tragedy, but we do not serve the cause of human rights by obfuscating the differences in intention.
So I have reasons for concern. At the same time - and I guess it's my eternal optimism, because a genuine peace is so important for both sides - maybe the dynamic of a return to negotiations will help bring about the cessation of incitement and terrorism on the part of the Palestinian Authority and the beginning of confidence-building measures by Israel.
Have you ever considered making aliya?
I've spent two sabbaticals in Israel and I have two children living in Israel. Aliya has always been an option for me, and I'd never foreclose that option.
GRAPHIC: Photo: Irwin Cotler, an ardent defender of Israel, coined the phrase genocide bombing in the Canadian House of Commons after a particularly deadly Jerusalem bus bombing.
LOAD-DATE: July 1, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 8 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 278 words
HEADLINE: Government of Canada Provides Funding to Inroads Journal Publishing
BODY:
MONTREAL, QUEBEC--Irwin Cotler, Member of Parliament (Mount Royal), on behalf
of Minister of Canadian Heritage Sheila Copps, today announced $29,757 in
funding for Inroads Journal Publishing Inc. The funds will be used to help raise the profile of the company's magazine, Inroads: The Canadian Journal of Opinion, among potential new subscribers.
"Canadian magazines are a reflection of our communities," said Mr. Cotler. "Their articles address the day-to-day reality of Canadians. These funds will help Inroads increase its visibility and improve its finances by attracting new readers and advertisers."
Founded in 1992, Inroads is published twice a year, in May and November. The magazine provides an open forum where Canadians take part in the search for practical solutions to political, economic and social challenges.
Financial assistance is provided by the Department of Canadian Heritage through the Support for Business Development for Small Magazine Publishers, a component of the Canada Magazine Fund. The objective of this program is to support the establishment of small, dynamic and viable publishing houses, to ensure that Canadians have access to a variety of high quality Canadian magazines.
Funding for this project was provided for in the 2003 federal budget.
(This news release is available on the Internet at
http://www.canadianheritage.gc.ca
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Office of the Minister of Canadian Heritage
Sonya-Kim St-Julien
Press Secretary
(819) 997-7788
LOAD-DATE: July 17, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 9 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 268 words
HEADLINE: Canadian Heritage: Government of Canada Announces Funding for The Black Coalition of Quebec
BODY:
MONTREAL, QUEBEC--Irwin Cotler, Member of Parliament (Mount-Royal), on behalf
of Secretary of State (Multiculturalism) (Status of Women) Jean Augustine, today
announced funding of $38,583 for the Black Coalition of Quebec. This will help
finance the creation of a three-year initiative to raise awareness in the
corporate sector of the qualified labour pool from ethno-cultural communities, particularly Black communities.
"We are committed to help integrate Black community members into Quebec's economic life," said Mr. Cotler. "This initiative will help reduce unemployment in the Black community and increase its members' representation in the business world."
The initiative of the Black Coalition of Quebec will reach out to more than 20 companies, informing management of the wealth of human resources available within Black and other ethno-cultural communities.
Planned activities include training for managers, in addition to information and networking sessions for members of the Black community.
Financial assistance is provided by the Department of Canadian Heritage through its Multiculturalism program. Funding for this initiative was provided for in the February 2003 federal Budget.
(This news release is available on the Internet at
http://www.canadianheritage.gc.ca
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Office of the Secretary of State
(Multiculturalism)(Status of Women)
Catherine Gagnaire
Press Secretary
(819) 997-9900
LOAD-DATE: April 30, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 10 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 348 words
HEADLINE: Canadian Heritage: Government of Canada Announces Funding for the Immigrant Worker's Centre
BODY:
MONTREAL, QUEBEC--Irwin Cotler, Member of Parliament (Mount Royal), on behalf
of Secretary of State (Multiculturalism) (Status of Women) Jean Augustine, today
announced funding of $22,950 for the Immigrant Worker's Centre to continue to help ethnic minorities integrate into the work force.
"I am pleased to support the Immigrant Worker's Centre in its mission to improve both the integration of immigrants and the participation of the various cultural communities that make up our country," said Ms. Augustine.
"I would like to thank the members of the Immigrant Worker's Centre who have, for many years, made remarkable strides in helping ethnic community members with workplace information and training," added Mr. Cotler.
The goal of the Immigrant Worker's Centre is to inform new immigrants about the standards, laws, and practices that govern Canadian workplaces, to help them integrate quickly into their new environment. The Centre also seeks to improve the living conditions of new Canadians, particularly on the economic level.
This funding, provided through the Multiculturalism Program, will help create a series of workshops on the laws of the workplace and available resources, particularly for youth and women.
Canada's Multiculturalism Policy promotes full and equitable participation in Canadian society of people of all origins, as well as interaction between individuals and communities of different origins. It also encourages public institutions to be respectful and inclusive of Canada's multicultural character.
Funding for this project was provided for in the December 2001 federal budget and is therefore built into the existing fiscal framework.
(This news release is available on the Internet at
http://www.canadianheritage.gc.ca
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Office of the Secretary of State
(Multiculturalism) (Status of Women)
Catherine Gagnaire, Press Secretary
(819) 997-9900
LOAD-DATE: April 30, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 11 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 295 words
HEADLINE: Canadian Heritage: The Government of Canada Announces Funding for the Fifth Artapalooza Festival
BODY:
MONTREAL, QUEBEC--Irwin Cotler, Member of Parliament (Mont-Royal), on behalf
of Minister of Canadian Heritage Sheila Copps, today announced funding of
$35,000 for Artapalooza, an art festival for children and teenagers.
"The Government of Canada is proud to support this bilingual, multi-disciplinary festival that combines music, dance, mime and theatre," said Mr. Cotler. "I would like to acknowledge the members and volunteers of Artapalooza, who, through their remarkable work, provide our youth with culturally enriching experiences and encourage their love of the arts."
The Artapalooza Arts Festival for Kids and Teens was created in 1999 at the Youth Institute of the Saidye Bronfman Arts Centre. Since 1996, the Institute has offered children, teens and young adults original creative and training programs to encourage openness to the arts.
Financial assistance is being provided by the Department of Canadian Heritage, through the Arts Presentation Canada program. This program seeks to give Canadians more access to direct experiences of the diversity and richness of Canada's culture through professional arts festivals, presentations of live professional performances and other artistic experiences provided by arts presenters.
Funding for this project was provided for in the December 2001 federal budget and is therefore built into the existing fiscal framework.
(This news release is available on the Internet at
http://www.canadianheritage.gc.ca
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Office of the Minister of Canadian Heritage
Kerry Edmonds
Director of Communications
(819) 997-7788
LOAD-DATE: August 5, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 12 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 385 words
HEADLINE: Government of Canada Announces Funding for the Shield of Athena Family Services
BODY:
MOUNT ROYAL, QUEBEC--Irwin Cotler, Member of Parliament (Mount Royal), on
behalf of Secretary of State (Multiculturalism) (Status of Women) Jean
Augustine, today announced funding of $406,790 for Shield of Athena Family
Services to support an ongoing public awareness program on family violence
prevention.
"I am pleased that the Government of Canada continues to support this organization and its important programs," said Mr. Cotler. "This year, the Shield of Athena is adding new programs on the radio and in the ethnic print media to further reinforce the message that help is available."
"Family violence is something we must all strive to eliminate in every community across Canada," said Secretary of State Augustine. "Working in partnership with Canadian ethnic media, the Shield of Athena is providing a vital lifeline for many individuals and families so they can get the information and services they need to help solve problems."
The Shield of Athena has developed a four-year project to collaborate with ethnocultural communities and ethnic broadcasters to develop and air programs about family violence prevention. The objective is to raise awareness of the issue in communities where little English or French is spoken. This project is a continuation of previous years' work and forms part of the Multiculturalism Program's outreach strategy under the federal Family Violence Initiative.
Financial assistance is provided by the Department of Canadian Heritage through its Multiculturalism Program. Canada's Multiculturalism Policy promotes full and equitable participation in Canadian society by people of all origins, as well as interaction between individuals and communities of different origins. It also encourages public institutions to be respectful and inclusive of Canada's multicultural character.
Funding for this initiative was provided for in the February 2003 federal Budget.
(This news release is available on the Internet at
http://www.canadianheritage.gc.ca
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Office of the Secretary of State
(Multiculturalism) (Status of Women)
Adam Burns
Press Secretary
(819) 997-9900
LOAD-DATE: December 8, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 13 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 38Cabinet Briefs
LENGTH: 121 words
HEADLINE: MARRIAGE PROPOSAL
BYLINE: BY CP
DATELINE: OTTAWA
BODY:
Newly-minted Justice Minister Irwin Cotler wants the issue of gay marriage to get the broadest review by Canada's top court -- including whether civil unions for gays would satisfy equality rights.
"That is an approach to which I'm open," Cotler said yesterday after being sworn in. He was en route to a meeting with his new department to discuss the thorny issue of same-sex marriage.
It was the latest sign that Prime Minister Paul Martin's new government will broaden three questions before the Supreme Court of Canada asking whether draft legislation allowing gay marriage is constitutional.
The question of whether civil unions -- separate from marriage -- are constitutional, is not currently before the court.
LOAD-DATE: December 13, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 14 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(22) My 29'03 pg 30; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5634778
LENGTH: 721 words
HEADLINE: UN body called a 'human rights charade'
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
[Graph Not Transcribed]
Irwin Cotler has been a keen observer of international human rights issues for decades and has often warned of the disturbing rise of Jew-hatred expressed through vilification of Israel. But even he was taken aback by the institutional anti-Israelism and lack of desire to tackle global human rights issues at the recent meetings of the 59th UN Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) in Geneva.
''You have to be there to witness what is effectively an Alice in Wonderland human rights charade,'' said the Mount Royal Liberal MP, law professor and past legal counsel for Nelson Mandela and Andrei Sakharov.
Beyond the fact that Libya chairs the commission, the UN body's lack of commitment to human rights can be seen through its discriminatory treatment of Israel, the denial of international due process, the implicit acceptance of terrorism as a legitimate means of opposing Israel and its turning a blind eye to human rights violations around the world, Cotler said.
In addition, when Israel is in the dock, ''the conviction and sentence is pronounced before the hearing begins,'' he said.
Cotler, who spent about one week at the six week-long human rights forum, said, ''Israel was the only country that was the object of a country-specific indictment before the commission hearings began.''
The world's most egregious human rights violators - China, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Zimbabwe - ''enjoy exculpatory immunity. This is a double standard at its zenith,'' Cotler said.
Cotler's critiques were echoed in part by Human Rights Watch (HRW), which stated in a news release that ''an 'abusers club' of governments hostile to human rights has further consolidated its position and blocked several important country initiatives, while the United States and to a lesser extent, the European Union have not exerted positive leadership.''
Cotler said the Jewish state is subjected to ''a form of apartheid'' in which it is disenfranchised, not able to vote on members of the commission, not eligible to be nominated to it and not entitled to participate in the drafting of resolutions that are aimed at it.
''It's the classic demonstration of denial of international due process,'' he said.
Illustrating the world body's discriminatory treatment of Israel was the decision to maintain an openended mandate for a special rapporteur for the West Bank and Gaza Strip while terminating the mandate of a rapporteur for Sudan, where ''genocide by attrition'' is occurring, he said.
Even when the UN body addresses issues of international concern, such issues as the rights of women, the rights of children or homelessness, the issue is hijacked and ends up turning into an indictment for alleged Israeli violations, he said.
A particularly disturbing development at the forum, he said, was the UN body's sanctioning of ''the use of all available means'' - codewords used to justify terrorism - in the Palestinian struggle against Israel.
Cotler said Canada, which takes its international commitments seriously, ought to forcefully oppose this misuse of an international body.
''By its participation, Canada gives this charade a certain implied legitimacy. I recommend that Canada speak out about a process that singles out one state for differential treatment. Canada should no longer involves ourselves in a process that engages in this kind of delegitimization of a member state and brings international law into disrepute.''
Cotler said he is adding his name to a petition sponsored by the World Jewish Congress, of which he is a legal counsel, that is being circulated to Jewish institutions and to NGOs in the broader community. The petition calls on UN Secretary General Kofi Annan to take the necessary initiatives to end ''this human rights charade, including anti-Semitic conduct being undertaken under the protective cover of the UN.''
Cotler said he is also asking his parliamentary colleagues to support urgent UN reform.
Canada can also push to include Israel as a full fledged member of one of the UN's regional blocs (opposition from Arab states has excluded Israel from the Asian bloc).
The situation as it now stands ''is not just prejudicial to Israel but it undermines the UN and international law,'' he said.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 12, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 15 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(32) Ag 15'02 pg 26; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5447657
LENGTH: 663 words
HEADLINE: Cotler criticizes omissions in terrorist list
BYLINE: Lazarus, David
BODY:
MONTREAL -- Mount Royal MP Irwin Cotler says his own government's
unwillingness to list Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah as terrorist
groups is ''an affront to the moral, juridical, diplomatic and political
struggle against terrorism.''
In a recent statement, he said, ''Simply put, this 'list of terrorist entities' undermines our counter-terrorism law and policy, both domestically and internationally.''
Last month, Canada's solicitor-general, Lawrence MacAulay, announced ''further action against terrorism'' by listing seven ''entities'' that Canada now officially considers terrorist based on the criteria of Bill C-36, the Anti-Terrorism Act.
The list included Al Qaeda and other Islamic groups, but made no mention of equally notorious terrorist organizations responsible for most, if not all, of the suicide bombings in Israel.
''The list... is seriously flawed and deficient,'' Cotler said in a response statement issued the same day MacAulay's list was published.
''In particular, it does not include major terrorist groups such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah, who have patented what I have referred to as 'genocidal bombing' -- terrorist suicide bombings that, by the terrorists' own covenant, call publicly for the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews wherever they may be.''
Others joining in the criticism were the Simon Wiesenthal Center (SWC) and Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC).
SWC founder Marvin Hier urged Prime Minister Jean Chretien to include Hamas in its listings of terrorist groups as have Germany and the United States.
Not doing so, Hier wrote, ''offers them undeserved legitimacy and weakens your country's commitment to the war on international terrorism.''
CJC president Keith Landy wrote to MacAulay to express his ''dismay'' over the omissions.
''What is particularly perplexing is that the list contained not one of the internationally known groups engaged in the longstanding concerted and murderous campaign of terrorism against Israel and its citizens,'' he wrote.
''We implore you to broaden the register of named terrorist organizations forthwith, and to ensure that the major anti-Israel terrorist groups are included in the first supplementary list.''
In an interview with The CJN, Cotler also said he hoped MacAulay would include the omitted terrorist names in the next list.
''It would be unacceptable otherwise,'' he said.
Cotler said the only possible reason he could think of for their exclusion was that they have some perceived ''generic connection'' with Al Qaeda.
Cotler said the list contradicted statements made previously by his government inside and outside the House of Commons over the years by former foreign minister John Manley and current Foreign Minister Bill Graham.
''It undercuts the government's own counter-terrorism law and policy which seeks to prohibit the preparation, financing, facilitating and perpetration of acts of terrorism - and the prohibiting of those terrorist entities engaged in such acts of terrorism,'' Cotler said.
In his statement, Cotler also referred to the omissions as a ''breach of our undertaking under UN Security Council Resolution 1373 to designate such terrorist groups on a list of terrorist entities, so as to prevent and prohibit any affiliation in Canada with them.''
Moreover, the failure to include the above-cited groups is also a ''breach of our commitments under international conventions against terrorist bombing and financing,'' Cotler said.
Cotler said even though Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the military wing of Hezbollah are listed in both UN and Canadian cabinet anti-terrorism regulations as organization whose assets can be frozen by virtue of their terrorist activities, ''they are disturbingly and conspicuously absent from this list.''
And the absence of the names on the list, he said, could lead people to conclude that Canada does not consider them terrorist entities.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: April 16, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 16 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: FRONT; Pg. A4
LENGTH: 310 words
HEADLINE: Anti-terror bill still has flaws, MP says
SOURCE: Canadian Press
DATELINE: OTTAWA
BODY:
The government's latest draft of antiterrorism legislation is tainted by an alarming potential to curb civil liberties, says backbench Liberal MP Irwin Cotler.
He called yesterday in the Commons for review of the proposed bill by the all-party Commons justice committee.
Cotler, a counter-terrorism law expert, pushed for more study just a day after Prime Minister Jean Chretien told his caucus of plans to fast-track the bill through Parliament by the end of June.
Now called the Public Safety Act 2002, the new legislation has rekindled criticism within and beyond Liberal ranks.
It was introduced in the Commons on Monday after an earlier version, Bill C-42, was scrapped amid Liberal bickering about some of its more heavy-handed provisions.
The most controversial measures of the new bill would allow the defence minister to designate any part of the country a military exclusion zone for up to one year, allowing the Canadian Forces to forceably remove trespassers.
Police would have new powers to scan all domestic and international airline passenger lists, a power critics have said could lead to draconian travel checkpoints. Passengers could also be detained for outstanding warrants for offences punishable by five years or more in jail.
"We must ask whether these authorized powers, taken as a whole, maintain the equilibrium between the related needs of security and rights protection," Cotler said during debate on the bill in the Commons. He cited the bill's potential to give "undue" power to ministers while diluting Parliament's role.
The proposed act includes important public safety elements, Cotler concluded. "But there are also disconcerting features . . . that taint this bill and which need to be addressed and redressed so that we can promote human security without unnecessarily intruding on civil liberties."
LOAD-DATE: May 3, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 18 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: F 26'02
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5316734
LENGTH: 332 words
HEADLINE: MPs twin with Zimbabwean political candidates to deter violence
BYLINE: Bueckert, Dennis
BODY:
OTTAWA (CP) Canadian MPs are twinning with opposition politicians in
Zimbabwe in hope of deterring attacks on them during that country's tense
election campaign.
Fourteen Canadian parliamentarians have volunteered to stay in close touch with Zimbabwean MPs who have been attacked or are considered at risk in pre-electoral violence by government thugs.
Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe should know the whole world is watching the election, Liberal MP Irwin Cotler said Tuesday.
''This is to put the Zimbabwe government and Mugabe on notice that the kind of intimidation and violence he's been engaged in, he will be accountable for,'' said Cotler.
He said his ''twin,'' Blessing Chebundo, has had his house destroyed, received death threats and narrowly avoided being set on fire after attackers doused him with gasoline.
New Democrat Bill Blaikie, another participant in the twinning program, said it can't guarantee candidates will be safe but should help deter attacks.
''We're doing what we can at this end.''
Prime Minister Jean Chretien said the Zimbabwean elections will be the main topic at the meeting of Commonwealth leaders on the weekend in Australia.
With less than two weeks go until the March 9 election, two leading opposition politicians have been charged with treason for allegedly plotting to assassinate Mugabe.
There has been talk of suspending Zimbabwe from the Commonwealth but Canada has withheld its decision pending further developments.
''The situation in Zimbabwe is deteriorating every day,'' Chretien said after a cabinet meeting. ''The situation is complicated, Canada will be in the avant garde to protect democracy in Zimbabwe.''
Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham said he was checking into reports from Zimbabwe that all Canadian journalists will be refused permission to cover the elections.
Graham said he would be horrified if the reports in a Zimbabwean state-run newspaper prove accurate.
JOURNAL-CODE: 1418
LOAD-DATE: July 26, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 20 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Pg. 4
LENGTH: 396 words
HEADLINE: ISRAEL SHOULD CHAMPION JEWISH REFUGEE CLAIMS, URGES TOP LEGAL SCHOLAR
BYLINE: Haninah Levine
BODY:
Israel can back the compensation claims of Jewish refugees from Arab lands
without fear of legitimizing Palestinian claims against Israel in the process,
says international law expert and Canadian parliamentarian Irwin Cotler. Cotler
- who asserts that the Palestinian claims rightly should be against Arab states,
not Israel - is honorary chair of the recently founded Justice for Jews from
Arab Countries (JJAC), which estimates that 856,000 Jewish victims of "ethnic
cleansing" at the hands of Arab governments after 1948 lost over $ 100 billion in confiscated assets.
Israel has so far pursued a split policy over restitution demands. The Ministry of Justice, along with the American Sephardi Federation, has been working since May 2002 to document claims of Jewish refugees from Arab countries. At the same time, there has been caution about setting official policy on the restitution issue, for fear of opening Israel up to claims from Palestinian refugees.
But Cotler insists that international law will find Palestinian refugees to have been "joint victims of the Arab war against Israel," and therefore not entitled to restitution from Israel. In rejecting the U.N. partition plan of 1947, the Arab states rejected the U.N.'s proposed Palestinian state as well, and thereby committed an act of "double aggression." Moreover, he argues, "the right of return (for Palestinian refugees and descendants) has no legal basis," since resettling so many millions of Palestinians from the Arab countries to Israel would constitute an illegal reward for the perpetrators of a crime - the Arab states.
Instead, Cotler is lobbying leading politicians worldwide to push for recognition of the "right of memory," involving an investigation of each side's historical narrative by all parties, rather than out-of-hand rejection by opposing sides. He suggests that this kind of mutual awareness, rather than just concentration on contemporary, pragmatic issues of territory and sovereignty, is increasingly recognized as prerequisite for reconciliation.
Israeli historian Benny Morris casts doubt on Cotler's legal argument. "At the end of a war, people who are pushed out of their homes... are allowed back," Morris says. Then he hedges a little. "I'm sure both sides have good legal arguments, and politically, certainly both sides have good arguments."
LOAD-DATE: July 28, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 21 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(32) Ag 14'03 pg 28; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5830383
LENGTH: 1064 words
HEADLINE: New Supreme Court justice hailed for judicial brilliance
BYLINE: Arnold, Janice
BODY:
Canada's newest Supreme Court justice grew up on Montreal's storied St.
Urbain Street, the heart of the old Jewish immigrant district, and
graduated from Baron Byng High School, a Protestant school that had a high
number of Jewish students who became very successful.
Morris Fish, 64, who took his seat on the highest court Aug. 5, is the younger son of the late Zlata Gruber and Aaron Fish, who came from an area in eastern Europe that has changed hands between Poland and Russia.
''He was an outstanding student and a good athlete, especially in basketball, but he was a normal boy,'' recalled his brother Abe Fish, a Toronto businessman.
''He made friends easily and always had a deep interest in people. And he always displayed very good judgment. That was an intrinsic quality he inherited from our parents.''
Mount Royal MP Irwin Cotler has been friends with Fish since they were law students at McGill University in the early 1960s. Reached in Jerusalem, Cotler called Fish's appointment ''simply brilliant, an ideal appointment. He is an exemplary judge in every respect.
''He has all the qualities you could seek in a judge: a judicial temperament, integrity, fairness, a command of civil and criminal law.''
Cotler remembers Fish as a distinguished debater in his university days, as well as an outstanding editor-in-chief of the McGill Daily. Fish helped support himself through university as a staff reporter for the Montreal Star from 1959-63. After graduating in law, he continued to write editorials until 1970.
Fish's flair for writing judgments has been traced back to his early career in journalism.
''Although Morris's background is more secular or cultural than religious, he has a good knowledge of Jewish history and culture, and he speaks a good Yiddish,'' Cotler said.
Fish has been to Israel and once visited with Cotler as part of an exchange program between Canadian and Israeli appellate judges.
He is a friend of Aharon Barak, chief justice of Israel's highest court, and former deputy chief Menachem Elon, Cotler said.
Fish and his wife the former Judy Chinks are longtime members of the Reconstructionist synagogue. Shul president Bram Rubinger said Fish attends High Holy Day services. ''He usually has one of his grandchildren on his shoulders as they listen to the shofar being blown. He's a tall, imposing man with snow-white hair. He's hard to miss.
''He is committed to the synagogue as an institution, as a place to be affiliated with. He was supportive our our expansion [last year]. He does not look at us from a distance.''
Fish has two daughters, Amy Budman, a health consultant, and Laura Goldin, a lawyer, and four young grandchildren.
Avi Morrow, Judy Fish's uncle, said what he respects most about Fish are his strong values and principles.
''A few years ago when I got a new passport, I sent it over to him to authenticate it. He called me up and said, 'I can't do that if I don't witness you signing it.' ''
Morrow said Fish has a passion for language. ''On my birthday, he gives me dictionaries and other books about words, and on his, I give him books with Jewish content.''
Morrow plans to hold an exhibition of Fish's photography - another hobby - at an Old Montreal gallery this fall.
Fish was named to the Quebec Court of Appeal in 1989 by Brian Mulroney, after a criminal law career that included directing Montreal's legal aid bureau.
Ian Solloway, immediate past president of the Lord Reading Law Society, the association for Jewish lawyers and notaries in Quebec, hailed Fish's appointment as ''fantastic'' and ''long overdue.'' Fish is only the second Jew on the nine-member High Court. The first was the late Bora Laskin, who was appointed in 1970 and was chief justice from 1973-84. Fish is also the first anglophone Quebecer named since 1954.
Solloway said Fish, who is a member of the society, has a ''superb judicial intellect'' and is a humanitarian. ''His appointment has been universally acclaimed by the profession.''
He called Fish ''a well-spoken, well-rounded, remarkable human being.''
As for whether Fish will bring a Jewish sensibility to his decisions, Solloway said, ''He will bring all his life experiences to bear.''
The Supreme Court is due to soon hear a case of a very Jewish nature. In April, the Supreme Court granted leave to B'nai Brith Canada to appeal a Quebec Court of Appeal ruling that prevents residents of a high-end condominium from erecting sukkot on their balconies. The Quebec court upheld the side of the condo corporation. B'nai Brith says the permanent injunction infringes on religious freedom.
Canadian Jewish Congress president Keith Landy welcomed Fish's appointment as ''a great source of pride to our community'' and a benefit to Canada.
CJC Quebec region honorary vice-president Max Bernard, a lawyer who knows Fish personally, said he has ''the qualities of understanding, caring and fairness that are the benchmarks of someone who is able to dispense true justice, in the noblest sense of the word, to all who come before him.''
Bernard said Fish cannot help but be shaped by ''the moral foundation'' of Judaism. He sees those coming before him as ''people, not just facts and figures... He does not apply the law in a technical way, but rather looks at whether justice is being done.''
Fish, he said, is ''very warm, down-to-earth.''
Joseph Nuss, a colleague of Fish on the Court of Appeal since 1995, described Fish's decisions as exhibiting a ''penetrating analysis of the issues, and clear reasoning written in an eloquent and elegant manner.'' His written French is also impeccable, honed during post-graduate studies at the University of Paris.
Criminal lawyer Raphael Schachter, who has known Fish professionally and personally for more than 35 years, was thrilled by the appointment of his old friend - and adversary.
''Morris is responsible for my spending many a sleepless night during those days when I was a prosecutor and he was a prominent defence attorney.
''There was never the need for a raised voice when Morris was your adversary. His style as a litigator was low-key, his demeanour gentlemanly, but when it came to matching wits and achieving bottom-line results, there were very few the equal of Morris.''
Morris Fish takes seat on top court
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 22 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. D10
LENGTH: 373 words
HEADLINE: Holocaust hero's legacy; Conference pays homage to the courageous spirit of humanitarian Raoul Wallenberg
SOURCE: CANADIAN PRESS
DATELINE: MONTREAL
BODY:
A conference on the legacy of Holocaust hero Raoul Wallenberg was told
yesterday the Swedish diplomat's fighting spirit and humanitarian outlook should be applied to more recent atrocities.
Liberal MP Irwin Cotler said 1990s bloodbaths like the "ethnic cleansing" in Bosnia or the genocide in Rwanda prove there's a crying need for courageous individuals to stand up against killing machines.
Those catastrophes showed the failure of large-scale international organizations such as the United Nations, but individuals can still play a big role, Cotler said.
He said Wallenberg, who was based in the 1940s in Hungary when he foiled Nazis targeting Jews for extermination, proved what a lone resister could do.
"One person can confront evil," said Cotler in the tribute to Wallenberg, who used diplomatic passports and other means to save more than 100,000 Jews and other people who were on the Nazis' fatal lists.
"He is a hero for our time."
The meeting, which drew about 150 people, paid homage to Wallenberg as a humanitarian who has been accorded the singular honour of being granted posthumous Canadian citizenship. Parliament has declared Jan. 17 as Raoul Wallenberg Commemorative Day.
The date matches the 1945 day when the 32-year-old Wallenberg, under military arrest, disappeared on his way to Soviet army barracks outside Budapest, Hungary.
Despite decades of efforts, Wallenberg's fate remains a mystery. Cotler said he was likely alive in the 1950s and 1960s but Russian authorities continue to block persistent inquiries.
Vera Parnes, founder of the Raoul Wallenberg International Movement for Humanity, said there were long-standing rumours that he was held in the Soviet gulag of prison camps.
The research continues, thanks to investigators in Stockholm and elsewhere determined to go beyond missing documents, fading memories and reports that proved false, such as a Russian statement about his 1947 execution.
The organization bearing Wallenberg's name has been instrumental in having a forest planted in the diplomat's memory in Israel, where many of those he rescued eventually found their homes.
As a non-Jew who risked his life for Jews, he is considered a fine example of humanity.
GRAPHIC: Colour Photo: CANADIAN PRESS; Vera Parnes, founder of the Raoul Wallenberg International Movement for Humanity, places flowers at the feet of a bust of Raoul Wallenberg in Montreal yesterday.
LOAD-DATE: January 21, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 23 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(19) My 8'03 pg 2; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5615285
LENGTH: 59 words
HEADLINE: Anti-hate March
BODY:
TORONTO -- The grassroots group Canadians Against Anti-Semitism will be
holding its second annual Canadian March for Humanity in Toronto on June 8
at 3 p.m. International human rights lawyer and MP Irwin Cotler, and
Ontario Chief Justice Roy McMurtry will lead the march, which will begin
at Avenue Road and Bloor Street and head to Queen's Park.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 12, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 24 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Ja 20'02
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5292881
LENGTH: 451 words
HEADLINE: [A conference on the legacy of Holocaust hero Raoul Wallenberg was told Sunday the Swedish diplomat's fighting spirit and humanitarian outlook should be applied to more recent atrocities] (Record in progress)
BYLINE: Daly, Conway
BODY:
MONTREAL (CP) A conference on the legacy of Holocaust hero Raoul
Wallenberg was told Sunday the Swedish diplomat's fighting spirit and
humanitarian outlook should be applied to more recent atrocities.
Liberal MP Irwin Cotler said 1990s bloodbaths like the ''ethnic cleansing'' in Bosnia or the genocide in Rwanda prove there's a crying need for courageous individuals to stand up against killing machines.
Those catastrophes showed the failure of large-scale international organizations such as the United Nations, but individuals can still play a big role, Cotler said.
He said Wallenberg, who was based in the 1940s in Hungary when he foiled Nazis targeting Jews for extermination, proved what a lone resister could do.
''One person can confront evil,'' said Cotler in the tribute to Wallenberg, who used diplomatic passports and other means to save more than 100,000 Jews and other people who were on the Nazis' fatal lists.
''He is a hero for our time.''
The meeting, which drew about 150 people, paid homage to Wallenberg as a humanitarian who has been accorded the singular honour of being granted posthumous Canadian citizenship.
Last year, Parliament declared Jan. 17 as Raoul Wallenberg Commemorative Day.
The date matches the 1945 day when the 32-year-old Wallenberg, under military arrest, disappeared on his way to Soviet army barracks outside Budapest, Hungary.
Despite decades of efforts, Wallenberg's fate remains a mystery. Cotler said he was likely alive in the 1950s and 1960s but Russian authorities continue to block persistent inquiries.
Vera Parnes, founder of the Raoul Wallenberg International Movement for Humanity, said there were long-standing rumours that he was held in the Soviet gulag of prison camps.
The research continues, thanks to investigators in Stockholm and elsewhere determined to go beyond missing documents, fading memories and reports that proved false, such as a Russian statement about his 1947 execution.
The organization bearing Wallenberg's name has been instrumental in having a forest planted in the diplomat's memory in Israel, where many of those he rescued eventually found their homes.
As a non-Jew who risked his life for Jews, he is considered a fine example of humanity.
''We know so little about his life after 1945,'' said Dorothy Zalcman Howard, chair of the Canadian Jewish Congress national executive.
She said roadblocks first raised by Soviet and later Russian bureaucrats haven't discouraged the widespread research effort into Wallenberg's last days after he vanished in the gulag.
''We're still searching,'' she said. ''Each step takes us a little closer.''
JOURNAL-CODE: 1418
LOAD-DATE: February 20, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 25 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(43) O 30'03 pg 37; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5877340
LENGTH: 832 words
HEADLINE: Canadian MPs find Muslim anger at Israel, U.S. (Record in progress)
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
Canadian parliamentarians meeting the elite of Arab intellectual and
political society in Jordan and the Palestinian territories were
confronted last week with a virtually monolithic expression of anger at
Israel's ''occupation'' and intense feelings of anti-Americanism,
according to Montreal MP Irwin Cotler.
In meetings with ''top people'' during a 10-day Mideast tour, Cotler said he was taken aback at the intensity of the emotions and views expressed by his Arab interlocutors. Cotler, who first visited the Arab Middle East in 1975 and who has been to Jordan nine time and Egypt 13 times, said he never before experienced ''the intensification of the focus on the Israel and Palestinian conflict in general and the occupation in particular. It came up wherever we went.''
In meetings with politicians, intellectuals, journalists and NGO representatives, the parliamentarians heard that ''the occupation was the root of all evil. We heard that in every strand of the Jordanian meetings.''
Speakers brought up Israeli military checkpoints ''as a kind of metaphor. For the Palestinians, it's held out as a sense of humiliation and restrictions on their movements'' while ''they refer to suicide bombings as acts of resistance,'' he said.
Cotler, along with MPs Keith Martin (Canadian Alliance) and Bernard Patry (Liberal), were in the Middle East to research the world of Islam.
Three groups of MPs from Parliament's foreign affairs committee have recently visited different parts of the Muslim world. One group visited southeast Asia, including India and Malaysia, while another visited Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Cotler's group visited Jordan, the Palestinian territories, Israel and Egypt.
The foreign affairs committee is planning to compile its findings in a report to Parliament. The report, which will likely be published early in the new year, ''will reflect what we heard and where, in a modest way, Canada can play a role,'' Cotler said.
Although the report has yet to be written, Cotler said, ''The idea was that we have to have an approach that will not be adversarial as the West versus Islam. Our discourse is not that of a conflict of civilizations... it is one of a dialogue and what we can do to promote understanding.''
The foreign affairs committee has already held hearings on the issue and will hear from other presenters before the report is begun, Cotler added.
Speaking from the Middle East before the Cairo leg of the trip, Cotler said what was ''compelling was the intensity of the focus on the conflict and the occupation as the root of all evil.''
In addition, the United States, which is seen as supporting Israel's occupation and is now seen as an occupier itself in Iraq, came in for heated criticism, even ''hatred,'' he said.
''Israel is seen almost as an extension of America, not as a legitimate independent entity, but as its agent in the Middle East, which is a delegitmating feature.''
In Jordan, one of the group's contacts told him that ''98 per cent of Jordanians hate Americans. We felt an intense animus against the United States. It was palpable.''
The U.S. invasion of Iraq was seen as a prelude to further incursions in Mideastern states and the group heard the argument, presented by secular Jordanians and Palestinians, that the Israeli occupation has inflamed the Arab and Muslim world and ''made the Arab world more Islamic.''
Cotler said he often presented a counter-argument in an attempt to balance the discussion, but ''when you hear a case presented in a very powerful way and given the emotionalism that underpinned it, it's hard for people who don't know the whole situation not be affected by it.''
The ''sheer weight of exposure would get someone to have sympathy certainly for Palestinian suffering.''
While the group heard a unified and emotional voice from the Arab side, their Israeli contacts spoke in a calmer manner in an office setting, which did not lend itself to the same kind of impact achieved in a visit to Palestinian areas. What's more, there was disagreement among Israelis - as might be expected in a democracy - on a number of issues, including the Geneva agreement promoted by Meretz MK Yossi Beilin. Incredibly, Cotler said, even one Shinui member of the governing coalition supported the initiative while two other government members opposed it.
On another occasion, an Israeli journalist seemed to confirm the Palestinian characterization of Israel's security fence, also calling it an ''apartheid'' fence, Cotler said.
Meanwhile, on the Palestinian side, specific suggestions were advanced for Canadian policymakers to adopt while no such unified message was advanced by Israeli parliamentarians.
Arab contacts refused to condemn the speech by Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, saying the entire speech should be examined and the comments on Jews were only a small part of the overall message, Cotler said.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: December 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 26 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. A14
LENGTH: 424 words
HEADLINE: Musharraf to consider memorial to slain journalist
BYLINE: Valerie Lawton, Toronto Star
BODY:
Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf says his country already has "so much" to do, but he'll consider a request from the family of slain journalist Daniel Pearl to build a monument in his memory.
Montreal Liberal MP Irwin Cotler delivered the request on the family's behalf when Musharraf appeared before the House of Commons foreign affairs committee yesterday.
"Building a monument on him now could be seen, I've never thought of it, really. There's so much to be done in Pakistan. I could consider that," the president said.
Pearl, the Wall Street Journal's South Asia bureau chief, was kidnapped and murdered while researching a story on Islamic extremists last year. His killers videotaped themselves slitting the throat of the 38-year-old journalist, who was Jewish.
Pearl's father said he's pleased Musharraf didn't rule out a memorial.
Judea Pearl said it would be an important symbol for Pakistan as it tries to refute accusations it is doing too little to fight terrorism.
"It would be a tremendous opportunity for Pakistan to clear its name. Wherever he goes, people ask him embarrassing questions. That could be a vehicle for him to show Pakistan is indeed a moderate country where terrorists are a negligible minority," Judea Pearl said in an interview.
"It has a great symbolic value. Here you have a man who stretched his hand in friendship and was betrayed. We were all betrayed. Everyone in the West was betrayed," he said.
Four Islamic militants were convicted last year of involvement in Pearl's death. One of them, British-born Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, was sentenced to death, and the other three were given life sentences. All have filed appeals.
Cotler also questioned Musharraf during the committee meeting about accusations in a new book that argues Pearl may have been killed because he'd found out Pakistani intelligence agents were preparing to give nuclear weapons to Al Qaeda terrorists.
The president denied the link made in Who Killed Daniel Pearl by French writer Bernard-Henri Levy, and suggested the journalist put himself at risk by investigating extremists.
"Unfortunately, in his investigative capacity, Daniel Pearl came ... to Pakistan, stayed with a group that had contacts with all kinds of people and then he kept moving down into this world of extremism himself. And then whatever happened, happened."
Musharraf, who also had a private lunch with Prime Minister Jean Chretien, is one of the few international leaders ever to appear before the foreign affairs committee.
LOAD-DATE: September 27, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 27 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(47) N 28'02 pg 5; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5518769
LENGTH: 767 words
HEADLINE: Sri Lankan peace process compared with Israel
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
While the world was focusing its attention on Palestinian-Israeli strife, a conflict that seemed just as intractable and emotion-laden has seen the
adoption of a historic peace process with potential ramifications for the
Middle East.
That's the assessment of Montreal-area Liberal MP Irwin Cotler, who was honoured recently by the Quebec Coalition for Peace in Sri Lanka for ''his extraordinary contribution to peace in Sri Lanka and in the world.'' Cotler was honoured in a ceremony at the Durkai Amman Koyil Temple in Montreal.
The Sri Lankan peace agreement ended one of the longest running disputes in Asia, a 19-year conflict that left 65,000 dead, 1.5 million displaced and 12,000 ''disappeared,'' the latter figure second only to the number of missing people in Iraq, Cotler said.
This ''untold human catastrophe'' was brought to an end by a process similar to the one adopted by Israelis and Palestinians at Oslo, but with one important difference, Cotler said.
While the Palestinian Authority (PA) reaped the benefits of the peace agreement without being compelled to do anything substantial in return, the Sri Lankan approach was based on reciprocity, he said.
In Sri Lanka, ''you had a situation with express undertakings organized around reciprocal obligations with a timeline.'' So when the Tamil Tigers renounced terrorism and said they would not seek an independent state, the government of Sri Lanka ''un-banned it'' and released prisoners, Cotler said.
Fulfillment of those terms led to a next set of commitments, and in that way the peace process progressed with both sides making concessions.
Under Oslo, ''the exact opposite occurred.'' The PA, he said, never complied with its commitment to cease and desist fomenting hatred of Jews. ''Not only was this obligation honoured in the breach, but the culture of hatred intensified,'' Cotler said.
Palestinians also violated the terms of Oslo by ignoring Israeli requests to extradite terrorism suspects and by refusing to bring them to justice within PA jurisdiction. Meanwhile, the limited police force contemplated by Oslo took ''a quantum leap in numbers and a veritable army was created,'' Cotler said.
''Not only was there a pattern of institutionalized breaches by one side, but on the Israeli side, regrettably, they didn't take these breaches seriously enough.''
Israelis, he continued, ''were psychologically and politically invested in the peace and so they engaged in wilful blindness to these violations.''
Cotler commended former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu for demanding Palestinian compliance with the terms of Oslo before making concessions. Commenting on the proposal by newly-crowned Labour leader Amram Mitzna to unilaterally dismantle Gaza settlements, Cotler said ''I think that approach will not work, because it will end up rewarding terror.''
On a related issue, Cotler said the newly-constituted organization, ''Justice for Jews from Arab Countries,'' is more than ''a crie de coeur of survivors. It dovetails with the emerging norms of international humanitarian law.''
In an address to a meeting of the organization last week, Cotler said 900,000 Jews were expelled from Arab lands in the postwar period in an early example of ''ethnic cleansing.''
This ''forgotten exodus'' is absent from the ''Mideast narrative, from which it has been utterly expunged,'' similar to the assault on Jewish memory undertaken by revisionists who deny the Holocaust, he said.
Cotler said a satisfactory resolution of the claims of Jewish refugees must be ''part of the reconciliation process'' between Arabs and Jews, along the lines of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in post-apartheid South Africa.
''As long as the Arab ethnic cleansing of Jews is replaced with the myth of Jews creating Arab refugees,'' there can be no peace or reconciliation, he said.
* * *
Last week, Cotler rose in the House of Commons to memorialize former Israeli foreign minister and UN ambassador Abba Eban as ''one of the greatest statesmen and diplomats of the 20th century.''
Cotler characterized Eban as ''a distinguished academic, a prolific scholar, the unparalleled chronicler of his people and his country and of civilization itself.''
Eban had emerged not only as the voice of Israel ''resonating with its unique combination of Churchillian rhetoric and Shakespearian literacy...[but as] the voice of humanity, and his entire being was suffused with the commitment to peace between Jews, Arabs and Palestinians,'' Cotler stated.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: May 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 28 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Section A; Page 7; Column 1; Foreign Desk
LENGTH: 566 words
HEADLINE: In Austria, an International Conference Examines a New Kind of Anti-Semitism
BYLINE: By RICHARD BERNSTEIN
DATELINE: VIENNA, June 20
BODY:
In 1938, after Germany annexed Austria, Hitler addressed a cheering crowd
from a balcony at the Hofburg royal palace here, a fact much noted by
participants in the first major international conference devoted exclusively to the subject of anti-Semitism.
The two-day meeting, which ended today at the palace, brought together the 55 member countries of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, including a delegation of members of Congress and Jewish leaders from the United States, led by the former mayor of New York, Rudolph W. Giuliani.
The overall theme of the meeting was a new kind of anti-Semitism -- a virulent hybrid derived from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and old anti-Jewish stereotypes that many believed had long faded into history.
"We are witnessing an old-new, escalating, global and even lethal anti-Semitism," Irwin Cotler, a Canadian member of Parliament, said in a speech to the conference today.
Its chief characteristic, Mr. Cotler and other delegates argued, is that it singles out Israel for criticism and condemnation beyond any other nation, and asserts that a Jewish homeland, by its nature and the nature of its citizens, violates the rights of others. "It is anti-Semitism under the banner of human rights at a time when human rights is the new secular religion," Mr. Cotler said.
In recent years, European countries, in particular, have experienced new waves of anti-Jewish attacks, many of them carried out by young immigrants from North Africa against synagogues and cemeteries in France. The French government, in a move that was widely praised here, has passed new legislation giving greater powers to the police to crack down on hate crimes.
"We have seen a level of anxiety in Europe that we hadn't seen in a very long time," Andrew Baker, a rabbi and member of the American delegation, said in an interview.
The conference was initially suggested by members of the Parliamentary Commission, a group of legislators from several countries, which proposed it to the United States Department of State.
From that point, according to members of the American delegation, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell pressed the idea against considerable resistance from other states, which argued that anti-Semitism should be taken up in the context of racism and discrimination generally, rather than as a separate subject.
Controversial ideas were raised, but not debated. For example, several delegates said governments should control publications and Web sites that promote anti-Semitism. One delegate, Jean Kahn, president of the Union of French Jewish Communities, argued that Al Jazeera, the Arab television network, fomented anti-Semitism and its broadcasts should be suppressed.
Ultimately, the significance of the gathering, for many, was that it put recent violence against Jews and Jewish institutions, especially in Europe, on the international agenda.
In that sense, the signal event was the invitation from the German ambassador to the Organization for Security and Cooperation, Dieter Boden, to hold a follow-up meeting in Berlin next year.
"It's truly historic," Mr. Giuliani said during the final session, referring to the prospect that the two most important centers of Jewish persecution in Europe will be where the group's member countries meet to combat the new anti-Semitism.
http://www.nytimes.com
LOAD-DATE: June 21, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 29 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: International News
LENGTH: 317 words
HEADLINE: MPs urge Ottawa to take the lead in restoring peace in DR Congo
DATELINE: OTTAWA, June 5
BODY:
Members of parliament from four parties, including the governing Liberal
Party, urged the government Thursday to take a lead in stopping mass killing in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
At a joint press conference with members of three opposition parties, Liberal MP Irwin Cotler said: "The prime minister (Jean Chretien) should now place wake-up calls to the international community."
Keith Martin, a doctor who has worked in conflict situations who is now with the opposition right-wing Canadian Alliance, said: "This is genocide ... We have done almost nothing to stop it."
The country's Ituri region has been a powderkeg of ethnic unrest, with more than 50,000 people killed there and some half a million displaced in the region since 1999.
Martin, whose party has been critical of the governing Liberal Party for allegedly having insufficient troops to carry out its current international obligations, said a new international "peace-making force" was required for the Democratic Republic of Congo -- and Canada should be part of it.
He also called for international pressure to be exerted on neighbouring countries in the region -- specifically Uganda, Rwanda and Zimbabwe -- to end their involvement in helping the different warring factions.
Cotler and Martin were supported by MPs from the left-of-centre New Democratic Party and the left-of-centre regional Bloc Quebecois.
The United Nations has deployed 4,300 peacekeepers to monitor a fragile ceasefire in the DRC, and last week the UN Security Council authorized a more heavily armed, French-led international force to Ituri in the north-east.
Canada has agreed to supply two Hercules aircraft and about 50 military personnel to help the French-led international force being set up to restore peace in the region.
Cotler said Canada's contribution was "too little and very late."
hfw/sba/gs Canada-DRCongo
LOAD-DATE: June 6, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 30 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. A03
LENGTH: 340 words
HEADLINE: Hamas put on Ottawa's terror list
BYLINE: Tonda MacCharles, Toronto Star
HIGHLIGHT:
Failure to name Hezbollah slammed Aiding groups a criminal offence
BODY:
The federal government expanded its blacklist of terrorist groups yesterday,
naming Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad among six more terrorist
organizations whose activities and support are now criminalized in Canada.
But despite months of opposition pressure, Solicitor-General Wayne Easter did not name the Lebanon-based Shiite Muslim group Hezbollah (Party of God) to the list, a move that was immediately condemned as a "dangerous omission" by the Canadian Alliance.
"Perhaps it will take a horrific tragedy before this government finally cracks down on these terrorists," said Alliance foreign affairs critic Stockwell Day.
Easter said the list, which now names 13 organizations in total, is "a work-in-progress" and will be continuously updated as facts warrant.
But one influential Liberal MP, Irwin Cotler, also denounced yesterday's failure to name Hezbollah as "unconscionable."
Cotler said the solicitor-general indicated to him "they were moving in that direction."
But the Mount Royal MP remained critical of the delay, saying the file on Hezbollah "is so comprehensive and so compelling that the failure to name them remains inexplicable."
Fundraising for Hezbollah's military wing is already prohibited in Canada under federal financial regulations that incorporate a broader United Nations list.
"So it is, in fact, listed," Easter said.
He denounced as "shocking" Day's suggestion the government had "political reasons" for not putting Hezbollah on the list.
Government officials contend there is a distinct difference between Hezbollah's social-political wing, which has elected members to Lebanon's legislature and does social work in the country's southern region, and its military wing.
That branch has been blamed for terrorist attacks in its fight against Israel's former occupation of Lebanon.
Last month, Prime Minister Jean Chretien was criticized for being oblivious, during a francophone summit in Beirut, to the presence of the head of Hezbollah, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah.
LOAD-DATE: November 28, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 31 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. A17
LENGTH: 414 words
HEADLINE: MPs back motion to indict Zimbabwe's Mugabe
BYLINE: Graham Fraser, Toronto Star
BODY:
Members of Parliament from three parties announced yesterday they are
supporting a move to indict Zimbabwe's president, Robert Mugabe, for crimes
against humanity.
Canadian Alliance MP Keith Martin has given notice of motion to the Commons foreign affairs committee to urge the Canadian government to make such an indictment, and he was supported yesterday by Liberal MP Irwin Cotler and - with qualifications - by Bloc Quebecois MP Yves Rocheleau.
"We have that indictment in hand today, and we will exercise that indictment against Mr. Mugabe if he sets foot in Canada," Martin said. "It will send a very clear message internationally that Canada is prepared to stand up and prosecute this individual ... for crimes against humanity within the context of our legal system."
He said that he hoped this would encourage other countries to do the same.
Cotler, who is an expert in international human rights law, noted that Mugabe could not be indicted by the International Criminal Court, because Zimbabwe is not a signatory to the international treaty that created the world court.
But Canada has passed war crimes and crimes against humanity legislation.
"When we enacted it, we stated that this legislation is an implementation of our obligations under the International Criminal Court treaty to bring perpetrators of international crimes to justice," Cotler said.
Similar legislation by Spain was used in an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to prosecute former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet.
Martin said that Mugabe was guilty of crimes against humanity, extermination, enforced disappearance, torture, imprisonment and persecution.
"The World Food Program has said by December, 2003, 51/2million Zimbabweans will be needing food aid."
"This is a direct result of Mr. Mugabe's efforts to use food as a weapon, to prevent his people from planting, and to deprive them of the land they require to plant and grow food."
Cotler said that Zimbabwe, as a society is at serious risk because of the convergence of the pandemic of AIDS, the politics of famine, endemic poverty, repressive government, massive violation of human rights and the pillaging of resources.
"President Robert Mugabe is responsible for the perpetration of crimes against humanity, including state orchestrated murder, torture and massive sexual violence," he said. "In a country like Zimbabwe, which is ravaged by the AIDS pandemic, this is a virtual death sentence for women."
LOAD-DATE: October 9, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 32 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Opinion Pages; Pg. A9
LENGTH: 718 words
HEADLINE: LIBERALS' IDEAS ON TERROR GROUPS 'DISGUSTING'
BYLINE: RORY LEISHMAN, LONDON FREELANCE WRITER
BODY:
What will it take to persuade the Jean Chretien Liberals to get serious about the war on international terrorism? When will they finally get around to placing a total ban on Canadian support for Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah?
In a commendably forthright statement in the Commons on Thursday, Liberal MP Irwin Cotler pointed out that these three terrorist networks share a common purpose: "Each seeks, by its own acknowledgment and assertion, the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews everywhere. Each partakes of a culture of incitement, the teaching of contempt and the demonizing of the Jew, that is the most proximate cause of terror in the Middle East and beyond."
Cotler also pointed out that the Canadian Security Intelligence Service has established that each of these terrorist organizations operates in Canada.
"Astonishingly enough," he concluded, "none has yet to be named to Canada's list of terrorist entities, while the political wing of Hezbollah terror is sanitized. It is past time for Canada to do the right thing, to name terrorist networks as terrorist entities, as mandated by our undertakings under UN Security Council resolutions and domestic law."
Cotler is a distinguished former professor of law at McGill University who is knowledgeable about the Middle East. Other conscientious Liberal MPs should join with him and like-minded members of the opposition who are pressing the government to ban all support for manifestly terrorist organizations within Canada.
As for Hezbollah, the Chretien government has cut off funding for its military arm, but still allows donations to its political and humanitarian operations. Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham explains: "We don't believe it would be appropriate to label as terrorists innocent doctors, teachers and other people who are seeking to do charitable and other good works in their communities."
What poppycock. By this reasoning, the Mackenzie King Liberals should have cut off support for Hitler's storm troopers in the 1930s, while allowing Nazi sympathizers to go on making donations to the Nazi Party in the hope some of the funds might be used to help German youngsters enjoy healthy outdoor exercise with the Hitler Youth.
Hezbollah is not a peace-loving organization. In a recent two-part series in The New Yorker, Jeffrey Goldberg has characterized this self-styled Party of Allah as, "the most successful terrorist organization in modern history."
Likewise, Richard Armitage, Deputy Secretary of the U.S. State Department, recently denounced Hezbollah as the "A-team" of terrorism and al-Qaida as the "B-team."
Hezbollah has been implicated in numerous terrorist attacks over the last 20 years, including the 1994 bombing of a Jewish Community Centre in Buenos Aires, Argentina, that killed 29 altogether innocent civilians. Yet Graham insists: "Our policy on Hezbollah is clear. We condemn its military wing as terrorists and we engage in dialogue with those with whom we wish to gain peace."
Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah is the secretary general of Hezbollah as a whole. He is hell bent on destroying Israel. He has no interest in peaceful dialogue with Graham or anyone else. He made that clear in a speech in Tehran last year, when he declaimed: "If some want to make use of the Intefadeh to strengthen their positions on the negotiating table, I say to them you are committing a big mistake. Our (Arab) nation has now a historic opportunity to wipe out the cancerous Israeli project."
After two murder bombers affiliated with Islamic Jihad blew up a civilian bus within Israel on Oct. 21, killing 16 people and severely wounding five others, including a two-year-old girl, Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat affirmed in a statement that the Palestinian leadership, "is opposed to attacks against Palestinian and Israeli civilians. We reject such attacks against civilians."
In shocking contrast, Nasrallah lauded the atrocity. Despite the fact the murder bombing had occurred well within the 1948 borders of Israel, he said: "The martyrdom operation that happened yesterday in occupied Palestine is clear proof that the Palestinian people will not be defeated."
That Graham hopes to conduct a peaceful dialogue with such a terrorist is not just naive: It's disgusting.
NOTES:
Rory Leishman is a freelance writer based in London. His column appears
Tuesdays.
LOAD-DATE: November 12, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 34 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(4) Ja 23'03 pg 5; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5541924
LENGTH: 887 words
HEADLINE: Ceremony marks first annual Wallenberg day
BYLINE: Csillag, Ron
BODY:
Swedish war hero Raoul Wallenberg, whose fate remains a mystery, has
bequeathed a legacy of human rights and the need to bear witness to the
horrors of the Holocaust, says a member of Parliament and Wallenberg
expert.
Wallenberg, who is credited with rescuing 100,000 Hungarian Jews from the Nazis - ''more than any single government - was the embodiment of the Talmudic idiom that he who saves one life is as though he saved an entire universe,'' Liberal MP Irwin Cotler told a gathering in Toronto last week held to mark the inaugural Raoul Wallenberg Day.
Last June, Parliament proclaimed Jan. 17 - the anniversary of Wallenberg's disappearance - as Raoul Wallenberg Day to commemorate and pay tribute to the Swedish diplomat's daring and bravery in Budapest in the latter half of 1944.
In 1985, Wallenberg was named Canada's first honorary citizen.
The scion of a wealthy Swedish banking and industrial family, Wallenberg, a non-Jew, was dispatched to the Hungarian capital by the U.S. War Refugee Board to rescue as many Jews as he could.
He worked feverishly to spirit more than 30,000 Jews to 32 ''safe houses'' in Budapest, which flew the neutral Swedish flag, and to crank out thousands of false passports, called ''Schutzpasses,'' which placed their bearers under the protection of Sweden.
He also persuaded the Nazis to call of their destruction of Budapest's Jewish ghetto, with its 70,000 inhabitants.
Known for his bluff and bluster, Wallenberg would literally yank people out of death marches and lines for Auschwitz-bound trains to issue them the fake passports.
But the invading Red Army took Wallenberg into ''protective custody'' on Jan. 17, 1945, thus beginning one of the most enduring mysteries of the 20th century. He was never seen again, save for alleged sightings by former prisoners of the Soviet gulag, and became the subject of several high-level investigations.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
Despite plenty of evidence to the contrary, the Soviets stuck to the same story for decades: that Wallenberg died of a heart attack in 1947 while in prison.
Cotler, who headed a commission of inquiry into Wallenberg's fate and whereabouts in the late 1980s, said the Swded must be considered ''disappeared, not deceased.''
Cotler's 1,200-page report, delivered in 1990 after years of research and interviews with dozens of witnesses, concluded there was ''compelling'' evidence that Wallenberg was alive during the '50s and '60s, and ''credible'' evidence he lived into the '70s and perhaps as late as 1981.
In 1991, Sweden and Russia announced they would conduct a joint inquiry into Wallenberg's fate. Their reports, delivered separately two years ago, conflicted.
The Swedes cited evidence that Wallenberg may have died in a psychiatric facility as late as 1989, but that in the absence of hard evidence, he must be considered a missing person.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
The Russian report stuck to the same line: That Wallenberg died in Soviet custody in 1947. Moscow said any further inquiry was pointless.
(However, only a month earlier, the Kremlin acknowledged for the first time that Wallenberg and his driver had been arrested as ''socially dangerous'' individuals, and said that Wallenberg had been shot in 1947 as an American spy.)
In 1998, another Canadian, Winnipeg-based human rights lawyer David Matas, released the findings of his own research, which charged the Soviets and Russians with conducting a massive coverup on the file.
Cotler said last week the evidence that Wallenberg did not die in 1947 is ''incontrovertible,'' and that the ''smoking gun'' in the case is still locked in secret KGB archives.
Also on hand at last week's commemoration were the consuls general of Sweden, Hungary and Israel, who brought greetings, and Yvonne Singer, a York University art teacher who found out in 1979 that Wallenberg was her godfather.
Singer recounted that her mother gave birth to her in Wallenberg's own bed because Budapest's hospitals were under siege. In gratitude, he agreed to be Singer's godfather.
Meantime, Wallenberg offers many lessons for today, Cotler told about 250 people at the program, held by UJA Federation's Holocaust Centre of Toronto.
''He showed us it is possible to confront, resist and unmask evil, and to overcome it. It's a call to bear witness.''
Quoting Elie Wiesel - that neutrality equals siding with the victimizer - Cotler warned of the dangers of turning away.
''Averting our eyes to evil is to become an accomplice to evil, which is to acquiesce to evil, which is complicity in evil.''
He slammed an ''indifferent and callous'' international community for ''waffling'' on mass murders in the Balkans, and the ''only too preventable'' genocide in Rwanda. ''This resulted in our being accomplices.''
Part of Wallenberg's legacy is ''the moral and juridical imperative'' to expose evil, Cotler said.
He also warned of ''new, global trafficking in hate and state-sanctioned anti-Semitism, the likes of which have not been seen since the end of World War II.''
As for Wallenberg, ''I'm not saying he's alive. I'm only saying that based on the evidence, the fairest thing to say, morally and legally, is that he remains the lost hero of the Holocaust.''
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: September 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 36 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Pg. 24
LENGTH: 3116 words
HEADLINE: THE REFUGEES' CHOICE?
BYLINE: Isabel Kershner
BODY:
The Refugees' Choice?
Critics accuse UNRWA of perpetuating the Palestinian refugee problem and abetting terror. Israeli officials say everyone would be much worse off without it. Has the 50-year-old mission gone right or wrong?
Isabel Kershner
THE VANISHED BUILDINGS of the now-notorious 200 square meters at the center of the Jenin refugee camp, flattened to rubble by Israeli bulldozers at the end of a tough battle in April against dozens of Palestinian gunmen of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the Fatah Tanzim, are set to rise again. Any day now Peter Hansen, the commissioner general of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), will sign an agreement with the United Arab Emirates Red Crescent Society for $ 30 million in emergency aid to rebuild the 100 or so destroyed homes.
Along with UNRWA's obvious obligation to help the largely hapless refugee families who lost their decades-old "temporary dwellings," there's a double irony in the fact that the agency is busy with the reconstruction in the area Israeli officials have described as a "hornet's nest" of terror. For the U.N.-mandated agency, which has provided humanitarian aid to Palestinian refugees in the Near East for the past 52 years, primarily in the areas of education, health and social services, has been placed under unprecedented scrutiny of late.
Its critics in Israel, in Jewish and Zionist organizations and among an increasing number of lawmakers abroad, argue that UNRWA perpetuates the Palestinian refugee problem by maintaining a "camp culture" and feeding refugees' expectation that one day they may return to their original homes. And they ask, incredulously, how civilian camps such as Jenin, which are being serviced by the agency, could have turned into nests of militancy and launching pads for terror under the nose of UNRWA's vast staff and without so much as a squeak from the U.N.
Irwin Cotler, a Canadian Jewish member of parliament and professor of international human rights law, has long had qualms about whether UNRWA hasn't become "part of the problem rather than the solution." Now, he tells The Jerusalem Report during a recent visit to Jerusalem, "the emerging allegations appear to suggest that UNRWA allows the camps to be used as a sanctuary for terror and for incitement."
Among other things, Cotler points to phenomena such as the "glorification of suicide martyrs as poster boys" in the schools and giving armed elements free rein of the camps. Those, he says, are clear violations of the U.N.'s own conventions regarding both the need to maintain the civilian nature of refugee camps and counterterrorism. The Security Council's 12-point anti-terror convention of last year, he notes, requires all U.N. parties to report back any relevant information.
UNRWA, he goes on, "has neither done anything to prevent, nor has reported any of the above. So one begins to infer that it may be complicit in incitement and terror."
Among Cotler's file of documents, Security Council resolutions and press cuttings about UNRWA is the letter sent to Secretary General Kofi Annan by U.S. Rep. Tom Lantos, ranking Democratic member of the House International Relations Committee in May.
According to David Bedein, head of the Jerusalem-based Israel Resource News Agency and an anti-Olso lobbyist who has been researching UNRWA operations for the past 15 years, these letters constitute the first serious challenge to the agency's mandate since 1958. Then, Israeli ambassador Abba Eban made a statement at the U.N. on the Arab refugees in which he argued that the problem had been "artificially maintained for political motives against all the economic, social and cultural forces which, had they been allowed free play, would have brought about a solution."
Bedein and other lobbyists now hope that questions about UNRWA will be raised not only in Washington and Ottawa, but in every European capital as well.
Lantos's May 2002 letter echoes something of Eban's frustration. As well as addressing the "ongoing exploitation for terrorist purposes of Palestinian refugee camps administered by UNRWA," he also voices his "deep concern that UNRWA is perpetuating, rather than ameliorating, the situation of Palestinian refugees."
The Jenin camp alone, he notes, produced 23 suicide bombers that killed 57 Israelis. He cites a Security Council resolution that calls upon the secretary general to report to the Security Council situations where "camps are vulnerable to infiltration by armed elements." And he cites Kofi Annan's own report to the Council of April 1998 concerning violence in Africa, when the secretary general urged that refugee camps "be kept free of any military presence or equipment, including arms and ammunition."
Lantos states that he is "frankly baffled as to why, more than 50 years after the founding of the State of Israel, there continues to exist a U.N. agency focused solely on Palestinian refugees," while all other refugee situations have been adopted by the U.N. High Commission for Refugees.
The Lantos letter came in the wake of lobbying by Avi Beker, secretary general of the World Jewish Congress and by the America Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the main Israel lobby in Washington. The battle in Jenin, and the extent of the terrorist infrastructure revealed in the camps by Israel's Operation Defensive Shield last spring, acted as the catalyst.
Although Israel has been taking a back seat in the campaign, Alan Baker, the Foreign Ministry's legal adviser, reportedly raised similar concerns to Lantos's with U.S. officials and members of Congress during a visit to Washington in June.
The Lantos letter contained a number of inaccuracies. It stated that UNRWA's mandate was up for renewal on June 30, though in fact it had been renewed last December through to June 2005. And it repeated AIPAC's figure of 23 suicide bombers from the Jenin camp. UNRWA officials counter that the 23 came from the Jenin governerate, which includes the camp, the town and the surrounding villages. The Israeli government speaks of 23 suicide bombers "from Jenin."
Nevertheless, with Lantos pressing for hearings in the House committee and with the allocation of U.S. funding to UNRWA coming up for annual approval, possibly in September, the stirrings in Congress are certainly not being dismissed. Senior UNRWA officials are concerned that funding could be cut or made conditional. UNRWA receives between a quarter and a third of its annual budget - which stood at $ 310 million in 2001 - from the U.S.
Annan's reply to Lantos explains that "the United Nations has no responsibility for security matters in refugee camps, or indeed anywhere else in the occupied territory." Rather, since the Oslo agreements, that responsibility lies with Israel or the Palestinian Authority. Of the 27 camps in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, 20 sit in PA-controlled areas, and 7 in areas where Israel has overall security control.
Annan says the U.N. has frequently called on the PA to do more to fight terror. Furthermore, alarmed by the human toll on both sides, he writes, he suggested in April that an armed multinational force be established in the area - something that Israel would vehemently oppose.
Hansen, in his clarifications attached to Annan's letter, stresses that UNRWA, a humanitarian organization, has no mandate to administer or police the camps, and as such has no "police force, no intelligenceapparatus and no mandate to report on political and military activities."
And he takes strong issue with charges that UNRWA creates dependency. In normal times, he writes, only 5.7 percent of the refugees receive food or other direct assistance from the agency. And UNRWA has awarded over 49,000 loans to budding refugee entrepreneurs over the past 10 years, amounting to over $ 69 million. Today, less than one-third of the 3.9 million Palestinian UNRWA-registered refugees live in the camps around the Middle East, though all are entitled to use UNRWA's facilities.
UNRWA was established by the U.N. General Assembly in 1949 with a temporary mandate to provide basic humanitarian and social services to the refugees until a political solution could be found. Under UNRWA's operational definition, Palestinian refugees are people whose normal place of residence was Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948, who lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. Their descendants are also classed as refugees, and as such, the register has grown from 914,000 refugees in 1950 to close to 4 million.
There are 59 recognized refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank and Gaza. In Jordan, the government extended citizenship to all refugees in the country, who now number over 1.6 million. In the West Bank and Gaza, over 600,000 of the 1.5 million refugees live in camps.
The UNRWA tents of the early 1950s turned into cement-block dwellings. Some have now grown into rickety-looking three-story homes. With the arrival of the PA in the mid-1990s, Paltel, the Palestinian telecommunications company, introduced phone lines into the West Bank and Gaza camps for the first time. Foreign donor aid was used to modernize sewage systems.
UNRWA schools have a reputation for excellence. The UNRWA mandate stipulates that its schools teach the same curriculum as ordinary schools in the "host" areas or countries, so students can qualify to go on to university. UNRWA says it provides extracurricular enrichment that "focuses on peace education, human rights, tolerance and conflict resolution."
Along with its international staff, UNRWA employs some 18,000 Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, making it the largest employer in the field after the PA.
ALL OF WHICH begs the question why many suicide bombers did come out of the Jenin camp - and why terrorists and armed militiamen have been able to turn other West Bank and Gaza camps into refuges of their own, where PA police often fear to tread.
Cotler acknowledges that UNRWA "may not be wrong in ascribing responsibility to the host countries." But it cannot exonerate itself, he says, as an agency of the U.N., which has set forth principles of conduct in its Security Council resolutions. All this, he fumes, is "taking place on UNRWA's watch. They may have no police, but they have a responsibility to report to the U.N. that 'we are unable to implement the mandate to which we are charged, or to fulfill international humanitarian law.' Instead," Cotler asserts, UNRWA is displaying a "willful blindness to what's going on. And that's being charitable, because this appears to be complicity."
UNRWA's Deputy Commissioner General Karen AbuZayd pleads innocent. "We just don't see anything like this," she tells The Report, speaking from UNRWA headquarters in Gaza. "These things are not visible to us." She says her staff files daily reports on events in the camps to the security office in New York - about a bomb that goes off here, or a casualty there - but what the security office does with that information she doesn't know.
What AbuZayd does know is that UNRWA staffers are operating within a very grim reality. Expelling armed men from the camps would be "difficult in this region," she says, with obvious understatement, though they are not allowed in the clinics and schools. When it comes to the posters and shrines to the suicide bombers that TV cameras have shown in the schools, she says, "We have to take the safety of our staff into account too. If we were to ask our staff to do certain things, we realize that would get them into big trouble. And if they didn't do them, would we take action against them?" As things stand, the local staff is not required to report on such activities.
She adds that U.N. resolutions about keeping armed elements out of the camps, haven't been applied elsewhere. "Think of the Somali or Afghan camps. People just look the other way." And here, she says, everything is "upside down. The refugees are the armed elements."
UNRWA did complain to the PA once when its police tried to use a school in Gaza after hours for meetings. "The PA police are not allowed in our facilities," she says.
In Minister Dani Naveh's March 2002 special report for the Israeli government on "Inciting and Educating Children Towards Hate, Anti-Semitism, and Violence in the Palestinian Authority," there is one documented case from July 2001 where Saheil Alhinadi, an UNRWA teachers' representative, praised suicide bombers at a Hamas rally at the Jabalya camp in Gaza. AbuZayd says this case was only recently brought to the agency's attention by AIPAC, and that UNRWA is investigating. According to AbuZayd, the agency still lacks evidence. For now, Alhinadi remains on staff.
But AbuZayd suggests that it is ridiculous to blame UNRWA for all the ills in the camps. Incitement, she argues, comes principally from TV and the mosque sermons that all Palestinians are exposed to.
"We certainly do our best. If we weren't there, things would be much, much worse. The children would not have access to the extracurricular activities we provide. It would be dreadful to think."
Surprisingly, perhaps, Israeli officials agree. Diplomatic sources in Jerusalem say that "so long as UNRWA is here, Israel supports its mandate, its work and its goals. It is very important, specifically at this time, to have assistance for the Palestinian refugees whose situation is very difficult."
Still, Israel has complaints about the agency at the operational level, and protests against what it sees as an increasingly anti-Israeli flavor in the statements Peter Hansen has been making to the press. After the Jenin battle, sources say, he was quoted in the Scandinavian press accusing Israel of having carried out a "massacre." Moreover, Israeli diplomats say, in its annual reports to the General Assembly, UNRWA consistently ignores the fact that the camps are breeding grounds for terror and that the PA police do nothing to stop it.
Officials admit there is sometimes a problem providing UNRWA with evidence of claims against the organization's staff because much of it is classified. But they add that when they have offered material, the UNRWA staffers don't always want it.
Israeli diplomats feel that UNRWA, which has a budget problem, is "demonizing" Israel to garner donor sympathy. "We don't want countries not to donate," they say, "but it shouldn't be at our expense."
Israel seems to have little interest in Congress cutting UNRWA funds. "If UNRWA wasn't doing what it does, Israel would be in a worse situation, and the refugees would be worse off too," says an official in Jerusalem. "We agree with a lot of what Lantos wrote," he goes on. "On the one hand, we want to see reform in UNRWA. But we don't want the baby thrown out with the bath water. We have no interest in harming UNRWA's ability to work."
To Israeli anti-UNRWA campaigner David Bedein, that smacks of expediency over morality. Israel, he states cynically, has benefited for years from cheap labor, with workers subsidized by UNRWA willing to work for a third of the normal rate.
A Lantos staffer told The Report from Washington that the questioning of UNRWA is ongoing. "We are interested in holding hearings on the subject. Many questions remain unanswered," he went on. "The purpose of UNRWA in the camps, particularly in the Palestinian territories, is still something we want to look into."
It is still too early to say whether Lantos will seek a reduction in funding to UNRWA, or for funds to be made conditional, "but I wouldn't rule it out," said the staffer. Asked about Israel's desire to see UNRWA's work continue unhindered, the staffer said, "We're aware of that. That's why we aren't jumping to conclusions."
Nevertheless, on the international agenda for the first time is the very question of UNRWA's continued existence. Many critics argue that the Palestinian refugees should come under the aegis of the UNHCR, established in 1951 initially to deal with European refugees of World War II. Diplomatic sources in Jerusalem call that "a whole other discussion" - one they don't seem overeager to engage in right now.
Some experts argue that Israel would be better off with the UNHCR, whose mandate is more oriented toward finding permanent solutions for refugees than pure maintenance. UNHCR aspires to offer refugees three options: resettlement in host countries, relocation to a third country or repatriation. UNRWA officials argue that in the Palestinian case, these options have not so far applied with the first two rejected by the refugees, and the third by Israel.
Some experts also argue that under the UNHCR terms of refugee status, the number of Palestinian refugees would significantly drop, since those living within PA areas, or those with Jordanian citizenship would be considered "resettled."
But Karen AbuZayd, who came to UNRWA after years at UNHCR, says nothing would change in the Palestinians' refugee status. On the contrary, she says, the numbers could even rise as the UNHCR doesn't have as strict a definition as UNRWA regarding the 1946-1948 place of residence. All refugees' children are refugees, she adds. Ironically, AbuZayd arrived in Gaza in August 2000 because her bosses thought that her UNHCR-acquired expertise in permanent settlement for refugees would be needed as the Israeli-Palestinian peace process progressed. "Now I'm doing emergency relief," she remarks wryly.
Whether the Palestinians fall under the aegis of UNRWA or the UNHCR, she says, there has to be a political solution to the root cause of the refugee problem before there can be moves to implement resettlement. The refugees in Jordan, she says, "have in a sense opted temporarily for local resettlement," by taking citizenship. And if local resettlement basically means becoming self-sufficient, then the majority of Palestinian refugees would fall in that category, she says. But eventually, once the root problem is solved, those refugees should have the choice, she suggests, whether to remain with local integration, or, say, to go to Canada.
Officials in Jerusalem, for their part, are split on whether it would be best to stick with UNRWA or opt for UNHCR, seeing advantages and disadvantages in both.
In the meantime, UNRWA will work to rebuild the destroyed houses of the Jenin camp. A roomier piece of land adjacent to the camp had been offered, says AbuZayd, but the refugees turned it down.
"Their families didn't want to move out of the camp," she says. For them, at least until further notice, it has become home.
LOAD-DATE: September 24, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 37 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. A10
LENGTH: 648 words
HEADLINE: Canada backs trial for Saddam
BYLINE: Tonda MacCharles, Toronto Star
HIGHLIGHT:
'Would welcome' U.N. prosecution Charges might speed ouster, MP says
BODY:
Canada will support calls for a special United Nations international criminal tribunal against Saddam Hussein to indict the Iraqi leader for war crimes, Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham said yesterday.
"We want to be active and make sure that we act within the traditions of this House and of Canada in ensuring that international criminal conduct is punished by international criminal courts," Graham said.
"I assure all members of the House that we will be acting in that respect."
The idea of a U.N.-sanctioned prosecution of Saddam is still in the planning stages, with most of the U.N.'s focus right now on the emerging humanitarian crisis in Iraq.
But it is receiving strong backing from the government even as the Liberals try to distance themselves from the American aim of forcibly ousting the Iraqi president.
"We would welcome the efforts to prosecute Saddam Hussein and other main regime members who would responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes," said Isabelle Savard, an aide to Graham.
"At this time, we're supportive of the efforts, but there is no procedural decision on exactly how that would be done."
Liberal MP Irwin Cotler (Mount Royal), an international lawyer, suggested a war crimes indictment against Saddam could be a way to hasten a "regime change" in Iraq, not by force, but through moral suasion of its population.
Another Liberal cabinet minister, Stephen Owen, said it might also be "an issue around which the Security Council could demonstrate unity."
Graham told the Commons the Liberal government had agreed to an all-party motion brought by the Canadian Alliance that calls on Canada to pursue the Iraqi leader for war crimes - though, in fact, the wording of such a motion was still under review.
A spokesperson for Prime Minister Jean Chretien said yesterday Canada believes "crimes against humanity must not go unpunished."
"Canada has been a leader in the past in establishing accountability mechanisms such as the Rwanda and Yugoslavia (war crimes) tribunals, the Sierra Leone special court, and the International Criminal Court that is now chaired by a Canadian lawyer," said Stephen Hogue, deputy PMO communications director. "And we will take an active role again this time."
Cotler said Canada should go further than simply endorsing the idea of prosecuting Saddam, and should draft or sponsor the resolution for the U.N. Security Council to consider.
"I think it's important that we take certain steps to make it clear we're not neutral or indifferent in terms of understanding who Saddam Hussein and his regime is - they are the personification of evil.
"He's committed more Nuremberg-type war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide than any other leader."
It would also show the United States that Canada supports an American victory in the war, Cotler said.
He said the establishment of an international criminal tribunal could undermine Saddam in the eyes of his fellow citizens, and bring about "regime change not by the use of force, but by ... morally symbolic and substantive initiative," as it did in the case of former Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosevic.
Owen, also an international lawyer, noted a special U.N. criminal tribunal against Saddam could be empowered to retroactively prosecute alleged war crimes, while the International Criminal Court is not. Furthermore, the international court will not be up and running until July.
In another development, Prime Minister Jean Chretien confirmed a report in yesterday's Star that the Canadian government would provide an extra $100 million in humanitarian assistance for Iraq.
The money is intended to provide access to clean water, proper sanitation, food, shelter and primary health care, and comes on top of $5.6 million already committed to emergency humanitarian measures for Iraq.War crimes
LOAD-DATE: March 27, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 39 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: F 25'02
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5316184
LENGTH: 398 words
HEADLINE: Canadian Falun Gong practitioner returns to Montreal after imprisonment
BODY:
MONTREAL (CP) Shenli Lin was met Monday with a huge hug and an enormous
smile from the wife he hadn't seen for two years while he was detained in
China for practising Falun Gong.
Lin, a Canadian accountant of Chinese origin, looked overjoyed as he was embraced by his wife Jinyu Li following his lengthy flight from China.
During his two years in a labour camp near Shanghai, Lin was denied a trial, visitors and letters from his wife. He was also threatened with life imprisonment before finally being released.
''I'm so happy to be able to be here, to finally obtain freedom,'' Lin said through interpreter Lucy Zhou.
''However, I'm just one of tens of thousands of Falun Gong practitioners who have been jailed and tortured and they need help and support. We need to end this brutal persecution.''
Li, a Canadian citizen, last saw her husband for five minutes on Dec. 26, 1999 when he was allowed to stop at home on his way from the Shanghai police station to prison.
Several dozen Falun Gong supporters were on hand Monday for Lin's arrival. His release was due in part to efforts by the federal government, including Montreal MP Irwin Cotler, and Amnesty International.
The Beijing government says Falun Gong is a cult and blames it for more than 1,600 deaths, mostly followers it claims were driven insane or to murder, or encouraged to use meditation instead of medicine to treat illness.
Falun Gong accuses Chinese authorities of torturing and mistreating detainees. It says 370 have been killed and 20,000 detained in labour camps.
Cotler said Lin's case is a dramatic example of how China is shirking its obligations to human-rights conventions it has signed.
''While we're delighted with his release and reunification we should appreciate that he should never have been arrested and detained in the first place,'' Cotler said.
Cotler said there has been a dramatic increase in the persecution of practitioners of Falun Gong.
He said China uses propaganda to demonize practitioners in the eyes of their fellow citizens.
Li staged an Ottawa vigil, handed out petitions and sent letters to Prime Minister Jean Chretien in an effort to have her husband freed.
Supporters on hand at the airport reunion Monday called for greater international pressure on China to release the other detainees.
(CP-Montreal Gazette)
JOURNAL-CODE: 1418
LOAD-DATE: July 26, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 41 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (684) Ap 28'03; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5604456
LENGTH: 100 words
HEADLINE: MPs' and Senators' Birthdays (Record in progress)
BODY:*Liberal MP Charles Caccia, 73, April 28, 1930
*Canadian Alliance Leader Stephen Harper, 44, April 30, 1959
*Liberal MP Jim Karygiannis, 48, May 2, 1955
*Ind. Liberal MP Jean-Guy Carignan, 62, May 3, 1941
*Liberal MP Gar Knutson, 47, May 4, 1956
*International Cooperation Minister Susan Whelan, 40, May 5, 1963
*Alliance MP Diane Ablonczy, 54, May 6, 1949
*Liberal Sen. Maria Chaput, 61, May 7, 1942
*Liberal MP Irwin Cotler, 63, May 8, 1940
*Alliance MP Gary Lunn, 46, May 8, 1957
*Liberal Sen. George Furey, 55, May 12, 1948
*Liberal Sen. Bill Rompkey, 67, May 13, 1936
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: November 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 42 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(1) Ja 2'03 pg 1,20; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5535084
LENGTH: 701 words
HEADLINE: Cotler defends Egyptian activist: Saad Ibrahim facing 'trumped-up charges'
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
On Tuesday, Jan. 7, human rights advocates around the world will turn their
attention to Cairo where Egypt's Cour de Cassation, an appellate court
that also sits as a court of first instance, will hear evidence in a case
that has become an international cause celebre.
Pro-democracy advocate Saad Eddin Ibrahim will be in the dock, facing a host of ''trumped-up charges'' his Canadian lawyer says are a clumsy attempt by the Egyptian government to silence a fragile pro-democracy movement.
Mount Royal Liberal MP and human rights lawyer Irwin Cotler visited Ibrahim in Cairo recently and came away impressed with the Egyptian sociologist's ''moral courage'' and perseverance, even though he is in poor health and has spent much of the last 18 months years in jail.
The Jan. 7 trial will be Ibrahim's third since he was arrested in September 2000, but the first in a court in which he can expect a fair hearing based solely on the evidence, Cotler said. Earlier trials were held in the State Security Court, and on one occasion, he was convicted after the court deliberated for only 20 minutes and was sentenced to seven years hard labour. It was a decision of the Cour de Cassation that overturned his earlier convictions and ordered a new trial. He was released in early December pending the new trial.
Ibrahim, 64, is director and chair of the Board of Trustees of the Ibn Khaldun Centre for Development Studies, a Cairo-based research institute he founded in 1988. He is internationally recognized for the study of applied social sciences in Egypt and is a senior advisor to numerous international non-governmental organizations.
In June 2000, Ibrahim and 27 colleagues were arrested for training fellow Egyptians in voter registration and election monitoring. They were held 45 days without charge and the case was referred to the State Security Court after Ibrahim announced he intended to proceed with election monitoring despite his arrest.
Ibrahim was charged on a four-count indictment: conspiring to bribe public officials, receiving grant funds from the European Commission (EC) without permission, disseminating false information and malicious rumours to foreign organizations, and attempting to defraud the EC.
Cotler, who prepared much of the defence's legal briefs, said the case against Ibrahim was a sham from the start and was marked by ''one absurdity after another.''
Not only were international procedural norms of justice ignored, but the charges are without merit, Cotler said. ''There is absolutely not a shred of evidence of any of these charges,'' he said, adding that the law used against Ibrahim is also unconstitutional.
Cotler, who has defended former political prisoners such as Natan Sharansky, Andrei Sakharov and Nelson Mandela, believes Ibrahim has been persecuted for doing nothing more than advocating democracy. ''It's case of the old totalitarian mindset: give us the person and we'll find the crime.
''Ibrahim is a leader of the democracy movement and human rights in the Arab world,'' Cotler said, adding that his influence led the Egyptian Organization for Human Rights, an organization Ibrahim founded, to publicly denounce Horseman Without A Horse, a recently aired Egyptian television series based on the Protocols of The Elders of Zion.
''I think that's an example of his courage,'' Cotler stated.
Ibrahim, who has visited Israel, has many supporters in the Jewish state and several Arab NGOs have rallied to his support, as have Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. The government of Canada has also taken an interest in the case and the Canadian ambassador to Egypt visited Ibrahim three times in prison. Earlier, 61 members of the U.S. Congress wrote to Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak protesting Ibrahim's conviction.
Cotler said the case may well ''strike a blow for the rule of law and the democratic movement... It will mean more democratic space for the budding and incipient human rights movement in Egypt.''
That could also prove important for the rest of the Arab world and even for the Arab-Israeli peace process, he added.
Mideast human rights case a cause celebre
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: September 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 44 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 3
LENGTH: 871 words
HEADLINE: 55 countries address the spread of a 'new anti-Semitism'
BYLINE: Richard Bernstein
SOURCE: The New York Times
DATELINE: VIENNA:
BODY:
In 1938, after Germany annexed Austria, Adolph Hitler spoke to cheering
multitudes on a balcony at the Royal Hofburg Palace in this city, a historical
fact that was much noted by participants in the first-ever, large-scale
international conference devoted exclusively to the subject of anti-Semitism.
The two-day meeting, which ended Friday at the palace where Hitler spoke, brought together the 55 member countries of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, including a delegation, led by former New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani, of members of Congress and Jewish leaders from the United States.
The overall theme of the meeting was that a new anti-Semitism is spreading in many regions of the world, spawned by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but drawing on many of the old anti-Jewish stereotypes that were supposed to have faded into insignificance years ago.
"We are witnessing an old-new, escalating, global and even lethal anti-Semitism," Irwin Cotler, a Canadian member of Parliament, said in a speech to delegates Friday. Its chief characteristic, Cotler and other delegates argued, is the singling out of Israel for an opprobrium and condemnation that applies to no other country in the world and that transforms the very notion of a Jewish homeland into a criminal offense.
"It is anti-Semitism under the banner of human rights at a time when human rights is the new secular religion," Cotler said. "Israel is characterized as the human rights violator of our time, so that it emerges as a new kind of anti-Christ."
For many participants, the fact that the meeting took place at all was itself of historical significance, because it puts the concern for rising incidents of violence against Jews and Jewish institutions in several European countries onto the international agenda.
In this sense, one of the most important events of the meeting came when the German ambassador to the organization, Dieter Boden, invited the delegates to hold another meeting on anti-Semitism in Berlin next year.
The conference comes after several years during which European countries in particular have experienced new waves of anti-Jewish attacks, many of them carried out against synagogues and cemeteries in France by young immigrants from North Africa.
The French government, in a move that was widely praised at the conference, passed new legislation giving greater powers to the police to crack down on hate crimes.
The conference was initially suggested by members of the Parliamentary Commission, a group of legislators from several countries, which submitted the proposal to the U.S. State Department. From that point, according to members of the American delegation, Secretary of State Colin Powell pressed the idea against considerable resistance from other OSCE member states, who argued that anti-Semitism should be taken up in more general meetings devoted to racism and discrimination, rather than made a separate, stand-alone subject.
"Plenty of people came in here kicking and screaming and with the idea that, 'O.K., we've done it,' rather than with the idea of really drawing some lessons," Andrew Baker, a member of the American delegation who is the director of international affairs for the American Jewish Committee in Washington, said as the meeting drew to a close Friday.
The conference consisted largely of statements by delegates and members of the many nongovernnmental organizations that were also present. There was almost no give and take, no debate and not even any authoritative presentation of the actual situation of Jews around the world, though individual delegations and organizations provided reports on incidents of anti-Semitism in specific countries, from Belgium to Romania.
There was thus no challenge to some specific ideas that, in another context, would probably have produced some dissenting views, including the idea that the anger around the world provoked by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict really is a new form of anti-Semitism. Indeed, that question has been heatedly debated in both Europe and the United States in recent months, with some, including some Jews, rejecting the notion that even very angry and virulent criticisms of Israel amount to anti-Semitism.
Another idea advanced by some delegates that would certainly provoke disagreement if it ever became actual policy by OSCE governments was that ways need to be found to control publications and Web sites that promote anti-Semitism.
Jacques Picard, a professor at the University of Basel, told the conferees that the ideas being expressed on Internet hate sites are imitations of old anti-Semitic notions but that "the Internet disseminates these ideas with the protection of anonymity." He continued, "Anonymity should be lifted."
If there was a single recommendation that seemed to gain widespread acceptance, it was that effective hate-crime legislation should be enacted in countries that do not have it yet, and that there should be a renewed commitment to enforcing that legislation.
"For too long we allowed a current of anti-Semitism to simmer in our societies," Gert Weisskirchen, a German member of Parliament, said. "Now is the time to act."
LOAD-DATE: June 22, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 45 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 485 words
HEADLINE: Criticism from human rights groups on Middle East conflict
ANCHORS: PETER MANSBRIDGE
BODY:
PETER MANSBRIDGE: The longer the Israeli offensive lasts, the louder the
criticism seems to get from human rights groups. Today they again demanded
Israel allow international observers into check on the situation. Jennifer
Ditchburn has that story.
CROWD: Human rights for Palestine
JENNIFER DITCHBURN (Reporter): These protesters are echoing a call that's gathering momentum in the international community.
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: We have very specific demands for the Canadian government and these are sending a delegation now to monitor the violations of human rights.
DITCHBURN: European nations, including France and Poland, and organizations like Amnesty International, want observers sent into monitor the violence. The United Nations seems poised to send in a mission.
MARY ROBINSON (US High Commissioner for Human Rights): Would it not be right for this commission to dispatch immediately a visiting mission that would travel to the area and return expeditiously to the commission with their findings and recommendations?
JOHN TACKABERRY (Amnesty International Canada): The concern of Amnesty International is that the space they're given be balanced.
DITCHBURN: Amnesty International wants observers, but says Israel and the Palestinian authority have to be open to the idea.
TACKABERRY: If it's going to work, it has to be based upon recognition of the desirability of this and the necessity of this and the rec..., that you can't run, as I indicated earlier, you can't run roughshod over human rights if you're going to going to build a strong peace.
DITCHBURN: But critics say that observers would have no affect on suicide bombers, and would be put in harm's way.
IRWIN COTLER (Quebec Liberal MP): There's no way that a group of observers are going to be able to do anything about suicide bombers. It's impossible, you know, to patrol that kind of frontier.
DITCHBURN: He also believes the Human Rights Commission has been biased against Israel in the past.
COTLER: In the longer run, we have to do something about this systemic institutional bias because what's at stake here, as I say, is the integrity of human rights and the integrity of the United Nations.
DITCHBURN: This human rights advocate says the situation has gone beyond the need for observers. Now peacekeepers are needed.
WARREN ALLMAND (President, Rights and Democracy): I'm not insisting on a UN, it should be an international, call it what you like, a peacekeeping force, some kind of force, international force that has the authority and the mandate to protect Palestinian and Israeli citizens from all kinds of attacks, military and terrorist.
DITCHBURN: The UN Human Rights Commissioner is scheduled to discuss the issue of a monitoring mission tomorrow. A government spokesperson said Canada would be at the table to evaluate the merits of the plan. Jennifer Ditchburn, CBC News, Ottawa.
LOAD-DATE: April 4, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 46 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: METRO; Sylvester Brown Jr. Column; Pg. C2
LENGTH: 620 words
HEADLINE: AT WHAT POINT DOES CRITICISM OF ISRAEL BECOME ANTI-SEMITISM?
BYLINE: Sylvester Brown Jr.
BODY:
Gene Carton has been my most persistent reader.
I've received e-mails from him after each column. Some are complimentary, others aren't. But none of my columns really touched the issue of utmost importance, he said, "the rise of anti-Semitism globally."
Carton wanted to discuss the matter. I kept putting him off. I hadn't noticed that anti-Semitic behavior was on the rise. Not locally at least. But who was I to discount his fears? After repeated invitations, we finally met a few weeks ago.
We had coffee in University City. For a guy in his mid-60s, Carton is in pretty good shape. He reminds me of actor Ted Danson, jacked up on caffeine. He speaks with a hushed urgency.
He told me Jews are stereotyped. "People perceive us as wealthy and owning all the media. With high numbers of unemployment, when times are hard, when people's houses are foreclosed, people blame Jews."
Carton added that blacks speak disparagingly of Jews. Michael Jackson used the term "Jew me" in one of his songs. Jesse Jackson referred to a Jewish neighborhood as "Hymie Town." Minister Louis Farrakhan called Judaism a "gutter religion."
"That's true, but it's old news, Gene," I said. How do those incidents indicate a rise in anti-Semitism?
The current situation in the Middle East will ultimately lead to worldwide anti-Semitism, Carton answered. Being anti-Israel is the same as being anti-Semitic. Anybody who's sympathetic to Palestinians should be considered anti-Israel. Carton said countries or groups supporting terrori sm in Israel hate Jews.
I left Gene thinking he was overreacting. I'm no expert on the conflict between Palestinians and Jews. But I do know the situation revolves around complex issue of land, historical grudges and religion.
But Carton's comments intrigued me. Do matters in Israel really affect how Jews are perceived worldwide?
Irwin Cotler, a renowned professor of law at McGill University in Canada, thinks so.
Speaking before hundreds at Washington University last month, Cotler said that violence in the Middle East has sparked a rise in anti-Semitism. Jews are now being blamed for "all evils of the world" - including the 9-11 attack in this country, he said. Cotler warned against "genocidal anti-Semitism" which he defined as the growing cry for the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews.
Last week's speech by the prime minister of Malaysia fueled those fears.
Malaysia's leader Mahathir Mohamad told a summit of Islamic countries that Jews "rule the world by proxy." He defended his comments by saying he had made a clear distinction between condemning Jewish people and the state of Israel.
So there's the question again. Does criticizing the policies of Israel make one anti-Semitic? Should Jews be blamed for the actions of the state?
Like I said these are complex issues. I called my friend Barry Leibman. He's one of the owners of Left Bank Books. Leibman's Jewish, and he's knowledgeable about world affairs.
"I'm critical of the policies in Israel. That doesn't make me anti-Semitic," he answered. "People are critical of the policies of the U.S. but that doesn't make them anti-American."
OK, I can buy that. But why is it becoming popular to associate all Jews with the Middle East conflict?
"It's just easy to do. It's easier to simplify everything. That's the danger," Leibman answered. "It takes courage to be more complex, to actually view things more than just the easiest way."
Even after investigating the matter a bit, it's difficult for me to discern when a criticism of Israel rises to the level of broad, sweeping anti-Semitism. I guess I'll have to stay up on the subject. My persistent reader, Gene Carton, would expect nothing less.
NOTES:
METRO PAGE 2; E-mail: [email protected]; Phone: 314-340-8374
LOAD-DATE: October 26, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 47 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(48) D 5'02; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5518886
LENGTH: 745 words
HEADLINE: Symposium seeks recognition of Jewish refugees from Arab lands (Record in progress)
BYLINE: Lazarus, David
BODY:
At a recent symposium on the Forgotten Exodus of Jews from Arab lands,
experts called for compensation for the 900,000 Jews displaced when Israel
was created and the exposure of the myth that Palestinians are the only
Mideast refugees.
''This is one of the most important initiatives we have ever done. We hope it will raise the consciousness of our own community and Canadians about the tragedy of those Jews who were expelled from their countries.'' Keith Landy, president of Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC), told The CJN
Following the symposium, CJC indicated it would co-operate with the efforts of a newly formed coalition, called Justice for Jews from Arab Countries (JJAC), based in New Jersey.
JJAC is working to document the losses suffered by Jews who were expelled from Arab countries in the 20th century, win redress for them and put the issue ''on the international political and judicial agenda.''
The group, whose supporters include the World Jewish Congress (WJC), the American Sephardi Federation and the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, also wants to raise public awareness on the issue.
Modelled after a symposium held in Paris about a year ago, the Montreal gathering drew an overflow crowd of 450 to the Gelber Conference Centre.
Some were refugees from Arab lands eager to hear of concrete progress being made on their behalf. Others, such as Iraqi-born Steve Acre, gave poignant accounts of the persecution and harassment Jews suffered in their native lands before finally finding safe haven in Canada. Iraq's once-thriving Jewish population of 135,000 is now largely gone.
About 600,000 of the 900,000 refugees, expelled or forced to leave their countries as Israel fought for independence and afterwards, ended up in the Jewish state.
And the centuries-old Jewish communities in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Yemen, Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco, were reduced to a shell of their former selves or were extinguished.
''My family lost all of its property,'' Acre said in an interview. ''This issue had to be brought to the forefront. Compensation should not be just for the Palestinians, but for us too.''
Recurrent themes emerged as the issue was addressed by some notable international experts.
Lawyer William Goldnadel of France, who is seeking legal avenues of redress, was joined by others, including MP and human rights lawyer Irwin Cotler, in puncturing the myth that Jews were ''protected'' in their native lands.
Goldnadel anticipated that a class-action lawsuit would be launched by a committee of former refugees, which could ultimately result in compensation for the hundreds of thousands whose properties and assets were confiscated when they were force to leave the countries they had called home for generations.
''The time for justice is at hand,'' he said.
Other experts, including French lawyer Arno Klarsfeld, stressed that the principle of ''reciprocity'' must apply for Jewish and Palestinian refugees and that the Jewish refugee issue must be a part of peace negotiations.
Cotler, who has agreed to serve as an honorary chair of JJAC, delineated several principles that should apply, among them the right to reparations and restitution, and the obligation to memory and truth.
Cotler said United Nations Resolution 242 referred to a ''just solution to the refugee problem,'' meaning all refugees created as a result of the birth of the State of Israel - Arabs and Jews.
Klarsfeld, son of the Nazi-hunting couple Serge and Beate Klarsfeld, said unlike Jewish refugees from Arab lands, only a ''tiny portion'' of Palestinian refugees were forced to leave the new Jewish state.
And while the Jewish state has acknowledged Palestinian suffering, no Palestinian has ever recognized the plight of Jews forced from their lands, he said.
Avi Beker, secretary general of the WJC, and others noted that the United Nations Relief Work Agency, which provides humanitarian aid at Palestinian refugee camps, has stood by as the camps became fertile breeding grounds for terrorism and helped to perpetuate the ''tragedy'' of the Palestinians.
The symposium appeared to give the Jewish refugee cause hope, although Jean Claude Niddam, an official of Israel's Justice Ministry, said that over the years, other groups, such as the WJC and WOJAC (the World Organization for Jews from Arab Lands) have had limited success in similar efforts.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: January 13, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 49 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(5) Ja 31'02 pg 1,17; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5300994
LENGTH: 963 words
HEADLINE: New group formed to fight anti-Semitism
BYLINE: Arnold, Janice
BODY:
MONTREAL -- Mount Royal MP Irwin Cotler is leading an effort to attract
prominent non-Jews to a new international body that will ''sound the
alarm'' over what he describes as ''an exploding new anti-Jewishness'' in
the world.
The International Commission to Combat Anti-Semitism held its founding meeting in early January in Jerusalem with Cotler, a longtime human rights lawyer, and Per Ahlmark, a former deputy prime minister of Sweden, agreeing to serve as its interim co-chairs. Ahlmark is also European co-chair of UN Watch, a group promoting the fair application of the UN Charter.
At a press conference announcing the commission's formation, Cotler said the new anti-Semitism hides behind denunciations of Israel and Zionism and is best defined as ''the discrimination against, or denial of, the national particularity and peoplehood'' of Jews.
''In other words, the singling out of Israel and the Jewish people for differential and discriminatory treatment in the international arena.''
Cotler told the commission's founding meeting that this latest form of ''the world's longest enduring hatred'' is not confined to Israel's enemies, but is increasingly finding legitimacy in international forums, including the United Nations.
''This globalized anti-Semitism cannot be fought by Jews alone but can only be fought by an international coalition involving the intergovernmental community, such as the UN, governments and political leaders everywhere, nongovernmental organizations, public intellectuals, academics, and civil society,'' Cotler said.
The Israeli government has endorsed the project. Michael Melchior, Israel's deputy foreign minister, told reporters the new anti-Semitism needs new strategies to expose and condemn it.
He said that while many Jewish organizations monitor this threat, one composed mainly of respected non-Jews of global stature would have more impact.
Plans are for the commission to be based in Switzerland, with offices in Jerusalem and New York. Details on funding and membership are yet to be finalized, Cotler said in an interview. The commission's board of directors is now being formed and will be announced at a later date.
Cotler told the founding meeting that classical anti-Semitism, which has been waning for years, denied individuals Jews the right to live as equal members of a free society.
By contrast, the new anti-Semitism denies the Jewish people the right to live as ''an equal member of the family of nations,'' he said.
''In a word, Israel is the only state in the world today - and the Jews the only people in the world today - that are the object of a standing set of threats from governmental, religious and terrorist bodies seeking their destruction,'' Cotler said.
The two strains have a fundamental characteristic in common, he continued.
Both are ''an assault upon whatever is the core of Jewish self-definition - be it the Jewish religion at the time of classical anti-Semitism, or the State of Israel as the 'civil religion' of the Jewish people under this new anti-Jewishness.''
The ''demonization'' of Israel today is the contemporary echo of the medieval indictment of the Jew as ''the poisoner of the wells,'' Cotler charged.
''In a world in which human rights has emerged as the new secular religion of our time, the portrayal of Israel as the metaphor for a human rights violator exposes Israel as the 'new anti-Christ' - with all the teaching of contempt for this 'collective Jew among the nations' that this new anti-Semitism implies.''
Although the new anti-Jesishness has been percolating for 30 years, Cotler said a number of glaring examples in the last year have made the need for action urgent. These include:
- The World Conference Against Racism in Durban, where Israel was ''the only state singled out for indictment.''
- The singling out of Israel by the UN Commission on Human Rights as the only country to receive condemnation.
- Israel becoming the first country in 52 years to be specifically indicated by the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Geneva Convention.
- The exclusion of Magen David Adom, Israel's emergency aid agency, from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
''If anti-Semitism is no longer respectable and anti-Zionism in the form of the 'Zionismis-racism' resolution has been exposed as a cover for anti-Semitism, what better mask than human rights - and the UN as repository of human rights - to carry out this process of distortion and defamation,'' Cotler said.
Cotler emphasized he is not suggesting that Israel should not be held accountable for violation of international law or human rights. ''The Jewish people are not entitled to any privileged protection or preference because of the particularity of Jewish suffering.''
The problem is that Israel has been ''systematically denied'' equality before the law in the international arena. What's more, he observed in an interview, anti-Jewishness at the highest levels is spawning a resurgence of old-style anti-Semitism in the form of physical assaults against Jews in the Diaspora.
''This pervasive and persistent anti-Jewishness constitutes a standing assault on democracies and human rights everywhere,'' he told The CJN.
This new type of anti-Semitism will have ramifications beyond the Jewish community, he said.
''Genocidal calls for Israel's destruction and racist terrorism singling out Jews everywhere are a clear threat to international peace and security.''
The Middle East peace process is also jeopardized because the new anti-Semitism incites terrorism and ''undermines the trust of even the most dovish Israelis.''
Irwin Cotler a leader in the effort
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: July 26, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 51 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(38) S 25'03 pg B66; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5859082
LENGTH: 948 words
HEADLINE: How to resolve Jewish Arab refugee claims stirs debate (Record in progress)
BYLINE: Morgan, Anna
BODY:
The question of how to proceed with the claims of Jews from Arab countries
has lingered, unresolved, for many years, with an ongoing debate on how to
solve the problem.
Raffaello Fellah, co-chair of the World Association of Jews from Arab Countries (WOJAC), believes the claims of Jews from Arab countries must be linked to those made by Palestinian refugees and that both issues must be dealt with in the context of the Middle East peace process.
Founded in 1975, WOJAC was created intially to relieve the distress of Jews forced to leave Arab countries after the creation of the State of Israel, abandoning all they owned. It later began raising awareness of the issue through various educational projects and lobby efforts.
''Jewish organizations need to act jointly and launch a claim similar to the one brought against Germany by Holocaust victims,'' Fellah said in a phone interview from Rome.
''There are differences between the two cases,'' Fellah acknowledged. Germany wanted to repair the damages, Arab countries do not.
However, a lot can be gained by simply forcing both sides of the dispute - Jewish refugees and representatives of Arab governments - to meet at the negotiating table, he said.
WOJAC places the number of Arabs that left Palestinian territory at 590,000 and the Jews that left Arab countries at around one million. The number of Jews from Arab countries and the number of Palestinians each total approximately four million.
As for assets, Fellah said that a 1978 conference in Washington, D.C., estimated the value of property left behind by Jewish refugees at billions of dollars.
The WOJAC Web site says the immediate cause of the en masse exodus of the Jews from Arab states ''was the considerable deterioration of their situation,... a process which occurred mainly between 1948 and the 1960s, as a result of a wave of Arab nationalism and the establishment of sovereign Arab states in the 20th century.''
The Web site goes on to say that any Middle East peace accord must deal with all victims - Palestinian and Jewish - fairly and equitably within the framework of negotiations.
The new democratization of Iraq could mark a turning point, Fellah said.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
Attention should also be paid to a boycott law, created in 1957 in Damascus by the Arab League, that allowed governments to confiscate all properties abandoned by Jews in Arab countries, Fellah said.
Issues need to be addressed first through diplomatic and political means, and then, if necessary, in front of the courts, he said.
''The most important thing is not to make individual cases,'' Fellah said. ''We must be united on this subject. No organization should be the prima donna.''
Mount Royal Liberal MP Irwin Cotler, an international human rights lawyer and activist, says Justice for Jews from Arab Countries, an organization formed this past June, has spent the past few months collecting testimonies and preparing a composite legal study to facilitate those who wish to pursue lawsuits.
In a phone interview, Cotler said that ''refugees have become the looking glass by which contemporary conflicts are understood.
''For this reason, it's important to return the question of Jewish refugees to the narrative. Otherwise, it's Middle East revisionism,'' Cotler said.
''Jews from Arab countries were the victims of patterns of harrassment and discrimination: assets were seized and legislation was passed declaring the Jewish nation an enemy of the people,'' Cotler said.
''The forgotten exodus of these Jews deserves to be recorded and presented,'' he added.
This doesn't take away from the importance of Palestinian refugees, Cotler said. But the United Nations General Assembly has passed 101 resolutions on refugees from different countries, many of them dealing with Palestinians, and ''not a single one deals with Jewish refugees,'' he said.
''If the United Nations wants to be a fair-minded arbiter, it should consider both... it needs to acknowledge that there is a joint victimization.''
However, Yehouda Shenhav, a professor at Tel Aviv University and editor of Theory Criticism, an Israeli journal of critical theory and cultural studies, says it is unfair to both the Palestinians and Mizrahi Jews - Middle Eastern Jews - to compare the two groups.
In a recent article in Ha'aretz, Shenhav wrote that ''the history of the Mizrahi aliyah [immigration to Israel] is complex, and cannot be subsumed within a facile explanation. Many of the newcomers lost considerable property, and there can be no question that they should be allowed to submit individual property claims against Arab states (up to the present day, the State of Israel and WOJAC have blocked the submission of [individual] claims on this basis).''
In addition, Shenhav wrote, WOJAC, ''which intended to promote Zionist claims and assist Israel in its conflict with Palestinian nationalism, accomplished the opposite: it presented a confused Zionist position regarding the dispute with the Palestinians, and infuriated many Mizrahi Jews around the world by casting them as victims bereft of positive motivation to immigrate to Israel.''
Shenhav quoted former Israeli government ministers Yisrael Yeshayahu, who was born in Yemen (he died in 1979), and Shlomo Hillel, who is from Iraq, as saying they weren't refugees. They came with messianic and Zionist aspirations.
But Cotler said the two terms, refugees and Zionists, shouldn't be considered mutually exclusive. Jews from Arab countries may have been Zionists, but their immigration to Israel increased because of discrimination.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 52 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 793 words
HEADLINE: Chretien and Martin Nix Referendum on Same-Sex Marriage
ANCHOR: Kate Wheeler
GUEST: Mike Duffy, CTV News
BODY:
WHEELER: Well, as the issue of same-sex marriage continues
to divide the Liberal caucus the idea of a referendum was shot down
by Jean Chretien and buried by his heir apparent. Both Chretien
and Paul Martin closed the door on the notion of a national vote.
Joining us now from North Bay, Ontario where the Liberal caucus is
wrapping up today is CTV's Mike Duffy.
Good morning, Mike. Tell us how much rending of garments and gnashing of teeth went on there.
DUFFY: I'll tell you, it was a pretty rough day yesterday. And the debate is going to continue today. Kate, over the years I have covered everything from the debate in Parliament over abortion, over the restoration of capital punishment, I haven't ever seen anything with the same emotional intensity of what we are seeing in the last day and a half here as Liberal MPs are talking not only about principle but also about politics and their own electoral survival.
WHEELER: How many of them are seriously worried about the possibility of losing their seat?
DUFFY: Well, I would say that you've got 25 or 30 MPs who think that this, and decriminalization of marijuana, will be enough to put their positions in jeopardy. And so, faced with losing your job, it's a pretty compelling argument. At the same time, those who oppose it say we are also defending families. So, they say it's not just about their own political survival, but it is also, they say, about protecting families that need protection.
WHEELER: So, the door has been effectively shut. Where will these politicians that disagree go from here?
DUFFY: Well, it's interesting. The Supreme Court in the Trudeau reference in 1982 on the Constitution was asked a question by the Canadian government about patriation of the Constitution. And they came back and they split the question they were asked into two, and provided a road map for Pierre Trudeau on the constitutional issue.
Professor Irwin Cotler, who is a Liberal MP from Montreal and an expert in constitutional law, he is suggesting that the Supreme Court of Canada could take this reference that they have been given and plot a way so that both sides win. In effect, what he would suggest is that instead of having church marriages as we see now, everyone in Canada would be into a civil union, a kind of registered marriage agreement. And then after you did that -- and everyone would do it, gays, heterosexuals, whatever -- after you do that then you go to the church of your choice -- if you want to go to church -- to have your union blessed.
So, this would be a way to keep the word "marriage" out of contention. A lot of people, particularly Roman Catholics and other Christians, feel that marriage is a sacrament. And they feel that it has been handed down, you know, for over a thousand years, that it should be carried out in this way.
So, Irwin Cotler's suggestion of a middle road here may in fact provide a way out. But in the meantime this debate will go for at least another year, Kate, because there are legal hurdles to be overcome. And nothing happens quickly when it comes to the Supreme Court.
WHEELER: Now, speaking about going for at least another year, the Prime Minister was somewhat toying with reporters yesterday, I feel.
DUFFY: I can't believe some of my colleagues who swallow the worm. He said he is going to stay until the 29th of February in a leap year. So, somebody ran out to the wire right away and said he's now ruled out an early departure. He is having great fun with this. And members of his personal staff yesterday were chortling as they watched the media all running in circles.
The fact is, he will be gone at about the end of the year, I am told. Maybe just a little bit into January. He wants to spend Christmas with his grandchildren one last time at 24 Sussex Drive. And then he will make way for Paul Martin.
Martin yesterday was interesting. He said there won't be a winter election because he wants to have redistribution in seats in western Canada. Western Canada and Ontario are going to get additional seats in Parliament. And so, therefore, what it looks like, we will have a Martin government come in early in January, and then three or four months later after the first of April he would call an election for sometime around the end of May, early June, and bring on his new team then. So, instead of getting the big bang in terms of an entire new Martin team we'll get it in two stages. Not as spectacular as Paul Martin wanted, but that's the way it works.
WHEELER: All right. Mike Duffy, as always, thank you very much.
DUFFY: Great to talk to you. Bye-bye.
WHEELER: Okay, bye.
LOAD-DATE: August 21, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 54 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: OPINION; Pg. 6
LENGTH: 592 words
HEADLINE: Questions for Arafat
BYLINE: Irwin Cotler
HIGHLIGHT:
The writer is a Canadian Member of Parliament on leave from McGill
University, where he is a professor of human rights law. He has written
extensively on international terrorism.
BODY:
The Aksa Martyrs Brigade, a branch of Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser
Arafat's Fatah movement, took "credit" for the horrific terrorist bombing on
Shabbat Eve the week before last - one of an increasing number of attacks for which this group has claimed responsibility.
The involvement of a terrorist group affiliated with Arafat's Fatah has intensified, and polarized, discussion as to how Arafat should be regarded. Is he a partner for peace - as the US administration, the European Union, Canada, and others continued to maintain last week, even after his rebuff of US Secretary of State Colin Powell's request for a cease-fire? Or is he a participant in terror - indeed, the head of a "coalition of terror," as the Israeli government and former prime ministers Binyamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak all claim.
Warning Arafat that it's his "last chance" to stop terror has long been a routine among Western foreign ministries. But these words usually lack teeth, because they are not accompanied by specific, verifiable indicators of progress on his part. Now that CIA Director George Tenet, Assistant Secretary of State William Burns, and special envoy Anthony Zinni are slated to come to the region to follow up on Powell's mission, they should approach the Palestinian leadership with the following questions:
1. Will Arafat order an immediate halt to the Palestinian Authority's officially sanctioned incitement to hatred and violence that is manifest in the Palestinian media, mosques, schools, and summer camps? The Arab scholar, Fouad Ajami, has argued that this culture of contempt, this demonizing of the "other" is precisely what incites suicide-bombers. As the Supreme Court of Canada noted in upholding the constitutionality of anti-hate legislation in Canada, "the Holocaust did not begin in the gas chambers, it began with words."
2. Will Arafat dismantle and disable the terrorist infrastructure, including the Aksa Martyrs Brigade, which enjoys sanctuary within the jurisdiction of the Palestinian Authority itself?
3. Will Arafat prohibit by law the operations of terrorist groups such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - groups that publicly call for the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews everywhere and that commit terrorist acts to that end?
4. Will Arafat investigate, arrest, and bring to justice all those who participate in the perpetration of terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians?
5. Will Arafat cease and desist from the smuggling of weapons into the Palestinian Authority, as evidenced by the seizure of the Karine A ship and its storehouse of illegal arms?
6. Will Arafat refrain from personally aiding and abetting acts of terror through the incitement, financing, and facilitating of terrorism as the available documentary evidence suggests is the case?
7. Will Arafat publicly and continually call for, in Arabic, the cessation of all acts of terror? In particular, will he publicly and unequivocally proclaim that all acts of terror from whatever quarter, for whatever purpose, are unjustified and prohibited under international law and Palestinian law?
Powell should address these specific queries to Arafat whether or not he chooses to meet with him.
Arafat's public response to these specific and verifiable indicators will allow the international community to finally determine whether he sees himself as a partner for peace or a participant in terror.
By his own words and deeds shall we know him.
LOAD-DATE: April 22, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 55 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: EDITORIAL/OPINION; Pg. C6
LENGTH: 771 words
HEADLINE: INFECTIOUS HATRED;
THE WEST NEEDS AWAKENING TO FANATICS' EVIL GAME PLAN
BYLINE: BY PAUL JACKSON
BODY:
With the exception of Montreal Liberal Irwin Cotler, who is Jewish, the only
other MPs who unceasingly stand up for Israel in the House of Commons are
Canadian Alliance members Stockwell Day and Jason Kenney.
Day is, of course, an evangelical Christian, and Kenney, of Irish Roman Catholic stock.
That the former leader of the Alliance and the Calgary Southeast MP are both devout Christians and also staunch defenders of the tiny Jewish state, shouldn't really be surprising.
After all, their Biblical faith comes greatly from the Old Testament, the Ten Commandments, handed by God to Moses, and Jesus himself was a Jew who tried to reform what he thought were abuses of Judaism of the day.
Every true Christian has to have a place in their heart for the Jewish people.
This past week I listened as Kenney spoke to Lou Pomerance's "Beth Tzedec Lunch Bunch" group as to how he moved from believing the Palestinians were a persecuted people to realizing the Palestinian leadership and most of the 22 Arab states in the Middle East were simply using the Palestinian people as pawns in their game plan to destroy Israel and push the Jewish people into the sea.
Now, one can never say Kenney has been on the left in political circles, and that is where the anti-Israeli and pro-Palestinian propaganda campaigns are hatched, but he admitted that, until he had really taken a close and objective look at who was saying what and who was doing what, he had been taken somewhat for a ride by the pro-Palestinian lobby.
Yet, slowly he began to see, no matter what Israel did to try and appease Palestinian leaders like Yasser Arafat and their terrorists, it was never enough. Arafat and the leaders of other Palestinian or Islamic groups would drive a hard bargain with Israel, sign that bargain supposedly in good faith, and then immediately launch new terrorist attacks and demand even more concessions. Kenney, like Day, eventually determined absolute annihilation of the Jewish state is the real agenda.
He noted the evolution of the code words such as "moral equivalency" in which the naive are taught to see both terrorists and the defenders against terrorism as having an equally just cause.
When terrorist groups such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah slaughter innocent Jewish men, women and children, they are doing so only because poverty and persecution have driven them to do so. When the Israelis try to defend themselves, they are deemed to be committing atrocities against innocent people. None of this make makes sense.
Shamefully, Jean Chretien's government has accepted the philosophy of "moral equivalence" and sees both sides through the same eyes.
Time after time in the United Nations, the Chretien team backs anti-Israeli resolutions drawn up by Arab league dictatorships.
When it comes to taking sides, we abandon the only democracy in the Middle East and side with the dictatorships. It's appalling and eventually, we'll pay for it.
With the Chretien government's capitulation to the charade of "moral equivalence," Kenney reminded his audience -- if they needed to be reminded -- it was only after five months of non-stop questions in the Commons and speeches across the nation that Day finally embarrassed Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham into listing Hezbollah in Canada as a terrorist organization.
Until then, Graham had claimed Hezbollah had both a military wing and a social wing, and no one should confuse the two or link them together. This was, Day insisted, like viewing a Nazi party social club being there for harmless fun, and not aligned with fundamental Nazi beliefs.
Kenney went on to paint a frightening picture of radical Islam that is not simply determined to destroy Israel, but western civilization as well. Judaism and Christianity are seen in the same light.
The U.S., Canada and other Western democratic nations are on the death list, too.
The terror attacks of 9/11 on New York City were meant to shake America's confidence -- and get it to abandon Israel in order to try and save itself -- but the attacks should be seen as a wake-up call.
Fanatical leaders like Osama bin Laden spread anti-western hatred amongst young Muslims -- even young Muslims in Canada and the U.S. -- and try to pervert their minds and use them as foot soldiers to subvert the very societies in which they -- and we -- live.
To my mind, Kenney's speech itself was a wake-up call.
Alarmingly, the Chretien and Graham types refuse to listen.
They just hope the inevitable will never happen. But if we don't start listening to the likes of Day and Kenney, it surely will.
LOAD-DATE: October 19, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 56 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: S 26'03
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5842514
LENGTH: 466 words
HEADLINE: Pakistan to reconsider request for monument honouring slain journalist
(Record in progress)
BYLINE: ,Dennis bueckert
BODY:
OTTAWA (CP) Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf says he'll consider a
request to honour slain American journalist Daniel Pearl with a monument
in Pakistan's capital.
But Musharraf sounded unenthused about the request from Pearl's family, relayed to him Friday in an appearance before the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee.
''Building a monument (to Pearl)? I never thought of it,'' he said. ''There's so much to be done in Pakistan. I could consider that.''
Montreal Liberal MP Irwin Cotler said he raised the matter at the request of Pearl's father, and thought a monument to Pearl in Pakistan could have great symbolic significance.
''This could be an important development in the building of bridges...between the West and Islam, and between Jews and Muslims.''
Four Islamic militants have been convicted in the killing of Pearl, but they have appealed. It has been widely assumed that Pearl was killed because he was an American and a Jew.
Musharraf angrily rejected allegations made in a new book that Pearl was killed because he had uncovered links between al-Qaida terrorists and Pakistan's secret service, the ISI.
''ISI involvement in the killing of this young man is unthinkable,'' the president said.
''The conjecture that is being done in this book, it's very sad. Where is the authentication?''
The book by French writer Bernard-Henri Levy claims Pearl had uncovered evidence that a faction of the ISI was working with terrorists and trading nuclear secrets with Iran and North Korea.
Musharraf said Pearl ''stayed with a group that had contacts with all kinds of people and then he kept moving down into this world of extremism.''
''Then, unfortunately, whatever happened, happened.''
He said there is total co-ordination between the work of ISI and U.S. intelligence services.
''They fully know exactly what we are doing.''
The president also told the committee that Pakistan has developed its nuclear capability on its own and has never had any defence deal or arrangement with Iran, while missile purchases from North Korea ended some time ago.
There is no chance of Pakistan's nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands, he insisted.
''Pakistan's strategic assets are in very strong custodial control. The organization that we have is far more effective than what India has.''
Musharraf is in Canada partly to pursue his interest in a free-trade relationship, but he has also taken every opportunity to defend Pakistan's record in the war on terrorism.
He said no army in the world could subdue the hostile and mountainous terrain of Western Pakistan, a region without roads or telecommunications infrastructure.
Even Britain did not dare to enter the region when it ruled that part of the world, Musharraf said.
JOURNAL-CODE: 1418
LOAD-DATE: November 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 57 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (634) Ap 29'02 pg 23; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5410086
LENGTH: 1149 words
HEADLINE: ''Humanitarian disaster unfolding before our eyes'': Svend Robinson. NDP MP explained prior to stepping down as critic why he travelled to Middle East, what Canada should be doing
BYLINE: Robinson, Svend
BODY:
[Graph Not Transcribed]
I returned yesterday from the Middle East, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and the occupied territories. In the very few minutes that I have to speak in the House and through the House to Canadians I want to share both what I witnessed and some observations with respect to the future of this tragic part of the world.
There is a humanitarian disaster unfolding before our eyes in the occupied territories. I fear for the future of the people of the occupied territories, the Palestinians and indeed the future of Israel itself.
My colleague from Mount Royal [Liberal MP Irwin Cotler] has spoken of security, insecurity and self defence. It is very important that we look at the context of what is taking place today. The squalor, despair and hopelessness of an entire generation that has grown up in refugee camps without any hope for the future, the despair and anguish that those people are feeling today and the fear in cities throughout the occupied territories are a result of the brutality, violence and contempt for international law which the government of Israel is demonstrating in its current military assault on the occupied territories.
All innocent human life must be protected. My colleagues and I have condemned in the strongest possible terms the suicide bombers terrifying Israelis who are out for an evening in the town or celebrating a holy day. That is terror and we condemn it. However, the terror of suicide bombers must not be responded to by the terror of Ariel Sharon's tanks, helicopter gunships and soldiers. That is what we are witnessing, the terrorism of the state in all its brutal, raw and violent reality.
I spoke in the Qalandiya refugee camp with those who were victims of this terror. There were young teachers watching television in their home in Ramallah who heard noise downstairs and gunshots ringing out. As they opened the door they saw two of their colleagues, fellow teachers, young Palestinians, innocent, with hopes for the future, who had been shot dead in cold blood by Israeli soldiers. As they looked down and cried out the soldiers kicked their bodies off the stairs and onto the floor below. They then proceeded upstairs, handcuffed these teachers, blindfolded them, beat them repeatedly and over the course of the next week engaged in what can only be described as torture before finally dumping them back at the checkpoint, because of course they were entirely innocent.
In a civilized society, a society which respects its obligations under international law, and my colleague from Mount Royal is well aware of the obligations under the fourth Geneva convention, this is an outrage and the international community cannot stand by and watch this happen.
We know all too well of what is happening in Jenin and throughout the occupled territories with this brutal and violent military assault, cutting off of food, water and electricity, stopping oxygen and medical supplies from entering, and stopping ambulances from rescuing the sick and the injured. This is inhumanity and the world cannot stand by and watch it happen.
The reality is that people are speaking out. I want to pay tribute tonight to those who in Israel and in the occupied territories have given me hope. I speak here of Canadians like Kevin Neish who is there in solidarity in a refugee camp in Bethlehem, volunteers from Oxfam Quebec, or those that I met with in Tel Aviv, 15,000 Israell people, mainly Jews, rallying on Saturday night against Sharon's war.
The war widows, who for the first time have spoken out, said ''No more.'' They said, ''In these days of blood, violence and destruction, when women from both sides are widowed and children are orphaned, we call for an end to the cycle of bereavement. The control over another people is leading to unnecessary casualties on both sides and endangering our lives and the moral fabric of Israeli society.'' They talked of the control.
We must recognize that the illegal occupation must end. Israel must withdraw from the occupied territories. The illegal settlements must be dismantled. Imagine what a young Palestinian must think as they see these settlements doubling since Olso and at the same time homes being demolished.
What can this lead to? Only to despair and hopelessness.
I want to pay tribute as well to those brave soldiers and reservists who as well have said ''No more.'' I speak here of the group Ometz Lesarev. I speak of Yesh Gvul, Ometz Lesarev, the courage to refuse. Those reservists and a growing number have said they are not prepared to participate in the violence in the occupied territories, soldiers like Staff Sergeant Gil Nemesh who said: ''Those terrible things happening in the territories have little to do with the security of Israel and stopping terror. It is all about the settlements. Choking and starving and humiliating millions of people, to provide safety to the settlements.''
This must stop. Canada must speak out. I was ashamed and appalled that at the United Nations Commission on Human Rights in Geneva our government almost alone among all members, only with Guatemala, opposed the sending of a human rights mission to that area. Shame on the Government of Canada.
What should Canada be doing? Canada should be calling, as the leader of my party has urged eloquently, for an international protection force. This would be an area in which Canada could show real leadership, not waiting but calling now for that protection force.
We would not be alone. Indeed, members of the Knesset, Yossi Sarid, the leader of the opposition from Meretz and others have called for that, as have the Jordanians and the Swedes. Where is Canada's voice in speaking out for an international protection force?
As I said, there must be a protection force. Israel must immediately withdraw. There must be emergency humanitarian relief. We have to consider, if the situation deteriorates, the possibility of re-evaluating our relations, both economic and diplomatic, with Israel.
I know my time is limited. I want to conclude by saying that certainly we in Canada condemn any acts of racism, of violence, the attack on a synagogue in Saskatoon for example.
I have been accused of taking sides in this tragic dispute. I want to say yes, I plead guilty. I have taken sides. I take the side of life over death. I take the side of peace over war. I take the side of the oppressed over the oppressor. I take the side of justice over dehumanization and tyranny.
There must be justice and peace for the Palestinian and Israeli people. The occupation and the violence must end. The world must not continue to turn a blind eye to this tragedy.
NDP MP Svend Robinson, who represents the federal riding of Burnaby-Douglas, B.C., delivered this speech in the House on April 9, 2002.
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: November 5, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 59 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: FEATURES; Pg. 15B
LENGTH: 2477 words
HEADLINE: Canadians honor one of their own
BYLINE: Greer Fay Cashman
HIGHLIGHT:
Grapevine
BODY:
THE party is over. At least the one between Pnina Rosenblum and Haim Moshe
has run its course - and now she can turn her full attention to the Likud Party
without feeling guilty about not giving enough time to her marriage. Cosmetics
queen Rosenblum, and her husband who were quickly reconciled after announcing a
month ago that they were divorcing, have decided to call it quits after all. But
they will remain friends and will continue to live in Ramat Gan, albeit not in
their luxury abode. She's moving into a rented penthouse, and he's moving into
something a little more modest. Given what they were up against at the start of
their marriage, the fact that they stayed together for even 10 years is quite an accomplishment.
CANADIAN Ambassador Michael Bell and Construction and Housing Minister Natan Sharansky heaped praise this week on international human rights activist, Irwin Cotler, who was Sharansky's first lawyer when Sharansky was imprisoned by the Soviet authorities. Several of the ministers rostered to represent the government at national day celebrations were otherwise occupied at the Labor Party convention. But even if they would have been available, given Cotler's presence at the Canada Day reception hosted by Bell and his wife, Linda, to celebrate the 135th anniversary of Canadian confederation, Sharansky, who owes so much to Cotler's persistence, was the most logical choice. Cotler, a frequent visitor to Israel, was here on this occasion to participate in the Ninth Biennial Jerusalem Conference in Canadian Studies at which both he and Bell presented papers.
AT the Canada Day reception held on the spacious lawns of the ambassador's residence in Savyon, Bell recalled that during the years of Sharansky's incarceration, Cotler had kept him informed about what was being done to secure Sharansky's release, and eventually in 1986 Bell got to meet Sharansky for the first time. Looking out at the splendid buffets that were constantly replenished, Bell thanked the generous sponsors who had made the festive function possible and noted that despite the difficult economic situation there were more sponsors than there had been the previous year. He was also impressed to see how many Canadian companies have their own representatives stationed in Israel working towards the prosperity of both countries. Bell, who is currently serving in Israel for the third time, said that he could not ignore what is affecting everyone and expressed Canadian concern about the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians with regard to safety, security and human rights. Canada, he said, was lending her voice to efforts to stop the violence and resume the negotiations. Bell said that he and his wife know victims of the conflict, yet for all that, he chooses to be an optimist, believing that with perseverance and commitment peace will eventually be achieved. As for Canada's relations with Israel, Bell said that despite the recession, trade statistics were still going up. In an aside to his colleagues from other countries, he expressed the hope that the same could be said of their bilateral trade. He also referred to strong relations between Canada and Israel on other levels, especially academic.
BUT it was Sharansky who mentioned Canada's involvement in the battle against renewed anti-Semitism. As for trade relations, Sharansky was particularly pleased to have been the minister of industry and trade who, in 1996, signed the Free Trade Agreement between Israel and Canada. Israel he said, is the only country to have a Free Trade Agreement with both Canada and the US. Despite the intense humidity, people were having such a good time at the Canadian affair that they were reluctant to leave. One guest in fact, had been so keen to come, that she arrived straight from the airport. Artist Sali Ariel, who heads the International Women's Club had been in San Francisco for a reunion of her high school clique, all the members of which wield influence in high circles and have chalked up major achievements. Ariel and her husband cartoonist, Ya'akov Kirschen, are long-time personal friends of the Bells.
UNEMPLOYMENT was the opening topic in Politica this week. In addition to Labor and Social Affairs Minister Shlomo Benizri and his old friend and colleague MK Tommy Lapid, moderator Dan Margalit lined up several experts on the subject plus a resident of Dimona who said that he had been unemployed for two-and-a-half years. Polite, and obviously hurting, the man tried to tell his story, but Margalit in his usual fashion kept cutting him short and the man never got to say what he wanted to say. His frustration was exacerbated by the fact that he was in a remote studio, and although visible on the screen in Margalit's studio, was only there as window dressing. All his efforts to attract Margalit's attention were to no avail. Dimona has been on the lower rungs of the socio- economic ladder for all of its existence. Its population suffers from lack of opportunity and therefore lack of motivation. But that doesn't mean that they haven't pinpointed their problems or that they haven't thought of viable solutions. They just need someone to listen and take note and should not be cruelly exploited by the insensitive Dan Margalits of this world.
OUTGOING Meretz MK Amnon Rubinstein gave only the barest hint last Friday that he had no further political ambitions, but he certainly didn't reveal that he was about to retire from the Knesset when he attended an Israel-India Cultural Association luncheon at Tandoori in Tel Aviv to mark the 10th anniversary of Israeli-Indian diplomatic relations. Rubinstein was there in the capacity of chairman of the Israel-India Parliamentary Group. When a yoga instructor mentioned the age of enlightenment that characterized his tenure as minister of education and expressed the hope that he would hold the position again, his response indicated that there was no likelihood of that happening. And of course, by Monday everyone knew why. Rubinstein announced that he was stepping down from the Knesset to take up an appointment as dean of the Law School at the prestigious Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya. In fact, it was during his period as education minister that colleges offering degrees began to flourish in Israel creating opportunities for students who might otherwise have missed out on higher education. Rubinstein said on Monday that his greatest satisfaction is in meeting people who tell him that it is due to him that they have a BA. But on Friday he had very little to say. Indian Ambassador Raminder Singh Jassal, who came with his wife, Smita, spoke of relations between India and Israel as a bonding of the minds and IICA chairman Eric Silver described relations between the two countries as an extraordinary success story. Rubinstein, who headed Israel's first parliamentary delegation to India last December, recalled his delight when, in an interview that he gave in Cochin, he was asked by a journalist why India is so popular in Israel. Rubinstein had replied that it was because there has never been any anti-Semitism in India. Whereupon his interlocutor asked: "What's anti-Semitism?" Thrilled by the question, Rubinstein joyfully embraced him.
SENIORITY or rather lack of it, was the primary reason that his Foreign Ministry colleagues were opposed to the appointment of Danny Ayalon as ambassador to the US - and the other reason was that they're not happy about political appointments that often thwart the aspirations of career diplomats. Ayalon is likely to be approved by cabinet on Sunday as are two other political appointees, Nissim Zvilli, a former secretary-general of the Labor Party whose staunch loyalty over the years to Foreign Minister Shimon Peres is being rewarded with an ambassadorship to France, and Avi Primor, currently vice president of Tel Aviv University who is tipped to become ambassador to the European Union in Brussels. With Primor, who acquitted himself with great distinction as Israel's ambassador to Germany, the problem is not a matter of seniority, but of what is widely perceived in the Foreign Ministry as having one's cake and eating it, too. Primor has very close ties with the EU, and no-one denies that as far as qualifications go, he really is the best man for the job. However, Primor resigned from the Foreign Ministry to take up his TAU appointment, and some say he should not be allowed to see-saw back into the diplomatic corps at the expense of others waiting in line for so plum a posting.
TOURISM may be waning, but not a week goes by without solidarity groups - not all of them Jewish - from different parts of the world coming to assure Israel that she is not alone. For some of these groups, leaving their home countries is not always easy as, for instance, those from South Africa. Nonetheless, for the second consecutive year, a delegation of 35 rabbis led by Chief Rabbi Cyril Harris has come to Israel under the auspices of the South African Rabbinical Association. Aside from meeting Israeli dignitaries such as President Moshe Katsav, the delegation went to Tel Hashomer and Shaare Zedek hospitals not only to visit victims of terrorism, but also to donate blood. Better to give a pint of blood to help save a life than to lose blood on the battlefield.
IT is comforting to know that despite anticipation of various strategies of creative corruption in the wake of the new tax reforms, Israeli politicians, compared to their European counterparts, are fairly free of corruption, and even when they do engage, it's not necessarily for their personal gain. Dr. Manfred Gerstenfeld, an international consultant on business and environment strategy in an address to Emunah in Jerusalem observed that even Shas leader, Arye Deri, who was found guilty of corruption, pocketed a relatively small amount of money, and the businessmen who gave it to him were minor players. Israel's top politicians may do favors for their friends at the expense of the state, observed Gerstenfeld, but they're less inclined than their European parts to line their own pockets. Hardly a day goes by without corruption scandals involving European politicians he said, but it's so much the norm that when Jacques Chirac ran against Jean-Marie Le Pen in the recent French elections, there were signs in the street urging "Vote for the crook, not for the fascist."
UNLIKE some of the tell-all officials who left the prime minister's office when Ehud Barak was the man in the hot seat, Uri Shani, who until recently was Ariel Sharon's bureau chief remains the soul of discretion. Shani, who was interviewed this week by Israel Radio's Dalia Yairi, gently fended off all questions related to the reasons for his resignation, but said that he still retains a close relationship with the prime minister, leading to speculation that despite all the rumors about him being shunted aside by Omri Sharon and various movers and shakers within the Prime Minister's Office, the real reason for his stepping down was to prepare the field for when Sharon has to battle to retain both the Likud leadership and the premiership. Current polls indicate that even though Binyamin Ben-Eliezer proved himself to be no less of a bulldozer within his own party than Sharon is in his, when it comes to national leadership, Ben Eliezer is trailing not only behind Sharon but also behind Binyamin Netanyahu; and Haim Ramon, who may or may not contest the Labor leadership in the upcoming party elections, has even less of a chance. But the surveys have been wrong before and may very well be wrong again.
AMAZINGLY spry and energetic nonagenarian Clara Hammer, better known as the chicken lady because, with the help of her many supporters in Israel and abroad, provides chickens for Shabbat for scores of financially distressed families. But well-wishers don't limit themselves to sending checks. Hammer has a collection of chicken-related adornments and household utensils that accompany the charitable donations. Many people think that the chicken lady should have some symbol of what she does - but the people who benefit from her love and her generosity can testify that it's far from being merely symbolic.
UNTIL the death of veteran National Religious Party leader Dr. Yosef Burg, there were two Burgs in the political arena - albeit in different corners of the political spectrum. With the exception of the Bible Quiz that was the senior Burg's great love and joy, a World Mizrachi tribute dinner in his honor, and his 90th birthday party at the Knesset, father and son meticulously abstained from appearing together on public platforms so neither would be in the position of having to disagree with or criticize the other. But now that Yael Burg has retired from her position as principal of the Givat Gonen High School at which Arabs and Jews study in the same classroom, there may be two Burgs on the same side of the political fence. Yael Burg's political views are pretty much in sync with those of her husband, Knesset Speaker Avraham Burg who has lost much of his political clout. But now that Yael Burg has more time to devote to politics, the two might make an effective team.
PROFESSOR Mark Spigelman, organizer of the upcoming conference on ancient DNA that has attracted participants from more than 20 countries, was pleasantly surprised by the overwhelmingly positive response. An Indian researcher told him: "Hey, your country and my country are both fighting Muslim extremists, so why shouldn't we come." A South African who lives near a police station in Johannesburg said that it was recently attacked by armed bandits carrying Kalashnikovs. "How much worse could it be in Israel?" he asked.
MOST of us go about our daily lives in Israel in as routine a fashion as possible while knowing that terror can strike anywhere at any time and that any one of us or our loved ones can become victims. It's not easy to live with. It's not easy for people who have lived under threat for most of their lives. It's probably even more difficult for people who've come from countries where terror was never something with which they had to contend. Either way, it's eating away at our collective psyche. To help English speakers in need of better emotional and psychological tools to withstand terror and psychological warfare, UJIA has arranged a Coping with Terror Workshop to be led by Professor Mooli Lahad, a globally recognized expert and international adviser on stress and crisis resulting from the daily threat of terror. The workshop will be held this coming Monday, July 8 at 7.30 p.m. at the Basel Hotel, 156 Rehov Hayarkon, Tel Aviv. Organizers promise that full security will be provided. To confirm attendance contact: UJIA Israel (03) 696-5244 or [email protected]
GRAPHIC: 2 photos: 1. Pnina Rosenblum and Haim Moshe: This time it's quits. 2. Uri Shani (Credit: 1. Israel Sun. 2. Ariel Jerozolimski)
LOAD-DATE: July 7, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 60 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: DOMESTIC NEWS
DISTRIBUTION: Attention News Editors
LENGTH: 529 words
HEADLINE: Government of Canada funds literacy project for immigrants
DATELINE: MONTREAL, Sept. 17
BODY:
The Service d'interprGete d'aide et de
rDefDerence aux immigrants will adapt their Canada: Citizenship CD-ROM to help illiterate immigrants. Mr. Irwin Cotler, Member of Parliament for Mount Royal,
on behalf of the Honourable Jane Stewart, Minister of Human Resources
Development Canada, today announced a contribution of $42,000 for this
adaptation project. The Government of Canada is funding this initiative
through the National Literacy Secretariat.
Under this project, the support and referral service for immigrants would like to create a Macintosh version of the Canada: Citizenship CD-ROM. It is already available for Windows. Through this initiative, this tool first designed for illiterate or poorly educated immigrants will be available to all francophone and anglophone clients across the country, regardless of the type of computer used.
"This project will help adult learners across Canada further develop their literacy skills, in addition to being a first-rate resource for trainers," said Mr. Cotler. "The Government of Canada is proud to support this initiative, which will improve access to literacy resources for people with reading and writing difficulties."
Literacy skills are linked to work skills, health and self-esteem. Higher literacy skills among Canadians enable them to participate more fully in our economy and our society. For instance, literacy skills help determine the kinds of jobs we find, enable parents to read to their children and help us understand technical jargon, allowing us to use tools and equipment safely.
The National Literacy Secretariat works in partnership with provincial and territorial governments, business, labour and the volunteer community. The goal of these partnerships is to increase public awareness of literacy, help people share information, improve access to literacy programs, develop learning materials and advance research on literacy.
This project supports the Government of Canada's Innovation Strategy and more specifically "Knowledge Matters", a policy paper that addresses the national challenge of ensuring Canadians possess the skills and knowledge required to fully participate in the knowledge-based economy.
Funding for this project was provided for in the December 2001 Budget and is therefore built into the existing fiscal framework.
This project has been reviewed to ensure compliance with the Department's administration of its grant and contribution programs.
VIEW ADDITIONAL COMPANY-SPECIFIC INFORMATION:
http://www.newswire.ca/cgi-bin/inquiry.cgi?OKEY=67704
CONTACT: Media Relations Office, Human Resources Development Canada, (819) 994-5559
LOAD-DATE: September 18, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 61 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(17) Ap 25'03 pg 21; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5601932
LENGTH: 240 words
HEADLINE: Imagine a dynamic young leadership conference
BODY:
The recent Imagine International Young Leadership Conference in Montreal -- touted as a weekend that would change the lives of young Canadian Jews --
lived up to its billing.
The conference began with a daylong ''by invitation only'' Jewish Leadership Institute for 100 young adults who have been identified as emerging leaders by Federations, community agencies and synagogues.
The program offered opportunities for learning, networking and socializing with peers. Participants also heard from worldclass speakers such as Rabbi Michael Melchior, Dr. Ellen Cannon, Dennis Prager, Irwin Cotler, John Loftus, Rabbi Shmuel Boteach and Elie Wiesel.
Over 500 young leaders attended the conference, including more than 100 recruited from Toronto by Jessica Cooperman and Brian Tanner.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
The conference provided a holistic Jewish experience, with a full Shabbat program focused on spirituality and capped off by a gala Mystery Ball.
Richard Diamond, the Past Chair of Young Leadership who was instrumental in developing the national young leadership structure, was honoured at the conference. Other leaders from Toronto honoured by the National Young Leadership Executive were Jessica Cooperman, Gilbert Palter, Anthony Sigel, David Spiro, and Naomi Cohen who were recognized by their peers for outstanding contributions both locally and nationally.
Toronto will host the conference in 2005.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 12, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 62 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(22) My 29'03 pg 6; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5634747
LENGTH: 404 words
HEADLINE: March against anti-Semitism set for June 8
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
A multi-faith collection of Jews, Christians, Hindus and Aboriginals will
gather in downtown Toronto on June 8 in the second annual ''march for
humanity.''
Sponsored by a coalition of groups led by Canadians Against Anti-Semitism (CAS), the march is designed to ''inspire Canadians to reclaim the pride imbedded in our traditions, and speak out against the spread of hatred threatening Canadian principles and our way of life.''
The march will also serve as ''a bridge to the non-Jewish grassroots, educate and promote awareness,'' said Sandra Stern, founder of CAS.
Six speakers will address the marchers, including Ontario Chief Justice Roy McMurtry, who will deliver the keynote address. Others scheduled to deliver remarks are Prof. Irwin Cotler, a parliamentarian who served as legal counsel to Nelson Mandela and Andrei Sakharov; David Mainse, host and executive producer of 100 Huntley Street on the Crossroads Television System; Charles McVety, president of Canada Christian College; MP Art Eggleton (Lib.) and MP Scott Reid (Canadian Alliance).
Participants will be entertained by a number of performers, including the Sai Children's Choir, the Tall Pines Singers, the Flying Bulgar Klezmer Band, gospel singer Jackie Richardson, and Cantor Benjamin Maissner.
''Although our focus is prejudice, we're doing it in an atmosphere of social harmony, communal harmony, and ending it on a hopeful note, because our hope is to make it better,'' Stern said.
Stern said she was inspired to create CAS and organize its first march in June 2002 due to her concern over a ''growing world wide rise of anti-Semitism. To me it was reminiscent of the 1930s.''
What's more, she said, much of the anti-Jewish hate was taking place ''right in my backyard,'' with Canadian synagogues struck by arson and with visible Jews being roughed up in the streets of Montreal.
Last year's march attracted about 1,200 participants most of whom were non-Jews, Stern said.
Among the march's co-sponsors this year are the Canada Christian College, the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada and Christian-Jewish Dialogue of Toronto.
''Hopefully the march will demonstrate that Canadians will not and should not accept anti-Semitism.'' he added.
The march will began at 2:45 p.m. at Bloor Street and Avenue Road and head down University Avenue to Queen's Park.
Sponsored by multi-faith coalition
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 12, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 63 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (685) My 5'03; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5611918
LENGTH: 1493 words
HEADLINE: The Hill Times' List of Who Supports Whom in Liberal Leadership Race (Record in progress)
BODY:
Paul Martin
Reg Alcock (Winnipeg South, Man.) David Anderson (Victoria, B.C.) Mark Assad (Gatineu, Que.) Sarkis Assadourian (Brampton Centre, Ont.) Jean Augustine (Etobicoke-Lakeshore, Ont.) Larry Bagnell (Yukon) Sue Barnes (London West, Ont.) Reginald Belair (Timmins-James Bay, Ont.) Mauril Belanger (Ottawa-Vanier, Ont.) Eugene Bellemare (Ottawa-Orleans, Ont.) Carolyn Bennett (St. Paul's, Ont.) Maurizio Bevilacqua (Vaughan-King-Aurora, Ont.) Robert Bertrand (Pontiac-Gatineau-Labelle, Que.) Ethel Blondin-Andrew (Western Arctic, N.W.T.) Raymond Bonin (Nickel Belt, Ont.) Paul Bonwick (Simcoe-Grey, Ont.) Claudette Bradshaw (Moncton-River, N.B.) Gerry Byrne (Humber-St. Barbe-Baie Verte) John Cannis (Scarborough Centre, Ont.) Murray Calder (Dufferin-Peel-Wellingto-Grey, Ont.) Elinor Caplan (Thornhill,Ont.) Aileen Carroll (Barrie-Simcoe-Bradford, Ont.) Jeannot Castonguay (Mad. Restigouche, Que.) Brenda Chamberlain (Guelph-Wellington, Ont.) Yvon Charbonneau (Anjou-Riviere, Que.) Denis Coderre (Bourassa,Que.) Joe Comuzzi (Thunder Bay-Superior North, Ont.) Irwin Cotler (Mount Royal, Que.) Roy Cullen (Etobicoke North, Ont.) Rodger Cuzner (Bras d'Or-Cape Breton, N.S..) Paul DeVillers (Simcoe North, Ont.) Nick Discepola (Vaudreuil-Soulanges, Que.) Stan Dromisky (Thunder Bay-Atikokan, Ont.) Claude Duplain (Portneuf, Que.) Art Eggleton (York Centre, Ont.) John Efford (Bon.-Trinity-Conception, Nfld.) Mark Eyking (Sydney-Victoria, N.S.) Raymonde Folco (Laval West, Que.) Georges Farrah (Bonaventure-Gaspe, Que.) Joe Fontana (London North Centre, Ont.) Liza Frulla (Verdun-St-Henri, etc, Que.) Hedy Fry (Vancouver Centre, B.C.) Roger Gallaway (Sarnia-Lambton, Ont.) John Godfrey (Don Valley West, Ont.) Ralph Goodale (Wascana, Sask.) Bill Graham (Toronto Centre-Rosedale, Ont.)
Ivan Grose (Oshawa, Ont.) Albina Guarnieri (Mississauga East, Ont.) John Harvard (Charleswood, etc, Man.) Andre Harvey (Chicoutimi-Le Fjord, Que.) Tony Ianno (Trinity-Spadina, Ont.) Ovid Jackson (Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound, Ont.) Marlene Jennings (Notre-Dame, etc, Que.) Joe Jordan (Leeds-Grenville, Ont.) Jim Karygiannis (Scarborough--Agincourt, Ont.) Stan Keyes (Hamilton West, Ont.) David Kilgour (Edmonton Southeast, Alta.) Gar Knutson (Elgin--Middlesex--London, Ont.) Karen Kraft Sloan (York North, Ont.) Walt Lastewka (St. Catharines, Ont.) Derek Lee (Scarborough-Rouge River, Ont.) Sophia Leung (Vancouver Kingsway, B.C.) Judi Longfield (Whitby-Ajax, Ont.) Paul Macklin (Northumberland, Ont.) Steven Mahoney (Mississauga West, Ont.) Gurbax Malhi (Bramalea-Gore, etc, Ont.) John Maloney (Erie-Lincoln, Ont.) Serge Marcil (Beauharnois-Salaberry, Que.) Diane Marleau (Sudbury, Ont.) Paul Martin (LaSalle-Emard, Que.) Bill Matthews (Burin-St. George's, Nfld.) John McCallum (Markham, Ont.) Larry McCormick (Hastings, etc, Ont.) Joe McGuire (Egmont, P.E.I.) John McKay (Scarborough East, Ont.) Anne McLellan (Edmonton West, Alta.) Dan McTeague (Pickering-Ajax--Uxbridge, Ont.) Maria Minna (Beaches-East York, Ont.) Andy Mitchell (Parry Sound-Muskoka, Ont.) Shawn Murphy (Hillsborough, P.E.I.) Lynn Myers (Waterloo-Wellington, Ont.) Anita Neville (Winnipeg South Centre, Man.) Gilbert Normand (Belle-Etchemins,etc, Que.) Patrick O'Brien (London-Fanshawe, Ont.) Lawrence O'Brien (Labrador, Nfld.) John O'Reilly (Haliburton-Victoria-Brock, Ont.) Stephen Owen (Vancouver Quadra, B.C.) Massimo Pacetti (Saint-Leonard,etc, Que.) Carolyn Parrish (Mississauga Centre, Ont.) Bernard Patry (Pierrefonds-Dollard, Que.) Janko Peric (Cambridge, Ont.) Joe Peschisolido (Richmond, B.C.) Jim Peterson (Willowdale, Ont.) Pierre Pettigrew (Papineau-Saint-Denis, Que.) Jerry Pickard (Chatham-Kent Essex, Ont.) Gary Pillitteri (Niagara Falls, Ont.) David Pratt (Nepean-Carleton, Ont.) David Price (Compton-Stanstead, Que.) Carmen Provenzano (Sault Ste. Marie, Ont.) Karen Redman (Kitchener Centre, Ont.) Julian Reed (Halton, Ont.) Geoff Regan (Halifax West, N.S.) Robert Thibault (West Nova, N.S.) Jacques Saada (Brossard-La Prairie, Que.) Andy Savoy (Tobique-Mactaquac) Judy Sgro (York West, Ont.) Helene Scherrer (Louis-Hebert, Que.)
Andy Scott (Fredericton, N.B.) Benoit Serre (Timiskaming-Cochrane, Ont.) Raymond Simard (Saint Boniface, Man.) Bob Speller (Haldimand-Norfolk-Brant, Ont.) Diane St-Jacques (Shefford, Que.) Brent St. Denis (Algoma-Manitoulin, Ont.) Paul Steckle (Huron-Bruce, Ont.) Andrew Telegdi (Kitchener-Waterloo, Ont.) Yolande Thibeault (Saint-Lambert, Que.) Anthony Tirabassi (Niagara Centre, Ont.) Alan Tonks (York South-Weston, Ont.) Rose-Marie Ur (Lambton-Kent-Middlesex, Ont.) Tony Valeri (Stoney Creek, Ont.) Lyle Vanclief (Prince Edward-Hastings, Ont.) Joe Volpe (Eglinton-Lawrence, Ont.) Tom Wappel (Scarborough Southwest, Ont.) Bryon Wilfert (Oak Ridges, Ont.)
Total: 124
Undeclared/Undecided
Carole-Marie Allard (Laval East, Que.) Eleni Bakopanos (Ahuntsic, Que.) Gerard Binet (Frontenac-Megantic, Que.) Don Boudria (Glengarry-Prescott-Russell, Ont.) John Bryden (Ancaster-Dundas, etc, Ont.) Marlene Catterall (Ottawa West-Nepean, Ont.) Jean Chretien (Saint-Maurice, Que.) David Collenette (Don Valley East, Ont.) Herb Dhaliwal (Vancouver South-Burnaby, B.C.) Stephane Dion (Saint-Laurent-Cartierville, Que.) Claude Drouin (Beauce, Que.) Wayne Easter (Malpeque, P.E.I.) Mac Harb (Ottawa Centre, Ont.) Charles Hubbard (Miramichi, N.B.) Nancy Karetak-Lindell (Nunavut) Bob Kilger (Stormont-Dundas, etc, Ont.) Rick Laliberte (Churchill River, Sask.) Peter Milliken (Kingston and the Islands, Ont.) Dennis Mills (Toronto-Danforth, Ont.) Rey Pagtakhan (Winnipeg North-St. Paul, Ont.) Denis Paradis (Brome-Missisquoi, Que.) Marcel Proulx (Hull-Aylmer, Que.) Lucienne Robillard (Westmount-Ville-Marie, Que.) Allan Rock (Etobicoke Centre, Ont.) Guy St-Julien (Abitibi-Baie-James, etc, Que.) Paul Szabo (Mississauga South, Ont.) Paddy Torsney (Burlington, Ont.)
Total: 27
Sheila Copps
Bonnie Brown (Oakville, Ont.) Sarmite Bulte (Parkdale-High Park, Ont.) Charles Caccia (Davenport, Ont.) Sheila Copps (Hamilton East, Ont.) John Finlay (Oxford, Ont.) Clifford Lincoln (Lac-Saint-LouisLaval East, Que.) Beth Phinney (Hamilton Mountain, Ont.)
Total: 7
John Manley
Peter Adams (Peterborough, Ont.) Colleen Beaumier (Brampton West, etc, Ont.) Martin Cauchon (Outremont, Que.) Dominic LeBlanc (Beausejour-Petitcodiac, N.B.) Bob Nault (Kenora-Rainy River, Ont.) Lawrence MacAulay (Cardigan, P.E.I.) John Manley (Ottawa-South, Ont.) Alex Shepherd (Durham, Ont.) Jane Stewart (Brant, Ont.) Susan Whelan (Essex, Ont.) Bob Wood (Nipissing, Ont.)
Total: 11
SENATORS
Paul Martin
Jack Austin (Vancouver South, B.C.) Lise Bacon (De La Durantaye, Que.) John Bryden (New Brunswick) Anne Cools (Toronto York, Ont.) George Furey (Newfoundland and Labrador) Jerahmiel S. Grafstein (Metro Toronto, Ont.) B. Alasdair Graham (The Highlands, N.S.) Colin Kenny (Rideau, Ont.) Shirley Maheu (Rougemont, Que.)
Total: 9
John Manley
Sharon Carstairs (Manitoba) Michael Kirby (South Shore, N.S.) Yves Morin (Lauzon, Que.) Marie-P. Poulin (Nothern Ontario, Ont.)
Total: 4
Sheila Copps
Willie Adams (Nunavut Territory) Tommy Banks (Edmonton, Alta.) Michel Biron (Quebec Mille Isles) Thelma Chalifoux (Alberta) Maria Chaput (Manitoba) Pierre De Bane (De la Valliere , Que.) Marisa Ferretti-Barth (Repentigny, Que.) Laurier LaPierre (Ontario) Raymond Lavigne (Quebec, Que.) Rose-Marie Losier-Cool (Tracadie, N.B.) Pana Merchant (Saskatchewan) Lorna Milne (Peel County, Ont.) Vivienne Poy (Toronto, Ont.) Fernand Robichaud (Saint-Louis-de-Kent, N.B.) Raymond Setlakwe (Laurentides, Que.) Charlie Watt (Inkerman, Que.)
Total: 16
Undecided / Undeclared
George Baker (Newfoundland and Labrador) Catherine Callbeck (Prince Edward Island) Ione Christensen (Yukon) Joan Cook (Newfoundland and Labrador) Eymard G. Corbin (Grand-Sault, N.B.) Jane Cordy (Nova Scotia) Joseph A. Day (Saint John-Kennebecasis, N.B.) Joyce Fairbairn (Lethbridge, Alta.) Isobel Finnerty (Ontario) D. Ross Fitzpatrick (Okanagan-Similkameen, B.C.) Joan Fraser (De Lorimier, Que.) Jean-Robert Gauthier (Ottawa-Vanier, Ont.) Aurelien Gill (Wellington, Que.) Daniel Hays (Calgary, Alta.) Celine Hervieux-Payette (Bedford, Que.) Elizabeth Hubley (Prince Edward Island) Mobina Jaffer (British Columbia) Serge Joyal (Kennebec, Que.) Leo Kolber (Victoria, Que.) Richard H. Kroft (Manitoab) Jean Lapointe (Saurel, Que.) Viola Leger (New Brunswick) Frank Mahovlich (Ontario) Wilfred Moore (Stanhope St./Bluenose, N.S.) Landon Pearson (Ontario) Lucie Pepin (Shawinegan, Que.) Gerard Phalen (Nova Scotia) Pierrette Ringuette-Maltais (New Brunswick) William Rompkey (North West River, Nfld.) Nick G. Sibbeston (Northwest Territories) David Smith (Ontario) Herbert Sparrow (Saskatchewan) Peter Stollery (Bloor and Yonge, Ont.) John (Jack) Wiebe (Saskatchewan)
Total: 34
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: November 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 64 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(29) Jl 17'03 pg 1,17; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5815094
LENGTH: 836 words
HEADLINE: 12 Liberal MPs, senators urge shift in Mideast policy
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
[Graph Not Transcribed]
[Graph Not Transcribed]
A dozen Liberal MPs and senators are asking the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) to ''improve and refresh'' its Mideast policy - in effect shifting to a more pro-Israel stance.
In a paper submitted to the department as part of its comprehensive review of foreign policy, the MPs advance a broad range of recommendations that would see Canada recognize Israel's legitimate need to fight terrorism, marginalize Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat, end its use of the term ''cycle of violence,'' and alter Canada's voting pattern on United Nations resolutions that single out Israel for criticism.
If adopted, the report suggests its recommendations would add ''a number of corrections... in the current Canadian foreign policy towards the conflict... [by] bringing our policy up to date and resolving the inconsistencies between our stated policy and our implementation of that policy.''
The policy paper states it ''offers a comprehensive vision of proactive, Canadian Middle Eastern diplomacy in the 21st century and it gives hope to this region in turmoil.''
The policy proposals were submitted by Toronto-area MPs Carolyn Bennett, Art Eggleton, Jim Peterson and Joe Volpe; Montreal-area MPs Raymonde Folco, Marlene Jennings, Bernard Patry, Irwin Cotler and Senator Leo Kolber; Winnipeg MP Anita Neville and Winnipeg Senator Richard Kroft; and Vancouver Senator Jack Austin.
The MPs represent ridings with the largest Jewish population concentrations in Canada.
Volpe said the MPs wanted to get away from a purely ''reactive'' approach to Mideast events.
''We said we have to come up with something coherent and encompassing, rather than piecemeal reactions to issues as they come up,'' Volpe said.
''It's not just a critique of our foreign policy regarding the Middle East, it's a road map for understanding what is going on and suggesting solutions from a Canadian perspective.
''My critique of the Canadian position has been that we're trying to have a balanced position so we can be the honest broker,'' Volpe said. ''Give me a break. People are dying every day.''
Volpe said Canada must stand for Israel's right to peace within secure and recognized borders.
Peterson said he's disagreed for some time with some aspects of Canadian policy, including part of its UN voting record and its criticism of Israel when it responds to terrorist attacks.
''One of the most egregious occasions was when we said Israel does not have the right to pursue terrorists in the territories and defend itself against them,'' he said.
Eggleton, Canada's former defence minister, said the report addresses some deficiencies in Canadian policy, such as criticism when Israel responds to terrorism. ''It's not proper to think of those situations of Israel attempting to defend its people as some sort of attack or retaliation on the Palestinians. It's part of a police action'' aimed at dismantling terrorism, he said.
Canada, Eggleton noted, took part in the Afghan campaign against terrorism, much as Israel is doing when it defends itself against Palestinian terrorism.
Neville, who recently visited Washington, D.C., on a program sponsored by parliament's Canada-Israel Friendship Group, said ''it's important that the politicians, not just the bureaucrats, have input on the policy-making process.''
She said the report asks policy-makers to consider Arafat an impediment to meaningful peace.
The MPs and senators agreed Israel enjoys support in the caucus beyond the dozen who signed the report. With the document on the table, their next step will be to meet colleagues, DFAIT officials and representatives of the Jewish community to solicit broader backing for the initiative, Neville said.
Among the recommendations outlined in the report:
- Canada should not use the term ''proportionate response'' in connection with Israeli security measures and should not second guess legitimate measures aimed at combatting terrorism;
- Canada should not used the term ''cycle of violence,'' as that equates terror attacks with their response;
- Canada should reverse its earlier policy of recognizing Arafat as head of the PLO and simply recognize the Palestinian Authority as the principal representative of the Palestinian people;
- Canada should endorse the road map for peace and contribute to the plan's multilateral track;
- Canada should lobby the UN General Assembly, western democracies and other international organization against the politicization of the UN;
- Canada should work with the Lebanese government to remove the military presence of Syria and Hezbollah in Lebanon;
- Canada should urge Saudi Arabia to tackle the underlying causes of Islamic extremism in that country;
- Canada should demand that Iran stop supporting terrorism and it should call on the UN Commission on Human Rights to re-establish its rapporteur there.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 12, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 65 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 411 words
HEADLINE: ISRAELI, FOREIGN LAWYERS REPRESENTING TERRORISTS' VICTIMS IN LAWSUIT AGAINST PA
BYLINE: Report by Dan Izenberg: "Lawyers' Mission Targets Terrorists' Bank Accounts"
BODY:
A group of English-speaking lawyers arrived in Israel earlier this week for a
special mission organized by ShuratHadin, an organization established to conduct
lawsuits against the Palestinian Authority on behalf of terrorism victims.
The group is headed by attorney Nitzana Darshan-Leitner, the first Israeli lawyer to submit a lawsuit against the PA. Since then, the district courts in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv have received about a dozen suits for damages totaling millions of shekels.
During a reception for the mission on Wednesday night, Darshan-Leitner said that the aim of Shurat Hadin was to use litigation to wipe out the financial resources of the terrorist organizations.
Canadian parliamentarian and human rights activist Irwin Cotler told The Jerusalem Post that the lawsuits could be an effective tool in the fight against terrorism, since Israel controls millions of shekels which it has collected on behalf of the PA (such as income tax and unemployment insurance payments for Palestinians working in Israel.) In the the past three days of the 10-day tour, the group has met with representatives from the Shin Bet and army intelligence,Supreme Court President Aharon Barak, Devorah Chen, chief state prosecutor for security matters, and Col. Shaul Gordon, a member of the army's Chief Appellate Court. The group has also visited the military court at Beit El.
Darshan-Leitner said she hopes that a core of lawyers in other parts of the world will help her in the campaign to cripple the terrorist organizations. She added that the suits against the Palestinians help give the victims of terrorism the feeling that they control their lives once again.
Barak told the group that he was disappointed with the way that the US is coping with al-Qaida. He said that the UShas a tradition of going too far in restricting civil liberties when it perceives threats to national security. Barakadded that Israel tries to strike a better balance between national security needs and human rights.
(Description of Source: Jerusalem The Jerusalem Post (Internet Version-WWW) in English -- Right-of-center,English-language, independent daily; root URL on filing date: www.jpost.co.il
JOURNAL-CODE: WWNC
LOAD-DATE: July 1, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 66 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 4A
LENGTH: 493 words
HEADLINE: Lawyers' mission discusses targeting pocketbooks of terrorist groups
BYLINE: Dan Izenberg
BODY:
A group of 47 men and women from English-speaking countries, most of them
lawyers, arrived in Israel earlier this week for a special mission organized by
Shurat Hadin, an organization established to conduct lawsuits against the
Palestinian Authority on behalf of terrorism victims.
The organization is headed by Attorney Nitzana Darshan-Leitner, who was the first Israeli lawyer to submit a lawsuit against the PA. Since then, the district courts in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv have received about a dozen suits for damages totaling millions of shekels.
During a reception for the mission on Wednesday night, Darshan-Leitner said that the aim of Shurat Hadin was to use litigation to wipe out the financial resources of the terrorist organizations.
Canadian parliamentarian and human rights activist Irwin Cotler told The Jerusalem Post that the lawsuits could be an effective tool in the fight against terrorism, since Israel controls millions of shekels which it has collected on behalf of the PA (such as income tax and unemployment insurance payments for Palestinians working in Israel.)
Evan Winer, an attorney from Chicago, said he had chosen this mission out of the many offered because of the impressive round of briefings and tours that Darshan- Leitner and her husband, Avi, had set up. In the the past three days of the 10-day tour, the group has met with representatives from the Shin Bet and army intelligence, Supreme Court President Aharon Barak, Devorah Chen, chief state prosecutor for security matters, and Col. Shaul Gordon, a member of the army's Chief Appellate Court. The group has also visited the military court at Beit El and held a barbecue at the settlement of Psagot, on the edge of Ramallah.
Darshan-Leitner said she hopes that a core of lawyers in other parts of the world will help her in the campaign to cripple the terrorist organizations. She added that the suits against the Palestinians help give the victims of terrorism the feeling that they control their lives once again.
Winer and another lawyer, Jason Wandner, of Miami, said they were impressed by the system of military justice in the administered territories. "The prosecutors are very professional," said Wandner.
The lawyers were skeptical about allegations that Israel is breaking international law in its fight against terrorism, questioning Belgium's ability to impose international law on a situation which involves "lawless countries or groups."
Supreme Court president Barak told the group he was disappointed with the way that the United States is coping with al-Qaida. He said the US has a tradition of going too far in restricting civil liberties when it perceives threats to national security, and that the detention of alleged terrorists on Cuba's Guantanamo Bay was a black mark on the constitution. Barak added that the court in Israel tries to strike a better balance between national security needs and human rights.
LOAD-DATE: June 29, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 67 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: International News
LENGTH: 200 words
HEADLINE: Canada's three largest political parties want Mugabe tried for genocide
DATELINE: OTTAWA, Oct 8
BODY:
Senior members of Canada's three largest parliamentary parties called
Wednesday on the Canadian government to indict Zimbabwe leader Robert Mugabe on charges of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Senior members of the governing Liberal Party, the right-wing populist Canadian Alliance and the regional, left-of-centre Bloc Quebecois said they were calling on Ottawa to issue a formal indictment against Mugabe.
At a joint press conference, Keith Martin, of the Canadian Alliance, said that if the government agreed to the three parties' demands, Mugabe could face arrest and trial if he ever stepped foot on Canadian soil or if he visited any other country with which Canada has extradition agreements.
In addition, said Irwin Cotler of Canada's governing Liberal Party, Zimbabwe should be "permanently suspended from the Commonwealth," an association linking Britain with more than 50 former colonies.
Martin said there was irrefutable evidence that "children as young as 10 are force to take part in torture and gang rape" by Mugabe's regime.
Martin claimed that Mugabe had been "using rape as a tool" to silence any opposition to regime.
hfw/mdl
Canada-Zimbabwe
LOAD-DATE: October 9, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 68 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(32) Ag 15'02 pg 1,13; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5447623
LENGTH: 1124 words
HEADLINE: Bombing shocks MPs' aides: parliamentary assistants on Israel mission
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
Missions to Israel are meant to do a lot of things, not the least of which is to expose visitors to the day-to-day lives of ordinary Israelis.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
Recently, a group of parliamentary assistants got more than they bargained for during a week-long visit to the Jewish state.
While enjoying lunch at the Anna Ticho House Restaurant in central Jerusalem, their afternoon briefing was interrupted by an explosion that shook the room and prompted local patrons to check in with their loved ones by cellphone. Only a block away, a suicide bomber had detonated an explosive charge, destroying a falafel stand but killing only himself.
Like the many Israelis sitting nearby, Tanis Gilbert felt the need to grab her phone and call her family -- in her case, her husband and mother back in Canada. They had been concerned about her visit to Israel and had asked that she call every day.
Gilbert, executive assistant to Montreal Liberal MP Irwin Cotler, knew it was still early in the morning back in Canada and felt she'd wait until later in the day. To her surprise, her husband, who had woken early and heard about the bombing on the morning news, was soon on the phone making sure she was alright.
Welcome to life in Israel in the year 2002.
Back in Canada, Gilbert said the suicide attack was ''a little nerve-racking.''
''In a way, I think it was helpful to us all when there was an incident, because it helped us understand better what the Israelis go through on a daily basis.''
Despite the attack, Gilbert was effusive when recalling her week in Israel. The beauty of the country, its sandy beaches, its holy places, its ancient architecture, all left an indelible mark on her. Especially memorable, she said, was an impromptu ''baptism'' in the Jordan River -- not by a Christian cleric, but by a Jewish man accompanying the trip.
''I figured Jesus was baptized by a Jew; why can't I be?'' she said.
Gilbert was one of seven parliamentary assistants who took part in the mission, which was organized by the Canada-Israel Committee (CIC), the Jewish community's political lobbying arm on Israel.
Roy Rempel was also fascinated by what he saw. A defence and foreign affairs analyst for Opposition Leader Stephen Harper, he was quite familiar with the issues facing Israel. Yet he was surprised by how small the country is and by the unmilitarized atmosphere in its major cities.
''I had certain preconceptions of what security would be like -- streets cordoned off, metal detectors at shopping centres. That wasn't the case, and I was surprised.''
Rempel was also taken aback at ''the extent to which Israelis continue to go to restaurants and to get on with their lives.''
Rempel admitted he felt somewhat ill at ease during portions of the trip. On their first night in Israel, the group stopped at an outdoor falafel restaurant and he felt somewhat nervous.
Beyond experiencing the uncertainty felt by ordinary Israelis, Rempel found the trip illuminating in a broader, strategic sense. During a visit to Israel's northern frontier, a trip that only took a few hours, he witnessed for himself the pre-1967 borders and ''the security dilemma Israel faces up there.''
Hills in Lebanon overlook the northern town of Metulla and ''you get a sense of how vulnerable those communities are. Hezbollah positions look down on a child's wading pool at [Metulla's] Canada Centre,'' he noted.
Gilbert, who was quite familiar with the Israeli scene because of her work in Cotler's office, said she was scared during the visit to northern Israel, when the group toured an Israeli military outpost and came ''face-to-face with Hezbollah.''
The Shiite terrorist group has erected a billboard facing Israel on which it placed enlarged photos showing mutilated Israeli soldiers killed in Lebanon.
''Hezbollah taunts the soldiers on a daily basis,'' she said. ''The fact they [Israeli soldiers] see this every day and managed to stay restrained was amazing to me,'' Gilbert said.
''The resilience of the Israeli people was amazing to me, that they go with normal lives even though things are blowing up around them. They have amazing resilience,'' she said.
A visit to the Shaare Zedek Hospital was a highlight for Laurie Scott, parliamentary assistant to Sen. Consiglio Di Nino, a Progressive Conservative.
Because of its location in Jerusalem, the hospital treats many bombing victims. A nurse by training, Scott was impressed by the hospital's efficiency in dealing with trauma, its triage system and its contingency plans in case of a chemical weapons attack.
Gilbert was moved by the personal story of a young X-ray technician who was badly burned and suffered shrapnel wounds while trying to help bombing victims on Ben Yehuda Street.
The woman now visits terror victims soon after they are brought to hospital and shows them a photograph of herself, with her face badly burned, taken immediately after she was hurt. Thanks to reconstructive surgery, she remains an attractive woman and she tells other victims they too will survive and be okay, Gilbert said.
The group also met with three Israeli parliamentarians as well as spokespeople for the Palestinian Authority. Rempel would have liked to have met more Palestinians, but he said he got a sense of how grim things are for the Palestinians and their economy. ''Because of the actions of the extremists, Israel has to take security measures... It just looks like a grim and wretched situation, something created by the extremists.''
Scott said: ''I kind of felt sad. There was so much anger and animosity between the two sides. That was kind of discouraging. I felt both sides were so exhausted and angry and there wouldn't be any negotiations... I'm so Canadian: 'Why can't you get along?' ''
David Cooper, CIC assistant director of government relations, said previous CIC missions to Israel involved MPs and senators. It was thought that showcasing Israel to parliamentary assistants would help expose an important group to the realities of the situation. ''They're the ones often helping their bosses doing the research, so we felt it wold be good to reach out to this level of the Ottawa political establishment.''
The visit to Israel ''puts faces on the human situation,'' Cooper said. ''They come away with a very positive feeling about Israeli society.''
Others who took part in the trip included Mark Buzan, who works with Canadian Alliance MP Jason Kenney; Rob Moore, assistant to Stephen Harper; Patrick St. Jacques, assistant to Bloc Quebecois MP Richard Marceau; and Adam Dubroy, assistant to Liberal MP Carolyn Bennett.
Attack 'a little nerve-racking'
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: April 16, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 69 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 32
LENGTH: 217 words
HEADLINE: TORONTO MARCHERS BATTLE ANTI-SEMITISM
BYLINE: BY DAVE GORDON, TORONTO SUN
BODY:
More than 1,000 people protested anti-Semitism and racial intolerance in the Canadian March for Humanity yesterday .
"We want to spread the message that there should be zero tolerance for intolerance," said Sandy Stern, founder and chairman of Canadians Against Anti-Semitism, which organized the March that began at Bloor St. and Avenue Rd. and ended at Queen's Park.
"There has been a sharp rise in anti-Semitism in our city and in our country. This is not a part of our city's values. Our city's strength is in its diversity. Racism runs counter to the spirit of Toronto," said MP Art Eggleton, who spoke at the event. Other speakers included MP Irwin Cotler, MP Scott Reid, and Rev. David Mainse of 100 Huntley Street.
According to B'nai Brith Canada, Canada has seen a 60% rise in anti-Semitic incidents in the past year.
Clyde Smith, 52, from the International Christian Embassy of Jerusalem, said he came as his religious duty.
"It is important for Christians to stand with the Jewish people, and do everything to prevent anti-Semitism. Canada has had a checkered past and made mistakes, and it would be nice if those mistakes didn't continue."
Earlier in the day, vendors and shoppers alike came to support Israel at Mel Lastman Square, in the eighth annual Israel Day Festival.
GRAPHIC: photo by Veronica Henri; A YOUNGSTER takes a break during the second Canadian March for Humanity yesterday. About 1,000 people gathered for the event.
LOAD-DATE: June 9, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 71 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(40) O 10'02 pg 35; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5486847
LENGTH: 800 words
HEADLINE: Jews expelled from Arab lands get new voice
BYLINE: Pomerance, Rachel
BODY:
NEW YORK -- An initiative seeking compensation for Jews forced to flee Arab lands during Israel's creation is gaining steam.
Justice for Jews From Arab Countries (JJAC) was launched last week to publicize the ''historical truth'' of Jewish refugees from Arab countries, said former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Richard Holbrooke.
The group says about 865,000 Jews had to flee Arab and Muslim lands because of hostility surrounding the the State of Israel's formation. That's more than the estimated 750,000 Palestinian refugees who fled or were expelled from Israel in the 1948 War of Independence.
Many of the Jewish refugees were stripped of their property when they fled.
The issue of Jewish refugees from Arab lands has been swept under the ''Persian carpet,'' joked Holbrooke, an honorary chairman of the new group, along with Lord George Weidenfeld of Great Britain's House of Lords.
Also taking leadership roles are Canadian MP and human rights lawyer Irwin Cotler and former Knesset speaker Shlomo Hillel, who helped some 100,000 Jews leave Iraq just after Israel's War of Independence.
The new group was created by the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the American Sephardi Federation and the World Jewish Congress.
The coalition seeks ''redress'' for Jews displaced from Arab lands. Exactly what form that will take should be determined in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, the group says.
''If the Palestinians will be getting financial restitution, then we believe Jewish refugees will be getting financial restitution,'' said Stanley Urman, director of the Center for Middle East Peace and the JJAC's co-ordinator. ''We want to make sure that every time the issue of refugees is discussed within the context of the Middle East peace process, then the rights of former Jewish refugees will also be addressed.''
The group plans to collect claims from Jewish refugees, start a legal committee to document the claims, lobby heads of state and international bodies, mobilize Jewish communal support and back a public education project.
The new coalition comes five months after Israeli Justice Minister Meir Sheetrit said his ministry was preserving and computerizing more than 10,000 claims from previous compensation initiatives that had been abandoned.
The ministry has partnered with the Sephardi Federation, which has been publicizing the effort and seeking new claims.
The goal is to gather information on Jewish property in Arab states to counter Palestinian claims to lost property in future talks, Sheetrit said in June.
Most Jewish refugees from Arab lands went to Israel, which undertook a massive effort to absorb them. Today, they and their descendants comprise half of Israel's Jewish population.
In contrast, Arab states largely refused to settle Palestinian refugees, denying them citizenship and forcing them into squalid camps to keep the conflict with Israel alive.
Israeli and Jewish leaders believe any final deal with the Palestinians will include compensation for Palestinian refugees. But they reject allowing refugees and their descendants to return to Israel, seeing it as tantamount to Israel's demographic destruction.
But Palestinian leaders continue to insist on the ''right of return.'' The issue was a key factor in the collapse of the July 2000 Camp David summit and subsequent peace talks.
The impetus for the new group, Urman said, is the prospect of future talks, the Justice Ministry push for documentation and the fact Jewish refugees with first-hand knowledge of their property claims in the Muslim world are dying off.
Until now, Jewish groups and individuals have crusaded for the cause with little support. Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice-chairman of the Conference of Presidents, said there has been no ''vehicle for doing this on a sustained basis'' and ''the UN wasn't taking it up.''
JJAC does plan to bring the matter to the UN, asking both UN delegations and Jewish groups with consultative status to broach the issue.
One basis for the group's diplomatic efforts will be UN Security Council Resolution 242, which since the 1967 Six-Day War has been the basis for land-for-peace talks. It also seeks to settle the refugee problem - without specifying which refugees.
The JJAC said it won't pursue a lawsuit against the Arab League, as proposed in June by Amram Attias, president of the International Committee of Jews From Arab Lands, which is part of the American Sephardi Federation.
''Our priority is to engage in political discussions,'' Urman said.
Attias said his group is still examining grounds for a suit, but said he would defer to the new coalition. ''Right now, we want to talk in one voice,'' he said.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: August 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 72 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. A17
LENGTH: 850 words
HEADLINE: Lawyer honoured for work in Bosnia
BYLINE: Harold Levy, Toronto Star
BODY:
Commands 'unparalleled respect'
A Toronto woman who helped thousands of victims of ethnic cleansing in Bosnia and Herzegovina repossess their homes and recover their stolen land has won a prestigious human rights award for her work.
Lawyer Georgette Gagnon, 44, is not only the first woman to receive the Walter Tarnopolsky Human Rights Award, but she is also the youngest recipient.
The award is presented annually to a Canadian resident who has made an "outstanding contribution to domestic or international human rights" by the Canadian section of the International Commission of Jurists.
Every third year it is given to a person like Gagnon who has managed to achieve extraordinary accomplishments in the area of human rights before reaching "the mid-point" of his or her career.
The top level selection committee which chose Gagnon for the honour included one member from the International Commission of Jurists.
The other members were from the Canadian Bar Association, the Canadian Judges' Conference and the Canadian Society of Law Teachers.
Other recipients since the award was initiated in 1994 have included human rights advocate and member of Parliament Irwin Cotler, former federal NDP leader and former head of the International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development Ed Broadbent, former justice minister Mark MacGuigan, former chairman of the Canadian Human Rights Commission Gordon Fairweather and, most recently, Senator Gerald Beaudoin, a constitutional scholar.
"This is a highly coveted award in Canada's human rights world," Ruth Selwyn, executive director of the Canadian Human Rights Foundation, said. "The award embodies the values and intellect of the late Walter Tarnopolsky, a great human rights advocate and scholar. And it is a reflection of the esteem with which she is held by her peers."
Gagnon, a graduate of the Osgoode Hall Law School, has been honoured largely for her efforts on behalf of more than one million citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina who were displaced by a 1992-95 regional war.
As director of human rights for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina for two years, she headed a 150-member staff whose job was to help people repossess their homes and businesses lost during the war.
Gagnon, who returned to Canada from Sarajevo at the end of June, said in an interview her work seeking justice for victims of human rights violations in Bosnia and Herzegovina was "overwhelming" in terms of the sheer numbers of people.
"Typically, we helped victims of ethnic cleansing whose loved ones had been killed, who had lost their jobs, who were forced out of their homes and communities, return to homes still occupied by the people who had moved into them," Gagnon said.
"There were tens of thousands of cases like this. It was a huge challenge to help them repossess their homes.
"Repossessing your property is the first step in a family's decision to return to your pre-war community. By making that happen, we contributed to stability and post-war reconciliation."
Gagnon's nomination was supported by Robert Beecroft, an American ambassador who heads the OSCE mission.
"I consider Ms. Gagnon to be one of those rare individuals who has single-handedly made a difference in Bosnia and Herzegovina, by enabling refugees and displaced persons to achieve justice while playing a key role in laying the foundations for a society based on the rule of law," Beecroft wrote.
"She commands an unparalleled respect among international colleagues and local counterparts in Bosnia and Herzegovina for her profound commitment to advancing respect for human rights in a country where abuses are still common ..." Beecroft said.
Gagnon majored in political science at the University of Calgary between 1977 and 1981, and receiving a law degree from Osgoode Hall in 1984, she went on, between 1997 and 1998 to write a master of law thesis .
In 1999 she plunged into human rights issues in Sudan where she studied the impact that trans-national companies had on the human rights of citizens in war-torn countries.
She later participated in several missions to Sudan that investigated links between Canadian oil development and human rights violations.
In 2002, she served as the legal and technical adviser to an International Eminent Persons Group created by the United States Secretary of State that investigated slavery, abduction and forced servitude in Sudan and recommended practical measures to stop it.
In addition to being presented with an inscribed bronze medallion at the Canadian Bar Association's annual meeting in Montreal on Aug. 18, Gagnon will also receive a $1,000 honorarium. She plans to donate it to an organization in Sudan that helps women become economically self-sufficient.
Gagnon is married to consultant Dan Rath, with whom she wrote a 1991 book about the demise of then-Ontario premier David Petersons's Liberal government. She is currently considering an offer from the United Nations to do human rights work in Iraq.
GRAPHIC: Rick Eglinton/toronto star Georgette Gagnon, 44, helped thousands of people in Bosnia repossess their lost homes.
LOAD-DATE: August 12, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 73 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 6A
LENGTH: 972 words
HEADLINE: STATESIDE
BYLINE: Melissa Radler
BODY:
Genocide Bombing
Two months after a White House spokesman coined the phrase "homicide bombing," a member of Canada's Parliament has come up with a new term to describe self-immolators targeting Israeli civilians in discos, pizza parlors and buses: "Genocide bombers."
"Suicide bombing to me is an inappropriate and misleading term," explained MP Irwin Cotler, who is also a world-renowned professor of human rights law. The term homicide bomber, he said, was "a quick attempt to offset the term suicide bombing. It's better than suicide bombing, but I think it should be called what it in fact is."
Cotler tried out his new phrase in the House of Commons on Tuesday, where he gave a minute-long floor speech condemning the "genocidal bombing" that killed 19 Israelis earlier that day in Jerusalem. Then, he personally explained his new term to Prime Minister Jean Chretien, who promptly issued a rare statement on the Middle East. "Canadians are horrified by these brutal attacks," it began.
Cotler discussed the reasoning behind his choice of semantics. "It appeared to me that this wasn't just a matter of people committing terrorist acts for the sake of terror. That would be bad enough," he said. "People are singling out Jews because of a covenant that they commit themselves to, to the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews wherever they live."
Recovery, New York style
A member of Congress secured his visa, a Russian- Jewish emigre donated his surgical skills and Russian- Americans paid for 16-year old Sergey Losavridza's stay in the US this week, where the Israeli teenager underwent surgery to remove a bolt lodged near his brain during a recent terrorist attack.
Losavridza, a high school student who enjoys sports, was injured in a December 2, 2001 suicide attack on a Haifa bus carried out by Hamas. Six months after a corrosive bolt shot through his face and lodged in his head, a four and a half hour operation on Monday to remove the bolt was deemed a success by ear, nose and throat surgeon, Daniel Branovan.
At a press conference before the surgery, Rep. Ben Gilman (R-NY) - who stepped in after Losavridza's visa was denied by the US embassy in Israel - praised the executive director of the Jewish Community Relations Council, Michael Miller, for organizing Losavridza's surgery and stay, the hospital and doctors for donating upwards of $ 20,000 in time and medical equipment to the injured teen, and the Russian-Jewish community for sponsoring Losavridza and his mother in the US. "When I was asked to assist Sergey, it personalized Hamas's cowardly acts of terror and barbarity," said Gilman.
Miller urged his fellow Jews not to become inured to terror's statistics in Israel. "Here we have a living, breathing survivor of a horrific attack," he said.
PeaceWorks
Fed up with the violence in the Middle East, a Mexican Jewish entrepreneur named Daniel Lubetzky inaugurated PeaceWorks last week in New York to solve a century old conflict halfway around the world.
With Jewish and Arab speakers in tow, Lubetzsky - founder and CEO of a company of the same name that promotes joint business ventures in the region - announced his plan to mobilize the Israeli and Palestinian masses in support of peace.
"A small core of extremists would like to achieve an absolutist agenda on each side," he said of the current strife. "One percent of the population has taken hostage of 99% of the population."
With a committee of 200 activists, PeaceWorks' plans entail gathering signatures (including anonymous signatures) by mail, telephone and the Internet in support of a general grassroots peace initiative, then hashing out a final peace deal using the January, 2001 Taba proposals as a starting point.
After calling for the masses to make themselves heard, a minor furor erupted at the inaugural event when an audience member said that Israel's masses have already mobilized for peace and that Israeli democracy already allows their voices to be heard. "If you would go and preach these beautiful ideas to the Palestinians, the next day you wouldn't wake up," he said, at which point he was heckled and told to "Be quiet!" by a fellow spectator.
Lubetzky tried to mollify both sides. "Whether there is democracy or not, it has been co-opted by extremists," he said. An Arab Israeli PeaceWorks member concurred, calling the audience member's comment "part of the dehumanization process."
Syrian ambassador speaks to Israeli reporter
After eight months of frosty silence, Syria's ambassador to the United Nations spoke to an Israeli reporter at a recent briefing held outside Security Council chambers. The gesture marked a first for Ambassador Mikhail Wehbe of Syria, who, along with his staff, had studiously avoided acknowledging members of the Israeli press corps since his country was elected to the 15-member council last October.
Syria's thawing diplomatic boundaries vis a vis Israel coincided with its assumption of the council's rotating presidency on June 1. During Wehbe's first week on the job, the Israeli reporter managed to get called on at a question and answer period, though the ambassador declined to answer his question. In another first, Wehbe explained his lack of response directly to the reporter. "He said, 'Why do you ask questions about Israel? I will not answer questions about Israel!'" the reporter recalled.
Jewish social scene
Hundreds of Jewish under-40s turned out for cocktails and humous at "Unity 2002," the Israeli consulate's first gathering of major Jewish organizations's younger membership under one roof. Spotted conversing with the locals at the event was Israeli basketball great and captain of Maccabi Tel Aviv, Nadav Henefeld.
"I'm really amazed by how many people are here," he said.
LOAD-DATE: June 26, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 74 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: PERSPECTIVE; Pg. 85
LENGTH: 587 words
HEADLINE: Musharraf denies charges raised in book about Pearl
BYLINE: BY DENNIS JOHNSON SPECIAL TO THE DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE
BODY:
Writer Dennis Johnson is publisher of Melville House Books in New Jersey,
which reprinted Who Killed Daniel Pearl?, by Bernard-Henri Levy. The book,
translated by James X. Mitchell, was originally published in France. Johnson's
column on books and authors formerly appeared in the Democrat-Gazette.
In response to a surprise question during an appearance before the Canadian Parliament on Sept. 26, the president of Pakistan has responded to revelations in the book Who Killed Daniel Pearl? that the killer of the Wall Street Journal reporter was a member of the Pakistani secret service, the ISI, and that the Pakistani government may be sheltering more who were involved.
In response to a query from MP Irwin Cotler, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf said the author of Who Killed Daniel Pearl?, Bernard-Henri Levy, lacks evidence and that Pearl put himself at risk by his involvement with "a group that had contacts with all kinds of people and then he kept moving down into this world of extremism himself."
Musharraf added, "And then whatever happened, happened."
Ruth and Judea Pearl, Daniel Pearl's parents, immediately denounced the comments. Speaking to a reporter from Toronto's Globe & Mail newspaper on Sept. 27, Ruth Pearl said Musharraf was "blaming the victim," while Judea Pearl said the Pakistani president was "trying to exonerate himself and the people he works with, the ISI."
The Levy book "raises major questions that the [Musharraf] government has never responded to," Ruth Pearl said.
Levy, meanwhile, called Musharraf's comments "outrageous," and "a slander on the memory of Daniel Pearl." In New York City on Sept. 27 to talk about his charges on the PBS news program "Now With Bill Moyers," Levy said, "Daniel Pearl was a journalist doing his job, and doing it fearlessly. He was not an extremist."
"This is the same thing that Musharraf had the nerve to say to President Bush at the time of the kidnapping," Levy said, "that Danny Pearl had been 'over-intrusive.' I am astonished that Musharraf is allowed to get away with these comments as a way of avoiding discussion on Pakistan's responsibility in this tragedy."
Musharraf has previously refused to answer questions about the book. During a state visit to France in July, Musharraf refused to answer reporters asking him about the book, saying Levy was subject to "vested interests," but refusing to elaborate.
The book, originally released in France, was released in the United States this month by the small independent publisher, Melville House in Hoboken, N.J. The book quickly become a bestseller in France.
Wall Street JournalEditorial Features Editor Tunku Varadarajan, in a review, said, "I commend this book," and praised Levy for his "painstaking research" and his "noble sense of outrage."
"He's one of the few to ask hard questions about Pearl's death, harder than the questions the Pakistani investigators appear to have asked of the suspects-harder, even, than the questions the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad was willing to ask of the investigators," wrote Varadarajan.
In a separate statement, Wall Street Journal Managing Editor Paul Steiger said the newspaper had no evidence to confirm one of Levy's hypotheses, that Pearl may have been investigating the exchange of nuclear technology between Pakistan, North Korea and al-Qaida.
"However," Steiger said, "we urge all the authorities involved in the investigation to review the book." This story was originally published on Sunday, October 05, 2003.
LOAD-DATE: October 6, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 75 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 4
LENGTH: 510 words
HEADLINE: UK to address issue of Jewish refugees from Arab lands
BYLINE: Douglas Davis, Melissa Radler Contributed To This Report.
BODY:
LONDON - British officials have promised to make "every effort" to highlight
the cause of Jewish refugees from Arab countries within the European Union.
The pledge followed the presentation of a report by members of the Justice for Jews from Arab Countries (JJAC) to Foreign Office Minister Baroness Symons and Lord Michael Levy, Prime Minister Tony Blair's personal envoy to the Middle East.
The JJAC report, entitled "The Middle East's Forgotten Jewish Refugees," notes that just 8,000 Jews now live in Arab countries, down from 900,000 in 1947.
It is seeking international recognition of the "de facto population exchange" of Jews and Palestinians, which "refutes the Arab claim for a 'physical' right of return." The report points out that "while everyone knows about the 'plight' of the Palestinians, few know about these Jews, who were "refugees no less than their Palestinian counterparts."
After the meeting at the House of Lords on Monday, human rights lawyer and Canadian legislator Irwin Cotler said the European Union "must take the lead in holding Arab governments responsible." He noted that "both Palestinian refugees and former Jewish refugees are victims of the Arab war against Israel."
The report, based in part on recently released UN documents, pointed to collusion by Arab governments against their Jewish populations, which Cotler described as "ethnic cleansing and criminal conspiracy."
Executive director Stanley Urman said the JJAC "will not allow this issue to be treated with lip service. We will plead the case for rights and redress in every hall of government in Europe."
"The issue of rights and redress for Jews displaced from Arab countries must be placed on the international political and juridical agenda as a matter of law and equity," he said.
The JJAC is demanding "recognition of the legitimate rights of the Jews from Arab countries and restitution of their private and collective claims for the loss of life and invaluable spiritual and material assets, including communal and private property that was expropriated or abandoned by Jews forced to leave those countries."
"At a conference on Jewish refugees from Arab countries, organized this past Sunday in London by the World Jewish Congress, speakers contrasted the integration of the Jewish refugees in Israel with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency's refusal to resettle Palestinian refugees.
Carole Basri, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania law who presented a study on Iraq's persecution and expulsion of its Jewish population following Israel's establishment, said that the measures were "orchestrated and carried out by the state," and that they constituted "ethnic cleansing under international law."
A new WJC report, "UNRWA, Terror, and the Refugee Conundrum: Perpetuating the Misery," written by the organization's secretary-general Avi Beker, as well as Basri's study, will be presented this week to the White House, Congress, the British Parliament, and the EU Parliament, said Beker.
LOAD-DATE: July 2, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 76 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: CANADA & WORLD; Pg. D02
LENGTH: 692 words
HEADLINE: MPs 'shield' Zimbabweans; Canada won't tolerate attacks, Mugabe told
SOURCE: The Canadian Press
BYLINE: Dennis Bueckert
DATELINE: OTTAWA
BODY:
Canadian MPs are twinning with opposition politicians in Zimbabwe in hope of deterring attacks on them during that country's tense election campaign.
Fourteen Canadian parliamentarians have volunteered to stay in close touch with Zimbabwean MPs who have been attacked or are considered at risk in pre-electoral violence by government thugs.
Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe should know the whole world is watching the election, Liberal MP Irwin Cotler said yesterday.
"This is to put the Zimbabwe government and Mugabe on notice that the kind of intimidation and violence he's been engaged in, he will be accountable for," said Cotler.
Prime Minister Jean Chretien said the Zimbabwean elections will be the main topic at the meeting of Commonwealth leaders on the weekend in Australia.
With the March 9 election less than two weeks away, two leading opposition politicians have been charged with treason for allegedly plotting to assassinate Mugabe.
There has been talk of suspending Zimbabwe from the Commonwealth but Canada has withheld its decision pending further developments.
"The situation in Zimbabwe is deteriorating every day," Chretien said after a cabinet meeting. "The situation is complicated. Canada will be in the avant garde to protect democracy in Zimbabwe."
Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham said he was checking into reports from Zimbabwe that all Canadian journalists will be refused permission to cover the elections.
He said his "twin," Blessing Chebundo, has had his house destroyed, received death threats and narrowly avoided being set on fire after attackers doused him with gasoline.
New Democrat Bill Blaikie, another participant in the twinning program, said it can't guarantee candidates will be safe but should help deter attacks. "We're doing what we can at this end."
Morgan Tsvangirai, head of the Movement for Democratic Change, was charged with treason Monday and released. The offence carries a penalty of life imprisonment or the death sentence.
MDC secretary general Welshman Ncube and Renson Gasela, the party's shadow agriculture minister, were charged with the same crime yesterday after being summoned by police, said their lawyer, Innocent Chagonda. They were also released from custody.
The government claims Tsvangirai met members of the Montreal-based political consulting firm Dickens and Madson last year to arrange for the "elimination" of Mugabe.
Earlier this month, the company's president Ari Ben-Menashe released a secretly recorded videotape of a Dec. 4 {2001?] meeting in Montreal which he said incriminated Tsvangirai.
The RCMP has launched an investigation into the alleged plot.
Zimbabwean police say Ncube and Gasela accompanied Tsvangirai when he first met officials of Dickens and Madson in London last year. Tsvangirai has acknowledged meeting officials of the firm four times about possible publicity it could offer his party abroad.
The opposition denies it planned to assassinate Mugabe and says the secret video was doctored.
Tsvangirai has also alleged it was the firm, not the opposition leader, that first proposed a plot to kill Mugabe.
Ben-Menashe has called that accusation "total rubbish." He has also denied Tsvangirai's allegation that his company was hired to discredit the opposition.
In Harare, Tsvangirai said yesterday he had not made an error of judgment in meeting the firm, which had worked for the Zimbabwean government for several years, a fact he was apparently unaware of.
"I trusted the judgment of my subordinates who recommended me to see these people."
He also said the charges would not affect his party's presidential campaign.
"If it was so serious a charge as treason, why should someone be allowed to go scot free? Our programs will continue as we planned them," he said.
Tsvangirai said the government was trying to sway voters and accused it of banning opposition rallies to stifle his campaign before the March 9-10 vote.
In South Africa, Zimbabwean opposition activists said the decision to charge Tsvangirai with treason was an "act of desperation" by a government petrified of losing power.
GRAPHIC: Photo: REUTERS; Supporters of Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe flash posters at rally before elections take place on March 9-10.
LOAD-DATE: February 27, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 77 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 26
LENGTH: 367 words
HEADLINE: MONUMENT EYED FOR SLAIN REPORTER
BYLINE: BY KATHLEEN HARRIS, OTTAWA BUREAU
DATELINE: OTTAWA
BODY:
Amid allegations his government's secret service was linked to Daniel Pearl's
murder, Pakistan's military ruler says he'll consider erecting a human rights monument in the slain journalist's honour.
President Pervez Musharraf told the Commons foreign affairs committee yesterday that Pakistan is "totally committed" to fighting terrorism and promised not to proliferate its nuclear weapons.
He also promised to consider a request from the Pearl family -- presented by Liberal MP Irwin Cotler -- to install a tribute memorial.
But he rejected claims Pearl was murdered because he was about to reveal links between terrorists and Pakistan's intelligence service, the ISI.
A recent book by French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy retraces Pearl's final steps in Karachi before he was kidnapped and beheaded in January 2002.
The author alleges Pearl was killed because he had found links between al-Qaida terrorists and Pakistan's secret service, and that a faction of the ISI was working with terrorists and trading nuclear secrets with Iran and North Korea.
BOOK 'CONJECTURE'
"ISI involvement in the killing of this young man in unthinkable," Musharraf told MPs.
"The conjecture that is being done in this book is very sad, and with what authentication?"
Musharraf said Pearl arrived in Pakistan from India and became more and moren involved in the "world of extremism.
"Unfortunately, whatever happened, happened," Musharraf said.
Visiting Canada to press for closer economic and trade ties, Musharraf also defended Pakistan's record on counter-terrorism, and said the enemy is "on the run" in small packs along the border.
Musharraf, who staged a coup in 1999, promised to relinquish military rule once the region is stable.
"I'm not giving a date, but I understand this is not democratic," he said.
"But under the present circumstances of turmoil in the region, internationally and internally, there is a requirement of stability and unity of command, which I am providing.
"The moment the democratic structure stabilizes, I will take off the uniform."
Today, Prime Minister Jean Chretien meets with Hamid Karzai, the president of the Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan.
GRAPHIC: 1. photo of DANIEL PEARL; 2. photo of PERVEZ MUSHARRAF
LOAD-DATE: September 27, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 78 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(35) S 5'02 pg B70-B71; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5456829
LENGTH: 3011 words
HEADLINE: The year 5762 in review: The year began with a security alert to Jewish institutions... and ended with an increasing toll of intifada death
BYLINE: Grachnik, Adam
BODY:
Tishrei
EVENTS
- The Canadian Jewish Congress issues a warning to all Jewish organizations, community centres and synagogues to go on neightened alert after the Sept. 11 terror attacks in the United States.
- The Los Angeles Times reveals that the Mossad had warned the United States in August 2001 that 200 terrorists linked to Osama bin Laden were entering the country to plan ''a major assault on the United States.''
PEOPLE
- Isaac Stern, master violinist, dies at 81.
Cheshvan
EVENTS
- British Prime Minister Tony Blair announces that a Palestinian state is key for peace in the Middle East.
- Syria is elected to the United Nations Security Council.
- Israeli Tourism Minister Rechavam Ze'evi is assassinated by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Israel responds by sending troops into six Palestinian cities.
- Shaar Shalom Synagogue in Thornhill, Ont. is vandalized with graffiti reading ''Jews must die/Taliban lives/Osama bin Laden lives.''
- Eleven Jewish organizations in Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa and Windsor receive letters containing substances feared to be anthrax.
- MP Irwin Cotler says the selection of the United Nations and its secretary general for the Nobel Peace Prize legitimizes the ''festival of hate'' against Israel and Jews that occurred at the UN anti-racism conference in Durban, South Africa.
- A Palestinian terrorist opens fire on bus in the French Hill neighbourhood of Jerusalem. Two Israelis are killed and the gunman is shot dead. Islamic Jihad claims responsibility.
- Then-foreign minister John Manley tours the Middle East. He attempts to get Israel to withdraw from Palestinian areas and criticizes the Palestinian Authority.
- The Israel Defence Forces officially declares dead three soldiers who were kidnapped by Hezbollah in southern Lebanon last year.
- U.S. President George W. Bush, declares support for an independent Palestine alongside Israel.
- The U.S. State Department freezes the assets of terrorist groups, including Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
PEOPLE
- Simon Wiesenthal announces his retirement at age 92 after bringing close to 3,000 war criminals to justice.
Kislev
EVENTS
- Hezbollah rejects a secret U.S. offer to ''forgive'' terrorist attacks in exchange for ending hostilities towards Israel.
- Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon calls for seven days without violence as a first step to implement the peace plan brokered by former U.S. senator George Mitchell.
- Vandals burn down part of a Jewish elementary school in Marseille, France.
- Eight Israeli terror victims go to Belgium to petition a court there to charge Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat with war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.
- In a 24-hour period, 28 Israelis are killed in two separate terrorist attacks by Palestinians. The first occurrs in Jerusalem. In the second, a suicide bomber hits a city bus in Haifa.
- The Israeli military fires missiles at locations near Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat's Gaza headquarters.
- Chapters and Indigo bookstores remove copies of Mein Kampf from shelves, calling it ''hate literature.''
- Canada endorses a UN declaration calling on Israel to refrain from violating the Geneva Convention.
- US mediator Anthony Zinni begins a visit to the Middle East with the goal of bringing peace to the region.
- Israel cuts of all contact with Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat, claiming he is ''no longer relevant,'' after a suicide bomber kills 10 Israelis near the West Bank settlement of Immanuel.
PEOPLE
- Shimon Fogel is appointed executive director of the Canada-Israel Committee.
Tevet
EVENTS
- Israel bars Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat from attending Christmas services in Bethlehem unless he arrests those responsible for the assassination of Tourism Minister Rechavam Ze'evi.
- Leger Marketing releases a survey which shows that twice as many Canadians believe Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat rather than Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is responsible for the resurgence of Mideast violence.
- The Jewish Agency for Israel says French immigration to Israel is up 30 to 40 per cent in the wake of anti-Semitic attacks in France.
- After seizing a ship headed for the Palestinian Authority from Iran with more than 50 tons of weapons, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon declares ''the PA is a central part in the international terror network, with Iran at its centre.''
- U.S. envoy Anthony Zinni concludes a trip to the Middle East, saying there are opportunities for progress.
- The Shin Bet security service reveals that Saudi Arabia has been sending money and instructions to Gaza for a Kassam rocket-development project.
PEOPLE
- Senator Sheila Finestone steps down after reaching the Senate's mandatory retirement age of 75.
- Israeli Defence Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer becomes Labor Party leader.
Shvat
EVENTS
[Graph Not Transcribed]
- A freak snowstorm blankets Jerusalem.
- Israeli forces enter Tulkarm, imposing a curfew and arresting dozens of suspected militants.
- Numerous attacks on Jewish sites in Paris trigger condemnation by French President Jacques Chirac.
- Israel's deputy foreign minister, Rabbi Michael Melchior, criticizes France and calls the counry the ''worst Western country concerning anti-Semitism.''
- Reports suggest the Al Qaeda terror network is trying to move its headquarters from Afghanistan to Lebanon.
- Six Israelis are killed when a Palestinian terrorist attacks a bar mitzvah celebration in northern Israel.
- A suicide blast kills 1 and wounds 100 others in central Jerusalem. The bomber is described as a 20-year-old female student from Nablus.
- Three teenagers are killed by a suicide bomber inside a shopping mall in the West Bank.
- Six Israeli soldiers are killed at a roadblock near Ramallah, leading Israel to launch land, sea and ground attacks that kill 14 Palestinians.
- Kidnapped Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl is confirmed dead after U.S. officials view video-tape of his throat being slit and his head being decapitated. The tape also shows Pearl saying repeatedly that he is Jewish.
PEOPLE
- Comedian Frank Shuster dies at 85.
- Deputy prime minister Herb Gray, 70, unexpectedly resigns from Parliament around the same time that Prime Minister Jean Chretien shuffles his cabinet.
- David Levine becomes Quebec's junior health minister, the first Jewish cabinet minister in a Parti Quebecois government.
Adar
EVENTS
- Israeli forces strike the main security complex in Gaza City in retaliation for shooting and rocket attacks in the Negev.
- A new Saudi peace initiative is called ''a positive trend'' by a senior aide to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, but Israel said it would not agree to a key provision - a return to the pre-1967 war borders.
- Canada abstains in a UN vote that begins implementing resolutions passed at the World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa, which was denounced by many Western nations as an exercise in Israel-bashing.
- Toronto Police report Jews were the single largest victims of hate crimes in 2001, being targeted a record 338 times - a 66 per cent increase over the previous year.
- An Ontario judge orders Daniel Weiz and two youths to stand trial in the beating death of Matti Baranovski.
- A suicide bomber kills 10, including six children, in Jerusalem's haredi neighbourhood of Beit Israel.
- In a 24-hour period 14 Israelis are killed. Eleven are killed in a suicide blast at the Moment Cafe, mere blocks from the official residence of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. In Netanya two Israelis are shot dead by Palestinian gunmen.
PEOPLE
- Ben Kayfetz, writer, broadcaster, activist and historian of Canadian Jewry, dies at 85.
Nisan
EVENTS
- Israeli President Moshe Katsav is honoured by Prime Minister Jean Chretien at the 17th Canada-Israel Committee Dinner.
- Arson is cited in a fire at Toronto's Anshei Minsk Synagogue. Damage is estimated at $100,000. Police say there is no indication of a hate crime. Books dating back to the 1860's were damaged in the fire.
- An 18-year-old Israeli is killed and 44 wounded in two separate terror attacks in Kfar Sava and Jerusalem.
- A suicide bomber kills 29 people and wounds hundreds in an attack on a seder at a hotel in Netanya.
- In Haifa, a suicide bomber strikes a restaurant, killing 15 people.
- Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, in a national television address, calls Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat ''Israel's enemy and the enemy of the entire free world.'' He launches Operation Protective Wall and the army engages in heavy fighting in Ramallah, Nablus, Bethlehem and Jenin. Arafat is put under house arrest at his Ramallah compound. Two right-wing Israeli cabinet ministers resign from the government after Sharon releases Arafat.
- March of the Living cancels the Israeli portion of the trip.
- Nine hundred people attend the first-ever Edmonton Jewish Film Festival.
- Israel withdraws its troops from Bethlehem and the Gaza Strip, but leaves troops in several towns and cities in the West Bank.
- A Palestinian ambulance is found carrying a bomb hidden under a gurney carrying a sick Palestinian child. The driver admits it's not the first time Palestinian ambulances have been used to carry bombs.
- Anti-Jewish attacks take place in France, with fires reported in shuls in Lyon, Strasbourg and Marseille.
- Thousands rally in Paris to express solidarity with Israel and protest a wave of anti-Jewish violence in France.
- Three Jewish community buildings in Ottawa and Toronto are vandalized with anti-Israel slogans. In Saskatoon, the Agudas Israel Synagogue is struck by a firebomb, causing $130,000 in damage.
- Hezbollah fires anti-tank rockets at Israeli forces on the Lebanese border.
PEOPLE
- Maj.-Gen. Moshe Ya'alon is appointed the Israel Defence Forces' 17th chief of staff.
Iyar
EVENTS
- Youths attack' the central synagogue in Kiev. They march down the street chanting ''kill the Jews.''
- Canadian Jewish Congress pulls out of a meeting of the Canadian Christian-Jewish Consultation, saying the CCJC doesn't support Israel in its fight against Palestinian terror and that churches have been silent on incidents of anti-Semitism in Canada.
- Twenty-three Israeli soldiers are killed in heavy fighting in Jenin, including eight killed in one ambush in an alley.
- Eight Israelis are killed and 14 wounded by a suicide bomber on a bus near Haifa.
- Six Israelis are killed at a bus stop in the Machane Yehuda market in Jerusalem.
- A crowd of 25,000 rally on Parliament Hill in Ottawa to show solidarity with Israel. A similar rally in Washington draws 100,000 people.
- Solidarity rallies in Montreal and Vancouver draw thousands.
- Canadian Jewish Congress calls the NDP ''biased and simplistic,'' even after leader Alexa McDonough apologizes for actions taken by former foreign affairs critic Svend Robinson during a trip to the West Bank.
- Israel captures Palestinian militia leader Marwan Barghouti, alleging he has been involved with ''directing, encouraging and financing terrorist activities.'' Israeli forces also capture Hamas operative Husam Badran.
- A truck filled with natural gas explodes outside a synagogue in Djerba, Tunisia, killing 15 people. Al Qaeda later claims responsibility.
- French Jews rally against extreme right-wing presidential candidate Jean-Marie Le Pen, who shocked France by qualifying for a head-to-head run-off vote against incumbent President Jacques Chirac.
- Israel rejects a UN-led fact-finding mission to the Jenin refugee camp. Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres claims the mission was looking to ''blood libel'' Israel.
- Twenty-two Canadian MPs and five senators - a record number - return from a trip to Israel sponsored by the Canada-Israel Committee.
- The standoff between Israeli forces and Palestinian gunmen at Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity ends as Israel says most of the wanted Palestinians would go free, while a few would be sent to Gaza and a small number would be deported.
- A Palestinian terrorist wearing an Israeli army uniform kills four people in the West Bank.
- El Al begins direct flights between Toronto and Los Angeles.
Sivan
EVENTS
- Canada abstains on a UN resolution condemning Israel hours after a suicide blast at a billiards hall in Rishon Lezion kills 15.
- The Likud Central Committee rejects the creation of a Palestinian state. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had tried to delay the vote on the resolution.
- After a meeting with Israeli Prime Ariel Sharon, Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham says Canada recognizes ''the need for Israel to have its security and it must take actions to ensure security.''
- The Beth Israel Ohev Shalom Synagogue, Quebec City's only synagogue, is firebombed in the early morning hours.
- The Israeli embassy in Paris burns to the ground, but terrorism is not cited as the cause.
- Two Israelis are killed and 41 injured in a suicide bombing in Rishon Lezion.
- Israeli Defence Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer orders a 225-mile-long security fence to be built between Israel and the West Bank.
- Four Israelis are killed in two separate terrorist attacks. One attack kills three yeshiva high school students in Itamar and a 50-year-old is ambushed near Ofra.
Tammuz
EVENTS
- Seventeen Israelis, including 13 soldiers, are killed when a suicide bomber detonates a car loaded with explosives beside an Egged bus near the northern town of Meggido. Islamic Jihad claims responsibility.
- At the Ontario regional convention of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), a resolution condemning Israel is passed without opposition.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
- Israeli forces attack Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat's Ramallah compound for six hours. Tanks and bulldozers destroy three buildings. One shell hits Arafat's bedroom.
- Unemployment in Israel hits a record 10.6 per cent, translating into 270,000 unemployed people.
- The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) passes resolution calling on Israel to withdraw from Palestinians areas. As well, the executive committee and council adopts a policy comparing Israel to South Africa under apartheid.
- One teen is killed by a suicide bomber in Herzliyah, leading the Israeli army to re-occupy Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat's compound for two days.
- In one week, 32 Israelis are killed by terrorism. In one incident, a suicide bomber blows himself up on a bus in Jerusalem.
- U.S. President George W. Bush, call for new Palestinian leadership through democratic means. He says if this happens, the United States will help put the new Palestinian Authority on firm financial footing.
- Israeli intelligence links Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat to a $20,000 (US) payment to the Fatah-affiliated Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group.
PEOPLE
- Yossi Goldberg, president of the Israeli Ice Skating Federation, dies at 60.
Av
EVENTS
- Hesham Mohamed Hadayet, an Egyptian immigrant living in the United States, opens fire at an El Al ticket desk in Los Angeles, killing two people before being shot dead.
- Pakistani tennis player Aisam Ul-Haq Qureshi, who teamed up with Israel's Amir Hadad in doubles play at Wimbledon, faces criticism and a potential ban by the Pakistan Sports Board because Pakistan has no ties with Israel.
- The New York Times reports that former Argentine president Carlos Menem received a $10-million (US) bribe from the Iranian government to remain silent about his country's role in the 1994 bombing of a Buenos Aries Jewish centre that killed 85 people.
- Nine people are killed when Palestinians wearing Israeli army uniforms ambush a bus on its way from Bnei Brak to Immanuel.
- One Israeli and two foreigners are killed in Tel Aviv by two suicide bombers.
- The Jewish Agency reports that 17,000 new immigrants have arrived in Israel since January 2002.
- The Israeli Consulate in Montreal. is one of eight foreign missions slated for closure by Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres. The Montreal Jewish community begins lobbying to reverse the decision.
- Israeli forces bomb the home of Saleh Shehadeh, head of Hamas's military wing in Gaza. The bomb kills 14 people, including Shehadeh's wife and three children.
- A bomb in a cafeteria at Hebrew University's campus on Mount Scopus kills seven and wounds 80.
- Israel releases $15 million (US) in frozen tax funds to the Palestinian Authority to avert a humanitarian disaster in the Palestinian areas.
- Israel launches a new offensive against Hamas, sending dozens of armoured vehicles into Nablus.
PEOPLE
- Thousands mourn after David Rosenzweig is stabbed to death in front of the King David Pizzeria in the heart of Toronto's Jewish community while helping his son with a broken-down car.
Elul
EVENTS
- Israel tells the United States that it will respond to a strike against it by Iraq, even if there are no Israeli casualties.
- Israel announces it will purchase 1 billion cubic metres of water from Turkey over the next 20 years.
- Jewish leaders in Prague launch an appeal for aid after floods cause $4 million (US) in damage to Jewish holy sites.
PEOPLE
- Notorious Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal, 65, is found dead in Baghdad from gunshot wounds. It's unclear if he committed suicide after a lengthy illness or was ordered killed by Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein for refusing to train Al Qaeda fighters in Iraq.
- Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs announces that, as of Aug. 30, 609 Israelis - 427 civilians and 182 members of security forces - have been killed by Palestinian violence since Sept. 29, 2000.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: April 16, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 79 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 515 words
HEADLINE: Media Advisory-CIAJ-Conference on Terrorism, Law and Democracy: How is Canada Changing Following September 11, 2001
BODY:
OTTAWA, ONTARIO--A multidisciplinary conference, "Terrorism, Law and
Democracy - How is Canada changing following September 11, 2001," will bring
together distinguished national and international experts on law and security.
The two-day conference will discuss the balance between the protection of public
security and fundamental rights and examine how countries around the world,
including Canada, have reacted to the events of September 11. It will be held in Montreal March 25-26.
The conference has a comprehensive program and brings together authorities and commentators from a diverse variety of fields, including: noted military commentator Gwynne Dyer, Ward Elcock, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, The Hon. Bob Rae, Paul Wilkinson, Director, Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence, University of St Andrews, Scotland, Desmond P. Morton, Former Director, McGill Institute for the Study of Canada, Alan Borovoy of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, MP Irwin Cotler, Vern Krishna, treasurer of the Law Society of Upper Canada and Stewart Bell of the National Post.
Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham will deliver the keynote address at the Conference luncheon on Tuesday, March 26th.
Among the topics to be discussed are the impact of September 11 on Canada's ethnic communities; international terrorist networks and the new threat environment; terrorism and the criminal law; does Bill C-36 give police too many powers; fighting terrorism financing - implications for the legal and financial sectors.
There will be a community forum, open to all members of the public, on Monday evening. The purpose of the forum will be to explore and discuss the impact that Canada's response to terrorism has had on the fabric of Canada's multicultural society. The forum will be moderator by Rivka Augenfeld, Table de concertation des organismes au service des personnes refugiees et immigrantes, Montreal, QC and Peter Showler, Chair, Immigration and Refugee Board, Ottawa, ON. The panel includes: Ms Saliha Bahig, Psychologist, Montreal, QC, Dr. Rudhramoorthy Cheran, Centre for Refugee Studies, York University, Toronto, ON and Dr. Emerson Douyon, Clinique Rene Laennec, Montreal, QC.
The conference is organized by the Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice and co-sponsored by the Law Commission of Canada, the Canadian Association for Security and Intelligence Studies, Carleton University's Centre for Security and Defence Studies, University of Ottawa's Faculty of Law, Universite de Montreal and McGill University's Institute of Comparative Law and Faculty of Law.
LOCATION: Renaissance Hotel du Parc - Montreal, Quebec
DATES: March 25 & 26, 2002
The full program can be viewed at: http://www.ciaj-icaj.ca/en/index.html
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice Christine
Robertson (514) 343-6157 Email : [email protected] Web : www.ciaj-icaj.ca
LOAD-DATE: March 18, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 80 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: News; Pg. A5
HEADLINE: WILD ART;
WARTIME HERO REMEMBERED
GRAPHIC: photo by Andre Forget CP; Dr. Vera Parnes, founder and president of the Raoul Wallenberg International Movement for Humanity, places flowers by a bust of Wallenberg in Montreal yesterday. The Swedish diplomat, based in Budapest during the Second World War, saved the lives of more then 100,000 people persecuted by the Nazis. A weekend conference in Montreal on the legacy of the Holocaust hero was told his fighting spirit and humanitarian outlook should be applied to more recent atrocities. Liberal MP Irwin Cotler said 1990s bloodbaths, such as the ethnic cleansing in Bosnia or the genocide in Rwanda, prove there's a crying need for individuals to stand against killing machines. Last year, Parliament declared Jan. 17 Raoul Wallenberg Commemorative Day.
LOAD-DATE: January 21, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 81 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 6
LENGTH: 802 words
HEADLINE: Diaspora Digest
BYLINE: Michael Freund
BODY:
Rabbi assaulted on Paris street
A French rabbi was attacked and physically assaulted in a Paris suburb Friday on the eve of the Shmini Atzeret/Simhat Torah holiday weekend, French television reported.
Rabbi Michel Serfaty was walking to a synagogue in the Essonne neighborhood when several men reportedly began pushing him. One of the attackers then got out of his car and punched him in the face.
French Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin condemned the attack, saying, "The government was determined to fight anti-Semitism and religious intolerance."
Police have arrested two men in connection with the incident.
Toronto marks Holocaust Education Week
The Jewish community of Toronto next week will launch its 23rd annual Holocaust Education Week, which will incorporate a series of over 120 programs throughout the greater Toronto area.
The Holocaust Center of Toronto and UJA Federation are organizing the 13-day event, which will open October 30 and run through November 11. Speakers will include Michael Berenbaum, the former head of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, Irwin Cotler, a member of the Canadian parliament and an internationally-renowned human rights activist, as well as Maj.-Gen. Edward Fitch, the highest-ranking Jewish officer in Canada's armed forces.
Architect Daniel Libeskind will deliver the keynote address at a community-wide commemoration of Kristallnacht on November 8, when he will discuss, "Designing Sacred Space: Memorializing the Holocaust." Other programming will include a daylong seminar for educators, and the screening of a documentary on a British stockbroker who saved 669 Jewish children from the Holocaust. A gathering of adult children of Holocaust survivors will take place, as well as lectures on subjects including Jewish resistance to the Nazis and modern anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism.
A growing number of local churches also plan to participate, reports the
Canadian Jewish News, which notes that some 15,000 people took part in last
year's Holocaust Education Week. For more information, visit:
www.holocausteducationweek.com
Site of first Phoenix Synagogue reclaimed
Thanks to the help of local philanthropists, the Arizona Jewish Historical Society (AJHS) has succeeded in finalizing the purchase of the site where the area's first synagogue once stood, the Jewish News of Greater Phoenix reports.
The complex, located on East Culver Street in Phoenix, housed Temple Beth Israel from 1920 through 1949, and it includes the original sanctuary as well as classrooms, cottages, and a social hall. For most of the past five decades, the site has served as a Baptist church. It was slated to be demolished before the AJHS stepped in and raised the funds necessary to purchase the complex.
"We're excited that we are able to save this wonderful historical Jewish landmark for the entire community," AJHS president Jerry Lewkowitz told the paper. "Now that phase one is completed for the purchase of the building, we will now embark on phase two: soliciting the community for matching funds for Arizona and City of Phoenix historic preservation grants," he said.
The historical society plans to renovate the complex, which will be renamed the Cutler Plotkin Jewish Heritage Center. It will be used to conduct Jewish life-cycle events, and may also house a museum documenting the history of Arizona's Jewish community.
Cleveland launches teen Jewish literacy project
Amid rising concerns over assimilation and intermarriage among American Jewry, a Cleveland businessman has come up with an unusual way to interest local Jewish youth in their heritage: paying them to read Jewish books.
According to the Cleveland Jewish News, the businessman, who prefers to remain anonymous, has committed the requisite funds to establish a program called the Committee for Jewish Literacy (CJL).
"It's not that kids don't want to learn about Yiddishkeit; it's just not easily accessible for them," CJL coordinator Channah Appel told the paper. "So, we supply books at no cost and offer a little monetary incentive to read them."
The program is geared toward high school students in the greater Cleveland area. Participants will be sent five short books explaining basic aspects of Judaism, and will meet once a month to discuss them and take a test on what they have read. They will be awarded $ 5 for reading the first two volumes, $ 10 for reading the second pair, and up to $ 50 based on their test results.
The books to be used include volumes on the Jewish holidays, Israel and the
Bible published by the Jewish Literacy Foundation (www.jewishliteracy.org
LOAD-DATE: October 22, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 82 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(27) Jl 3'03 pg 1,25; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5716445
LENGTH: 938 words
HEADLINE: Report calls for justice for Jews from Arab lands
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
A report on the fate of Jewish communities in Arab lands may draw greater
attention to an often ignored episode of Middle Eastern history at a time
when the Palestinian refugee claims are under discussion.
That's the hope of one of the authors of a legal report that calls for redress for up to a million Jews and their descendants who were forced out of their homes by Arab governments.
Winnipeg lawyer David Matas believes the claims of Jewish refugees must be addressed as an issue of fundamental human rights. The claims of Palestinian refugees are high on the agenda in any discussion of Mideast peace, yet the experiences of Jews is currently given short shrift, Matas said.
''This is not just about the peace process,'' he said. ''It's about getting justice.''
Matas, along with Montreal native Stanley Urman, is author of Jews from Arab Countries: The Case for Rights and Redress. The report was prepared for Justice for Jews from Arab Countries (JJAC), an international organization that is lobbying for recognition of the rights of Jews who were displaced from their homes in Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen and Aden in the 1940s and 1950s.
In announcing release of the report, honorary JJAC chair and Mount Royal Liberal MP Irwin Cotler charged Arab governments with ''a pattern of ethnic cleansing'' and ''criminal conspiracy'' in forcing their Jewish populations to flee.
Speaking at a news conference in New York marking release of the report, Cotler said, ''This campaign is about truth, justice and reconciliation; we must return the history of Jews from Arab countries to the narrative of the Mideast from which it was expunged.''
''Confronting the reality is as important as getting compensation,'' said Matas, who also serves as vice-president of the Canadian section of the International Commission of Jurists.
The reality as presented in the report paints a disturbing picture of a broad range of Arab states enacting restrictive legislation, fomenting mob violence and, finally, forcing Jews to depart.
''The status of Jews in Arab countries changed dramatically immediately before and after the first Arab-Israeli war of 1948-49,'' the report states. ''By way of example, in Syria, as a result of anti-Jewish pogroms that erupted in Aleppo in 1947, 7,000 of the town's 10,000 Jews fled in terror. In Iraq, 'Zionism' became a capital crime. More than 70 Jews were killed by bombs in the Jewish quarter of Cairo between June and November 1948. After the French left Algeria, the authorities issued a variety of anti-Jewish decrees, prompting nearly all of the 160,000 Jews to flee the country. After the United Nations partition vote, Muslim rioters engaged in a bloody pogrom in Aden and Yemen, which killed 82 Jews. Varying numbers of Jews fled from 10 Arab countries, becoming refugees in a region overwhelmingly hostile to Jews. In virtually all cases, as Jews left the country, individual and communal properties were confiscated without compensation.''
Of 800,000 Jewish refugees between 1948 and 1972, 586,000 settled in Israel. The report says, ''There exists a moral imperative to ensure that justice for Jews from Arab countries assumes its rightful place on the international political and judicial agenda and that their rights be secured as a matter of law and equity.''
The issue has been largely ignored by the international community, but there have been exceptions, Matas said. The UN High Commission for Refugees lobbied on behalf of Egyptian Jews form 1957-67, he said, leaving behind ''a huge paper trail'' but very few successful compensation claims.
Matas said the rights of Jewish refugees have been recognized in various international treaties and agreements. UN Resolution 242, which contemplates Israeli withdrawals from seized territories in exchange for peace, includes a provision for redress for refugees. The resolution does not indicate who qualifies as a refugee although debate at the time indicated it would include Jews fleeing Arab lands.
Matas said a number of remedies could be implemented to satisfy Jewish claims, ranging from continuation of the efforts made by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, to legal claims under the Refugee Convention in 1951, to creation of an international fund that would be part of a comprehensive Arab-Israel settlement.
He was particularly critical of Canada's role as chair of the Refugee Working Group, established following the 1991 multi-party Madrid Peace Conference. Canada has ignored the issue, arguing it would complicate the situation, Matas said.
Foreign Affairs spokesperson Marie-Christine Lilkoff said the question of Palestinian refugees had been identified as a central issue of the peace process.
''Since they do not impinge directly on Israeli-Palestinian situation, the claims of Jewish refugees from Arab countries should be resolved between the countries concerned,'' she said.
In other developments, the British House of Lords was scheduled to hold public hearings earlier this week, after The CJN went to press, on the rights of Jews from Arab countries. The hearings were to examine the response of the British government to the plight of Jewish refugees who fled Egypt in the mid-1950s. International legal experts and British and French Jewish community leaders were to participate in the proceedings.
At the same time, a formal delegation was to present Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean, the British Minister of State for Middle East Affairs, with a copy of the report.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 12, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 83 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: LOCAL; Pg. A08
LENGTH: 406 words
HEADLINE: Ontario dominates regional cabinet representation
SOURCE: The Canadian Press
DATELINE: OTTAWA
BODY:
A regional breakdown of the 39-member federal cabinet. The cabinet was
appointed yesterday by Paul Martin, who was newly installed as Canada's 21st prime minister:
LOAD-DATE: December 13, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 84 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 37
LENGTH: 357 words
HEADLINE: GRIT CAUCUS REVOLT;
MPS SAY MARRIAGE BILL MAY BE THE KISS OF DEATH
BYLINE: BY BILL RODGERS, SUN OTTAWA BUREAU
DATELINE: NORTH BAY
BODY:
Angry Liberal MPs opposed to their government's same-sex legislation finally
got their say yesterday at a sometimes-raucous summer retreat in North Bay.
Sources say Quebec MP Clifford Lincoln gave one of the most impassioned and cogent arguments against the controversial legislation, telling the caucus he was as equal as anybody else in the room and had the right to his view. He later told reporters, "there are a lot of people (in his riding) that are very worried about it."
Toronto's Jim Karygiannis predicted many Liberal MPs would "definitely" lose their seats in the next election if the legislation were passed.
He said if he supported the bill, "I might as well pucker up my lips and kiss (my seat) goodbye."
An angry Pat O'Brien, a London, Ont., Liberal said, "It's very discouraging to hear the Justice Minister (Martin Cauchon) say, 'well, I'm coming and I'm listening but my mind's made up so what you say doesn't matter a hell of a lot.' That continues the farce that this has been for too long now."
Montreal MP Irwin Cotler, a former law professor, is recommending a compromise that would leave the current definition of marriage unchanged.
He calls it civil marriage, which would have "all the rights and benefits and obligations of a marriage."
Prime Minister Jean Chretien, who sat and listened, virtually shot down a recommendation by Pickering MP Dan McTeague that the government hold a national referendum on the issue.
The PM told reporters on his way into the caucus, "I'm not keen on referendums. To have a referendum to decide the fate of a minority -- it's a problem."
Chretien, who said he would listen to arguments for such a vote warned that if federal governments had put the French language to a vote it might have been banned in Canada.
He believes the same-sex issue must be decided by Parliament.
"We're elected to make decisions, like it or not. Sometimes it's not easy," the PM said.
One source predicted it definitely wouldn't be easy for Chretien. He estimated up to 60% of the 172 elected Liberals are opposed to changing the definition of marriage to include gays and lesbians.
LOAD-DATE: August 21, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 86 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 6
LENGTH: 293 words
HEADLINE: Activists bloodied, unbowed
BYLINE: Amanda Ruth Thomas
BODY:
Despite a budget cut, close to 300 young people from over 30 countries kept a tight focus on activism as part of the World Union of Jewish Students
week-long annual conference.
MKs Tzippi Livni and Rabbi Michael Melchior opened the conference on December 26, while the Israeli band Gaia kicked off a week of theme parties representing different continents.
WUJS Chairman Peleg Reshef said the recurring message was the need for Jewish student leaders to be responsible, not only for fellow Jews, but for their campuses in general. In a visible expression of this point, 30 Canadian students from Montreal and Toronto were in attendance, as opposed to the two to five representing other delegations. Montreal's Concordia University was one campus to which Palestinian students brought the intifada last fall. Demonstrators who took over the student union there burned Israeli flags and equated the Star of David with a swastika.
Guest speaker at the closing ceremony was Canadian MP Professor Irwin Cotler, who praised WUJS for its participation at the UN Durban conference. Reshef said Dutch students in particular admitted that they had not been politically active in the past, but had now realized that without action, their situation would revert to that of 1939.
"The Foreign Ministry is realizing our potential," said Reshef, "but students are very angry that after Durban and all that we did there, after all our educational programs, the Jewish Agency has cut the student budget again, this time by 20%. The students are putting all their energy into fighting cut-backs instead of the enemy outside. Although we come from different countries, we share exactly the same problems and face the same propaganda wherever we are."
LOAD-DATE: January 8, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 88 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(25) Je 19'03 pg 30; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5643761
LENGTH: 360 words
HEADLINE: Abella to address OSCE conference on anti-Semitism
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
For the first time, a conference of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) will focus on the issue of anti-Semitism as a
distinct phenomenon, while a Canadian delegate will participate in one of
the key discussions on how to tackle the problem.
Ontario Court of Appeal Judge Rosalie Abella will join a panel discussing legislative and institutional mechanisms, including law enforcement, as tools to address violent anti-Semitic incidents.
Abella will lead a Canadian delegation that will include Senator Jerry Grafstein, treasurer of the OSCE's Parliamentary Assembly, as well as MP and human rights advocate Irwin Cotler. The conference will be held in Vienna from June 19 to 20.
In the past, the OSCE has discussed anti-Semitism as part of a broader anti-racist agenda. The Vienna conference will look specifically at manifestations of anti-Semitism in Europe, Central Asia and North America, as well as the role governments and civil society can play in promoting wider tolerance, the OSCE said in a statement.
Abella's husband, Prof. Irving Abella of York University, said the OSCE's focus on anti-Semitism is ''an earthquake.''
''For Canada to ask a judge, rather than a diplomat, to lead [the Canadian delegation] is significant... They've chosen a person who is Jewish, who is a refugee, born in a displaced persons camp, [the daughter] of Holocaust survivors,'' he said.
The OSCE addressed the recent growth of anti-Semitism at the 11th annual session of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly last summer. At the time, Sen. Grafstein urged his colleagues to endorse an American-drafted resolution that called on member states to issue strong denunciations of anti-Semitism.
The 55-member OSCE adopted the resolution unanimously, but Grafstein said he has had trouble mobilizing interest in debating the issue in the Canadian Senate.
More than 150 delegates from participating OSCE states, as well as at least 100 NGOs, are expected to participate in the Vienna conference. The U.S. delegation will include diplomats and congressmen and will be led by former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 12, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 89 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 4
LENGTH: 766 words
HEADLINE: New group to combat new anti-Semitism
BYLINE: Tovah Lazaroff
BODY:
Fighting surging anti-Semitism requires a new strategy, Deputy Foreign
Minister Michael Melchior said yesterday as he announced the creation of an
international non-Jewish organization based in Switzerland to head that effort.
"It will be the approach of the International Commission for Combating Anti-Semitism that wherever and whenever anti-Semitism appears with its ugly face, we will expose, condemn, and fight against it," he said.
There are many Jewish organizations monitoring this threat, Melchior said, but there isn't a non-Jewish one looking at it from an international perspective.
"Anti-Semitism is not just a threat against Jews, it's a threat to the basis of civilization, decency, and democracy. " said Irwin Cotler, one of the founding members of the commission. He is a human rights lawyer, a member of the Faculty of Law at McGill University in Montreal, and a member of Canada's Parliament.
Hatred against Jews is not new, but today it has a new emphasis that must be addressed, Cotler said.
"This threat always begins with the Jews and never ends with the Jews," said Per Ahlmark, a former deputy prime minister of Sweden and European co-chairman of UN Watch.
"We are witnessing a new anti-Jewishness, one that is a dramatic transformation, grounded in classical anti- Semitism, but distinguishable from it," said Cotler. "That is the singling out of Israel and the Jewish people for discriminatory treatment in the international arena."
Traditional anti-Semitism denied Jews the right to live as equal members of society, the new anti-Jewishness is a denial of the right of Jewish people to live an as equal member of the family of nations, Cotler said.
Experts point to the fact that anti-Semitic incidents are on the rise. According to the Annual Report on Anti- Semitism in the World by Tel Aviv University, terror attacks against Jews rose from from 32 in 1999 to 66 in 2000. Other violent incidents rose from 114 to 190.
But what concerns Cotler is discrimination against the State of Israel in the international arena.
"It's carried out under the protective cover of international law and human rights," Cotler said.
The most blaring example, is of course, is the anti- Semitism at the UN conference against racism in Durban last summer, he said.
But there are many others. Israel is singled out for differential treatment in other UN conferences. Thirty percent of the indictments by the United Nations Human Rights Commission are against Israel, Cotler said.
Last December, for the first time in 52 years, an indictment was registered a against a country under the Geneva Conventions - Israel. "For 52 years, no one was ever brought before them, not for the genocide in Cambodia, not for the ethnic cleansing in Bosnia," Cotler said.
Israel is also excluded from participating in international bodies that levy such indictments, he said.
It took four years to plan the Durban conference, Cotler said. But only six weeks was spent organizing a protest for the anti-Semitism it exhibited. Had this new commission been in existence it would have been lobbying to keep anti-Semitism out of the conference from the start, he said.
"If you have a member state of the UN like Iran calling for the destruction of Israel, the UN should be responding. When Hamas calls for the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews, the international community should be alarmed," Cotler said.
"Nothing I am saying here is intended to suggest that Israel is not accountable for any violations like any other state, that is the point, like any other state. No one is suggesting that Israel should be above the law, but Israel is being systematically denied equality before the law," Cotler said.
The commission will also explore anti-Semitic rhetoric by the Palestinian Authority, including Chairman Yasser Arafat, said Melchior.
Anti-Israel rhetoric by Palestinians was not taken seriously enough in the past, he said.
"There can't be a peace process with the incitement going on," he said.
"Regardless of how we look at the Middle East conflict, anti-Semitism can never be accepted," said Ahlmark.
Neither Melchior, Ahlmark, nor Cotler was specific as to how the organization would be funded or how many members it would have. Developing a board and a president is one of its first tasks, Cotler said. Eventually, national committees would also be set up in each participating country.
The International Commission for Combating Anti- Semitism will initially also have offices in New York and Jerusalem.
LOAD-DATE: January 7, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 90 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (709) O 20'03; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5878124
LENGTH: 989 words
HEADLINE: Hill staffers running in Ottawa-area municipal elections: dhaliwal hires a new B.C. assistant (Record in progress)
BYLINE: Rana, F Abbas
BODY:
One current and one former Parliament Hill staffer have thrown their hats
into the ring and are running in the Ottawa municipal elections on Nov.
10, 2003.
[Graphs Not Transcribed]
Jean-Francois Claude, a former special assistant to Government House Leader Don Boudria and Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Stephane Dion, is running for the position of councillor for Innes ward in Ottawa, while Sean Casey, executive assistant to Alliance MP Randy White, is running for a school board trustee position from zone 3 of the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board.
Mr. Claude is married to Tanis Gilbert, executive assistant to Quebec Liberal MP Irwin Cotler who represents the riding of Mount Royal. Mr. Claude hails from Ottawa. He earned his BA in communications from the University of Ottawa and started to work as legislative assistant first with Ontario Liberal MPP Jean Poirier and later on with Jean-Marc Lalonde. In 1996, Mr. Claude started to work on Parliament Hill first as special assistant to Mr. Boudria and then in the same position with Mr. Dion. Currently, he is serving as a senior adviser with Communications Canada.
The incumbent councillor Rainer Bloess has represented the Innes ward for nine years.
In an interview last week with Hill Climbers, Mr. Claude said he was optimistic he can win this race which he said is being widely labelled as ''the race to watch in Ottawa.''
''I think we stand a tremendous chance. There is an appetite for change not only in this ward but we also saw it in the recent provincial election. We have a very solid organization in place. We are on target in terms of our fundraising objectives and our canvassing. It's a headon race, there are only two candidates,'' said Mr. Claude.
Mr. Claude said that the spending limit in this election is expected to be $23,000 and his campaign has already raised more than half of this amount. He also said that in this campaign, along with his family and friends, some of the current and former Hill staffers who live in the ward are helping him out.
Mr. Casey, 34, who is running for the position of school board trustee is a native of Markham, Ont., and has his bachelor of journalism from Carleton University in Ottawa. After his graduation, he started to work at a local radio network CKBY, now known as Y105 and later on at CHEZ FM as a reporter. As a reporter for the two radio networks, he mostly covered municipal politics. In 1994, Mr. Casey joined the office of former deputy mayor Allan Higdon as communications assistant.
Mr. Casey moved to federal politics in 1997 as communications assistant to Alliance MP Randy White and was promoted to the position of executive assistant to Mr. White in 2000. Currently, Mr. White is a solicitor general critic and is incharge of election readiness for the Canadian Alliance party.
Two other candidates Norm MacDonald and David Burkitt along with Mr. Casey are running for the position of school board trustee.
In an interview last week, Mr. Casey, who lives in Barrhaven, said he decided to run for a school board trustee because there is an ''extreme shortage'' of schools and nothing has been done to fix this problem.
''I thought if somebody doesn't work or get on to the board and work with them to do some kind of planning in order to build some new schools in this area and upgrade some of the existing facilities, these kids are going to have nowhere to go,'' said Mr. Casey.
''I'd like to see balanced books, I'd like to see a long-term plan in order to build schools in communities where they are needed something that currently doesn't exist.''
Mr. Casey said if elected, he will be involved in the decision-making process related to the school board on issues such as ''transportation, hiring teachers, to basically administering the entire school board and how the money is spent, what schools are built, what schools are repaired, what schools are closed.''
DHALIWAL HIRES A NEW WESTERN ASSISTANT
Natural Resources Minister Herb Dhaliwal, who represents the British Columbia riding of Vancouver South-Burnaby and is the political minister for the province, has hired a new assistant for British Columbia.
Carla Brumpton, 23, started her new job earlier this month replacing Michael Drummond, who has now started working as manager, public consultation at TransLink, Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority in Vancouver, B.C.
Originally from Kelowna, B.C., Ms. Brumpton earned her BA from Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, B.C. After her graduation, she briefly worked as research assistant at Industry Canada.
Before starting her current job, Ms. Brumpton was working as a special assistant in Mr. Dhaliwal's regional office in Vancouver, B.C.
As a special assistant, Ms. Brumpton will be responsible for files such as softwood lumber and offshore oil on which she will keep the Minister abreast with different developments on these files.
EA TO ALLIANCE MP KEITH MARTIN LEAVES
Alliance MP Keith Martin, who represents the B.C. riding of Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca, announced last week that John Koury his longtime EA in the riding office will leave his job on Nov. 15.
Mr. Koury, who has served as executive assistant to Mr. Martin for the last seven years, has recently completed his MBA and is now ''searching for new opportunities and challenges.'' He was also campaign manager for Mr. Martin's national run for the 2000 leadership campaign of the Alliance party.
In a press release issued last week, Mr. Martin said ''Mr. Koury has been a loyal and superb executive assistant, displaying outstanding skills in organization, communication and management. He will be an enormous asset to any organization that chooses to hire him, and I wish John great success in the future.''
The Hill Times
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: December 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 91 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 4
LENGTH: 242 words
HEADLINE: Canadian MPs urge Mideast policy shift
BYLINE: Michael Freund
BODY:
A dozen members of the Canadian parliament are urging the country's Foreign Ministry to adopt a more balanced and less pro-Palestinian approach toward the Arab-Israeli conflict, the Canadian Jewish News reported.
In a policy paper submitted to the government, the MPs suggested a number of significant changes to Canadian foreign policy which would revamp the country's stance vis- a-vis Israel.
These would include recognizing that the Jewish state has a legitimate right to combat terror, marginalizing Yasser Arafat as head of the Palestinian Authority and refraining from the use of the term "cycle of violence," which effectively equates the perpetrators of terrorism and its victims.
"It's not proper to think of those situations of Israel attempting to defend its people as some sort of attack or retaliation on the Palestinians," said former Canadian defense minister Art Eggleton, one of the MPs pushing for a change in Canadian policy. Rather, they are akin to "part of a police action" to stop the violence, he said.
He added that Israel's war against Palestinian terror was comparable to the action taken by the US against al- Qaida and the Taliban.
The signatories, which include internationally renowned human rights activist Irwin Cotler, plan to meet with other parliamentarians, as well as with Foreign Ministry officials and heads of Jewish organizations, to drum up further support for their initiative.
LOAD-DATE: July 22, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 92 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 5
LENGTH: 463 words
HEADLINE: WJC focuses on Jewish refugees, anti-hate legislation
BYLINE: Melissa Radler
BODY:
NEW YORK - After a two-day visit with officials in Canada where the rights
of Jewish refugees from Arab countries and anti-Israel sentiment on campus took
center stage, the leadership of the World Jewish Congress is on its way to
Hungary to press for anti-hate legislation, said WJC secretary-general Avi
Beker.
On Sunday, the WJC hosted a day-long conference in Montreal entitled "The Forgotten Refugees," which focused on the 900,000 Jews who were forced to flee Arab countries in the aftermath of Israel's establishment. The conference, which included first-hand testimonies from Jews born in Iraq, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, and Libya, included presentations on the legal and historical basis of the refugees' right for redress.
"When you collect all the testimonies together I think you get a very grim picture," said Beker, who spoke about the perpetuation of the Palestinian refugee problem by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). The WJC and other Jewish groups in the US have urged Jews who fled Arab and Muslim countries to file claims forms documenting their stories with the Justice Ministry in Israel.
"This is a clear case that all these people were refugees. The only difference between Jewish and Palestinian refugees is that Jews are no longer refugees," he said.
The conference, which was attended by 500 people, was followed by meetings yesterday in Ottawa with opposition leader Stockwell Day, who Beker said voiced sympathy and support for Israel, and Member of Parliament Irwin Cotler, who called on the Canadian government to outlaw Palestinian terrorist groups. WJC officials were slated to meet with Minister of National Revenue Elinor Caplan yesterday afternoon.
Cotler, a professor of international human rights law, has long urged his colleagues to outlaw Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Hizbullah. "It is past time for Canada to do the right thing, to name terrorist networks as terrorist entities, as mandated by our undertakings under UN Security Council resolutions and domestic law," he told the House of Commons last week.
Beker said he also discussed the recent spate of anti- Semitic acts on Canadian college campuses, including a riot at Concordia University in Montreal earlier this year that forced Binyamin Netanyahu to cancel an appearance. "We have to educate people," said Beker, noting that many Jewish students are not aware of basic Middle East history, including the flight of the Jews from Arab countries.
On Monday, said Beker, a team of five WJC experts from Paris, Geneva, and Israel are meeting with Hungarian Justice Ministry officials in Budapest. Led by Justice Minister Peter Barandy, participants are slated to discuss adopting legislation that would outlaw anti-Semitism in Hungary.
LOAD-DATE: November 19, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 93 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 516 words
HEADLINE: Dissent over Canada's role in Iraq invasion without UN approval
ANCHORS: PETER MANSBRIDGE
BODY:
PETER MANSBRIDGE: Last week, we saw the first indications of dissent from the
Liberal backbench over what role Canada might play in a war on Iraq. It started
when Defense Minister John McCallum suggested Canada may decide to go to war
without approval of the UN, and today more evidence of just how serious that
dissent could be. Eric Sorensen now on another issue that's causing trouble in the Liberal Caucus.
ERIC SORENSEN (Reporter): It was a tricky photo-op, Canada's Defense Minister and the US Defense Secretary, a reassuring image to some that Ottawa and Washington defense policies are not at odds.
JOHN MCCALLUM (Minister of National Defence): The Secretary was very happy with what I said to him.
SORENSEN: But the message was troubling to many Liberals who fear Ottawa may join an US-led war in Iraq without United Nations' approval.
MCCALLUM: Some may say we're doing it only with an UN mandate. We're saying we much prefer that, but we may do it otherwise.
SORENSEN: That comment had an immediate impact on the Liberal Caucus. Carolyn Parrish confirmed to CBC she's prepared to sit as an independent if Canada does not stick with the UN.
IRWIN COTLER (Quebec Liberal MP): I think there would be concern in Caucus.
SORENSEN: Many Liberals insist all non-military options must be exhausted before signalling any willingness to join an US-led coalition.
COTLER: If it means that we're nudging towards being more open, you know, to a military option without a UN Security Council resolution, that would be premature.
SORENSEN: Since McCallum's comments, the Foreign Affairs Minister has been working to convince Liberal MPs and Canadians that Ottawa remains committed to the United Nations' process. Colleen Beaumier, who is in the Liberals' anti-war camp, is content with assurances she received from the Prime Minister over the phone.
COLLEEN BEAUMIER (Ontario Liberal MP): He assured me his position has not changed. That we will not be going in to Iraq unless it is with the United Nations.
SORENSEN: And the man who could stir things up in Caucus, if he wanted, has signalled his satisfaction with what he's heard from the government.
PAUL MARTIN (Quebec Liberal MP): Canada's overwhelming preference is that this should be done, if it is to be done, through the United Nations as a result of an United Nations resolution under an United Nations mandate. That is clearly Canada's preference.
SORENSEN: Which, even for many so-called anti-war Liberals, puts to rest suggestions of a brewing Caucus revolt.
JOHN GODFREY (Ontario Liberal MP): I don't think this has the potential to split the Caucus because I think we're overwhelmingly all of the same view, that we first want peace, secondly we want an United Nations solution.
SORENSEN: Ottawa has left itself some political wiggle room for Canada to be part of a coalition outside the United Nations as it was in Kosovo, but that position also puts many Canadians and Liberals on high alert for any sign that Canada might indeed join a US-led invasion of Iraq.
Eric Sorensen, CBC News, Ottawa.
LOAD-DATE: January 15, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 95 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: News; Pg. A3
LENGTH: 463 words
HEADLINE: IRAQ UPPING ANTE: GRAHAM
BYLINE: JANE SIMS, FREE PRESS JUSTICE REPORTER
BODY:
Iraq is "playing a game where they are raising the stakes" by not allowing
international weapons inspectors into the country, Canada's foreign affairs
minister said yesterday.
"If they are going to refuse to let inspectors in, then I think it is going to be up to the (UN) Security Council to revisit exactly what we are going to do," Bill Graham, said at the Canadian Bar Association's annual meeting in London.
The Iraqis have to recognize the efforts of the international community that are giving them a chance to participate in the ongoing high-stakes debate, he said at a news conference.
Iraq's refusal to allow inspectors entry tends "to give credence to the belief they are hiding something" and supports the U.S. contention Iraq is an international security threat, he said.
But Graham warned there has to be a "a clear and present danger" before any action is taken in the area because of the potential to destabilize a volatile spot.
Canada, he added, has been urging "extreme caution."
Graham's speech preceded a forum on the threat to civil liberties in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
The debate, which was to answer the question how much should we give up in times of crisis, was a wide-ranging discussion, involving some the of the country's leading legal pundits.
Participants included: Darrell Bricker, president and chief executive officer of Ipsos-Reid polling, Hugh Segal, president of the Institute for Research and Public Policy, MP Irwin Cotler and Janice Stein, professor of conflict management and director of the Munk Centre for International Studies at the University of Toronto.
Much of the discussion focused on the effect of Bill C-36, the federal anti-terrorism legislation.
Pollster Bricker said for Canadians, the loss of security has been at the forefront of public opinion.
"Canadians do feel less secure today than they did on Sept. 10 last year," he said, talking about limiting freedoms for safety concerns.
But as we move farther from the attacks, there is an increased desire for more personal freedom, he said.
Stein spoke of Canadians' fear of being terrorists' "back door to the United States." However, she said, no political leader can give assurance there is no risk.
The biggest problems are integrating the intelligence community, forging better communication and monitoring, with come civilian oversight to ensure rights are not being compromised, she said.
Graham pledged Canada's support to the international criminal court and urged the United States, which has balked at the court, to come on side.
Graham said he has spoken to leaders in the American law community who support the international court.
"What we want to do is have a world system we can really rally around," he said.
GRAPHIC: photo by Geoff Robins, The London Free Press; TARGETS IRAQ: Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham speaks at the Canadian Bar Association meeting in London yesterday. Graham warns there has to be a "a clear and present danger" before any action is taken against Iraq because of the potential to destabilize a volatile spot.; Canada, he says, has been urging "extreme caution."
LOAD-DATE: August 13, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 96 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 5A
LENGTH: 851 words
HEADLINE: Government decision on Falash Mura corrects historical injustice - activist
BYLINE: Dan Izenberg
BODY:
Jerusalem attorney Michael Corinaldi, a key activist in the struggle to
bring Ethiopian Jewry to Israel, bridles at criticism of the government's
decision on Sunday to bring over thousands of members of the Falash Mura
community currently languishing in Addis Ababa and Gondar.
"The decision corrects the historical injustice of 1991, when the government discriminated between the members of Beta Yisrael and the Falash Mura," said Corinaldi.
Corinaldi also rejects the criticism that the government did not give any serious consideration to the matter and instead made an out-of-the-blue, knee-jerk decision or simply went along with the demands of Shas and its religious mentor, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, who declared recently that the Falash Mura are Jews.
According to Corinaldi, the decision to bring over the Falash Mura is part of a long process of persuasion and lobbying involving Canadian civil rights activist Irwin Cotler, former Supreme Court president Meir Shamgar, former deputy Supreme Court president Menahem Elon, and Corinaldi. Others active in the campaign are Avraham Neguise, director of the Ethiopian advocacy group, South Wing to Zion, and Rabbi Menachem Waldman.
Corinaldi told The Jerusalem Post that Attorney- General Elyakim Rubinstein, who also threw his support behind the proposal to bring the Falash Mura to Israel, read a letter in support of the move from Shamgar to the cabinet before it voted on the proposal, which was submitted by Interior Minister Eli Yishai.
According to the cabinet decision, "The Population Registry will immediately begin to complete the examination of the ancestry of those awaiting immigrant permits. Anyone descended from an Ethiopian Jew on his mother's side will receive an entry permit in accordance with the Entry to Israel Law."
The origins of the cabinet decision are to be found in 1991's Operation Solomon, when the government decided to bring thousands of Ethiopian Jews assembled in a camp in Addis Ababa to Israel. The names of those eligible to immigrate were listed in a survey conducted by the Jewish Agency. But when the Israeli officials reached the Ethiopian capital, they founds thousands of people belonging to the Falash Mura community who wanted to come to Israel but did not appear on the list. Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir refused to allow them to board the planes.
Since the relations between Beta Yisrael and the Falash Mura were fluid, some members of the Falash Mura community did come to Israel in Operation Solomon. After reaching Israel, they called on the government to allow their relatives to follow.
The fate of those left behind was ostensibly settled in 1993, when a ministerial committee headed by then- absorption minister Yair Tsaban decided not to allow the Falash Mura to come.
However, in the next few years, relatives in Israel petitioned the High Court on behalf of their family members left behind. Between 1994 and 1996, a steady trickle of Falash Mura came to Israel. Some had to convert, while others underwent a special program to reacquaint themselves with Judaism.
In 1997, then-interior minister Natan Sharansky agreed to allow the 4,000 Falash Mura still waiting in Addis Ababa to come to Israel. But the government also decided that this marked the end of immigration from Ethiopia and refused to consider any more requests.
In the meantime, however, thousands more members of the Falash Mura community began to gather in Addis Ababa and Gondar. Since 1999, the government has allowed 200-300 Falash Mura into Israel each month.
Today, nevertheless, an estimated 10,000 members of the community live in Addis Ababa, 7,000 in Gondar, and 4,000 in villages in the Gondar area. Many of the Falash Mura officially converted to Christianity or left Judaism over the past century. The formal abandonment of Judaism came in the wake of political coercion or natural disasters, including a four-year famine, which decimated the Jewish population and isolated parts of the Jewish community. After leaving the fold, many Falash Mura continued to observe parts of the Jewish tradition, including Shabbat. "They are in effect Maranos," said Corinaldi.
Since moving to Addis Ababa and Gondar, they have informally returned to Judaism and maintain a religiously observant lifestyle.
According to Corinaldi, the Falash Mura are very poor and live in harsh conditions. They do not live in the camp, but often find jobs there, receive meals, and study Judaism. The camps are maintained by Jewish organizations abroad and Israel does not contribute to them, nor is it involved in the Jewish education of the community.
Corinaldi said he believes the government has applied double standards to the would-be immigrants from Ethiopia compared with those of the former Soviet Union. A large number of FSU immigrants are not Jewish according to their own declaration. Nonetheless, they are allowed into Israel in accordance with the Law of Return, either because they are first- or second-generation descendants of Jews or because they have Jewish relatives.
LOAD-DATE: February 23, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 97 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 4
LENGTH: 423 words
HEADLINE: Group seeks justice for Jewish refugees
BYLINE: Melissa Radler
BODY:
NEW YORK - Decades after most Jewish communities in Arab countries were
wiped out by persecution, expulsions, and flights to new homelands, Jewish
groups here launched an organization to help secure justice for the Middle
East's 900,000 forgotten Jewish refugees.
The aim of the new group, Justice for Jews in Arab Countries (JRAC), is to educate the public on the issue and advocate for rights and redress, said the group's founders at a press conference here yesterday.
Established under the auspices of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, World Jewish Congress, Center for Middle East Peace and Economic Cooperation, and American Sephardi Federation, the group's chairmen include former US ambassador to the UN Richard Holbrooke; former Knesset speaker Shlomo Hillel; Lord George Wiedenfeld of Chelsea; and Canadian MP and international human rights lawyer Irwin Cotler.
In May, Justice Minister Meir Sheetrit launched a campaign in conjunction with the American Sephardi Federation to collect affidavits from individuals who fled the Arab lands.
"There are hundreds of thousands of Jews who became refugees in the tragedy of the last half century, and we're here today to raise historical consciousness," Holbrooke said. He noted that Jewish refugees outnumbered the estimated 700,000 Palestinians who became refugees as a result of the Arab-Israeli wars.
The founders said they don't plan to press for compensation for the refugees. However, they noted that past agreements cover the refugees' rights for redress. UN Security Council Resolution 242, passed on November 22, 1967 in the aftermath of the Six Day War, calls for "a just settlement of the refugee problem" and was meant to encompass a solution for both Jewish and Arab refugees, Holbrooke said.
A decade later, the 1978 Camp David Accords between Israel and Egypt entitled Jewish refugees to file claims in their place of birth, although he noted that nearly all the claims were rejected by the Egyptian courts and just one claim is still pending. At Camp David II in 2000, former president Bill Clinton called for an international fund to be set up to compensate both Jewish and Arab refugees.
"Our sole purpose is to ensure justice for Jews in Arab countries, that their rights be secured as a matter of law and equity," said Mortimer Zuckerman, chairman of the Presidents Conference.
"It's very important now that we address ourselves to a solution and that they are not forgotten," Wiedenfeld said.
LOAD-DATE: October 3, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 98 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(3) Ja 16'03 pg 32; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5541884
LENGTH: 817 words
HEADLINE: Canadian at Oxford inspired by Limmud conference
BYLINE: CRAIMER, ALIZA
BODY:
What did you do on your winter holiday? If you are like 2,100 Jews in the
United Kingdom, you descended upon the University of Nottingham for the
annual winter conference of the Jewish educational organization, Limmud.
For five days, you go from session to session feasting on a veritable buffet of Jewish education. If you are so inclined (and I was), you can attend sessions from early morning until late at night at programs on community, culture, education, family, history, Israel, music, philosophy, social issues, Torah and more.
Between sessions, and while scarfing down the not-so-gourmet meals, people from all over England, continental Europe, Israel, North America and South America have the opportunity to chat and get to know one another.
Since the conference began more than 20 years ago with 80 participants, Limmud has grown immensely. This year's event featured 350 speakers and almost 700 sessions. There is something incredibly inspiring about taking an intensive period of time and devoting it to Jewish learning, especially during such a hyper-commercialized Christian holiday season.
As one person explained it, the goal of Limmud is to take each person further on his or her personal Jewish journey. This intent was evident in the variety of sessions and denominations represented at the conference. Whatever their personal background or level of religious observance, participants shared a strong sense of Jewish identity and a desire to expand their Jewish literacy.
For me, the sessions were the highlight of the conference. Of the 15-plus sessions I attended, none felt like a waste of time. That said, some of them stood out.
One of the best speakers was Canadian MP and human rights lawyer Irwin Cotler, who spoke compellingly about the ''new anti-Jewishness'' and indicators of this trend, including state-sanctioned cultures of hate (in most Arab countries and the Palestinian Authority) and genocidal covenants against Israel and the Jews (Hamas and Hezbollah).
Daniel Taub, a lawyer in Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, gave a fascinating lecture about negotiation theory, based on his experiences as a negotiator in the Israeli-Palestinian and Israel-Syria negotiations. I had never really considered the complexities of negotiations, and it was enlightening to hear about the dynamics and psychology involved from someone with firsthand experience.
In order to broaden my horizons away from my main passion, Israel, I attended a variety of sessions on other topics, including the issue of Judaism as universalistic or particularistic, Halachah and alternative medicine, and how to lead the Kabbalat Shabbat service. The latter session was especially useful and gave me a feeling of really connecting with being Jewish.
I am glad that Limmud has a ''how-to'' series of lectures that provide useful information for everyday Jewish living. Even though I will probably never lead a Shabbat service, I take pride in the fact that I am on my way to having this ability. Another bonus of this session was that I had the chance to ask general questions about praying protocol, long forgotten from my Akiva Academy days.
For instance, it was really bothering me that at the end of the Amidah service I could not remember which way to bow first. Now, I no longer have to rely on furtive glances at my neighbours (hoping that they too are not guessing). Bowing first to the left at the end of the Amidah may seem like a trivial detail; however, now that this technical mystery is solved, I can focus more on the praying and less on the esthetics.
Some may be thinking that attending so many lectures would be exhausting. But Cafe Limmud and the bar were great for re-energizing and socializing, and the participants in open-mike sessions at the Limmud acoustic cafe consistently wowed me with their talent. In the evenings, you could also do Israeli dancing or attend a Jewish stand-up comedy show. And the Brighton Jewish film festival selections were a great way to relax at the end of a long day of lectures. Whatever your interests, there was no shortage of ways to unwind!
As I relished my experience at the conference, I could not help but think
about my fellow Canadians and how much the Jewish community at home could
benefit from such a winter conference. I spoke with some ex-pat British
Limmudniks who are working on a Canadian Limmud for spring 2004 in the
Toronto area. I won't be home until fall 2004, but if Limmud is not yet
established, I intend to organize one. With a lot of help (anyone
interested?), hopefully, we'll see Limmud Banff in 2005! For more
information on Limmud, check out www.limmud.org
Aliza Craimer ([email protected]) is a graduate of the University of Calgary now working on an MPhil in modern Jewish studies at the University of Oxford.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: September 5, 2003
Canadian Jewish News January 16, 2003
LOAD-DATE: September 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 100 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(10) Mr 6'03 pg 33; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5569837
LENGTH: 633 words
HEADLINE: Remembering Bar-Ilan professor Dafna Izraeli
BODY:
CJN Wire Services
RAMAT GAN, Israel -- Hundreds of mourners gathered at the Kiryat Shaul Cemetery in Tel Aviv last Sunday to pay their final respects to Bar-Ilan University Prof. Dafna Izraeli, who died the previous Friday after a battle with cancer.
Prof. Izraeli, 65, was a sociologist and a leading proponent of women's rights in Israel.
She was the founding director of the university's program in gender studies, the only graduate program of its kind in Israel. She was also founding director of the Rachel and J.L. Gewurz Center for Gender Research. Established nearly three years ago, the centre supports research in areas such as women in the labour force, women in politics and public life, changing patterns of family life, family violence and women and Halachah (Jewish law). The Gewurz Center was established with the generous support of Prof. Izraeli, her daughter and her brother, Samuel Gewurz and his wife, Brenda, of Hampstead, Quebec. With the support of the family, the university will be establishing an academic chair for research in gender studies in Prof. Izraeli's name.
In his eulogy, Bar-Ilan University president Prof. Moshe Kaveh said that Prof. Izraeli served in many circles as the spokesperson for women's rights in Israel and in the entire world. He vowed that the university would continue to pursue her life's work in order to eternalize her ''spirit, vitality and vision for the advancement of feminist rights.''
''I would define her as a leader,'' said Prof. Tova Cohen, director of the Heller Center for the Study of Women in Judaism and a close colleague.
''Most recently her leadership was directed toward starting the interdisciplinary study program at Bar-Ilan University. She regarded it as her most important mission over the last five years. She was one of the straightest and fairest people I've ever known,'' added Prof. Cohen, who has been appointed as the new director of the graduate program in gender studies and the Gewurz Center.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
Mount Royal Liberal MP and professor Irwin Cotler, a close family friend, was also among the mourners.
Prof. Izraeli was born in France in 1937 and grew up in Montreal. She held a BA in political science and philosophy and an MSW in social work from McGill University and a PhD in sociology and anthropology from Manchester University in England. She served as visiting professor at New York University, Northeastern University, Harvard University and at University of California at Berkeley. Prof. Izraeli served two terms as chair of Bar-Ilan University's sociology and anthropology department.
Prof. Izraeli co-wrote six books and wrote dozens of articles on issues relating to gender in unions, work, family, social policy and the Israeli military. Her paper on Israel's first affirmative action law will be published in Women's Studies International Forum.
A tireless advocate for peace, democracy and women's rights in Israel, Prof. Izraeli was a founding member of the Israel Women's Network, an organization fighting for women's equality, the vice president of the New Israel Fund, a U.S.-Israeli organization working for peace and democracy in Israel, and was personally and professionally involved in bringing together Palestinian and Jewish women. Over the past two decades, she was an advisor to many government committees on the status of women in Israel, most recently the sub-committee on the Advancement of Women and Work and on the Economy in the Knesset Standing Committee on the Status of Women.
Prof. Izraeli and her late husband, Dove, who passed away just weeks ago, leave behind three children, Leora, Sharona and Haim, as well as 19 grandchildren, two great-grandchildren, two brothers and one sister.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: September 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 102 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(37) S 18'03; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5849909
LENGTH: 756 words
HEADLINE: Liberal MPs, senators oppose Al-Jazeera license
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
A group of Liberal MPs and senators is opposing the application by cable
providers to bring the controversial Qatar-based network Al-Jazeera to
Canadian digital cable subscribers.
Inclusion of the Arab-language network would likely lead to incitement against Jews, breaches of Canada's anti-hate laws and damage to the country's multicultural mosaic, the lawmakers argue.
Canadian Jewish Congress and B'nai Brith Canada have already lined up in opposition to the license application, citing Al-Jazeera's track record of broadcasting anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial and glorifying suicide bombers
The Canadian Arab Federation (CAF) and the National Council on Canada-Arab Relations, meanwhile, have stated they would support the application. In a news release, the CAF states it is important for Arabs and Muslims to hear news from the Middle East ''without North American filters.''
The controversy stems from a request by the Canadian Cable Television Association, an industry lobby group, and Videotron Ltee to add Al-Jazeera to the list of digital channels that can be distributed in Canada.
The Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), which regulates the broadcasting industry, has solicited the input of Canadians on proposals to add a variety of non-Canadian satellite services for digital distribution, among them Al-Jazeera.
In a written submission to the CRTC, the 13 Liberal parliamentarians say that ''allowing the Al-Jazeera channel to be carried in Canada would be detrimental to the public good. We believe this will disrupt the tolerant, multi-cultural makeup of Canadian society, import extremist hatred into Canadian living rooms and result in an increase of crimes directed against the Jewish people within Canada. As such, we are asking the CRTC to deny the application.''
The submission is signed by senators Jack Austin, Isobel Finnerty, Leo Kolber, Richard Kroft and MPs Carolyn Bennett, Irwin Cotler, Art Eggleton, Raymonde Folco, Marlene Jennings, Anita Neville, Jim Peterson, Jacques Saada and Joe Volpe. Most of the MPs represent ridings with substantial Jewish populations. Earlier this summer, the same group called on the Liberal government to shift federal policy on the Middle East toward a more pro-Israel stance.
The group's nine-page submission to the CRTC cites instances when Al-Jazeera provided a platform for terrorist organizations such as Al Qaeda and Hezbollah to disseminate their views. The network has also aired its own programs that have engaged in Holocaust denial and encouraged terrorist suicide attacks, they say.
Among the incidents cited in the submission:
- an interview with KKK leader David Duke;
- an interview with French Holocaust-denier Robert Faurisson, who testified for Nazi apologist Ernst Zundel at two of his Canadian trials;
- a statement by a Saudi cleric saying ''Jews are the most despicable people... worms... all evil.''
- an interview with a mufti who said ''there can be no peace with the Jews because they suck and use the blood of Arabs on the holiday [sic] of Passover and Purim.''
- a statement by Sheikh Yousif Al-Karadawi of Al-Jazeera's own Sharia and Life program that ''every man has the right to blow himself up inside this [Israeli] military society.''
- an e-mail read on the Al-Jazeera program The Opposite Direction that ''[Jews are] the descendants of apes and pigs [who] will not be deterred unless there is a true Holocaust that will exterminate all of them at once.''
Toronto-area MP Art Eggleton said Al-Jazeera's presence in Canada ''would be a detriment to Canadian society. The hatred spoken over the airwaves by Al-Jazeera could well contravene Canada's hate laws.''
Eggleton said that in recent years Canada has experienced a rise in anti-Semitism tied to events in the Middle East. Adding Al-Jazeera to the roster of cable offerings would add to the incitement against Jews, he said.
Montreal-area MP Jacques Saada said that ''Al-Jazeera is a station which has a history of allowing the distribution of materials that are contrary to our Canadian laws and Charter. I don't think Canada has anything to gain by being exposed to hate propaganda. Allowing it would go against the grain of who we are as Canadians.''
Coincidentally, one of Al-Jazeera's star reporters, Tayssir Alluni, was charged in Spain last week with having links with Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda terror network.
'Would be detrimental to the public good'
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 104 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (697) Jl 28'03; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5851024
LENGTH: 1559 words
HEADLINE: The Hill Times' list of who supports whom in liberal leadership race, after Manley's exit
BODY:
MPS
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: November 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 106 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (680) Mr 31'03; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5577901
LENGTH: 1543 words
HEADLINE: Government caucus 'torn' and 'divided' over Iraq war (Record in progress)
BYLINE: Malloy, Kate; Francoli, Paco
BODY:
OTTAWA--The federal Liberal caucus is "torn" and "divided" over the
U.S.-led war in Iraq, say Liberals who predict relations will continue to
deteriorate between Canada and its largest trading partner, especially if
the war lasts several months and if more American and British soldiers are
killed.
Other Liberals say Prime Minister Jean Chretien's (Saint-Maurice, Que.) leadership is missing on this critically important time in world history.
Although Prime Minister Chretien's Cabinet is dominated by "doves" who oppose going into this war on Iraq, a number of government backbenchers say the caucus is divided on the issue and that confusion remains over whether Canada is actually not involved in the conflict.
Some of the divisions surfaced during votes on a Canadian Alliance motion to support the war last Tuesday in the Commons, with at least four government MPs abstaining, including David Pratt (Nepean-Carleton, Ont.), Albina Guarnieri (Mississauga East, Ont.) Irwin Cotler (Mount Royal, Que.) and David Price (Compton-Stanstead, Que).
Liberal MP Albina Guarnieri, who is considered a "hawk," and who told the National Post on Jan. 30 that Canada should stand with its allies, was extremely cautious last week with her words. Ms. Guarnieri would not say whether Canada should join the so-called "coalition of the willing," making it clear that the decision has been made by her Prime Minister to stay out of the war. She said the time has come for the party to appear united and that "Canada should be looking for every possible way to support our allies."
Asked about U.S. Ambassador Paul Cellucci's controversial comments last week when he said "there are a lot of people disappointed in Washington and a lot of people are upset," Ms. Guarnieri said she did not believe he had over-stepped his bounds.
"Cellucci is a diplomat and whenever diplomats speak you know that it's always an understatement and I think we need to be sensitive and concerned about White House reaction, but I didn't hear Cellucci insulting the Prime Minister or calling anyone insulting names, so relatively speaking, some comments should be more circumspect," said Ms. Guarnieri.
Asked whether or not the Liberal Caucus is "out of control," Ms. Guarnieri responded: "Certainly, the comments and heated rhetoric are anything but helpful, although I think we should have a united front when it comes to foreign policy, we certainly should not be insulting the United States, particularly at a great time of sensitivity and we should redouble our efforts to enhance relations with the United States in every possible respect."
Last Wednesday was the first time the governing Liberal caucus met since the U.S. and British started dropping bombs on Iraq before 10 p.m. (Eastern Time) and 6 a.m. Baghdad time on Wednesday, March 19.
One Liberal source said the Prime Minister told the caucus that the country is divided and so is the party. The source said the PM addressed his caucus in a monotone voice and appeared "deflated" and "totally exhausted." However, Prime Minister thanked the MPs who don't take his dove-style approach to the war in Iraq for expressing themselves, and he vowed to stop the anti-American rhetoric flying out of the government caucus, or, as the source put it, "to put his finger back in the dyke."
A Liberal source said Art Eggleton (York Centre, Ont.), the former federal defence minister, stood up in caucus to say the 31 Canadian soldiers in Iraq should be removed by the Canadian government, which raised some eyebrows.
That Canadian soldiers are fighting in the Persian Gulf proved to be a major source of tension among the Liberals. Last week, reports surfaced that of the 31 Canadian Forces members serving on exchange programs with coalition forces, at least six are involved in logistical or support positions for combat troops.
"My feeling is that I couldn't understand the Prime Minister saying that we weren't there when we are already there. And there is no way we can pull out. We are in too deep. It's not that simple. So we are part of the coalition, indirectly maybe but we are still there," said MP David Price (Compton-Stanstead, Que.), a member of the House's Defence Committee and who is also considered a "hawk."
Liberals were also split over the impact the government's position has had on Canada-U.S. relations, especially at border towns.
One Grit source said Liberal MP Gary Pillitteri (Niagara Falls, Ont.), who owns Pilliteri Winery Estates, raised the Canada-U.S. relations issue at caucus and also defended Ambassador Cellucci's comments in the face of attacks from other Liberals.
Grit MP Roger Gallaway (Sarnia-Lambton, Ont.), who wasn't at the caucus meeting but whose riding includes a major border-crossing, said Mr. Cellucci's remarks should be seen as a "clarion signal."
Declared Mr. Gallaway: "I think we are doing great damage to ourselves at the moment in terms of that relationship. We have to say something supportive of the U.S."
Mr. Gallaway was particularly dismayed that the Liberal caucus is now seen as anti-American, and in some cases even "pro-Iraq." He said his office has been overwhelmed by e-mails and phone calls upset with the Liberal Party.
"I can tell you that we're getting a profound shift in phonecalls and e-mails from my riding that people are saying that they are annoyed with the government's stance [which] is perceived as anti-American. This is all viewed very negatively," he said.
Much of the same came from MP Lawrence O'Brien (Labrador, Nfld.), who said he was "dismayed as a Canadian" by the fallout over the events over the past few weeks.
"I just think we have a long way to go following this particular confrontation to put ourselves back on the footing we were a year ago. I am absolutely dismayed as a Canadian and as a Parliamentarian," he said during committee hearings of the House's Defence Committee on Canada-U.S. military relations last Tuesday.
"I happen to believe from my understanding that [relations] are getting worse by the second. That's my take and I can't change my mind. Those are my feelings and that's based on what I see and hear."
Later, Mr. O'Brien told The Hill Times that Canada should be doing more to help the Americans in the war effort.
"I would love to see Canada there, playing some role," he said, adding that he is confused by the role being played by the Canadian soldiers currently deployed in the Persian Gulf .
Another Liberal source told The Hill Times the party needs new leadership, and suggested that Paul Martin (LaSalle- Emard, Que.) "would have been a more effective voice at the UN and would have had a greater impact at the United Nations and would have engineered a better solution for Canada and for the United States."
But several Liberals defended the government's position and played down any talk that U.S.-Canada relations are at an impasse.
Liberal Hedy Fry (Vancouver Centre, B.C.) said after caucus last week that she continues to support the Prime Minister's decision, saying he took a "principled position consistent with multi-lateralism."
Although admitting that relations are now "strained," she cautioned against blowing events over the past two weeks out of proportion.
"We have to remember that our relationship is based on more than just one thing. Like any relationship it is going through a rocky piece right now, but I think we can rebuild because it has been a strong relationship," she said.
Liberal MP Jacques Saada (Brossard La Prairie, Que.) agreed. "I fully espouse the position of my government. Canada's identity in foreign affairs policy has always been based on the fundamental value of multilateralism and I think we should stick to that," he said.
Mr. Saada found himself on the defensive over Canada's war stance during a trip to Washington, D.C., on the eve of the war. As co-chair of the Permanent Joint Board on Defence, which was established after World War II to oversee bi national defence relations between Canada and the U.S, he was in the American capital the week the war started for highlevel meetings with dozens of military and foreign affairs officials from both governments. The other co-chair is a American Jack David, appointed by President Bush.
The theme of the meetings, which had been scheduled weeks in advance, was expanding continental security but Iraq quickly rose to the top of the agenda.
Mr. Saada admitted that his American counterparts put him on the defensive with many questions about Canada's decision not to support the U.S.-led invasion.
"It was friends trying to explain [their] position to each other," he said when asked about the mood of the meetings, adding that the American officials made their "disappointment" to him very clear.
"I had to explain that to us it is important to give as much strength as possible to multilateral organizations such as the UN. I explained that we should not be on the defensive in this regard. It's a very proactive stand that we have taken," he said. The Hill Times
[email protected] [email protected]
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: November 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 107 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(47) N 28'02 pg 35; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5518819
LENGTH: 688 words
HEADLINE: Mideast situation adds urgency to Hadassah meet
BYLINE: Lazarus, David
BODY:
MONTREAL - Rochelle Levinson launched her three-year term as national
president of Canadian Hadassah-WIZO with a pledge to boost membership, to
keep the organization vital for Canadian-Jewish women and to make Diaspora
Jews more aware of just how much Israel needs them right now.
''This is still a very vibrant organization,'' Levinson, a 63-year-old native of Winnipeg who lives in Vancouver, said in an interview as Hadassah's 37th national convention came to a close recently at a downtown Montreal hotel.
''It's more and more difficult for women to balance careers and a home life, leaving little time for volunteerism,'' said Levinson, who ran unopposed for the presidency of the organization, currently celebrating its 85th anniversary.
''New chapters are being formed, but I would like to raise awareness about the organization and of the work we do.''
One positive sign, Levinson noted, is the large number of women - out of Hadassah's Canadian membership of 14,000 - who belong to its ''Aviv'' component for women 45 and younger. A highlight of the three-day convention was a reunion of Aviv participants.
''I'd like to see us grow in strength and in numbers,'' she said.
At the time of the interview, Levinson was set to leave almost immediately for a Canadian Hadassah solidarity mission to Israel being co-ordinated by her and her immediate predecessor, Marion Mayman.
Mayman, of Ottawa, made it clear before the triennial convention got underway that it would not be a ''business as usual'' event in light of the two years of terror against Israel that has left 600 Israelis dead.
The convention program clearly reflected that.
Besides featuring panels on Israel and the media and on what Jewish students face on campuses, the convention, chaired by Susan Balinsky and Maxine Sanders, also presented awards to two friends of the Jewish state: human rights lawyer and Liberal MP Irwin Cotler, who received the Humanitarian Award, and hockey legend Jean Beliveau, who received the Canadian Award.
Beliveau has travelled several times to Israel for the Maccabiah Games and shown strong sympathy for Israel.
At the convention's closing dinner, attended by about 300 delegates, Israel's ambassador to Canada, Haim Divon, praised Canadian Hadassah-WIZO and referred to the ''reassurance and strength'' provided by Jerusalem's Hadassah Hospital, which Canadian Hadassah has raised funds for since 1990. Also singled out for a tribute was veteran Canadian Hadassah executive vice-president Lily Frank, a name synonymous with the organization.
The evening's most memorable moment came when the Dr. Avraham Rivkind, who heads the hospital's Trauma Unit in Ein Kerem and which has treated hundreds of terror victims, accepted Canadian Hadassah's highest honour, the Rebecca Sieff Award.
To Rivkind's surprise, Shimon Ohana, a young Israeli whom he had literally brought back from death two years ago, appeared at the presentation ceremony with his mother Rachel.
Ohana, then 18 and a police border recruit, was shot in the heart soon after the start of the latest intifadah in the Jerusalem suburb of Gilo. Rivkind never gave up on him, even though Ohana showed no vital signs and was clinically dead.
Past recipients of the Rebecca Sieff Award have included former Jerusalem mayor Teddy Kollek, conductor Zubin Mehta, filmmaker Claude Lanzmann, and Soviet refusenik Ida Nudel.
Another convention highlight was a tribute to three lieutenant-governors: Lise Thibault of Quebec, Marilyn Trenholme Counsell of New Brunswick and Myra Freeman of Nova Scotia, who is Jewish.
The convention also stressed the need for continued support of Canadian-funded Hadassah projects in Israel.
They include a network of day-care centres, schools, residences and youth villages, and two hospitals: Assaf Harofeh Hospital near Ben-Gurion Airport and Hadassah Hospital.
At the closing dinner, it was announced that the Dan family had just pledged $500,000 towards Canadian Hadassah projects in Israel, including $100,000 for Hadassah Hospital's Trauma Unit.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: May 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 108 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(44) N 7'02 pg 34; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5500896
LENGTH: 660 words
HEADLINE: Reconstructionist convention set for Montreal
BODY:
MONTREAL - The 39th Jewish Reconstructionist Federation (JRF) convention,
to take place Nov 7 to 10, will gather over 300 people from across the
continent for four days of learning, worship and networking.
The JRF is the synagogue organization of the Reconstructionist movement, providing its 103 affiliated congregations with a wide array of services.
These services include rabbinic placement, and national and regional offices that offer consultation on key areas of congregational life, including youth and adult education, leadership, development, outreach and community-building initiatives, fund-raising and budgeting, as well as musical, liturgical and other resources.
The theme of the convention, the first in Montreal since 1967, is Self, Congregation, Community and the World: Seeking a Reconstructionist Balance.
It is dedicated to the memory of Rabbi Lavy Becker, founding rabbi of Congregation Dorshei Emet, the Reconstructionist synagogue of Montreal; and Rabbi Ira Eisenstein, credited with founding Reconstructionism as a separate movement.
Shabbat morning services will be held at Congregation Dorshei Emet's new building.
The convention's opening plenary session, Jewish Identity in the Modern World, will feature Gil Troy, a professor of history at McGill University and member of Congregation Dorshei Emet; and Rabbi Shawn Zevit, JRF director of outreach and congregational services.
The session will examine where Reconstructionism fits into the landscape of North American Jewish life in both historical and contemporary contexts, using information from the recently released National Jewish Population Survey and other sources.
Participants will have the opportunity to gather in small groups by geographic region to discuss the findings, and their impact on local communities.
Keynote speaker, MP Irwin Cotler, will consider the global implications of the rise in racism and anti-Semitism.
Convention participants will celebrate the many successes of the Reconstructionist movement over the past two years, including the establishment of the first Reconstructionist summer camp that completed its first session this summer; and a new Israel programs department.
Teens from 14 charter member congregations will join lay and professional leaders for special programming and the launch of No'ar Hadash (New Youth), the Reconstructionist Youth Programming Network.
About 40 workshops will be offered on topics including Interactive Jewish Art, Rabbi-Congregational Relations, Leading Shabbat Services, Canadian Jewry in Comparative Perspective and Reconstructionist Halakhah.
Also at the convention, Ilana Axel of Congregation Shir Hadash in Northbrook, Ill. and Staci Scheinblum of Kehilat HaNahar in New Hope, Penn., will be awarded the JRF Master Teacher Award presented to Jewish educators for their exemplary dedication to children's Jewish education.
The first ever Kehilat Tzedek Award, honoring a JRF community for its innovative, effective and sustained work in tikkun olam, will be presented to Darchei Noam Congregation of Toronto.
The business plenum will elect a new board and officers.
Daniel Cedarbaum of the Jewish Reconstructionist Congregation in Evanston, Ill. has been nominated as the new JRF president. He has served on the board since 1990 as secretary, treasurer and vice president of financial affairs.
Affiliates also have access to other Reconstructionist institutions, including the Reconstructionist Press, which publishes a broad selection of books including the six-volume prayerbook series Kol Haneshamah, a Passover Haggadah and CD, educational materials, musical recordings keyed to the liturgy, and related materials; the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College, which trains rabbis, teachers and spiritual leaders; and the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association, the professional support organization for Reconstructionist rabbis.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: August 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 110 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: DOMESTIC NEWS
DISTRIBUTION: Attention News Editors
LENGTH: 820 words
HEADLINE: Canadian Jewish Congress, Quebec Region - Father of Slain Journalist Daniel Pearl, and First Nations Chief Matthew Coon Come to Headline Event
DATELINE: MONTREAL, May 29
BODY:
This Sunday Canadian Jewish Congress,
Quebec Region (CJC, QR) will hold its triennial Conference, "Breaking
Barriers...Building Bridges" which will include major sessions on
antisemitism, "Breaking out of the Jewish Bubble", and a town hall on
tolerance in Quebec and will take place on:
Participants will hear from Dr. Judea Pearl, father of slain Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl; Amy Stevens, Deputy Front Page Editor of the Wall Street Journal; Jean Lapierre, well-known TQS & CKAC journalist; First Nations Chief Matthew Coon Come; Montreal Police Director Michel Sarrazin; Guy Bouthillier, past-President of the SSJB; Rwandan satirist Michel M'mbara; Graeme Decarie, historian and broadcaster; Enza Cappadoro, co-President, National Congress of Italian-Canadians, Federal Immigration Minister Denis Coderre, Quebec Minister of Revenue Lawrence Bergman, and many more. (see attached program for more details.) An award ceremony will feature Most Rt. Rev. Andrew S. Hutchison as a recipient of the Allan Rose Human Rights Award and Concordia Hillel students for the CJC, QR Award for Excellence in Community Advocacy.
CJC, QR will launch this conference with a night of "Flavours of Jewish Montreal" on:
A tantalizing celebration of Jewish food, music, and culture, featuring Quebec Klezmer sensation RAOUL and the music of Jews from Arab lands, an opportunity for all Quebecers to share the many flavours of Jewish Montreal.
Canadian Jewish Congress, Quebec Region is the official voice of the Jewish community of Quebec.
NB: Conference organizers and some featured speakers will be available for advance interviews.
TENTATIVE PROGRAM
9-9:45 a.m.
Opening ceremonies
Nina Ben Ami Acting Consul General of Israel
Denis Coderre Federal Minister of Immigration
Lawrence Bergman Quebec Minister of Revenue
AndrDe Boulerice Parti-QuDebDecois MNA
Louise O'Sullivan Boyne City of Montreal Executive Committee
David Birnbaum Executive Director's report
9:50-10:15
Address by Chief Matthew Coon Come, Assembly of First
Nations
INTRODUCTION: Keith Landy National President, Canadian
Jewish Congress
10:20-11:40
The Mike Dym Symposium on Combating Antisemitism
"Antisemitism: New threats, new strategies"
Michel Sarrazin Director, Service de police de la Ville de
MontrDeal
Irwin Cotler MP, Mount Royal
Manuel Prutschi CJC National Director of Community Relations
Kenneth Stern Counsel and Advisor, American Jewish Committee
CHAIR: Jack Silverstone Executive Vice-President and
General Counsel, CJC
11:45 a.m.- 12:15 p.m.
'BUILDING BRIDGES'
Israel's program of assistance and cooperation in developing
countries
MAZAL RENFORD Director, Golda Meir Mount Carmel
International Training Centre, Haifa
INTRODUCTION: Dorothy Zalcman Howard Chair, CJC National
Executive Committee
12:15-2:00
AWARDS LUNCHEON
Joseph Gabay CJC, QR Presidential address
AWARD RECIPIENTS
Flora Naglie and Most Rt. Rev. Andrew S. Hutchison Alan Rose
Human Rights Award
Edward Wolkove Ezekiel Hart Award
Concordia Hillel CJC, QR Award for Excellence in Community
Advocacy
DR. JUDEA PEARL Keynote address
INTRODUCTION: Amy Stevens, Wall Street Journal
2:15-3:30
BREAKING BARRIERS: Breaking out of the Jewish bubble
3:40-5:30
A Town Hall on Tolerance and Pluralism in 21st Century Quebec
HOST:
Jean Lapierre TDelDevision Quatre-Saisons / Radio CKAC
Guy Bouthillier Past President, SSJB
Max Bernard Honorary Vice-President, CJC, QR
Enza Cappadoro Past President, Italian-Canadian Congress-Quebec
JosDee Legault Political columnist, The Gazette
Peter McAuslan Founder and President, McAuslan Breweries
Michel Mpambara Comedian
Graeme Decarie Historian, broadcaster
Nancy Rosenfeld Vice-President, Canadian Affairs,
Andrea and Charles Bronfman
VIEW ADDITIONAL COMPANY-SPECIFIC INFORMATION:
http://www.newswire.ca/cgi-bin/inquiry.cgi?OKEY=36018
CONTACT: Eta Yudin, Director of Communications, Canadian Jewish Congress, Quebec Region, (514) 345-6411 ext. 3165 or cel (514) 894-7440
LOAD-DATE: May 30, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 111 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (645) Jl 15'02 pg 7; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5463993
LENGTH: 2081 words
HEADLINE: Total contributions received through Liberal riding associations in 2001
BODY:JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: December 20, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 113 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: DOMESTIC NEWS
DISTRIBUTION: Attention News Editors
LENGTH: 406 words
HEADLINE: Pluralism, Religion & Public Policy Conference - October 9 - 11, 2002 - McGill University, Montreal
DATELINE: MONTREAL, March 26
BODY:
Can there be any consensus in a pluralist
society respecting the common good? Can notions such as "the dignity of the
human person" or "equality of persons" or "human rights" be articulated in
such a way as to guide effectively our legislators, judges, and those charged
with overseeing public welfare? What role should religion play in shaping
policies on economics, education, scientific research, foreign policy? It is
often said that ours is a "secular" society, but what exactly does that imply?
"Pluralism, Religion & Public Policy" is a conference designed to bring together people from academia, law, politics, and religious institutions to debate some of the foundational issues which must be faced in addressing such questions - questions which have been made all the more urgent since the tragic events of September 11, 2001.
Participants will include McGill professors from a wide range of disciplines and special guests with internationally recognized expertise, among whom are TRISTRAM ENGELHARDT, WILLIAM GALSTON, CHIEF JUSTICE BEVERLEY MCLACHLIN, RICHARD JOHN NEUHAUS, DAVID NOVAK, AND MARGARET VISSER. Public addresses and conference lectures will be accompanied by symposia in law, politics and bioethics, each with distinguished panelists (including the Hon. Irwin Cotler, the Hon. Preston Manning, the Hon. Claude Ryan, and many others). A book will be published, from conference papers and related research, with the aim of helping to frame the future of these debates.
The project is co-sponsored by the Faculty of Religious Studies and the
Centre for Cultural Renewal in Ottawa, with participation by the Faculty of
Law and other McGill units. Public evening lectures by the Rev. Dr. Neuhaus
and Dr. Visser are being sponsored by the Beatty Memorial Lecture Fund.
Prof. Douglas Farrow and Mr.Iain Benson are conference co-chairs. Registration
material will be available on the web by the end of March, at
www.mcgill.ca/prpp
VIEW ADDITIONAL COMPANY-SPECIFIC INFORMATION:
http://www.newswire.ca/cgi-bin/inquiry.cgi?OKEY=13755
CONTACT: Professor Douglas Farrow, Faculty of Religious Studies, (514) 398-8945,
douglas.farrow(at)mcgill.ca; Source: Kate Williams, Director, University
Relations Office, (514) 398-6747, kate.williams(at)mcgill.ca
LOAD-DATE: March 27, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 115 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(41) O 17'02 pg 6; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5486887
LENGTH: 472 words
HEADLINE: Holocaust Education Week marks its 22nd year
BYLINE: Kraft, Frances
BODY:
Even though Holocaust Education Week is in its 22nd year, there has been no
shortage of ideas for programs. ''They're adding new programs right until
the brochure goes to press,'' said Barbara Rusch, chair of this year's
Holocaust Education Week.
The annual event, which is co-ordinated by the Holocaust Centre of Toronto, UJA Federation, will run from Oct. 30 to Nov. 11 at a variety of locations around the city.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
The series of 110 lectures and presentations will kick off at 7:30 p.m. Oct. 30 at Beth Tzedec Congregation with Hana's Suitcase, a story that began when a Holocaust-era suitcase belonging to a young girl, Hana Brady, ended up at the Tokyo Holocaust Education Centre two years ago, prompting the centre's curator, Fumiko Ishioka, to investigate the girl's fate.
The story became a book by Karen Levine, who will speak at the program. She will also introduce her award-winning radio documentary on the same subject, and will be joined by moderator Michael Enright of CBC; and speakers George Brady (Hana's brother), and Ishioka.
This year, instead of the usual Kristallnacht closing program, Holocaust Education Week will end on Remembrance Day with a talk at Beth Sholom Synagogue by Ed Carter-Edwards, a World War II veteran from Hamilton who was shot down over France and sent to the Buchenwald concentration camp. Jewish war veterans will participate in the program.
To commemorate Kristallnacht on Nov. 9, Irwin Cotler, human rights crusader and MP for Mount Royal, Que., will discuss Echoes of Kristallnacht in our Time. The program will take place at Beth Tikvah Synagogue.
''There are many varied and really interesting programs,'' said Rusch. ''There are so many researchers, artists and writers who every year are committed to taking the Holocaust and its commemoration to new heights and new levels that previously haven't even been thought of.''
Along with personal testimonies of Holocaust survivors and a myriad of other events, some of the programs are The Ringelblum Archives (from the Warsaw Ghetto) with Warsaw curator Eleonora Bergman (Nov. 2, Holocaust Centre of Toronto); A Place to Save Your Life, a film on the Jews of Shanghai (Nov. 3, Stan Wadlow Seniors' Centre); the dedication of Megillat HaShoah, a new liturgy to be used in congregations worldwide on Yom Hashoah (Nov. 7, Beth David B'nai Israel Beth Am Congregation); Eichmann in my Hands, with Peter Malkin who captured Nazi war criminal Adolph Eichmann in 1960 (Nov. 3, Shaar Shalom Synagogue); and Displaced Persons: Growing Up American after the Holocaust with Joseph Berger, author of the memoir Displaced Persons (Nov. 5, Beth Emeth Bais Yehuda Synagogue).
A complete schedule of Holocaust Education Week events can be found at
www.jewishtoronto.net
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: April 16, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 116 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 5
LENGTH: 823 words
HEADLINE: New report accuses Arab states of Jewish 'ethnic cleansing'
BYLINE: Jenny Hazan And Greer Fay Cashman
BODY:
Linda Menuchum's father, a prominent Jewish lawyer in Baghdad, was abducted and executed by the Iraqi government in 1972.
"After 1963, Jews were forbidden to leave the country," recalled Menuchum, who told her tearful story for the first time on Wednesday morning at Jerusalem's David's Citadel Hotel, where Justice for Jews from Arab Countries (JJAC) presented their case for the rights and redress of Jewish refugees from Arab states. JJAC has produced a report, compiled by 22 leading international law and human rights experts, charging Iraq and other Arab governments with subjecting their Jewish populations to what the JJAC leaders call "ethnic cleansing."
"It was in 1968 when the radio reports started to be very harsh on Jews. They were really inciting people against us," said Menuchum, whose father stayed in Iraq after she fled to Iran at the age of 20 with her mother, brother and sister in 1970, from where the family eventually made its way to Israel. "At that time, Jews who were living in houses were given one month to leave. It was not permitted to travel more than 100 kilometers from the place where we lived. Those who worked in the private sector found themselves out of a job. Jews were not permitted to enter university. Several were taken in for interrogation. Phone lines were cut."
Menuchum is one of over 850,000 Jews who have been displaced from Arab countries since 1948, according to the JJAC report, which states that 97% of Jews from Arab lands have left their countries of origin, leaving a mere 8,000-member population behind.
"This report presents a damning indictment of the Arab world for the mass violations of human rights and for the coordinated, repressive measures to drive out their Jewish populations or to hold them as political hostages," said JJAC executive director Stanley Urman, who listed in- timidation, beating, persecution, pogroms and the enactment of Nuremberg-type laws as among the state-sanctioned tactics used in Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Yemen, Aden, Syria and Lebanon.
"It presents a damning indictment of the international community, for its disproportionate and favorable treatment towards Palestinian refugees and their failure to respond to the plight of Jewish refugees," he said, referring to the fact that Israel has become a safe-haven for over 600,000 Jewish refugees from Arab lands.
"The time has come to restore the truth and the justice of Jewish refugees from Arab lands to the Middle East narrative from which they have been expunged and eclipsed," said Canadian parliamentarian Prof. Irwin Cotler, who is honorary chairman of the JJAC. He charged that Arab regimes were guilty of "a pattern of ethnic cleansing" and "criminal conspiracy in dealing with their native Jewish populations."
"Any narrative of the Middle East - including the road map - that does not include justice for Jewish refugees from Arab lands, is a case study in Middle East revisionism. It's an assault on truth and memory and justice," said Cotler, who accused the United Nations of singling out Israel for differential and discriminatory treatment in the international arena.
"Since 1947, there have been some 687 resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly, which have dealt with the Arab-Israeli conflict," explained Cotler. "One hundred and one of those resolutions dealt with the question of refugees. All 101 dealt with Palestinian refugees only. Not one resolution dealt with the issue of Jewish refugees from Arab lands." There would not be an Arab refugee problem if the Arabs had not rejected the UN partition plan, he said.
"The biggest mistake we made was that we allowed the development of the concept that the Palestinian refugee problem is the consequence of the establishment of Israel," said former Knesset speaker Shlomo Hillel at the organization's presentation to President Moshe Katsav on Wednesday.
"Those who waged war in the aftermath of the UN Resolution on the partition of Palestine are the ones responsible for the refugee problem," said Hillel, who is a member of the JJAC's legal advisory committee.
While the UN has spent billions on the Palestinian refugees, it has not allocated a single cent for Jewish refugees from Arab lands. "We had refugees in transit camps that were not funded by the UN," said Hillel.
"This raises serious questions of the appropriateness of the United Nations having a role in the Quartet," said Cotler. "Until the UN assumes its responsibility for the pursuit of justice in the proper duty of remembrance, in the right of redress, we are speaking of an issue of misrepresentation."
The JJAC - which was founded only 18 months ago - will in the coming week distribute its findings to the governments of the United States, Canada, and England in the hopes of raising awareness and motivating them to apply diplomatic pressure on Arab states.
LOAD-DATE: June 26, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 119 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: INTERNATIONAL NEWS
DISTRIBUTION: TO FOREIGN AND POLITICAL EDITORS
LENGTH: 483 words
HEADLINE: Four-Day International Conference on Anti-Semitism Wraps up in Lower Manhattan
DATELINE: NEW YORK, May 14
BODY:
Is anti-Zionism a new form of the old anti-Semitism? Is the Vatican
anti-Jewish? Who is ideologically responsible for the thousands of anti-Semitic
acts in Europe over the past two years? These are a few of the questions that
drew 36 top-level scholars, writers and other intellectuals from a dozen
countries to New York for a four-day international conference on anti-Semitism
in the West. The event ended on Wednesday.
(Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20030514/NYW146
Speaking of more than 1,300 attacks on Jews and Jewish property in France and an equal number of incidents in Britain over the past two years, Mortimer B. Zuckerman, president of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations and publisher of the Daily News said, "The physical acts are committed by Moslems, but the rhetoric that made them acceptable comes from the European political elite."
The conference, entitled "Old Demons, New Debates: Anti-Semitism in the West," was sponsored by the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research at the Center for Jewish History.
Canadian human rights lawyer and Member of Parliament Irwin Cotler said that subject of the conference was important to the survival of humanity because "anti-Semitism is the proverbial canary in the pantheon of evil."
The speakers were almost evenly divided between North Americans and Europeans, with others from Israel, Iran and Mexico. Participants included public intellectuals and representatives of activist Jewish organizations.
Islamic anti-Semitism and its spread to the West was a repeated theme. "The first step to overcoming this plague and to the treatment of this disease which threatens civilization and the Jewish People must be the lucid, relentless, implacable exposure of its roots and that has been the raison d'etre of this conference," explained Hebrew University Professor Robert Wistrich.
"Thousands attended the conference throughout its four days," said Bruce Slovin, chairman of YIVO. "We have opened discourse on anti-Semitism at a higher, intellectual level that will influence the debate for decades to come."
The conference was organized in the wake of resurgent anti-Semitism in Europe following the attack on the World Trade Center, which took on new urgency with the Iraq War. Among the organizers of the conference were YIVO and Center for Jewish History Chairman Bruce Slovin and YIVO Board members Joseph Greenberger, Martin Peretz, Dr. Leon Botstein, Max Gitter, Dr. Arnold Richards and Leon Wieseltier, Literary Editor of The New Republic.
SOURCE YIVO Institute for Jewish Research
CONTACT: Tamara Moscowitz of YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, +1-917-606-8288; or Steven E. Greene of the Center for Jewish History, +1-212-294-8303, [email protected]
URL: http://www.prnewswire.com
LOAD-DATE: May 15, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 120 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. A04
LENGTH: 387 words
HEADLINE: Hezbollah added to terror blacklist
BYLINE: Les Whittington, Toronto Star
HIGHLIGHT:
Ottawa to make it official today Joins 13 other banned groups
BODY:
The federal government will announce today that it has added Hezbollah to the
list of terrorist groups banned in Canada, sources say.
Cabinet made the decision yesterday morning and signed the order last night, sources told the Star. It means the assets of Hezbollah will be frozen, joining 13 other groups whose activities have been banned in Canada.
Late last month the federal government expanded its blacklist of terrorist groups to include Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad but did not name Hezbollah. Opposition critics, led by Alliance MP Stockwell Day, have condemned the government for not including Hezbollah, a Lebanon-based Shiite Muslim group.
"Perhaps it will take a horrific tragedy before this government finally cracks down on these terrorists," Day said two weeks ago.
Fundraising for Hezbollah's military wing is already banned in Canada but the government had been slow to move on banning the complete organization.
Revenue Minister Elinor Caplan told the Star 10 days ago that she expected cabinet to add Hezbollah to the list and that it was simply gathering evidence before doing so. She made the comments on the same day that B'Nai Brith launched legal action against the government for not banning Hezbollah.
Both the RCMP and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service have reported Hezbollah has used Canada as a base for more than a decade. Its ventures reportedly include collecting charitable donations and stealing luxury vehicles in Ontario and Quebec, authorities say.
Irwin Cotler, a Liberal MP from Mount Royal, has been critical of his own government's delay in naming Hezbollah.
He says the file on the group is "so comprehensive and so compelling that the failure to name them remains inexplicable."
In a recent speech in Lebanon, Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah said "martyrdom operations - suicide bombings - should be exported outside Palestine."
Government officials had contended that there is a difference between Hezbollah's social-political wing, which has elected members to Lebanon's legislature and does social work in the country's southern region, and its military wing.
But Day says "the leader of Hezbollah himself has said very clearly in print that there is no separation between the military arm and the social arm."
LOAD-DATE: December 11, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 121 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(22) My 30'02 pg 26; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5393602
LENGTH: 462 words
HEADLINE: Thousands march to show 'unwavering support for Israel' [March to Jerusalem]
BYLINE: Regenstreif, Michael
BODY:
MONTREAL - Thousands of Montrealers of all ages braved unseasonably cold
weather on May 19 for the city's 30th annual 18-kilometre March to
Jerusalem
The event shows the community's ''unwavering support for Israel,'' and is ''more relevant than ever,'' said march co-chair Bonnie Paperman.
At the opening ceremonies before the first marchers departed from the Ben-Gurion checkpoint at 1 Cummings Square, Jewish community leaders and politicians mingled with the crowd and spoke.
Shlomo Avital, Israel's consul general in Montreal, said the march is one of the community's greatest events.
Montreal Mayor Gerard Tremblay attended the opening ceremonies and spoke of his ''profound attachment to the Jewish community.'' He wished the marchers well on their journey through ''the many diverse neighbourhoods of the city,'' adding that all Montrealers are united in the values of ''love, justice and peace.''
Rabbi Sidney Shoham of Congregation Beth Zion spoke about the central importance of Jerusalem to the Jewish people and deplored the violence and bloodshed that the ''city of peace'' has seen. He told the marchers to walk ''with pride and dignity'' and prayed for a ''ray of peace to shine on Jerusalem.''
Morton Besner, president of the Jewish Cultural Association, the march's sponsor, recalled that ''30 years ago, four men had a great idea to express our solidarity with the wonderful people of Israel.''
Two of the four, Gordon Brown and Joe Ain have since passed away, and Ruby Zimmerman sent his best wishes from Israel. Herbie Paperman, the fourth founder of the March to Jerusalem, was beside Besner on the podium.
FEDERATION CJA president Steven Cummings referred to the march as a symbol of the community's ''solidarity, love and support with our brothers and sisters in Israel.'' He also announced that the Israel Emergency Campaign in Montreal had already raised $15 million.
Other dignitaries included Mount Royal MP Irwin Cotler, D'Arcy McGee MNA Lawrence Bergman, Montreal city councillors Robert Libman and Michael Applebaum, and Daniel Gal, Israel's former consul general in Montreal.
The runners of the Wolf Pack led the way as the marchers began to make their way through the streets of Montreal to ''Jerusalem.'' March co-ordinator Aviva Miller told The CJN that between 10,000 and 15,000 marchers participated. Proceeds from the march help fund cultural exchange programs with Israel.
The route brought the marchers back to Cummings Square and Checkpoint Jerusalem. As they finished the march, the participants were joined by thousands of others for the annual YM-YWHA Israeli Street Festival, where animators got the crowd dancing, to Israeli horahs one moment and to disco beats the next.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: February 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 123 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: F 26'02
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5316767
LENGTH: 1087 words
HEADLINE: TORONTO (CP) - The success of Canadian athletes at Salt Lake City has spawned a collectibles frenzy across the country as people make (Record in progress)
BYLINE: Press, The canadian
BODY:
TORONTO (CP) The success of Canadian athletes at Salt Lake City has
spawned a collectibles frenzy across the country as people make mad grabs
for everything Olympic including hockey jerseys, Maple Leaf-adorned
clothing and, for the extreme sports fan, a $5,000 autographed skate.
The Team Canada hockey jersey, emblazoned with the stylized Maple Leaf worn by the gold-medal winning hockey team in 1924, is quickly becoming the must-have fashion accessory this season, followed by Team Canada baseball hats.
Stores like Sport Chek are having a difficult time keeping up with demand.
''It's been going crazy,'' said Scott Allen, store manager for a Halifax store. ''People want anything that says Canada on it.''
Nike Canada, the exclusive producer of the jerseys, is currently doing another run of the shirts to keep up with the immense popularity.
''The Canadian public really is interested given the numbers that watched the game on Sunday and the women's game on Thursday,'' said Scott Farley, director of marketing services for the Canadian Hockey Association in Calgary, which owns the rights to the Team Canada logo.
Many people are also trying to cash in on Olympic popularity by selling 2002 Olympic pins, hats, autographed merchandise and other knick-knacks on the online auction house Ebay.
One of the priciest items on Tuesday was a size 9 Nike Air Quest hockey skate worn and signed by Team Canada captain Mario Lemieux at $5,100 US.
MPs twin with Zimbabwean political candidates to deter violence
OTTAWA (CP) Canadian MPs are twinning with opposition politicians in Zimbabwe in hope of deterring attacks on them during that country's tense election campaign.
Fourteen Canadian parliamentarians have volunteered to stay in close touch with Zimbabwean MPs who have been attacked or are considered at risk in pre-electoral violence by government thugs.
Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe should know the whole world is watching the election, Liberal MP Irwin Cotler said Tuesday.
''This is to put the Zimbabwe government and Mugabe on notice that the kind of intimidation and violence he's been engaged in, he will be accountable for,'' said Cotler.
He said his ''twin,'' Blessing Chebundo, has had his house destroyed, received death threats and narrowly avoided being set on fire after attackers doused him with gasoline.
New Democrat Bill Blaikie, another participant in the twinning program, said it can't guarantee candidates will be safe but should help deter attacks.
''We're doing what we can at this end.''
With less than two weeks go until the March 9 election, two leading opposition politicians have been charged with treason for allegedly plotting to assassinate Mugabe.
Eghbal to return to France to fight for custody of daughter he abducted
HALIFAX (CP) A man who abducted one of his young daughters in France three years ago vowed Tuesday to fight for custody of his children ''even at the price of my life.''
In a brief note scribbled on a scrap of paper and given by family members to reporters, Marc Habib Eghbal said: ''I need to have custody. If not, I will be engaged in a war without end.''
Eghbal has agreed to waive his right to an extradition hearing and will be transferred to French authorities in the coming days, his lawyer said.
''He wants to return so he can start the custody battle that he hopes and believes will result in having his two children returned to him,'' Lee Cohen said outside Nova Scotia Supreme Court.
Eghbal, 37, was arrested outside Truro, N.S., earlier this month after being on the run with his six-year-old daughter, Sara, since 1999, when he fled France with her.
There was an international warrant for his arrest from France where Eghbal was convicted in absentia of removing Sara and assaulting Fabienne Brin, his former common-law wife.
The story captured international attention when Brin, 34, flew to Halifax for an emotional reunion with Sara, later recounting the meeting to a crush of TV cameras, reporters and documentary filmmakers from two continents.
Watchdogs plan alternative conference to jump-start Alberta's G-8 summit
CALGARY (CP) Groups that lobby governments for human and civil rights plan to hold their own five-day conference leading up to next summer's G-8 summit of world leaders in Alberta.
The conference, called the G-6B to reflect the world's six billion people, is to raise issues that likely won't get on the G-8 agenda child labour exploitation, arms trade to Third World countries and narrowing the gap between rich and poor countries.
''It's an alternative view of how the world ought to run with respect to human beings,'' said Lynn Foster of Alberta-based International Society for Peace and Human Rights, lead conference organizer.
''We're not opposed to the concept of globalization per se. It's just the way it's being implemented benefiting the rich and destroying the poor.''
Ever since the violent protests at the World Trade Organization talks in Seattle in 1999, government leaders have said they welcome citizen input at world meetings.
But many conference organizers, mostly from non-governmental organizations, fear the average Joe's opinion won't be heard at the G-8 summit in Kananaskis, Alta. So they are creating their own ''people's summit'' at the University of Calgary on June 21-25, 2002.
Vancouver and Ottawa lead Canadian cities in UFO reports in 2001
WINNIPEG (CP) From a strange funnel of fire in Alberta to a triangle of light flying over Sydney, N.S., reports of unidentified flying objects increased a staggering 42 per cent last year in Canada.
''We're not sure (why),'' said researcher Chris Rutkowski, one of the authors of the annual Canadian survey of UFO reports.
''We're thinking that perhaps more people are seeing something that's really there or perhaps more people are aware of how or whether they should report things.''
The trend started well before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 in the U.S., so that has been ruled out as a factor.
For the first time, researchers also tied reports to cities and found that Vancouver and Ottawa topped the list with 17 and 15 reports respectively.
Once again, British Columbia was the best place to be in Canada to spot a UFO. The province accounted for 123 of the 374 reported sightings and has led the country consistently since 1999.
Ontario was next with 87 sightings and Alberta was third with 40 reports.
JOURNAL-CODE: 1418
LOAD-DATE: July 26, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 127 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 2
LENGTH: 576 words
HEADLINE: THE NEW CABINET
BODY:
The 39-member federal cabinet, as appointed yesterday by Paul Martin, newly
installed as Canada's 21st prime minister:
GRAPHIC: 1. photo of ANNE MCLELLAN; Deputy PM; 2. photo of DAVID COLLENETTE; He's out
LOAD-DATE: December 13, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 129 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 485 words
HEADLINE: Liberal caucus remains divided on certain issues
ANCHOR: LISA LAFLAMME
BODY:
LISA LAFLAMME: It wasn't power that dominated the Liberal Caucus
meeting in North Bay today. It was passion for and against same sex unions,
where Prime Minister Jean Chretien shot down alternatives to the proposed law
almost as quickly as they came up. It's Chretien's last retreat before retiring,
but his MPs first chance to share their views on the controversial subject
behind closed doors. CTV's Joy Malbon is in North Bay tonight following a
Prime Minister who refused to budge. Joy.
JOY MALBON [Reporter]: Lisa, they talked, the Prime Minister listened but the Liberal Party is just as divided as ever over same sex marriage.
ROGER GALLOWAY [Liberal - Ontario]: There's absolutely no agreement on much at all.
MALBON: Disgruntled Liberal backbenchers holding out for an alternative to gay marriage came away with, well, nothing. The idea of a national vote on the issue shot down by the Prime Minister.
JEAN CHRETIEN [Canadian Prime Minister]: We are there to protect every minority, linguistic, religious and so on and to have a referendum on these things there would be no protection anymore.
MALBON: He's not keen on referendums. Remember the Quebec sovereignty vote? On this, at least Chretien and his likely successor, Paul Martin, agree.
PAUL MARTIN [Liberal Leadership Contender]: There are other issues which are certainly subject to referendum. I think this is something for Parliament to deal with.
MALBON: But it has polarized the party and public opinion and some fear Liberals may pay the price at the polls.
DAN MCTEAGUE [Liberal - Ontario]: And this thing is really heating up. We are on a collision course with the electorate on this issue.
MALBON: And while the Prime Minister rules out civil unions, this MP, who fought for gay rights, believes there could be another legal option.
IRWIN COTLER [Liberal - Quebec]: If you can call a civil union you know a civil marriage with all the rights and benefits and obligations of a marriage.
MALBON: Others say allowing gays and lesbians into the marriage tent is simply the right thing to do.
CAROLYN BENNETT [Liberal - Ontario]: Are we going to do it now or are we going to do it when our children are in Parliament? It's going to happen. It's the way society's evolving.
MALBON: The Prime Minister introduced the legislation but it will be up to the new leader, likely Paul Martin, to make it law. The Supreme Court's expected to give its legal opinion sometime next year almost certainly making gay marriage an election issue. Joy Malbon, CTV News, North Bay.
LAFLAMME: Angioplasty or clot busting drugs, a new study goes straight to the heart of a life or death medical debate. Researchers are urging hospitals to choose the method that shows an astonishing success rate. That's just ahead. A look at what's coming up in local news is next.
[COMMERCIAL BREAK]
LOAD-DATE: August 21, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 130 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(39) O 3'02 pg 31; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5477406
LENGTH: 789 words
HEADLINE: Hebrew U seminar not welcome at Concordia
BYLINE: Arnold, Janice
BODY:
The local president of the Canadian Friends of Hebrew University (CFHU)
says it's ''a measure of the desperation'' of the Concordia University
administration that an academic seminar his group was to hold at the
Loyola campus Oct. 6 will not be allowed to go ahead.
Lewis Dobrin said he received verbal notice Sept. 19 from Concordia Jewish studies professor Ira Robinson that rector Frederick Lowy had decided the day-long public event, titled The Pursuit of Brilliance: The Best of Hebrew U, fell under Concordia's definition of a Mideast-related activity banned under the current moratorium on such events.
Lowy imposed the moratorium Sept. 9 after violent protests forced the cancellation of a speech at Concordia by former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The seminar features six Hebrew U professors giving a total of 16 lectures on topics such as medicine, technology, Jewish thought, law and political science, as well as the Mideast crisis.
''This event is not political at all, it is scholarly... I think the administration feels it not only has to show no bias, but has to have the appearance of showing no bias,'' Dobrin said.
Dobrin said the CFHU signed a contract with Concordia in July for the space at Loyola. The university was not charging the group, he said.
The event will now take place at McGill University's law faculty, which will charge the group for the space.
Concordia spokesperson Chris Mota said the event was cancelled because it ''contravenes the moratorium guidelines,'' and said Concordia offered to help find another location for it.
Dobrin said the CFHU had to scramble to find a new venue and inform the 3,000 people who received a seminar brochure in the mail about the change.
He acknowledged some seminar topics could be considered political.
Political science professor Meron Medzini will discuss Israel - Two Years of Intifadah and the Peace Options for Israel. Another political scientist, Reuven Hazan, will discuss Public Opinion and the Peace Process: From Golda Meir to Rabin and now Sharon, and Democracies at War: Lessons from Israel.
The day will conclude with a plenary session on Israel in Crisis, moderated by Mount Royal MP Irwin Cotler.
But most of the program deals with such areas as women's rights in Judaism, brain research, Israel's hi-tech industry and the role of Israel's Supreme Court.
The event was to have been held in co-operation with Concordia's Jewish studies department.
The event is not a fund-raiser. In fact, Dobrin said, it is ''a money-loser,'' because of the cost of bringing in the professors and publicizing the event. But the last-minute switch may attract people, he said, because the Concordia cancellation has people talking about it.
Hillel city-wide president Yoni Petel called the cancellation ''disgusting... It's not just students affected [by the moratorium], now it's academics. How far will it go?''
But Petel said the change of venue of last week's ''community rally/Hakafot Shniot celebration in support of Jewish students and democracy at Concordia'' was not due to the moratorium.
Petel said reasons included the fact that police would not issue a permit for a march after dark and that the McGill planning office advised Hillel it does not allow outside groups to hold such gatherings on its premises.
* * *
A B'nai Brith Canada delegation was received at Premier Bernard Landry's Montreal office last week and asked that the province conduct an inquiry into the Sept. 9 events at Concordia University.
Speaking to reporters outside the Hydro-Quebec building, B'nai Brith's national legal counsel Steven Slimovitch said a government-appointed inquiry is the only body that can subpoena witnesses and ascertain why the protest against former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu turned violent.
The violence at Concordia's Hall Building led to the cancellation of Netanyahu's planned speech there. Slimovitch said he hoped an inquiry would examine what led up to the protest and recommend ways to prevent a similar incident from recurring.
B'nai Brith believes everyone involved should be questioned, including the university administration, the police, officials from the city and other levels of government, as well as demonstrators and student organizations.
B'nai Brith Quebec region executive director Saulie Zajdel said ''nothing spectacular'' came out of the meeting with Roy, ''who said he would discuss the issue with Landry. ''That's all we could hope for,'' Zajdel said.
Roy said Landry is not commenting on B'na' Brith's request for an inquiry, which he said has been forwarded to the Procureur General for consideration.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: August 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 131 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Pg. 22
LENGTH: 3636 words
HEADLINE: HERE WE GO AGAIN
BYLINE: Ina Friedman
BODY:
Here We Go Again
The assault on Israel's legitimacy at last summer's Durban conference, endorsed by the overwhelming majority of participating Non-Governmental Organizations, was no freak event. But with new storms brewing, Israeli and Jewish groups are still agonizing over how best to respond.
Ina Friedman
It started in Durban last August, continued in Geneva in December, and now battle is being rejoined, again in Geneva, during the annual session of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights.
For six weeks, through to late April, the 53 nations on the commission are meeting to discuss the state of human rights around the world, focusing on xenophobia, torture, the rights of women and children and much more besides. Only one country is singled out for its own discussion sessions: On March 25 and 26, the entire commission will focus on human rights violations by Israel in then occupied territories.
Israel has long felt the U.N. displays unwarranted bias against it. But the fear among Israeli and Jewish Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) attending the current gathering is that - as at Durban and subsequent human rights get-togethers in Geneva - Palestinian NGOs, abetted by other NGO allies, intend to use the event to whip up another storm of anti-Israeli rhetoric so crude as to smack of anti-Semitism.
At the NGO Forum in Durban, a parallel event to the U.N. World Conference Against Racism (WCAR), representatives of over 3,000 human rights NGOs from around the world met to champion their individual concerns - from the caste system in India to the plight of indigenous peoples. They also crafted a program of action intended to guide the United Nations, individual governments, and joint international work on human rights in years to come. (The NGOs play an ever more important role in shaping international priorities and influencing government agendas. Notes leading Canadian human rights lawyer and Member of Parliament Irwin Cotler: "It was the NGOs that brought about the International Criminal Court Treaty and the Land Mines Treaty. They are now significant political actors.")
But the Durban Forum erupted into a frenzy of anti-Semitic rhetoric and vicious anti-Israel resolutions. Dr. Shimon Samuels, the Paris-based international liaison of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, headed the Jewish Caucus there, comprising organizations like the Anti-Defamation League, B'nai B'rith International, Hadassah and the World Union of Jewish Students. And he says he experienced - firsthand and repeatedly - the aggressive disruption and intimidation tactics against Jews and Israelis practiced by Arab participants and their South African and other Third World allies, against a background of flyers and placards proclaiming slogans like "Down with Nazi-Israeli Apartheid" and "Hitler should have finished the job."
Some Israeli and Jewish activists hoped Durban was a one-time aberration, the result of clever manipulation, by anti-Israeli elements, of the wide-spread concern over the plight of the Palestinians. But the malaise has proven persistent.
At a follow-up meeting of the Forum's International Steering Committee (ISC), in Geneva on December 6, Samuels realized that Durban was no fleeting phenomenon, and that the brazen efforts to malign and discriminate against Israel and its supporters - indeed, against Jews, per se - now threaten to become a permanent fixture of the international human rights culture.
"At the last minute in Geneva, I discovered that, via an exchange of e-mails, members of the committee had appointed someone to replace me," relates Samuels, who had been elected as an ISC alternate by the European Network Against Racism (ENAR), where he promotes understanding between European Muslims and Jews. "When I took my seat, Mercia Andrews of SANGOCO," the South African National NGO Coalition, which had hosted the NGO Forum, "looked at me and said: 'I no longer know who has credentials to attend this session. Certainly the enemies of the anti-racism process don't.'"
Samuels says he refused to be cowed into leaving the ISC meeting. Besides standing on principal, he was intent on thwarting a proposal drawn up by SANGOCO - which had been active in fomenting the anti-Semitic atmosphere at Durban - to establish a U.N.-funded World Movement Against Racism. Referring to a leaked copy of that intended movement's manifesto, Samuels says its first priority would have been to work to dismantle the State of Israel by, among other measures, urging a commercial embargo, and promoting a "full right of return" for Palestinian refugees while canceling Israel's Law of Return. In the event, Samuels kept his seat, the proposal was not tabled - and the ISC has now been disbanded.
Only the previous day, at a session of NGOs parallel to the meeting of the High Contracting Parties of the Fourth Geneva Convention - called to discuss Israeli violations of the treaty - the Palestinian hosts had unabashedly ordered Samuels to leave the room. "Dianne Luping of (the Palestinian human rights organization) LAW, who is an excellent lobbyist and legal mind, came up to me and said: 'Shimon, you're leaving!' I stayed put, and then Raji Sourani, the veteran director of the Palestinian Center for Human Rights in Gaza, approached me and ordered: 'You leave now!' And when I again refused, he actually put his fist onto my chin." After a heated exchange, "including a threat to 'get me later,'" Samuels reports, Sourani backed down.
Present in the room all the while were representatives of the Swiss government, the European Commission, the International Commission of Jurists, Amnesty International, and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) - "and no one intervened," Samuels reports bitterly. He stayed long enough to hear a repre-sentative of the International Commission of Jurists explain how to impose a total commercial embargo on Israel without violating World Trade Organization provisions. "Then I left to call the representatives of the governments and three international human rights organizations on their cell phones," Samuels continues. "'You have witnessed an act of racism,' I told them. 'Please leave this forum.'"
None of them did.
No one questions that from the standpoint of the Jewish organizations attending it, the five-day NGO Forum in Durban was a disaster. Held immediately prior to the government-level WCAR conclave - from which the United States and Israel walked out, in protest against the draft language on the Middle East conflict - the Forum was an often chaotic, sometimes rowdy affair. Even U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan and U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson were booed when they appeared before the plenum of 3,000 human rights NGOs.
Much has been written about the "hijacking" of the Forum by Palestinian groups and their allies, and of the consequent resentment of various minority groups - including the Roma (Gypsies), Chechins and groups of indigenous peoples - that their issues had been marginalized. But only the Jews were subjected to flagrant harassment. Members of the Jewish Caucus were verbally abused. The meeting of the Commission on anti-Semitism was stormed by about 100 shouting protesters, forcing it to recess and reconvene in smaller groups (some of which were similarly disrupted).
And at its closing session, the plenum adopted a Declaration and Program of Action that branded Zionism as racism; condemned Israel as a "racist, apartheid state" guilty of "acts of genocide" and "ethnic cleansing"; called for the establishment of a war crimes tribunal to bring to justice those responsible for these "crimes against humanity"; and urged the international community "to impose a policy of complete and total isolation of Israel," as it had done with apartheid-era South Africa.
As Irwin Cotler was later to sum up: "A conference at which human rights was to have been celebrated as the new religion of our time turned into one at which Israel was portrayed as the anti-human rights metaphor ... the new anti-Christ."
Some believe that in endorsing the declaration, the NGO Forum shot itself in the foot. Crucially, Robinson, who expressed her dismay at the "hateful, even racist" atmosphere of anti-Semitism at the conclave, chose not to recommend the declaration to the government WCAR conclave as a framework for action.
Yet, with representatives of Jewish NGOs like Samuels still being excluded from and harassed at international events, and the preoccupation with Israel again evident at the current Geneva gathering, the question must be asked: Has anti-Semitism - of the classical variety, or cloaked in the form of virulent anti-Israel rhetoric - insidiously seeped into the NGO culture, to be accepted as "normative" behavior?
The answer is heavily nuanced. Israel's human rights record in the territories occupied since 1967 is far from sterling. Violations are regularly documented and condemned by Israeli groups such as B'Tselem, Physicians for Human Rights, and the Public Committee Against Torture. But the Palestinian Authority's dismal record on human rights was utterly ignored at Durban and has been ever since. What's more, notes Israel's Deputy Foreign Minister Rabbi Michael Melchior (who canceled his appearance at the WCAR), the NGO declaration went beyond protesting Israeli policies in incitefully hyperbolic language. "It denied Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state," he says, by branding Zionism - which most Jews regard as a national liberation movement - as racist. "And it singled out Israel" - among the world's many nation-states with a sizable ethnic minority - "for such disapprobation."
How did this happen with such ease? Even Jewish delegates to Durban are prepared to be forgiving toward some of the single-issue NGOs, less versed in Middle East politics. Many at Durban, says one of these delegates, were so engrossed in advocating their own causes that they failed to notice the storm brewing over Israel and anti-Semitism. And the plenum session that adopted the declaration was so disorganized that many delegates did not understand what they were voting on - to say nothing of its implications.
Furthermore, a number of groups - including the Eastern and Central European Caucus and the Roma Caucus - joined the Jewish Caucus in walking out of the closing plenum after a clause deploring anti-Zionism as "a virulent contemporary form of anti-Semitism" was stricken from the declaration's final draft (the only section of the 475-clause document to be voted out).
During the following week, moreover, 81 NGOs from 35 countries signed a statement (framed by the Eastern and Central European Caucus) disassociating themselves from the offending sections of the declaration - and dozens more endorsed it after the closing date for signatures.
And yet, these groups represent only a tiny fraction of the NGOs that participated in Durban, and the declaration remains on the record. The overwhelming majority of the NGOs - single-issue groups from every continent, concerned with everything from reparations for victims of the slave trade to the rights of the Dalits of India - remain formally committed to its wording.
But the greatest disappointment, even anger, expressed by Jewish groups has to do with the behavior - at Durban and since - of the major international human rights organizations (INGOs), such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights.
David Matas, a legal adviser to B'nai B'rith Canada, has summed up that grievance (in a report on Durban entitled "Civil Society Smashes Up"): "The international NGOs disassociated themselves from the attacks on the Jewish community, but refused to condemn those attacks." While rejecting the language applied to Israel in the NGO declaration, he notes, they were careful to point out that they "agreed with the issues" raised in its controversial clauses. And most of all, the INGOs expressed a desire to put the ugly aspects of Durban behind them as quickly as possible. In answer to a question at a press conference held directly after the Forum, for example, Michael Posner of the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, said that his organization rejects the "Zionism is racism language ... But it's time to move on."
Some of the INGOs did try to prevent the offensive language from reaching the final draft. Ronald Eissens, the Dutch director of ICARE (Internet Center Anti-Racism Europe), recalls that, at a pre-Durban meeting, "Melinda Ching of Amnesty International stood up and said that if the draft (containing the anti-Israel hyperbole) goes to Durban, the international NGOs would oppose it and call a press conference to condemn its hate language." Other sources say that the Palestinian NGOs prom-ised the INGOs that the inflammatory language would disappear, but then reneged. Why, then, didn't the INGOs follow through on Ching's threat to denounce the draft and vote against it?
"What held them back was intimidation by the Palestinian and Arab caucuses," says Stacy Burdett, associate director of government affairs at the Anti-Defamation League. "People have told me that they've seen internal memos or been present at discussions in which donors to these organizations said: 'What the hell were you doing at the Zionism is racism conference? And why didn't you speak out against it?'" The reason was that "Arab groups had told them: 'If you want to continue working in our region, don't interfere in this.'" Amnesty's Ching, while saying that her organization was not subject to intimidation, says she has heard of it happening to other NGOs.
That explanation deeply rankles leading Jewish NGOs, which are far from ready to "move on."
First of all, there are the practical consequences of the NGO declaration to deal with. Jeff Rubin, the communications director of Hillel, the leading Jewish campus NGO, says there have been "no ramifications at American colleges," where NGOs are especially influential, and he ascribes that to September 11. "Dealing with the political and emotional repercussions of that event has really pushed everything else onto the sidelines," he says. But Cotler notes that he is already seeing "divestment campaigns at various universities - along the lines of campaigns conducted against South Africa - now being applied to Israel. This is part of the program of action in the Durban NGO document."
And in Western Europe, Durban has "drawn back to the surface" the anti-Semitism that has always figured, to a degree, in its anti-racism movement," says ICARE's Eissens. "Many organizations wanted to sign the statement of the Central and Eastern European Caucus," he explains. "But they were stopped by groups of African descendants, who did not want to detract from the declaration's value" - because of its clauses on the slave trade. "The conflict over this got pretty ugly, including accusations that the European Caucus was led and being paid off by Jews."
Then there is the unresolved bitterness among Jewish NGOs at how their colleagues behaved. "Frankly, I can't see how we can continue to conduct business as usual with these NGOs until there is some meeting of minds about that horrendous show of anti-Semitism at Durban," says B'nai B'rith's Executive Vice President Dan Mariaschin. "Until then, I would be for suspending cooperation with the human rights groups that sat by and did nothing there - and certainly with those who joined the bandwagon."
At the same time, Mariaschen speaks of the need to launch an "educational campaign among the major human rights groups." In part, it would aim at overcoming what Dina Siegel Vann, the U.N. and Latin American Affairs Director of B'nai B'rith International, calls the "distortions" in human rights ideology. "Human rights NGOs naturally identify with the underdog," she observes. "Our problem is that they perceive the Jews as the opposite - what they call a 'privileged minority.'"
Yet there is no consensus on the wisdom of pressing for a "meeting of minds" with the NGOs whose actions proved so disappointing at Durban. "I don't think they'd cooperate. All they want to do is bury Durban and get back to their own issues," says Leila Seigel, who represents the International Council of Jewish Women at the UN institutions in Geneva. "If we keep pushing them on this, we'll just turn people off."
Eissens echoes that fear in confessing his ambivalence about how to proceed. "I'm aware that continuing to air Jewish grievances about Durban alienates many groups, who want 'their thing' to be in the spotlight," he says. "Then again, as human rights activists, we're obliged to address all manifestations of racism, including those within the NGO movement itself."
Cotler offers yet another perspective on this dilemma, especially in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. One reason for the Jewish NGOs' strained communications with other human rights groups, he suggests, may have to do with a tendency toward insularity. "The Palestinians have mainstreamed their cause by becoming involved in the larger human rights agenda," he says. "They don't just make their own case; they attend meetings on women's rights, on children's rights, while we've withdrawn from that larger agenda, in part because we see it as being adversarial."
Still, he too favors vigorous action to ensure that what went on in Durban, and its lingering effect, are not swept under the carpet. "We need a coordinated governmental-NGO effort to hold the institutions and people involved to account," he urges. "If we take them at their word - that they're concerned about the international human rights regime - we (must show them) how they're undermining exactly what they say they are committed to."
THERE MIGHT HAVE BEEN AN opportunity to do just that - and to see whether Jewish NGOs are capable of thwarting repeats of the Durban scenario - at the current Geneva meeting of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights.
But because March 26, when the commission debates Israel, is the day before the Passover Seder, few Jewish NGOs are sending representatives. Israel's Foreign Ministry is creating a special unit to liaise with NGOs, but it will not be organized in time to act effectively. The World Union of Jewish Students is sending its chairman, Peleg Reshef, from Israel, but he is taking just two students along. Reshef is hoping to mobilize local Jewish students to demonstrate against the commission's tendency to single out Israel for censure - and, he says, "to defend Israel's right to exist."
It's unlikely many Jewish representatives will be around a day earlier, either, when Palestinian NGOs will be holding a briefing for diplomats, which will also feature a speaker from Amnesty International. As of this writing, the Palestinian NGOs had not decided whether to organize demonstrations, as well.
The next landmark event, drawing governments and NGOs from around the world, is the U.N.-sponsored World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD), to be held in Johannesburg on August 26-September 4. Given the venue, and the proven support of South African NGOs (represented by SANGOCO) for the Palestinian cause, that summit is already prompting concern about a display of anti-Israel rhetoric (and worse).
Mordechai Yedid, the Foreign Ministry's deputy director general for U.N. and international organizations (who represented the Israeli government at WCAR), notes that "while Durban was about ideology, Johannesburg is about practical issues of globalization, social development, and the environment. Israel has much to contribute to the developing countries in these areas," he says, "and their governments know it. In general, they're are keenly interested in seeing the summit succeed." The stance that may be taken by the NGOs, however, is another matter. "I know that Jewish NGOs are worried that the WSSD will turn into another Durban," Yedid admits. "But it's still too early to predict what will happen."
Gidon Bromberg, the director of Friends of the Earth in the Middle East - which coordinates the work of various Israeli, Palestinian, and Jordanian environmental NGOs - attended the February session of the WSSD's Preparatory Committee in New York and says he did not come across any Israel bashing there. Nevertheless, he adds, "We're not fooling ourselves and know that we can expect attempts by some radical groups to hijack the agenda in Johannesburg." This fear, he believes, is shared by leading environmental INGOs. "They're all aware of what happened in Durban, and none of them wants to see yet another international conference sidelined by Middle Eastern politics. That's not to say there won't be any discussion of the Middle East," Bromberg qualifies. "The challenge is to ensure that it doesn't prevent discussion of other issues."
It may therefore be critical to see how Jewish and international NGOs relate to the "poverty tribunal" that LAW is organizing at the WSSD. It is modeled on the International People's Tribunal on the Third World Debt, held in Brazil in February, which was a challenge by the "south," as a whole, to the "north," as a whole, to erase the debt. But LAW's poverty tribunal "will specifically be against Israel," says the group's Dianne Luping, "for all the violations that have led to poverty among such large numbers of Palestinians."
Once again, that is, Palestinian NGOs and their allies will be trying to single out Israel. Will the heavy-hitting international and the single-issue NGOs, whose counterparts in Durban copped out, take a stand this time?
LOAD-DATE: April 24, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 133 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: OPINION; Pg. A21
LENGTH: 839 words
HEADLINE: Security ties to U.S. key to Arar saga
BYLINE: Thomas Walkom, Toronto Star
BODY:
The release of Canadian citizen Maher Arar from a Syrian jail is being
celebrated as a triumph of Canadian diplomacy. In some ways, perhaps, it was.
But the bizarre story of Arar, which began last year when he was detained in New York while on stopover to Ottawa, was never about relations between Canada and Syria. It was about the relationship - particularly the security relationship - between Canada and the U.S.
The 33-year-old's troubles date to Sept. 26, 2002. On a flight home from Zurich, the Syrian-born Ottawa engineer touched down at New York's Kennedy Airport to change planes. But, instead of being allowed to board his Ottawa flight, he was arrested, placed in solitary confinement and denied the right to contact Canadian consular officials.
For a week, he was not allowed to phone his wife. He was rushed through a deportation hearing without the benefit of counsel, declared to have links to Al Qaeda terrorists (with no evidence provided) and ordered deported to Syria - a country he left when he was 17.
In fact, he was not sent to Syria but Jordan, where he was detained for 12 days while the Canadian government, completely in the dark, scrambled to find him.
Why Jordan? Eventually, Arar may provide some answers. Jordan did not. But news reports indicated he had been sent there to be questioned by U.S. Central Intelligence Agency interrogators, who do not have to observe constitutional niceties when operating outside of their own country.
From Jordan he was sent to Syria, plopped into prison and, eventually, charged with being a member of the Muslim Brotherhood - an organization the Syrian dictatorship calls terrorist but which Canada and the U.S. do not.
Initially, there was not much support in Canada for Arar. His only public champions were the New Democratic Party's Alexa McDonough and his own Liberal MP, Marlene Catterall. When Arar's wife invited MPs to a candlelight vigil on Parliament Hill for her husband, the office of one Alliance member sent back the curt reply, "Get a life."
Over time, the sheer absurdity of Arar's situation drew others to his cause, including Montreal lawyer and MP Irwin Cotler and former Conservative foreign affairs minister Flora Macdonald.
Arar's wife, Monia Mazigh, made the perfectly logical argument that if her husband were a terrorist he should be charged and interrogated in Canada - not consigned to a Syrian dungeon.
But even as opinion began to shift, the specifics became murkier. Back in November, newspapers reported that U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell told Canada the FBI had warned the RCMP of Arar's alleged terrorist links.
But by mid-summer, the same newspapers were reporting the reverse; that, in fact, Canadian security forces had tipped off the FBI.
Paul Cellucci, Washington's ambassador to Canada, gave weight to this second explanation when, reportedly, he told a private audience that Canadian security forces preferred to keep Arar in a Syrian jail.
Solicitor General Wayne Easter denied this was official RCMP policy. Flora Macdonald talked darkly of "rogue agents."
The real explanation is probably simpler than rogue agents. In its effort to pacify the Americans (and keep the Windsor tunnel open to truck traffic) the federal government has effectively put its national security apparatus under U.S. control.
None of this is new. During the Cold War, the RCMP security service operated as a branch of the CIA/FBI. Then, as now, the political masters of Canadian spookdom preferred to turn a blind eye.
The benefit of this arrangement is that there is coordinated security. We do share the continent. The downside is that, increasingly, the RCMP and the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service no longer work for us. Instead, they work for Washington.
For many Canadians that may not matter. For some it does. Mohamed Mansour Jabarah, a St. Catharines teenager allegedly linked to Al Qaeda, was lured across the border to the U.S. by CSIS so he could be jailed, without charge, in an undisclosed location by American authorities.
Like Arar, Jabarah's alleged crimes could have been dealt with in Canada. But Canadian security services, apparently acting without the knowledge of the Canadian government, thought it more convenient to hand over this particular Canadian citizen to a foreign power.
Is this what happened with Arar? Perhaps we will find out. An intriguing left-right coalition of interests has developed to support the Ottawa engineer's cause. The collapse of the federal government's ludicrous Project Thread case against 21 Indian and Pakistani immigrants initially deemed terrorist has demonstrated how shallow so-called national security cases can be when put under proper scrutiny.
With the shadow of 9/11 receding, Liberal backbenchers no longer seem as reluctant to support civil liberties.
Meanwhile, Maher Arar is out of jail. Good for him. This time, he took a direct flight home.
Thomas Walkom's column appears on Tuesday. twalkom @ thestar.ca.
LOAD-DATE: October 7, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 134 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(10) Mr 6'03 pg 16; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5569813
LENGTH: 476 words
HEADLINE: Young leadership set to 'Imagine' the possibilities
BODY:
At a time when many Jewish leaders are lamenting a perceived lack of Jewish
interest from young men and women, it's encouraging to see what's planned
for Montreal this April.
United Israel Appeal Federations Canada (UIAFC), UJA Federation of Greater Toronto, and Jewish Federations across Canada have created ''Imagine,'' an International Young Leadership Conference for young Jewish adults from around the world.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
Over 500 people between the ages of 25 and 45 are expected to attend the conference from April 4 to 6, with the Toronto contingent at 100. Also taking part in the weekend will be young adults from the United States, Europe, Israel, South America and Australia.
''Two years ago, the Young Leadership Conference in Ottawa was wonderful,'' says Jessica Cooperman, Chair, along with Brian Tanner of Toronto's Young Adult Division. ''This year's event in Montreal is going to be incredible with people from around the world. It's such a great chance to network with worldwide young Jewish leadership. We're all looking forward to it. There's already a feeling of electricity about it and it's still not for a couple of months.''
The goal of the weekend is to help young Jewish leaders share ideas while enhancing their leadership skills through networking, speakers, and a series of interactive workshops led by experienced community leaders from around the country. The conference will feature top international talent, from business, entertainment, spirituality and motivation fields. The outcome of the weekend will be better-equipped young Jewish leaders and a national network to continue the dialogue into the future.
''It is a chance for young Jews to reflect on the world today and to have their spirits lifted, to hear inspiring stories and to bond with other young Jews in similar positions,'' says Imagine co-chairs Karyn Saragossi and Heather Adelson-Zipkin. ''It will be a weekend that will set the standards for all Young Leadership conferences that will follow.''
Speakers include Rabbi Shmuel Boteach, MP Irwin Cotler, and Israel's Ambassador to Canada, Haim Divon, Ellen Cannon, and John Loftus.
A ''Club Med Day'' brings interested participants to Montreal's newly renovated YM-YWHA Jewish Community Centre. There they will spend Sunday working out or enjoying the health centre.
Another unique aspect of this year's Young Leadership Conference is The Mystery Ball. Billed as the ''must-attend party of the year,'' it is the first international ball for young Jewish people held in North America. The black-tie affair is being organized to allow conference guests to explore Montreal's unique food, fashion, culture, festivals and nightlife.
For more information or to register, contact Naomi Cohen at 416.631.5698 or by e-mail at [email protected]
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: September 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 136 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Ja 30'02
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5300445
LENGTH: 335 words
HEADLINE: Woman, child huddle in Montreal church fearing deportation to Zimbabwe (Record in progress)
BODY:
MONTREAL (CP) A woman and her child hid from immigration officials in a
Montreal church Tuesday, saying she preferred jail in Canada to a death
squad at home in Zimbabwe.
''If I go back, I'm going to die,'' said Dorothy Dube, upon hearing that she and her family were refused refugee status. ''At least here it's only prison.''
Immigration officials ordered Dube, her 10-year-old son, Basil, and her 18-year-old niece, Nompilo Ncube, to meet with them at Dorval airport Tuesday afternoon.
Instead, Dube and her family sought asylum from Rev. Darryl Gray of Union United Church.
Ncube says she was raped by Zimbabwean government thugs and Dube says she faced death for political dissent.
Dube said she cannot understand how Canada can deport refugee seekers back to Zimbabwe in the face of confirmed reports of torture, beatings and political killings.
''Canadians were born free; they don't understand the terror we face at home,'' Dube said, speaking in a whisper because of a heart condition. ''I'm sick with stress.''
Supporters are appealing to Immigration Minister Denis Coderre to halt the deportation, said Gray, whose church will be providing food and shelter. ''We simply want justice. We don't believe the family got a fair hearing,'' he said.
Aside from a judicial review, activists will also urge the minister to review the process for Zimbabwean refugees, who are rejected twice as often in Quebec as in other provinces.
''And we're calling for a moratorium on deportations,'' said Gray, linking Zimbabwe to Afghanistan, Zaire and Congo. ''Britain isn't deporting to Zimbabwe; why would we do it?''
The Zimbabweans also mustered support from MPs Irwin Cotler and Marlene Jennings, who appealed to Coderre.
''He's very sympathetic,'' Jennings said after speaking with Coderre Tuesday to urge him ''to do what he can.
''I understand he's dealing with it as a priority file,'' she added.
Coderre did not return calls.
(Montreal Gazette)
JOURNAL-CODE: 1418
LOAD-DATE: February 20, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 137 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 377 words
HEADLINE: Ottawa made it illegal to support named terrorist organizations
ANCHORS: PETER MANSBRIDGE
BODY:
PETER MANSBRIDGE: Ottawa pulled out last year's anti-terror legislation and
put a previously unused section to work today. It allowed Ottawa to formally
name organizations as terrorist groups and make it illegal for Canadians to
support them. As Chris Goldrick reports, there is already controversy over who
has made the list, and who hasn't.
CHRIS GOLDRICK (Reporter): It was Solicitor General Lawrence MacAulay who issued the list and with it a warning.
LAWRENCE MACAULAY (Solicitor General): If you deal, facilitate, provide an apartment, hook up a telephone, deal with these people to make, to help them in their activities, you have broken the law and we are coming after you.
GOLDRICK: And the penalties are severe. Up to life in prison for some offenses. And here are the groups Lawrence MacAulay is talking about. Topping the seven names on the list is Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network. The other six groups are suspected of having links to it and are based in countries such as Egypt, Algeria, Somalia. Now, those suspected terrorist groups can have their assets seized. And Ottawa's new anti-terror legislation means anyone in Canada caught financing or assisting them can be charged.
ROCCO GALATI (Constitutional Lawyer): A metric ton of fertilizer.
GOLDRICK: Rocco Galati doesn't like anything about the list and he is outraged all the groups on it are Muslim.
GALATI: We know of other terrorist organizations from Irish to Basque to a number of other terrorist organizations that are not Muslim. This is a focus and target on the Muslim community.
GOLDRICK: Lawrence MacAulay dismisses those concerns, saying other groups will soon be added. Canada's security agency is considering new additions to the list. Cabinet will have the final say.
IRWIN COTLER (Quebec Liberal MMP): In my view, at some point in that process, the alleged terrorist entities should have been given notice and offered the opportunity to, in fact, challenge the determination that was being made.
GOLDRICK: But Ottawa seems determined to keep the process away from the public. It won't even say if any of the seven terrorist groups are operating in Canada, or if any Canadians are suspected of assisting them. Chris Goldrick, CBC News, Ottawa.
LOAD-DATE: July 24, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 138 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: DOMESTIC NEWS
DISTRIBUTION: Attention News Editors
LENGTH: 901 words
HEADLINE: The Privacy Commissioner of Canada, George Radwanski, today sent the following letter to the Honourable David Collenette, Minister of Transport, on the subject of Bill C-55
DATELINE: OTTAWA, June 18
BODY:
The Privacy Commissioner of Canada, George
Radwanski, today sent the following letter to the Honourable David Collenette,
Minister of Transport, on the subject of Bill C-55:
Dear Minister Collenette:
On May 6 and May 15, I wrote to you regarding my concerns about section 4.82 of your Bill C-55.
Other than your letter of May 15 stating only that you had forwarded my correspondence to you to Solicitor-General Laurence MacAulay for a reply, I have received no response from you on this important matter.
As you are no doubt aware, Minister MacAulay's reply to me did not substantively address any of the specific privacy concerns that I had brought to your attention.
As I have emphasized to you in my previous letters, Bill C-55 is indisputably your legislation. Not only was this Bill presented to Parliament by you and bears solely your name as its sponsor, but the section in question, 4.82, proposes amendments to the Aeronautics Act which falls within your responsibilities as Transport Minister. Under such circumstances, it is difficult to understand how the principle of ministerial accountability could be reconciled with purporting that the need to justify deeply disturbing provisions such as this rests with some minister other than yourself.
Because the proposed provisions that are at issue would have extremely serious impact on the fundamental human right of privacy to which all Canadians are entitled, and because they would create a precedent that opened the door to further unjustified intrusions, I simply do not have the option of letting the matter rest.
I therefore wish to bring to your attention again that section 4.82 of Bill C-55 goes far beyond the stated anti-terrorism and security purposes of this legislation. By giving the RCMP and CSIS unrestricted access to the personal information of airline passengers for purposes that include looking for individuals wanted on a warrant for any of more than 150 Criminal Code offences punishable by imprisonment for five years or more, this section would strike unjustifiably at the privacy right of Canadians to be anonymous with regard to the state.
You have provided no explanation whatsoever as to why it would not be sufficient to limit this provision to allowing the RCMP and CSIS to access the passenger information in question, check it against data bases of known or suspected terrorists, and then immediately destroy it if no such match is found. As I have previously made clear, I would raise no privacy objection to such a more limited provision, which I believe can be justified as a reasonable anti-terrorism measure.
I wish further to bring to your attention that the concerns that I have raised in this matter have been publicly endorsed by the Information and Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia and the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario; by members of every party in the House of Commons, notably including your own caucus member who is an internationally recognized expert on human rights, Irwin Cotler; by editorials in newspapers including the Toronto Star, the Globe and Mail, the Vancouver Sun, the Vancouver Province, the Calgary Herald, the Edmonton Journal, the Saskatoon StarPhoenix and the Sault Star; and by prominent national affairs commentators including James Travers of the Toronto Star and Andrew Coyne of the National Post.
If there are considerations that nevertheless lead you to be convinced that you are right while all of the above, in addition to the Officer of Parliament specifically mandated to oversee and defend the privacy rights of Canadians, are wrong, then I respectfully suggest that it would be timely to explain your reasons without any further delay.
In the absence of such an explanation, it is my duty to request an undertaking from you that you will present amendments to fix this unjustified, unnecessary and unacceptable provision. In my letter to you of May 15, I detailed the specific amendments that I believe would be appropriate.
The purpose of these amendments is solely to limit RCMP and CSIS use of air traveler information to purposes related to anti-terrorism and security by deleting the reference to searching for individuals wanted on a wide range of other warrants, and to facilitate oversight by the Privacy Commissioner in cases where passenger information is retained indefinitely even though there is no specific match to known or suspected terrorists.
The proposed amendments would in no way impede the legitimate anti- terrorism and security purposes of the legislation. Rather, they would make the legislation appropriately respectful of the privacy rights of Canadians without in any demonstrable way diminishing our safety or security.
I would appreciate your prompt reply.
Yours sincerely,
George Radwanski
Privacy Commissioner of Canada
VIEW ADDITIONAL COMPANY-SPECIFIC INFORMATION:
http://www.newswire.ca/cgi-bin/inquiry.cgi?OKEY=37018
CONTACT: Anne-Marie Hayden, Media Relations, Office of the Privacy Commissioner
of Canada, Tel: (613) 995-0103, ahayden(at)privcom.gc.ca, www.privcom.gc.ca
SECTION: (634) Ap 29'02 pg 22; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5410085
LENGTH: 2126 words
HEADLINE: Headlines ''cloud and sometimes corrupt understanding,'' says Cotler: Liberal MP Irwin Cotler probes root causes for conflict in the Middle East and the basis for conflict resolution
BYLINE: Cotler, Irwin
BODY:
[Graph Not Transcribed]
As I rise to speak I am reminded, particularly because this is Holocaust Remembrance Day, of the reverence for human life. That is why I wish to begin almost by way of prologue with a statement that every person, be they Palestinian or Israeli, Arab or Jewish, is a universe, and the death of any innocent a tragedy.
I rise also to speak not only as the MP for Mount Royal but as a Jew, as one who has been engaged in the struggle for a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in the Middle East for over 35 years, who has family in Israel and friends among the Palestinians and who has acted as legal counsel to both Israeli and Palestinian human rights NGOs. Accordingly, with this experience in mind, I would like to go behind the daily headlines, which cloud and sometimes corrupt understanding, to probe the real basis for conflict, the root causes, to use the popular metaphor, of conflict in the Middle East and the basis for conflict resolution.
I will organize my remarks around a set of foundational principles for understanding the conflict and for moving toward a just solution, many of which are themselves anchored in the basic principles of Canadian foreign policy in the Middle East.
Principle number one, which successive Canadian governments have described as the cornerstone of Canadian foreign policy in the Middle East, is respect for the security, well-being and legitimacy of the state of Israel. Indeed, this principle is itself rooted in a related notion or principle: the existential nature of the Israeli-Palestinian-Arab conflict. In a word, this is not a conflict about borders, though borders are certainly in dispute. This is not a conflict about territory, although territory is certainly in dispute. It is not a conflict about resources such as water, though resources are certainly in dispute. Nor is this even a conflict about Jerusalem, though Jerusalem is sometimes a metaphor for the existential nature of this conflict.
Simply put, the core of the conflict has been, and for the most part, continues to be the unwillingness of many among the Palestinian and Arab leadership to accept the legitimacy of Israel's right to exist anywhere in the Middle East.
Historical rejectionist evidence speaks for itself. In 1947 the United Nations recommended the partition of the Palestine mandate into a Jewish state and a Palestinian-Arab state. The Jews accepted the UN resolution. The Arabs rejected it and launched a war that by their own acknowledgement was intended to exterminate the nascent state of Israel.
It should be noted that at the time of this first rejection of a Jewish state there were no Palestinian-Arab refugees, no occupied territories, no settlements. Indeed, this was the beginning of a pattern of double rejectionism: the Arabs rejecting a Palestinian state if that meant having to countenance a Jewish one.
From 1948 until 1967 the West Bank was under the occupation of Jordan, and Gaza under the occupation of Egypt, so that only Arab occupation prevented the emergence of a Palestinian state during this period. In June 1967, again with no Israeli occupation or settlements in occupied territories, Egypt, Syria and Jordan waged a war against Israel, not to establish a Palestinian state but to once again extinguish the Jewish one.
In the Israeli exercise of self-defence, which the UN acknowledged, Israel gained control of the Sinai, the West Bank and the Gaza strip. Israel's offer in the immediate aftermath of that 1967 six-day war to return these newly obtained territories for a peace treaty was met with the triple ''no'' of the Arab Khartoum declaration: no recognition, no negotiation, no peace with Israel.
The pattern continued through the launching of yet another war of aggression against Israel on Yom Kippur until the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty in 1979 resulted in the return of the Sinai and peace between Israel and Egypt, just as a peace treaty was to be completed with Jordan in 1994.
In a word, therefore, and this is the reading of the Middle East history, fast forward now to the year 2000. It is not the Israeli occupation that has been the root cause of the conflict; rather, it is the rejection of Israel, even at the price of rejecting thereby a Palestinian state, that led to the initial occupation in 1967 and still sustains the less than five per cent of the territory yet occupied by Israel as a result of the six-day war. In a word, over 95 per cent of the territory captured by Israel in the exercise of self-defence in the six-day war has been returned within the frame-work of peace treaties with countries that were prepared to recognize Israel and, in the initial stages of Oslo, which have given Arafat control over 98 per cent of the Palestinian people.
However, in the year 2000 in the Camp David talks and then again in Taba, Arafat rejected a Clinton and Israeli initiated proposal that would have ended what remained of the occupation and would have established an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza with East Jerusalem as its capital. This would have given the Palestinians almost everything that they themselves had been asking for, save for the right of return which, as Palestinian leader Sari Nusseibah put it, would have meant a second Palestinian state in place of Israel.
This would have required of Arafat and the Arab world to finally accept the legitimacy of a Jewish state in the Middle East alongside the 22 Arab states in the region. Arafat not only rejected this proposal, which recalls the refrain that the Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity, but as the Arab scholar Fouad Ajami recently put it, Arafat launched a war of terror in the heartland of Israel of which the recent Passover massacre was a real life metaphor.
Principle number two and related existential principle which has emerged as a basic tenet of Canadian foreign policy is that the Palestinians are a people who have legitimate rights and needs, including the right to self-determination and the right, as I myself have been maintaining for more than 30 years, to an independent, democratic, rights protecting state in the Middle East. Only a democratic Palestinian state will protect the authentic Palestinian right to self-determination while affording the best security for Israel.
Israelis have acknowledged their willingness and readiness to negotiate an independent Palestinian state. The core question then is not whether there will be an independent Palestinian state on which Israel is prepared to agree. The question is whether the Arab world is prepared to make room for a single Jewish state alongside 23 Arab states.
Principle number three refers to UN security council resolutions 242 and 338 agreed upon for conflict resolution in the Middle East, a formula sometimes known as the land for peace resolutions. These UN security council resolutions have been further refined and built upon by the Madrid and Oslo process, including the importance of a just solution to the refugee question.
Principle number four is an end to any Arab or Palestinian government sanctioned incitement to hatred and violence. It is this government sanctioned teaching of contempt, this demonizing of the other, this culture of incitement, is where it all begins. In the words of Professor Ajami: ''The suicide bomber of the Passover massacre did not descend from the sky; he walked straight out of the culture of incitement let loose on the land, a menace hovering over Israel, a great Palestinian and Arab refusal to let that country be, to cede it a place among the nations, he par-took of the culture all around him -- the glee that greets those brutal deeds of terror, the cult that rises around the martyrs and their families.''
Principle number five is the danger of the escalating globalizing genocidal anti-Jewishness. It is a tragic irony that on the occasion of today's International Holocaust Remembrance Day, where Jews in concert with our fellow citizens remember the worst genocide of the 20th century, international holocaust and genocide scholars warn once again of a genocidal anti-Semitism rearing its ugly head. In particular, I am referring to the state and terrorist sanctioned public calls for the destruction of Israel and the murder of the Jewish people which I have documented elsewhere.
Principle number six is terrorism. The deliberate maiming, murder and terrorizing of innocents can never be justified. It is important to recall and reaffirm the foundational principles of international and Canadian counterterrorism law and policy as they apply also to the Middle East. These include that terrorism from whatever quarter for whatever purpose, as the Prime Minister put it, can never be justified; that the transnational networks of super terrorists with access to weapons of mass destruction constitute an existential threat to the right to life, liberty and security of the person; and that freedom from acts of terror, freedom from fear of terror constitute a cornerstone of human security. In the words of our Prime Minister: ''There is nothing in our experience that can capture the fear that Israelis live with every hour of every day.''
They further include that there is no moral equivalence or similitude between terrorism and counterterrorism, between deliberate acts of terror against civilians and acts of self-defence against terrorists; that support and sanctuary for groups responsible for terrorism, as the foreign minister has put it, is unacceptable; and that counterterrorism must always comport with human rights and humanitarian norms.
Principle number seven is respect for human rights and humanitarian law as a cornerstone for the protection of human security. If human security were an organizing principle of Canadian foreign policy then it is human insecurity which is the most serious dimension of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict today. What is needed therefore is a culture of human rights in place of a culture of hate, a culture of respect in place of a culture of contempt. As the foreign minister put it recently at a meeting of the UN commission on human rights in Geneva, ''security is sustainable only in an environment where human rights are protected'' including in particular the protection of civilians in armed conflict.
Principle number eight is support for the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Lebanon. In accordance with UN security council resolutions Canada supports the progressive extension of the Lebanese government's authority over all of its territory and the withdrawal of foreign forces from Lebanon.
Principle number nine is the implementation of the Tenet security work plan and Mitchell commission recommendations. Close to a year ago I described in this place a tenuous Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire that hung on a thread and threatened to explode into violence and stated that it was more necessary than ever that the parties adhere to the recommendations of the Mitchell commission. I reiterate these words today with all the urgency that today's situation commands.
The Tenet security work plan and the Mitchell recommendations are a carefully calibrated set of procedures and substantive requirements to end the incitement, terrorism and violence, to proclaim a ceasefire, to enter into mutual confidence building measures and to proceed to negotiations leading to a political settlement.
Principal number ten is confidence-building measures, the Parliamentary and people to people contributions. I want to associate myself with the initiative represented and mentioned earlier by my hon. colleague from Cumberland--Colchester [Tory MP Bill Casey] of an Israeli-Palestinian-Canadian Parliamentary peace forum.
Principle number eleven is the end game. UN security council resolution 1397 states: ''the vision of a region where two states, Israel and Palestine, live side by side within secure and recognized borders.'' For this vision to be reached, the culture of incitement, hate and terror will have to end, as stated by Professor Ajami.
Indeed, that is the core of what Tenet and Mitchell seek to build upon. For that to happen we must realize that saying yes to Palestine means also saying yes to Israel. Otherwise we will have learned nothing from history and will never realize the vision of a peaceful future for all peoples in the Middle East that we all desperately yearn for.
Liberal MP Irwin Cotler, who represents Mount-Royal, Que., delivered this speech in the House on April 9, 2002.
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: November 5, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 141 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 327 words
HEADLINE: Guessing on Paul Martin's cabinet
ANCHOR: CRAIG OLIVER AND JOHN IBBITSON
BODY:
CRAIG OLIVER: Oh, the anxiety. In just twelve days, Liberal MPs will
find out whether they made the cabinet cut or not. Well to save those Liberals
the anguish of sitting by the phone, worrying about whether their cellphone
batteries are charged up, Will Paul call, we're going to save them a lot of
work. We've done some snooping around, and we have up with a cabinet list of our own. Here it is.
In BC, David Anderson and Steve Owen get another shot at cabinet. Herb Dhaliwal is sent to the showers. In Alberta, Anne McLellan is a sure bet for cabinet again, but this time, rumours that she may become Canada's first female Finance Minister. David Kilgour is out. In Saskatchewan, Ralph Goodale stays. He's almost certain to be Deputy Prime Minister. In Manitoba, Reg Alcock is in. Rey Pagtakhan is out.
In the Liberal stronghold of Ontario, Martin is said it be cleaning house. Ministers Sheila Copps, David Collenette, Don Boudria, Jane Stewart, Elinor Caplan, Robert Nault all out. Ministers John McCallum, Bill Graham and Lyle Vanclief will likely stay in cabinet, shuffled to different portfolios. Maurizio Bevilacqua hangs in there and Allan Rock is still a 50-50 bet. Ontario newcomers to cabinet include Stan Keyes, John Godfrey, Judy Sgro, Jim Peterson, Joe Volpe, Tony Valare, Mario Belanger and Carolyn Bennett.
In La Belle Province, ministers Pierre Pettigrew and Denis Coderre are survivors. Stephane Dion is a 50-50 bet at best. But Martin Cauchon and Lucienne Robillard get the au revoir. Newcomers to the cabinet include Liz Fruila, Helen Scherer, Irwin Cotler and Georges Farrah.
In Atlantic Canada, Solicitor General Wayne Easter and Claudette Bradshaw bite the dust. Newcomers will include John Efford, Geoff Regan, Shawn Murphy. Well, we should add, by the way, that those of you who are left out, take hope. We're still working on our list. It's still in flux. And presumably so is Mr. Martin's.
LOAD-DATE: December 1, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 142 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 4
LENGTH: 886 words
HEADLINE: Report presses for reparations for Jewish refugees from Arab lands
BYLINE: Melissa Radler
BODY:
NEW YORK - The exodus of close to one million Jews from Arab countries
following the Israel's founding was a case of orchestrated, state-sponsored
repression that deserves immediate redress, international law and human rights
experts stated in a landmark report released Monday.
The report, "Jewish Refugees from Arab Countries: The Case for Rights and Redress," was released at a press conference across the street from the United Nations Monday by Justice for Jews from Arab Countries (JJAC), an organization founded last year to secure justice for the 856,000 forgotten Jewish refugees of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
"The historical fact is that Jews were made refugees in many parts of the Arab world," said JJAC honorary chairman Richard Holbrooke, who served as US ambassador to the UN from 1999 to 2001.
"Historical truths cannot be denied," he said. "We must not forget this issue, and as we talk about refugees in the region, let's remember there were refugees on both sides." The report, compiled over 10 months by 22 experts from the US, Europe, Canada, and Israel, documents the Arab world's collusion in driving Jews from their homelands more than 50 years ago. It also details the international community's failure to recognize the Jews' suffering or provide redress for their lives or property.
Among the evidence of organized discrimination and persecution cited is a series of legal decrees undertaken against Jewish citizens, criminalized by the 1945 Nuremberg Charter and the 1949 Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Civilians in Time of War, including the freezing of Jewish bank accounts and confiscation of property in Syria in 1947; the classification of Zionism as a capital crime in Iraq in 1948; the confiscation of Jewish property in Egypt in 1956; and the destruction of Jewish synagogues, cemeteries, and abolishing of local religious bodies in Tunisia in 1958.
The report also quotes numerous press reports and statements by Arab leaders dating back to the 1940s. Egyptian delegate to the UN Heykal Pasha warned on November 14, 1947, for example, that the partition of Palestine would "endanger a million Jews living in Muslim countries... If the United Nations were to partition Palestine, it might be responsible for the massacre of a large number of Jews," he said.
A May 16, 1948 article in The New York Times entitled "Jews in grave danger in all Muslim lands" reported on the drafting of an Arab League law that moved to make Jewish citizens of Arab nations "members of the Jewish minority of Palestine," and freeze their bank accounts for use in the war against Israel.
"We really had a pattern of ethnic cleansing," said international human rights lawyer and Canadian MP Irwin Cotler, a member of JJAC's advisory legal committee.
Calling the treatment of Jews after Israel's founding "state-sponsored, state-orchestrated repression," with the "marking of a criminal conspiracy," Cotler and other leaders present called for the establishment of an international tribunal to resurrect and rectify the issue after decades of neglect by the international community.
The executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, Malcolm Hoenlein, said that JJAC plans to present a copy of the report to the White House, press for hearings in Congress, and seek input from human rights groups. Next Monday, Lord George Weidenfeld of Britain is hosting hearings on the issue in the House of Lords, he said.
Several refugees who fled their homelands to escape persecution and violence spoke at the press conference. Giullia Boukhobza, whose family fled Tripoli in 1967, recalled a local mob threatening to burn down her house after Israel emerged the victor in the Six Day War. After its brush with death, her family went into hiding and escaped to Italy, she said.
"My family had to start from scratch," she said. "We didn't seek to make ourselves wards of the international community and we did not seek to plot against Libya."
In contrast to the approximately 700,000 Palestinians who became refugees after Israel's founding, the plight of Jewish refugees did not capture the world's attention; of the 681 UN General Assembly resolutions dealing with the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1947, 101 refer to Palestinian refugees, and none refer to Jewish refugees, noted the report.
No financial assistance was ever provided to the Jewish refugees, with Israel absorbing more than 600,000 people, compared with billions spent on Palestinian refugees, who have not yet been absorbed into their host countries or the Palestinian Authority.
The report also estimated the value of Jewish assets at more than $ 100 billion, and among JJAC's proposed activities is seeking financial redress through the court system.
"We ask for justice. Let all claims be judged equally," said Maurice Soussa, an Iraqi Jew whose family's electrical plant was shuttered in the 1940s by the government because it was Jewish-owned. For the two years, he recalled, the area serviced by the plant had no electricity.
"This campaign is about truth, justice, and reconciliation," said Cotler. "We must return the history of Jews from Arab countries to the narrative of the Mideast from which it was expunged."
LOAD-DATE: June 25, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 143 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. A6
LENGTH: 411 words
HEADLINE: Native, Jewish leaders join to fight hate, anti-Semitism
SOURCE: Canadian Press
DATELINE: MONTREAL
BODY:
Shared experiences of oppression and racism bind Canada's Jews and native
people in a common battle to fight hatred, the grand chief of Quebec's northern Cree told a conference on Sunday.
"Part of a shared experience between aboriginal peoples and Jews is a history of oppression, of marginalization, and of struggling to retain our identities as societies within larger, often hostile and hateful societies," Grand Chief Ted Moses told an anti-Semitism conference organized by the Canadian Jewish Congress.
The event attracted the father of slain American reporter Daniel Pearl, Canadian political leaders, human rights experts and a variety of Quebec political commentators.
In an emotional speech, Judea Pearl denounced the growing global scourge of anti-Semitism and discussed his family's efforts to address the root causes of hate that resulted in his son's death.
Pearl was a Wall Street Journal reporter who was kidnapped and killed last year in Pakistan while researching militants and terrorism in Pakistan.
In a videotape of his killing, Pearl defiantly told his captors that he was Jewish.
The significance of Pearl's killing lies in the reasons for his death and highlights the new realities of the world following the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, said his father.
"Danny was not killed for what he knew or for what he wrote or for what he intended to write," Judea Pearl said. "He was killed for what he represented and what he represented was each one of us."
His death struck an emotional chord among Americans, journalists, Jews and even progressive Muslims because they felt targeted themselves by the hate-fuelled murder, he said.
"The legacy of Daniel Pearl represents not a story of martyrdom, not a claim for victimhood but a proud reminder of who we are and what we stand for as well as a vivid reminder of who our adversaries are and what they stand for," he said.
A series of conference speakers described the worsening anti-Semitism that has arisen around the world since the attacks on New York's World Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington.
"We are entering a new, escalating, virulent, global and even lethal anti-Semitism," said Irwin Cotler, a renowned human rights professor and Liberal MP. Traditional anti-Semitism against Jews in Canada, the U.S. and elsewhere has been replaced by increasing attacks against the Jewish people and the right of Israel to survive among nations, he said.
LOAD-DATE: June 2, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 144 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(50) D 19'02 pg 1,31; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5535210
LENGTH: 1186 words
HEADLINE: Anti-Semitism on Senate agenda
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
For Sen. Jerry Grafstein, the parallel could not be more disturbing. While
visiting Germany last summer, he and his wife planned to attend synagogue
services in Berlin, but to do so, they were forced to pass through heavy
security screening before they could enter. Disturbing, no doubt, but
perhaps not surprising considering Germany's history and the upsurge in
anti-Jewish incidents throughout the continent.
Back in Canada, he had a feeling of deja vu when he and other members of the Beth Tzedec Synagogue, one of Toronto's largest congregations, were made to enter the building through a parking lot entrance and pass through security screening not much different than what he experienced in Germany.
For Grafstein, the idea that Canadian Jews would have to be protected during High Holy Day services was galling, even ''personally demeaning.''
What's more, unlike in Germany, where security costs are subsidized by the government, congregants at Beth Tzedec and other synagogues themselves pay a special security fee for the added measures.
That is outrageous, Grafstein said, as have been the half dozen arson attacks on Jewish houses of worship and memorial chapels in the last two years and the upsurge of anti-Semitic incidents that now number in the hundreds.
As a senator in Parliament's Upper House, Grafstein has been in a position to do something about it. Late last month, he introduced a ''resolution on anti-Semitic violence in the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) region including Canada.''
The resolution is closely modelled on another resolution adopted unanimously this past summer in Germany by the 55-member OSCE, where Grafstein serves as treasurer, though it has been ''Canadianized'' and updated in its preamble recitations. It reaffirms Canada's obligation to ''unequivocally condemn'' anti-Semitism and take effective measure to protect individuals from anti-Semitic violence. It also calls on the government to schedule follow-up seminars to study the issue and to ''make public a statement recognizing violence against Jews and Jewish cultural properties as anti-Semitic, as well as issue strong public declarations condemning the depredations.''
The resolution will be referred to a Senate committee for further discussion and last week, Montreal MP Irwin Cotler said he planned to introduce a similar resolution in the House of Commons some time in the new year.
The U.S. Congress and the German Bundestag have already adopted the OSCE resolution and the German parliament held a one-day seminar to study the issue. Only last week, Grafstein was in Washington to participate in a meeting of the U.S. Helsinki Commission, an agency consisting of American lawmakers. A visiting delegation of German parliamentarians, who also participated, heard from a number of American Jewish groups on the question of anti-Semitism.
''They're way ahead of the game,'' Grafstein said of the American and German governments.
Grafstein, a Liberal, believes the government of Canada has fallen short of its international and moral obligations to speak out strongly against the current manifestation of anti-Semitism in Canada. He's also critical of political and religious leaders, and of the media for not giving the issue the attention he believes it deserves.
In introducing the resolution, Grafstein told his fellow senators that ''in Canada... all I have heard is silence... Honourable senators, silence is acquiescence. Acquiescence breeds license. License breeds legitimacy. Legitimacy leads to fear, scorn, loathing and then violence.''
Grafstein said the initial response of his Senate colleagues was one of surprise and shock at the extent of the problem. ''They were surprised by the fact there were those anti-Semitic incidents,'' he said.
Peter MacKay, Progressive Conservative House leader and justice critic, told The CJN he was unaware of the extent of the problem and he believed few other MPs were familiar with it. He agreed federal leaders hadn't done enough to speak out against anti-Semitism and pledged he would do so in the future.
Sen. Jack Austin agreed that most of his colleagues were unaware of the level of anti-Semitism in Canada. ''It's not part of their reality,'' he said. ''People are pre-occupied with their own concerns.''
Although the record of public statements by political and religious leaders on the two-year spate of anti-Semitism is sparse, it is not a complete wasteland.
A news release issued by Prime Minister Jean Chretien last July when Toronto accountant David Rosenzweig was murdered read ''that such acts of hatred directed against Canadians for reasons of race, faith or for belonging to any identifiable group are totally unacceptable. We will not allow anti-Semitism or religious and ethnic intolerance in Canada.''
About one year ago, Cotler said he briefed the Prime Minister on ''the new anti-Jewishness'' and asked him to speak out about it. The Prime Minister addressed the issue at a Liberal fundraising dinner, but ''in my view, it was not enough and not in the right forum,'' Cotler stated.
In March, the Islamic Society of North America condemned the arson at Toronto's Anshei Minsk Synagogue, as did other religious groups, while a month later the Islamic Shia Ithna-Asheri Jamaat of Toronto called vandalism attacks against Jewish facilities the ''cowardly'' acts of ''irrational and desperate individuals.''
In May, Canadian Ethno-cultural Council president Art Hagopian ''expressed concern'' over the rise of hate crimes and attacks on cultural and religious communities while around the same time, the United Church responded to the upsurge in attacks against Jews in Canada and around the world with an ''absolute condemnation of all acts of anti-Semitism.'' The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, on the other hand, has remained silent on the issue.
Manuel Prutschi, national director of community relations for Canadian Jewish Congress, said some faith groups and other organizations have responded to specific attacks on Jews - he cited the outrage over a synagogue fire in Saskatoon - he felt ''there hasn't been a consistent ongoing response to what is a pattern. Our responsibility is to make people aware that this is a pattern, that these are not isolated events in Canada and that it is a reflection of the global pattern.
''This is a work in progress. Certainly we've been disappointed by the level of response to date,'' he said.
Prutschi said the Jewish community had not witnessed the same level of solidarity ''quite rightly'' expressed by the wider community to Muslims after 9/11. ''The federal government issued several statements and the prime minister visited a mosque in Ottawa. There wasn't that level of response when the police issued a general threat alert in June regarding an Ottawa synagogue being targeted,'' he said.
''I think a heartening gesture would have been if members of the government would have attended during services, as a statement.''
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: September 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 146 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(36) S 12'02 pg 1,28; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5474060
LENGTH: 841 words
HEADLINE: Israel consulate spared
BYLINE: Lazarus, David
BODY:
MONTREAL -- Staff at the Israeli consulate and Montreal's Jewish community
are thrilled that the consulate here will stay open after all.
Bowing to extraordinary pressure from the Jewish community -- as well as to a call from Canadian Foreign Minister Bill Graham -- the Israeli government notified the consulate Sept. 2 that it would not close.
''We're very happy,'' said Israeli Consul General Shlomo Avital. ''We're happy for all our friends. It's a good day for the Jewish community and all our friends in Quebec.''
The decision, which came as the consulate was literally packing its bags, brought a collective sigh of relief.
Two weeks ago, a New York official from Israel's Finance Ministry visited the consulate to take inventory and prepare the paperwork for closure, which was expected to take place around the High Holy Days.
Out of eight Israeli diplomatic missions slated for closure, two others -- in Marseille, France, and Minsk, Belarus -- were also spared.
Meanwhile, the Jewish community of Sydney, Australia, said it would be willing to pay to keep Israel's consulate open there. The offer was made by the head of the Australian Zionist Federation in Israel, Frank Stein, in a letter to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, Israel Radio reported last week.
Avital said the Israeli government was not preparing any official announcement about Montreal or the two other diplomatic missions staying open.
''This is the official announcement,'' he said.
But there appeared little doubt that intensive lobbying by the Jewish community and politicians played a decisive role in Israel's Foreign Ministry reconsidering its July 22 closure announcement.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
Those said to have intervened included FEDERATION CJA president Steven Cummings, Rabbi Reuben Poupko, Senator Leo Kolber and Charles Bronfman, a longtime friend of Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres.
The campaign also included Jewish community petitions, and requests to reconsider by figures such as Montreal Mayor Gerald Tremblay, Quebec's International Relations Minister Louise Beaudoin and Quebec Liberal leader Jean Charest.
Graham said he was urged by Kolber and local MP Irwin Cotler to intercede. After hearing ''why the consulate was of particular importance to the Jewish community,'' he said he contacted Peres personally. His Israeli counterpart described the severe cost constraints the Foreign Ministry was experiencing, but Graham said he was left with the impression Peres was doing all he could to save the consulate.
Those lobbying for the consulate underscored the distinct role the institution plays in Montreal and Quebec in catering to the province's six million francophones.
Graham said Quebec is ''a francophone jurisdiction that has particular ties to Israel... There's a francophone community in Israel itself and there's a real interest between Quebec and the Montreal Jewish community and Israel that goes back in time.
''I think it's important to maintain those links,'' he said. ''There's a consulate in Toronto. It's important that Montreal also have a consulate.''
According to Rabbi Poupko, the Israeli government finally ''understood the absolute need to keep the consulate open at a time when the perception of Israel in not what it should be.
''It shows that our support for Israel is valued and appreciated, that when we speak with a united voice, we are listened to.''
In 1998, the consulate faced a similar threat of closure, but stayed open after Bronfman and the Jewish community intervened. Unlike 1998, however, this time it came right down to the wire.
According to one source, the decision to spare the consulate was made over the objections of Israel's Finance Ministry, now under intense pressure to pare the government budget across the board.
As reported last month in The CJN, Peres and Sharon asked the ministry to try to find the money necessary to keep the Montreal consulate open - about $1.2 million (US) annually.
But according to the source, Peres held little sway with the Finance Ministry, particularly its high-ranking bureaucrats who make the decisions.
It was Sharon who ''finally banged on the table'' and ordered the ministry to come up with the money, the source said.
''Peres didn't win the battle. Sharon had to do it.''
Avital said that with the consulate staying open, it was unclear whether he would be taking on the post of ambassador to Senegal. News of his appointment coincided with the closure announcement.
One possibility was that Avital, who arrived in Montreal in 1999, would stay on for another year. Another was that he would depart for Senegal, and be temporarily replaced by Israeli consul Nina Ben-Ami.
Whatever the case, Avital said there seemed little doubt that the Israeli government came to realize the importance of the Israeli consulate to the Jewish community in Montreal and for maintaining important ties with Quebec.
- With files from Paul Lungen and JTA
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: August 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 147 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(21) My 23'02 pg 18; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5413891
LENGTH: 906 words
HEADLINE: Israel, Jews and the left
BYLINE: CUMMINGS, JORDY
BODY:
Can it be that it was all so simple? In 1948, upon Israel's founding, the
international left - including Arab communist and socialist parties,
particularly in Egypt - was supportive of Israel. After the nakba (Arabic
for catastrophe, referring to the founding of Israel), Marxists, even
within the Arab world, were prepared to accept Israel's right to exist
within secure borders.
The reasoning was that a socialist, labour-based country - Israel - would rub off on the repressive ''Islamo-fascist'' regimes that dominated the region.
Indeed, it was the British-funded Muslim Brotherhood, ostensibly an Islamic charity, that provided the basis for Arab anti-Semitism, as well as a means to push Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser to the right.
Also, it was the Americans (and particularly former U.S. president Jimmy Carter's National Security Council adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski), in their brilliance, who later decided to create an International Islamic Fundamentalist Brigade - later to be called Al Qaeda - in order to defeat communism in Afghanistan.
Aside from some American corporations, international big business has always relied more strongly on iron-fisted Wahabis - the inventors of what we call fundamentalist Islam, who essentially run Saudi Arabia - than on Eretz Yisrael.
Why is it, then, that the international left seems to be so pro-Palestinian, leading many hitherto left-leaning Jews to abandon their progressive affiliations? Why is it that an innocuous Naderite research group like QPIRG-McGill has been lumped in with ''extremists'' (as was the case in a recent issue of The CJN)? Much of it has to do with a misunderstanding of our position on this issue.
Even the most ardent leftist critics of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's actions do not deny Israel's right to exist within secure borders. It is just that we cannot square Sharon's appointing of transfer-mongers to his government and his stated desire to destroy the Oslo peace process with our support for Israel. Therefore, like Americans who saw it as their patriotic duty to speak the truth while their nation was involved in the horrendous Vietnam War, we see it as our responsibility, as Jews and as internationalists, to speak out against Sharon.
The charge that the left is anti-Semitic is ludicrous, especially given that those in the vanguard of many, if not most progressive social movements, are disproportionately Jewish. Indeed, the group of non-violent activists who recently occupied MP Irwin Cotler's office in Montreal included more than one Israeli, as well as quite a few Palestinians.
Furthermore, as more Palestinians and Arabs become involved in leftist and internationalist politics, it will bring a far preferable mode of political thinking to the Middle East than that of the Wahabis or the Baathists. (The latter are the worst anti-Semites in the region, growing out of what was supposed to be an Arab socialist movement into something heavily influenced by Nazi expatriates in the 1950s. Iraq's Saddam Hussein and the late Syrian leader Hafez Assad are Baathists.)
On the other hand, as many Jews close ranks to support Sharon, there has been a tremendous growth of openly expressed Islamophobia and anti-Arab racism, if not Meir Kahane-derived attitudes, not only toward Palestinians but toward such ''self-hating Jews'' as Rabbi Michael Lerner, the editor of Tikkun magazine, Israeli author Amos Oz and Labour MK Yossi Beillin.
Israel and Palestine are but a small part of the international left's current agenda, which can be simplified in the great catch phrase ''Another world is possible.'' Unlike the media-created label of ''anti-globalization,'' the left aims to globalize social justice, environmentalism, human rights and labour movements to eventually be able to counter the international power of corporations. The nation state has declined in power over the last half-century, while big business acts ever more globally. Anyone confused about the current global corporate agenda can look at victims of the Enron debacle, not only in Houston, but all through India, where it was a regular Enron practice to bribe state officials to build huge dams that are environmentally destructive, while nearly 100 million Indians are without a safe supply of water.
As the world faces a huge resurgence in anti-Semitism, both of the fascist LePenite and the Islamist variety, it is important that members of the Jewish community understand one another - a sort of macro-level shalom bayit.
It is of course also important for us to understand that Jean-Marie LePen in France and other Euro-fascists are as anti-Arab as they are anti-Semitic. We Semites - Muslim, Jewish and Christian - must find ways of working together globally.
My aim in writing this opinion piece is not to propagandize or proselytize. Rather, it is rather to explain to my community why so many of us are involved in internationalism. I expect that the knee-jerk responses to me will be visceral, just as they were to Baruch Spinoza, who was thrown out of the Amsterdam Jewish community for his views. Yet, a compass is far more important when it is inconvenient. I believe that history will vindicate my position, while the same cannot be said for those who blindly support Sharon.
Jordy Cummings is a freelance journalist and activist based in Montreal.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: February 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 148 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Vol. 21, No. 31
LENGTH: 749 words
HEADLINE: Ontario's chief justice confident the law will achieve balance between security, Charter rights
BYLINE: John Jaffey
TEXT:
Toronto
Ontario's chief justice says Canadians can count on the law -"a vital pillar of any democratic society"-to balance the competing needs of collective security and individual freedom.
Addressing a Canadian Club luncheon last week, Chief Justice Roy McMurtry spoke on the theme, "The Role of the Courts in Turbulent Times."
He framed the debate with a quote from The New York Times, which saw the current issue in the U.S. as "Civil liberty vs. security: Finding a wartime balance."
The Times said President George W. Bush's decision to try alleged terrorists in military tribunals is "a travesty of justice,"and declared that, "in his effort to defend Americans from terrorists, the President is eroding the very values he seeks to protect, including the rule of law."
Chief Justice McMurtry went on to point out that Britain had responded to Sept. 11 by permitting detention without trial for six months and the taking into custody of suspicious-looking airline passengers. France was similarly quick to permit police to search people's baggage.
"It has often been acknowledged that in times of fear, the majority of people place security above all else and are quite willing to cede government extraordinary authority,"he said. "As one U.S. law professor recently expressed it, 'we love security more than we love liberty.'"
He acknowledged that the federal government's proposals for increased security "have raised many concerns, as Canadians debate how to defend the Canadian model of a diverse and tolerant society in the face of international terrorism."
There was no doubt the government had a duty to protect its citizens. But the complexity of the debate was illustrated by the positions of Liberal MP Irwin Cotler and Alan Borovoy, general counsel of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, who both had "lengthy and distinguished records in their commitment to individual rights."
Cotler finds Canada's criminal laws inadequate to deal with an unprecedented terrorist threat. But Borovoy says Bill C-36's new powers of detention, investigation and surveillance are so wide they will catch behaviour that isn't terrorism.
Chief Justice McMurtry said it would be improper for him to comment on the law. "However, the legislation may well be tested in our courtrooms and as a result the role of judges could be subjected to closer scrutiny than at any time before in our nation's history."
Noting that in the last decade courts have been criticized as too activist and inclined to give too liberal a meaning to Charter guarantees of rights and freedoms, he reminded his audience he was one of the Charter's architects. He said its use of indeterminate terms "was deliberate, as the document was intended to evolve in response to new challenges and conditions. Our constitution was intended to endure without having to be reinvented by an endless series of constitutional amendments."
While judges had the task of interpreting the Charter, "they are aware they must exercise their role so as not to lose public confidence. ... Judicial creativity is part of legal existence, and law without discretion has been described as a body without a spirit."
Describing courts as impartial bodies that must reflect the basic values of society, he said they are not "necessarily democratic institutions, as they are not bound by the majority of public opinion. However, I believe that when the majority takes away the rights of a minority that is not democracy. Democracy is, therefore, a delicate balance between majority rule and individual rights."
He said that in many cases judges are told the solution to conflict lies in a balance between conflicting values. "However, there is no legislation or legal precedent that adequately indicates what weight should be attached to each value and how a judge should balance between the conflicting values."
Citing Brown v. Board of Education, where the U.S. Supreme Court held segregation in schools to be unconstitutional, as an example of courts becoming "the crusader for a new consensus,"he said a judge's decision "should reflect the deep values of society, not merely his personal values."
Recognizing that pressures on Parliament and provincial legislatures in the wake of September 11 were virtually unprecedented, he said that in the months ahead, "a high order of legislative and judicial statesmanship will be needed which will require wisdom, courage and restraint under the watchful eye of an informed public."
LANGUAGE: ENGLISH
LOAD-DATE: December 10, 2001
LEVEL 1 - 152 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: News; Pg. 5
LENGTH: 434 words
HEADLINE: MP WANTS U.S. DIPLOMAT BOOTED
BYLINE: BILL RODGERS, OTTAWA BUREAU CHIEF
DATELINE: OTTAWA
BODY:
Grit backbench MP Alex Shepherd demanded Paul Cellucci, the U.S. ambassador
to Canada, be booted out of the country, sources have told Sun Media.
A Liberal, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Durham MP told the weekly caucus that Cellucci "should be censured and expelled" from Canada.
A blunt-talking Cellucci said in a Toronto speech this week that Washington "was disappointed and upset that Canada is not fully supporting" the U.S. in the war on Iraq.
Cellucci was directed to make his remarks by the "most senior levels" in the White House because federal Natural Resources Minister Herb Dhaliwal had levelled personal criticism against U.S. President George Bush, sources said.
The White House "expects these things, when they get personal, to be addressed by the leader," a source said.
"We watched and we waited and nothing was said about Dhaliwal's comments and, since we know of the prime minister's strong control of his own cabinet, it raises the issue, 'Does (Jean) Chretien support these remarks?' "
Simcoe-Grey Grit Paul Bonwick said it was time the U.S. ambassador was "reeled in" for his comments on Canada's position on Iraq and recent criticism of the lack of government spending on the Canadian military.
Oak Ridges MP Bryon Wilfert told caucus there should be some type of "discipline" for Cellucci while former defence minister Art Eggleton weighed in to say Canada should "pull out the 31 Canadians (soldiers)" who are working with American military units in Iraq as part of a Canada-U.S. exchange program.
Sources told Sun Media Chretien didn't intervene, allowing MPs to have their say on the issue.
Asked later about his caucus comments, Shepherd said: "I thought Mr. Cellucci crossed the line of diplomacy," adding Cellucci needs a lesson in recent history.
"I think he has forgotten the fact that we supported the United States on September 11, that we allowed all of these American planes to land in Canada."
Other Liberals, however, jumped in to cool down the heated rhetoric.
"This is not the way members of a family treat each other," said Quebec Grit Irwin Cotler.
Paul Martin admitted Canada's stance has strained relations between the countries, but not irreparably.
"I think that we've really got to understand just how strong the friendship between Canada and the United States is," Martin said.
Dan McTeague reminded those critical of the U.S. ambassador that Raymond Chretien, our former ambassador in Washington, once crossed the diplomatic line and expressed a preference for the Democrats during the 2000 presidential election.
GRAPHIC: photo of PAUL CELLUCCI
LOAD-DATE: March 27, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 153 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Pg. NAT8, NAT9, NAT14
ACC-NO: KJP2002121101
LENGTH: 1984 words
HEADLINE: Antidote to anti-Semitism
BYLINE: Weinblatt, Rabbi Stuart
BODY:
Most of us are probably too young to recall a year like the one we have just
experienced. After the liquidation of Jewish life in Europe, and the
annihilation of six million Jews, the Jewish people displayed an amazing
resiliency and, tenacity, defying all expectations by refusing to disappear from the annals of history.
Yet equally surprising, just one generation after the destruction of the European Jewish community, anti-Semitism is rampant throughout the world, especially in Europe and the Arab and Muslim nations. It is surprising because in the shadow of the Holocaust we enjoyed a period in which such bigotry was repudiated and viewed as repugnant and unfashionable.
Yet today anti-Jewish sentiment knows no bounds, and is prevalent in many respectable quarters around the world. It is the bedrock of communist countries and atheistic regimes alike, uniting Muslim fundamentalists and neo-Nazis, intellectuals on the left and barbarians on the right.
Not only is it no longer unfashionable to express anti-Semitic comments, it is now down right fashionable. A conversation at a dinner party in London of European diplomatic types and others this past spring was defiled by the comment by France's ambassador to England attributing all the troubles in the world to that (expletive deleted) little country, Israel. He was neither recalled nor rebuked by his government.
It seems that no international colloquium can be held without Palestinians and Arabs hijacking the forum and turning it into a festschrift of hate and seizing the opportunity to either slander or exclude Israel. Last year's United Nations-sponsored conference on racism in Durban, South Africa was turned into a conference of racism against Israel and the Jewish people. Taking place a week before Sept. 11, the horrifying events of that tragic day overshadowed the deliberations, but the conference against racism actually foreshadowed Sept. 11.
Events spiraled downhill from there.
Despite protestations to the contrary, attempts to cloak good old-fashioned anti-Semitism in the mask of protesting Israel's policies is transparent. When Israel is singled out among all the nations of the world for the kind of criticism it faces, it is anti-Semitism, and must be identified as such. It is the only country in the world rebuked for defending itself. A defining characteristic of the new anti-Semitism denies that Jews are victims of Palestinian violence. Although in a break with its past, this summer, for the first time, Amnesty International actually declared that attacks on Israelis should be considered violations of human rights.
Renowned international human rights lawyer and professor of law Irwin Cotler wrote, "Anew, virulent, escalating, globalizing anti-Jewishness has emerged in the world which singles out Israel and the Jewish people not only for deferential and discriminatory treatment in the family of nations, but also for specific, targeted terrorist assault. It takes the form of genocidal anti-Semitism--the public call for the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people."
Hardly any nation in the world is impervious to the plague of promoting and tolerating anti-Semitic speech and actions. In fact, when I was speaking with my children about the topics of this year's sermons, and how hard it is to come up with themes for five sermons, my daughter, Margalit, proposed a novel solution. She suggested I could devote a sermon one day to the problem of anti-Semitism in France, the next day could be about anti-Semitism in Bulgaria, one could deal with the situation in the Netherlands, and so on.
The day after the deadly Palestinian attack on Hebrew University in Jerusalem, the British newspaper, The Guardian, published an editorial criticizing Israel for, "random, vengeful acts of terror" against Palestinian civilians in Jenin. This, despite the fact that the United Nations had already issued a report dismissing the claim. Even though Israel waited until 126 civilians were murdered in the month of March before responding, so as not to be accused of over-reacting, Portuguese Nobel laureate Jose Saramago wrote, "We can compare what is happening in the Palestinian territories with Auschwitz."
It is hard to tell which came first, but there is a definite correlation between governmental policies and the attitudes expressed by leading intellectuals and the physical and verbal violence against Jews and institutions of the Jewish community. How a nation treats its Jews has always been a barometer of a country's moral fiber.
In Kiev, 50 youths chanting "kill the Jews" went on a rampage, smashing windows in a synagogue on a Saturday evening. Jewish cemeteries and the Holocaust memorial in Salonika, Greece, were defaced with pro-Palestinian slogans. Anti-Israel protesters hurled rocks and bottles at Jewish places of business in Amsterdam. In Brussels, Belgium, five firebombs were tossed into a synagogue and a Jewish bookstore was damaged by arsonists.
A number of assaults on Jews and desecration of Jewish communal institutions were reported in Germany, England, and elsewhere. In Barcelona, 10,000 people demonstrated against what they called Israeli "genocide" and burned the Star of David. Norway has an informal embargo on Israeli products, as dock workers have refused to unload merchandise from Israel.
The European Union has just instituted a 15 percent import tax on all products made in the disputed areas of Israel, and some stores are requiring that Ahava products bear a sticker with the words, "Made in the West Bank." Israel is isolated culturally, as concerts of Israeli performers and orchestras are canceled, and performing artists avoid coming to Israel.
And in the granddaddy of European anti-Semitism, France, gangs of hooded men attacked Jews and struck them with iron clubs. Youths with baseball bats attacked the Maccabi soccer team. Buses carrying Jewish school children were attacked. A French movie theater refused to rent its theater to a group of Jewish school children who wanted to see the movie "Harry Potter." Synagogues, Jewish schools, cemeteries and kosher stores were defaced. In the month of April alone, over 360 crimes were committed against Jews. A synagogue in Marseilles was burned, along with its prayer books and torah scrolls.
Despite all this, French President Jacques Chirac had the chutzpah to protest to Prime Minister Sharon against the campaign to portray France as anti-Semitic.
Gabriel Schoenfeld wrote in Commentary magazine, "The themes are the same everywhere. Israel, a country victimized by terrorism, stands accused of perpetrating terrorism; the Jews, having suffered the most determined and thoroughgoing genocide in history, stand accused of perpetrating genocide." It is no coincidence that the vile terms of the very people who sought to annihilate the Jews are now applied to Israel, as people march through the streets of Europe with placards calling Jews Nazis.
Following up on a petition signed by 120 university academics for a moratorium on cultural and research links with Israel and Israeli scholars, Egyptian-born professor Mona Baker wrote to two Israelis on the editorial board of the journal she edits demanding their resignations simply because they are Israeli.
How does this differ from the Nazis firing people from academic posts just because they were Jewish?
They want to boycott? Fine, let them boycott.
The Jewish sage Ann Landers, who died earlier this year, wrote a column a number of years ago based on something originally written by the late humorist Sam Levenson in response to the anti-Semites of the world.
"It's a free world. You don't have to like Jews if you don't want to, but if you are going to be an anti-Semite, you should be consistent and turn your back on everything Jews have done, including the medical advances that Jews have made possible."
They then go on to list things such as:
"... the vaccine for hepatitis discovered by Baruch Blumber, the Wasserman test for syphilis and the first effective drug to fight syphilis developed by Paul Ehrlich. Bela Schick developed the test for diphtheria. Insulin would not have been discovered if Oskar Minkowski had not demonstrated the link between diabetes and the pancreas.
"It was Burrill Crohn who identified the disease that bears his name. Alfred Hess discovered that vitamin C could cure scurvy. Dr. Casimir Funk was the first to use vitamin B to treat beriberi. Streptomycin was discovered by Dr. Woronan. Jonas Salk developed the first polo vaccine. Later, Albert Sabin developed the oral version."
Levenson concluded in his own inimitable way:
"Humanitarianism requires that we offer these gifts to all people of the world. So the bigots who don't want to accept these gifts can go ahead and turn them down, but I'm warning you, you aren't going to feel so good!"
In April the United Nations Human Rights Commission, with the support of France, Belgium, Sweden, Portugal, Spain and Austria, passed a resolution condemning Israel for war crimes, acts of mass killing and offenses against humanity, while supporting the right of the Palestinians to resist.
With all the tzoris going on all around the world, and this is what they dray their kop about?!
In two days in May government forces in Nepal tracked down and killed 350 guerrillas. Rwandans have slaughtered hundreds of thousands of Tutsis, China oppresses Tibet, Syria currently occupies Lebanon, Russia bombs Chechnya, and not a word of protest is uttered in the hallowed halls of the United Nations. There is no academic or religious freedom, nor is there freedom of the press in any of the oppressive and backward Arab regimes that trample on human rights. Yet only Israel is singled out, and accused of massacres and compared to Nazis, and they say it is not anti-Semitism!
How dare they do this? How dare the world not distinguish between aggressor and self defense? How dare the world side with the perpetrator and not the victim? It is inexplicable to me how people of good conscience can side with those who celebrate the loss of innocent lives and dip their hands in the blood of their victims.
Mitch Albom, author of Tuesdays with Morrie, tried to explain the absurdity of the accusations in a column he wrote a few months ago:
"When we bombed Afghanistan, it was a mission to "smoke them out." Yet when Israel attacks its hornet's nest of terror, it is accused of 'occupying' and told to retreat.
"When we fired on Kabul, from the safety of the air, we said innocent people would be caught in the crossfire and, sadly this was war. Yet when Israeli soldiers go door to door in Palestinian areas, the most dangerous, yet humane way to root out terrorists, we call them 'murderers' the moment one civilian is killed. When we were scorned by critics who thought our treatment of prisoners in Guantanamo was inhumane--because we bound, gagged and blindfolded them--we bristled and said, 'These are dangerous people.' Yet when Israel demands certain Palestinians strip and stay on the ground, we say this is outrageous and must be stopped.
"When a videotape emerges showing bin Laden speaking of September 11, we say it proves the man is evil. Yet when Israelis produce documents to show Arafat funds terror, they are accused of forgery."
It wasn't supposed to be like this. Europe, of all places, has no right less than 60 years after the Holocaust to act this way. I feel like the kid on the playground who cries out against an adversary who was supposed to refrain from attacking, "you promised you wouldn't do this again." Europeans, of all people, should object and realize that there is something seriously wrong when people march in the streets shouting, "Hitler should have finished the job.": The viciousness of the vitriol belies a deep-seated and underlying visceral resentment and contempt of Jews.
LOAD-DATE: January 15, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 154 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Assignment and International desks
LENGTH: 301 words
HEADLINE: ADL to Release Survey of European Attitudes Toward Jews; Wiesel, Fischer to Address International Conference on Anti-Semitism
BODY:World Jewish leaders from Europe, the former Soviet Union, and Central and South America will join government officials, UN consular diplomats and prominent individuals from the corporate, civic and arts world in New York City for two days of dialogue and deliberations for responding to the rise of anti-Semitism around the world. The full conference schedule follows.
ADL CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL ANTI-SEMITISM SCHEDULE OF EVENTS OPEN TO MEDIA COVERAGE
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 31
http://www.usnewswire.com
CONTACT: Myrna Shinbaum, 212-885-7747 or Todd Gutnick, 212-885-7755, both of the Anti-Defamation League
LOAD-DATE: October 29, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 158 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 697 words
HEADLINE: Government's revamped anti-terror legislation
ANCHOR: LLOYD ROBERTSON
BODY:
LLOYD ROBERTSON: Good evening. It's a rare admission. But
Ottawa concedes it went too far after September 11th in tightening anti-terror
measures in the name of national security. And today the government took the
unusual step of rewriting its own legislation to calm critics who expressed
fears
about civil rights. These new measures will restrict federal powers to
investigate and arrest law abiding citizens. Among key changes are limits to
police powers to indefinitely keep secret files on airline passengers. Now,
police
files can only be kept for seven days unless a traveller is a criminal suspect.
And Ottawa no longer seeks unlimited powers to impose so-called military
security zones and arrest trespassers. New legislation limits the measure to
only
protecting military personnel and equipment. This last provision was the most
contentious. Critics feared the government would use the security zone
measure to criminalize peaceful protest at political events like this June's
conference of G-8 leaders in Alberta. As CTV's Joy Malbon reports, Ottawa is
giving assurances it will not quash dissent in the name of security. But not
everyone is convinced.
JOY MALBON [Reporter]: This is what all the fuss is about. Concern that when Canada hosts a world summit here it would be turned into a military zone. Protesters shut out, denied their right to demonstrate. Not so says Art Eggleton. New legislation now limits his powers.
ART EGGLETON [Defence Minister]: It cannot be used to protect international conferences or to prevent protesters from carrying out their activities. It can only be used, it couldn't be used in the Kananaskis case.
MALBON: His powers restricted to protect military troops or equipment only. Critics aren't buying it.
JAMES MOORE [Canadian Alliance BC]: If military equipment is a reason to create a military security zone, ipso facto, if you put, land a helicopter in the middle of Kananaskas you need to protect that equipment, Kananaskis becomes a military security zone, so it's an out.
MALBON: An out civil rights watchdogs say still gives government far too much power.
ALAN BOROVOY [Civil Liberties Association]: This provision would make the government the umpire of its own ball game.
MALBON: The old legislation was compared to the War Measures Act, used to suspend civil liberties during the October crisis of 1970 in Quebec. Ottawa says it's listened to those concerns and made changes.
DAVID COLLENETTE [Transportation Minister]: These changes are needed to strengthen Canada's ability to protect the country and Canadians. Changes proposed in this legislation are just plain common sense.
MALBON: Another terrorist tool allows RCMP and security officers to share air passenger information. Red flagging suspects, including anyone with an outstanding warrant for a serious offense.
LAWRENCE MACAULAY [Solicitor General]: This individual's information will be forwarded to where the plane is landing and the individual would be arrested in this country.
MALBON: This Liberal still isn't convinced the new bill solves the old problems.
IRWIN COTLER [Liberal Quebec]: I think the good faith is there, but, you know, as they say the devil sometimes is in the details.
MALBON: This is Ottawa's third run at anti terror legislation in eight months. Criticized for rushing in the wake of September 11th, it's Ottawa's attempt to balance privacy and civil rights while remaining tough on terrorism. Lloyd.
ROBERTSON: Joy this is quite a weighty piece of legislation. What else is on the list that might be of general interest to people.
MALBON: Well as you said, a very thick document. But what's interesting is it makes it a criminal offence to even joke about terrorist activity. There are new definitions for hoaxes, and if it caused bodily harm, even death, it could mean jail time. Air rage is also a serious offense. It also allows Ottawa to put more money into port security after a Senate report about a month ago criticized Canada's ports as fertile grounds for terrorism.
ROBERTSON: Alright Joy. Thank you very much.
MALBON: Thank you.
LOAD-DATE: April 30, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 159 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: News; Pg. 6
LENGTH: 721 words
HEADLINE: RALLYING CRIES;
BOTH SIDES IN MIDEAST CONFLICT PARADE THEIR VIEWS IN OTTAWA
BYLINE: MARK BONOKOSKI
DATELINE: OTTAWA
BODY:
They came hours apart, those pro-Israel and then those pro-Palestine, to
stand below the Peace Tower at Parliament Hill and claim that their side is
right and the other is wrong.
The day before, a bannered news story in the Ottawa Citizen gave rise to worries that the two back-to-back rallies would collide and that violence would break out, Jew versus Arab, Arab versus Jew.
"Police fear a bloody clash," the story began, fuelling anxieties further with the certainty that this "potentially explosive situation" had the RCMP and Ottawa police going on "high alert."
Then the day came, and nothing happened.
No confrontation, no clash, no bloodshed.
Just words versus words. Pro-Israeli demonstrators condemning Palestinian terrorism; pro-Palestinian demonstrators condemning Israel for atrocities of its own.
Meanwhile, atop the Peace Tower, high above them all, a Canadian flag was flying at half-staff, commemorating the four Canadian soldiers killed fighting another of terrorism's ilk when a U.S. fighter pilot mistakenly unleashed a bomb on them Thursday as they conducted a nighttime training mission in the Afghanistan desert.
Even in this mad, mad world, there is room for irony to have its own sense of timing.
According to police, the pro-Israel rally attracted upwards of 15,000 demonstrators -- with 100-plus busloads coming from Toronto alone -- while the pro-Palestinian gathering, a locally-organized event now in its fourth week, attracted perhaps 3,500.
But the twains never met.
SEA OF PLACARDS
In the sea of waving Israeli flags, certain placards stood out, some for their ingenuity, some for the imagery they triggered.
"Imagine a homicide bomber on the TTC," read the one being carried by Simon Marmar, a 16-year-old high school student from Toronto.
"There may not be a subway system in Israel, but it gets the message across," said the boy's father, Michael. "They have to live in that kind of fear every day of their lives ... going to work, stepping out for a coffee. It's just not tolerable."
Another placard: "America's 9/11 is Israel's 24/7." And another: "Bin Laden + Good PR = Arafat."
The Solidarity Rally for Israel, organized by the Canadian Jewish Congress, had two members of Prime Minister Jean Chretien's government take to the podium -- Eglinton-Lawrence MP Joe Volpe and Montreal-area MP Irwin Cotler.
"Canada is not -- and cannot -- be neutral," Volpe told the cheering crowd. "This is a time for Canada to stand with its friends. This is a time for Canada to stand for Israel."
The pro-Palestinian rally, on the other hand, had no elected official in attendance, and has had none since federal NDP leader Alexa McDonough addressed one of its rallies several weeks ago.
That, of course, was prior to Svend Robinson being removed as the party's Middle East critic after travelling to the West Bank and attempting to get a meeting with embattled Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat.
No problem for Volpe to declare his bias on the side of Israel because of Canada's support of the State of Israel but the same could not be said for Robinson.
"Yes, I have taken sides," he admitted. "The Israeli government and the Israeli military are guilty of torture and murder."
Stripping him of the Mideast file did not take long.
POLICY CLEAR
As McDonough explained, Robinson had to get the boot "because of a regrettable public perception that the NDP has abandoned its long-standing position which supports the right of Israel to exist within secure borders and the right of Palestinians to have a homeland.
"The perception that we have strayed from this principle is deeply worrisome," she said and, with that, Robinson was gone.
The pro-Palestinian demonstrators, of course, had placards of their own. And diametrically opposed, of course, to those carried by the supporters of Israel.
But they, too, triggered imagery of their own.
"Sharon and Hitler are the same. The only difference is the name," read one.
Equating a Jewish leader with Hitler is absolutely hideous, of course, particularly when, hours before, some Jewish demonstrators were carrying placards reading, "Do another six million have to die first?"
But, unfortunately, that's the way it was under the Peace Tower yesterday.
And those were the signs of these times.
LOAD-DATE: April 22, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 160 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (654) S 16'02; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5462900
LENGTH: 1486 words
HEADLINE: Governor General widely expected to prorogue Parliament today: Handful of controversial bills in the spotlight as Prime Minister Jean Chretien gears up for Throne Speech
BYLINE: Francoli, Paco
BODY:
The Governor General is widely expected to prorogue Parliament on Monday,
Sept. 16, formally ending the first session of the 37th Parliament and
making way for the Liberals' Throne Speech on Sept. 30.
Rather than allow Parliament to sit needlessly for two weeks, Governor General Adrienne Clarkson is expected to act on the advice of Prime Minister Jean Chretien, and will prorogue Parliament today. The session has lasted two years.
This is the last day the Prime Minister's Office can prorogue the session before Parliament is scheduled to resume -- the Senate is slotted to sit on Sept. 17 and the House of Commons the following day.
The move will spare Parliamentarians from returning to Ottawa to work on legislation which could be quickly killed given a planned Speech from the Throne on Sept. 30. It was also timed so that Parliament could remain in session as long as possible in case an emergency arose, such as the expected U.S. attack on Iraq. The House will miss a total of eight sitting days, while the Senate will miss six days.
Prorogation will occur by a proclamation published in The Canada Gazette and will most likely happen sometime in the afternoon after the House Foreign Affairs Committee adjourns its scheduled meeting. As the move will kill all bills and committee business left incomplete after Parliament adjourned last June, speculation has already started about which bills will be revived and which ones won't.
Normally, the House passes a blanket motion that enables all legislation to be revived, as was done the last time Parliament prorogued in 1999. This usually happens after the first vote of confidence in the House which is scheduled on the second sitting day in reply to the Throne Speech.
After the motion is passed, individual ministers must put their bills on the Order Paper for 48 hours, as if they are introducing them for the first time. They will then have up to 30 sitting days to reintroduce their bills in the same stage they were in when Parliament adjourned last June.
Parliament still has 12 bills to deal with in areas such as cruelty to animals, species at risk, public safety, pesticides usage and reproductive technologies. Insiders says most of them will likely be quickly returned to the Order Paper as is, but some might not.
All eyes will be on Transport Minister David Collenette to see what he decides to do with his controversial Public Safety Bill, C-55. Introduced last spring, it is a follow-up to the equally controversial Anti-Terrorism Bill, C-42, which was introduced in November, 2002 but got split into two in the face of stiff opposition to measures allowing ministers special powers to take emergency action to empower the defence minister to declare "military security zones" across the country.
Although it has many critics, such as Privacy Commissioner George Radwanski who said the bill would lead to a "power grab" for the police, its latest incarnation is not without merit.
Liberal MP Irwin Cotler, who said he would not support the bill in its current form, told The Hill Times that it contains some useful amendments to the Aeronautic Act which would enhance air travel security and amendments to the Criminal Code to deter criminal and terrorist hoaxes.
Furthermore, said Mr. Cotler, the bill "would domestically enact and implement the biological and toxic weapons convention which would prevent the development, production, stockpiling, and use of biological weapons. That would not only reinforce Canada's existing legislation, but it's an important part of the domestication of anti-terrorist treaty laws."
Still, the Liberal MP who has made a name for himself as a human rights lawyer, is staunchly opposed to the general thrust of the bill. "Unless the legislation, as it now stands, is substantially rewritten or amended, I would not be able to support it in its present form. There are also some very disturbing and disconcerting features."
The Assisted Human Reproduction Bill C-56, is another major piece of legislation which has stirred controversy. Opposed by social conservatives by both Liberals and opposition MPs who are against using embryos for research, it sets out a regulatory framework for reproductive technologies.
Introduced by Health Minister Anne McLellan last May, this is Ottawa's third attempt to make laws to govern assisted human reproduction. Ms. McLellan expressed hope that Parliament quickly pass the bill -- which reflects much of the work done by a Royal Commission between 1989 and 1993 -- given Canada remains the only major industrialized nation that doesn't have laws governing reproductive and genetic technologies
The bill calls for a ban on areas such as human cloning, and buying and selling human embryos, but allows research on embryos that families no longer need to reproduce. Liberal MP Paul Szabo, who wrote a book on stem cell research, said there are many parts of the bill which should be a cause for concern. Specifically, the Ontario MP takes issue with the fact the legislation would permit the use of human embryos for research purposes, embryos which would come from so-called surplus embryos left over after the process of in vitro fertilization.
Question marks also remain around Indian Affairs Minister Robert Nault's First Nations Governance Bill C-61 which will reform the 126-year-old Indian Act by giving aboriginal communities more power to govern their own affairs. Mr. Nault has called the legislation an "interim step towards self-government."
However, many aboriginal leaders have denounced the bill, some going so far as to protesting on Parliament Hill with placards blasting Mr. Nault. Matthew Coon Come, national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, was among them and said the legislation is a "direct attack" on existing native rights and threatens native peoples with "assimilation and legislated extinction."
In response, Mr. Chretien has encouraged native leaders to appear before the parliamentary committee reviewing the bill to say "what you like and what you don't like. Amendments can be made."
The fate of C-5, the Species at Risk Bill, will also be interesting to follow. Sponsored by Environment Minister David Anderson, the House finally passed last June this bill intended to protect 400 wildlife species at risk of extinction across the country.
This is the federal government's third attempt to pass an endangered species law in Canada. As the two previous attempts died slow procedural deaths, environmentalists and the MPs who went to bat for the bill will be keen to make sure it doesn't die on the Order Paper again.
Mr. Anderson ended up making some amendments to his legislation at the last minute after being pressured by several backbenchers who threatened to vote against the bill, notably Liberal MPs Karen Kraft-Sloan, Charles Caccia and Clifford Lincoln who also took to organizing opposition within the government.
The MPs believed the legislation was weak in two key areas. It did not protect the living spaces of endangered species and it left the decision on whether or not species are considered at risk up to politicians, not scientists. Mr. Anderson's office ultimately gave in to the pressure and made the requested changes rather than face having the bill die yet again.
The Alliance said the legislation is doomed for failure because it doesn't provide adequate compensation for landowners and will obstruct urban expansion. Environmentalists, meanwhile, have been chatting up Senators all summer in the hopes of getting further amendments. They are concerned that it doesn't provide as much help to creatures not found on federal lands -- about two-thirds of the species on the list.
Aside from these left-overs from the last Parliamentary session, the government is working on introducing a number of new bills, including new legislation from Treasury Board Minister Lucienne Robillard on the public service, from Heritage Minister Sheila Copps on historic places, from David Collenette on transportation issues, and from Justice Minister Martin Cauchon on criminal law reform.
The Prime Minister's new ethics package outlining new standards for politicians and senior bureaucrats is also on the horizon, as is Parliamentary reform. Changes to private members' business, as outlined in a recent report from the Procedure and House Affairs Committee, and Parliamentary rules are expected.
But the thrust of the Throne Speech, which is expected to dominated by ratification of the Kyoto Protocol and new legislation to combat child poverty and address aboriginal grievances and the health care crisis, is expected to have the biggest impact on the fall agenda. More on this next week.
-- Paco Francoli's e-mail address is [email protected]
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: August 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 161 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(34) Ag 28'03 pg 30; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5840862
LENGTH: 472 words
HEADLINE: South African advocacy group marks 100 years
BYLINE: ZAREK, ELYSSE
BODY:
The South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD) will be celebrating its
100th anniversary with an international meeting of the World Jewish
Congress (WJC) in Johannesburg and Cape Town from Sept. 5 to 7.
When SAJBD - the South African equivalent of Canadian Jewish Congress - was founded 100 years ago, it represented an immigrant community that hailed from Eastern Europe. Today, South Africa's Jewish community is ''strong and self-sufficient,'' Yehuda Kay, executive director of the SAJBD, said in a phone interview from Johannesburg.
''We've gone from a community of immigrants to a vital, vibrant part of South Africa,'' Kay said.
Among the attendees at the centenary will be Martin Luther King III. One of the most pressing issues facing the Jewish community in South Africa is its relations with local black Muslim groups, and hosting a black leader from the United States sends a strong message, said WJC Secretary-General Avi Beker.
''It shows blacks in South Africa that the Jews have a very close relationship with blacks,'' he said from Jerusalem.
Other issues facing the South African community are crime and anti-Israel bias in the media. In response, Kay said, the SAJBD participates in a grassroots, cross-cultural group that looks for ways to fight crime, and has created a professional media team to counter the ''ugly'' media campaign against Israel.
''Our priority has always been to safeguard the Jewish community's rights, lobbying for protecting Israel from bias in the media and political circles,'' Kay said. Other top priorities are building relationships with the government and fighting anti-Semitism.
Demographics is another pressing problem for the South African Jewish community. At its height, the community numbered 120,000, but the population has dropped to about 80,000 as its younger members have sought better opportunities abroad.
Beker said many South African Jews abroad become active in their adopted communities.
''[CJC president] Keith Landy is an example of the dispersion of the Jewish community from South Africa,'' he said.
Landy, who came to Canada from South Africa in 1970 and will be attending the anniversary bash, said many South African Jews left the country after the Soweto race riots - the worst in South Africa's history - in 1976, and after the fall of apartheid in 1994 because of the shaky political situation.
''Nobody knew there was going to be peace and reconciliation under Mandela,'' Landy said.
That's why there are pockets of South African Jews in English-speaking countries such as Canada and the United States, Britain and Australia, he explained.
Liberal MP Irwin Cotler will also be speaking at the meeting.
'We've gone from a community of immigrants to a vital, vibrant part of South Africa'
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 162 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 5
LENGTH: 857 words
HEADLINE: Diaspora Digest: A review of the Jewish world
BYLINE: Michael Freund
BODY:
Greece to remember Holocaust
Reports in the Greek press indicate that the government in Athens has decided to accede to requests by local Jewish leaders and will soon declare a national day of remembrance for the Holocaust.
The date reportedly chosen is January 18, the day upon which Allied forces entered Auschwitz in 1945.
As part of the commemorations, teachers will speak to students about the Holocaust and its impact on the country's Jewish community.
During World War II, the Germans deported approximately 55,000 Jews from Salonika to the death camps, of whom just 1,200 survived. Only 60 remain alive today.
Russian editor jailed for anti-Semitic incitement
A court in Novosibirsk has found the editor-in-chief of the newspaper Siberia guilty of "inciting national, racial, and religious discord" and sentenced him to three years in prison, Pravda reports.
Charges against Igor Kolodezenko were filed in 2000 after Siberia published "materials calling for violence against Jews," said prosecutor Yuri Kondratyev.
Despite being found guilty, Kolodezenko was freed from custody, as the court said his conviction was covered by the amnesty recently announced by the State Duma in honor of the anniversary of the end of World War II.
According to Kondratyev, the Novosibirsk prosecutor's office has petitioned the regional court to shut down Siberia on the grounds that it contains material which incites "national intolerance and discord."
Effort to beatify Italian Holocaust-rescuer
A Catholic diocese in Italy has initiated a campaign seeking beatification on behalf of Odoardo Focherini, who rescued more than 100 Jews from the Nazis.
Focherini, who served as administrative director of the antifascist newspaper Avvenire, is credited with risking his life and career to save Jews from deportation.
As anti-Jewish racial laws intensified in the fall of 1943, he helped organize a covert network to smuggle Jews into Switzerland.
He provided refugees with financial support and false documents and enabled some 105 Jews to escape to safety.
On March 11, 1944, German troops arrested Focherini in a hospital, where he was tending to a Jewish patient.
He was sent to the Flossenburg concentration camp, and then to the Hersbruck camp, where he died from an untreated leg wound at the age of 37, on December 27, 1944.
After the war, Focherini's efforts were recognized by the Union of Italian Jewish Communities and by Yad Vashem, which conferred upon him the title of "Righteous Among the Nations."
In May, the diocese of Carpi announced that it would seek to have Focherini beatified, which is considered the first step toward sainthood.
Canadian MP warns of rising anti-Semitism
Speaking at a conference in Montreal last week, international human-rights activist and Canadian MP Irwin Cotler warned that hatred of Jews in the post-September 11 world is on the rise and is taking new forms, Canadian television reports.
"We are entering a new, escalating, virulent, global, and even lethal anti-Semitism," Cotler told participants in the conference, which was organized by the Quebec region of the Canadian Jewish Congress.
He argued that traditional anti-Semitism is now being replaced by attacks against the Jewish people and their right to form "a nation in the family of nations."
Cotler cited calls for the destruction of Israel and legalized anti-Semitism veiled as concern for human rights as examples.
Asserting that criticism of Israeli policies is legitimate, he insisted that efforts to demonize Jews or advocate their death is not.
"As we have learned only too well, while it might begin with Jews, it doesn't end with Jews," he said. "Anti- Semitism is the canary in the contemporary pantheon of evil. It is time we hear it. and it is time that we act."
Argentina pressured to open Nazi files
US congressmen and Jewish groups are urging Argentina's new president, Nestor Kirchner, to open government files from the Peron era relating to efforts to smuggle Nazi war criminals into the country after World War II.
Though Argentine authorities have promised on three occasions since 1992 to make the files available, they have yet to do so.
Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D, NY) introduced a resolution in the House last month calling on Kirchner to finally come clean on the issue.
"We certainly hope for cooperation from the new government, a new attitude on this issue," Hinchey, told Knight-Ridder newspapers. "That lack of action has created a bad impression of Argentine governments."
An additional 22 lawmakers have signed on as cosponsors, and the Simon Wiesenthal Center is lobbying other members of Congress to follow suit.
In a book published last year, Argentine journalist Uki Goni said that the country's police, diplomats, intelligence agents, and Catholic church all collaborated with dictator Juan Peron to facilitate the escape of wanted Nazi fugitives from Europe to Argentina.
Argentina is known to have served as a refuge for senior German war criminals such as Adolf Eichmann and Dr. Josef Mengele.
LOAD-DATE: June 17, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 163 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Assignment Desk, Daybook Editor
LENGTH: 364 words
HEADLINE: ADL to Release Survey of European Attitudes Toward Jews During International Conference on Anti-Semitism
BODY:CONTACT: Myrna Shinbaum, 212-885-7747, or Todd Gutnick 212-885-7755, both of ADL
LOAD-DATE: October 25, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 164 OF 199 STORIESLENGTH: 832 words
HEADLINE: Changes sure to happen in the Liberal cabinet
ANCHOR: LLOYD ROBERTSON
BODY:
LLOYD ROBERTSON: Good evening from Parliament Hill. I'm
standing just outside the House of Commons. Over my shoulder, the front
benches on the government side where many familiar faces of the Chretien
cabinet will be moved or gone when Parliament sits again. Tomorrow morning,
Paul Martin will fulfil his lifelong dream and be sworn in as Canada's
twenty-first Prime Minister. But on this eve of the transfer of power, the halls
of Parliament are buzzing with speculation about who'll be in the Martin cabinet
and who'll be left off the list. With the inside track on what to expect, CTV's Ottawa bureau chief Craig.
CRAIG OLIVER [Reporter]: Lloyd, the changes being announced by Paul Martin tomorrow represent the most sweeping shift of cabinet ministers between Prime Minister's of the same party ever. And these changes are sweeping aside most of the high profile members of the Chretien cabinet.
SHEILA COPPS: The Prime Minister-elect has put together a new team and so he is.
OLIVER: In the hopes of reviving Liberal fortunes in the west, two of the most powerful positions in the Martin cabinet are going to westerners. That rare Alberta Liberal Anne McLellan becomes Deputy Prime Minister. She also heads a new super-department of national security.
ANNE MCLELLAN [Health Minister]: We've reflected on everything that's been accomplished and we're looking towards the future, all of us, including the Prime Minister.
OLIVER: Saskatchewan MP and long time Martin backer, Ralph Goodale, will work closely with the Prime Minister in his new job as Minister of Finance.
RALPH GOODALE [Public Works Minister]: Obviously marking the end of one very important period and the beginning of another, and some continue and others don't.
OLIVER: As Chair of the Commons Defence committee, David Pratt recommended more money for the military. Now, as Minister of Defence, he'll be able to carry that out. As for the present Defence Minister, John McCallum, he's been demoted to Veteran's Affairs. A major priority for the Martin government will be health care. That file is going to Quebecer Pierre Pettigrew. His old job has been turned into a new super-department of International Trade and Investment. The job goes to Martin's old university pal Jim Peterson.
A number of high profile Martin supporters get their reward. Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham who fought hard to keep his job does so. Hamilton MP Stan Keyes and Tony Valeri go to Revenue and Transport respectively. Winnipeger Reg Alcock is headed for the Treasury Board, and Torontonian Joe Volpe takes over the reorganization of the trouble plagued Human Resources Department, while fellow Torontonian John Godfrey takes over Environment.
Two Chretien loyalists from Quebec are survivors. Lucienne Robillard goes to Industry and Denis Coderre takes on Amateur Sport. It's a step down from Immigration, but he's a renowned political organizer and the Martin team wants him inside. The hot issues at Justice will be handled by internationally known human rights lawyer, Irwin Cotler.
A slew of Parliamentary secretaries will have more power than ever before, and a standout surprise is Scott Brison, lured from the Conservatives by Martin. Two BC Ministers, Stephen Owen and David Anderson, are coming back because this shuffle was all about loyalty. Consider Maurizio Bevilacqua, one of the earliest and strongest supporters of Paul Martin. He paid a price for joining the Chretien cabinet and being seen as just a little too loyal to Mr. Chretien. He got dumped from this shuffle. Lloyd.
ROBERTSON: Craig, we've also learned about some big names left out of the cabinet list including, Allan Rock, Sheila Copps, Jane Stewart, Martin Cauchon and David Collenette. Now as you've alluded to, Craig, this is the biggest change in a sitting government that anyone can remember around here, so what's behind all of this?
OLIVER: Well the point was simple, to put Paul Martin's stamp on his own government. This, as of tomorrow, will be the Paul Martin government not the Jean Chretien government any more. And the object lesson here, by the way, is John Turner. When Turner took over from Trudeau, he only changed four ministries. He left twenty-four Trudeau ministers in place. He was defeated. It looked like a continuation of the Trudeau government which the people wanted to see a change in. Martin, by comparison, has changed, dumped, shuffled out almost twenty of the Chretien ministers. So you can see that Martin is determined to show that this is a fresh start, a new government for him.
ROBERTSON: Yes, this is really massive. Now, of course, if he wakes up in the middle of the night and changes his mind, then we're wrong.
OLIVER: That would be fine because that would give me a reason to have an excuse, for any of the names I've just listed not being right.
ROBERTSON: Thanks very much Craig. CTV Ottawa bureau chief Craig Oliver.
LOAD-DATE: December 12, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 165 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(35) S 5'02 pg 35; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5456792
LENGTH: 1174 words
HEADLINE: The Centre for Jewish Studies at York University: a challenging environment for growth and continuity
BODY:
[Graph Not Transcribed]
MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR
[Graph Not Transcribed]
The name that Jews use today to refer to the holiday that will be observed this weekend, Rosh ha-shanah, The New Year, is a relatively recent name. Early Jewish texts often called it ''the Day of Remembrance'' (Yom hazikkaron).
At York University's Centre for Jewish Studies we are dedicated to Jewish memory. We are committed to enriching and making meaningful students' knowledge of Jewish history, language, literature and philosophy.
While many of the teaching and research activities of our Centre relate to the theme of ''remembrance,'' I would like to highlight a project that we inaugurated last year that looks toward the past and toward the future as well. Our program ''Learning from the Past, Teaching for the Future'' trains future high school teachers both here and in Europe to teach the Holocaust in a meaningful way. The first group of these teachers completed their training this February with a week-long seminar and conference at York. We are confident that they will now be more effective teachers about the sad history of antisemitism in general and of the Holocaust in particular.
Our York students will also have the benefit of learning more on this topic this year as we welcome to York Dr. Keith Weiser, the first Silber Family Professor of Holocaust and Eastern European Jewish Studies. This Chair is the first of its kind in Canada, focusing on remembering both the Holocaust and the vibrant Jewish life in Eastern Europe before the Shoah.
5762 was a difficult year for Jews in many countries. We at York believe that bringing knowledge of the Jewish past to both Jews and non-Jews can strengthen the Jewish future. We ask for the community's continuing support for our efforts.
On behalf of my colleagues and myself I would like to wish you all the best for 5763. Leshanah tovah tikkatevu!
[Graph Not Transcribed]
Martin Lockshin, Director; Sara Horowitz, Associate Director; Irving Abella, Chair of Council; Sydney Eisen, Founding Director
Executive Committee
Michael Brown, Humanities; Helen Doan, Psychology; Joe Levy, Nursing and Social Work; Bernard Lightman, Humanities; Alex Pomson, Education; Rachel Schlesinger, Social Science; Ahouva Shulman, Hebrew; Mark Webber, Humanities and German
For further information, please contact:
Professor Martin Lockshin, Director
Centre for Jewish Studies, York University
241 Vanier College
4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Tel.: 416-736-5823
Fax: 416-736-5344
e-mail: [email protected]
website: www.yorku.ca/cjs
CENTRE HIGHLIGHTS 2001-2002
Prof. Irwin Cotler, M.P. delivered the keynote address at The Future of Memory, an international conference on Changing Contexts for Holocaust and Anti-Racism Education held at York University on February 9-10, 2002. The conference was part of a larger project for future teachers in Canada, Germany and Poland and followed field study in Germany and Poland during the summer of 2001.
[Graphs Not Transcribed]
- The inauguration of the Koschitzky Family Chair in Jewish Teacher Education and the appointment of Prof. Alex Pomson to the Chair took place on May 29, 2002. Jack and Anne Weinbaum, Carol Weinbaum and husband Nigel Schuster, partners in the Jewish Teacher Education Programme, joined in the celebration. Seated left to right: Julia Koschitzky, Aleta Shiff, Laura Walsh-Mida, Prof. Shoshana Kurtz. Standing left to right: Prof. Michael Brown, Barry Shiff, Israel Mida, Ruth Lockshin and Prof. Martin Lockshin, Tanya Pomson and Prof. Alex Pomson.
- Prof. Irving Abella, incumbent of the J. Richard Shiff Chair for the Study of Canadian Jewry, received an Honourary Doctor of Laws Degree from the Law Society of Upper Canada, February 7, 2002.
- The Centre for Jewish Studies inaugurated a renovated ''Reading Room'' furnished by The Art Shoppe and honoured Allan and Leslie Offman at a reception on March 18, 2002. Prof. Michael Brown (left) chaired the event that included congratulatory remarks by Julia Koschitzky, Chair, CJS Advisory Committee.
HONOURABLE MENTION
- Jewish Campus Services of Greater Toronto Annual Awards Night was held on May 8, 2002. Prof. Michael Brown was bestowed with the Founding Friend of the Campus Award. Josh Goodman, Robin Hermolin and Sivan Raz received awards for their work on behalf of the Jewish Student Federation at York University.
- Prof. Sara Horowitz, Associate Director of the Centre for Jewish Studies, was appointed as a member of the Academic Advisory Board of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., one of two Canadians on that Board.
SCHOLARSHIPS AND PRIZES 2001-2002
Benarroch-Hazan Book Prize
Daniella Galbut Hailey Saleman Moshe Weinstock
Benarroch-Hazan Sephardi Studies Award(f.#1)
Moshe Weinstock
Tom and Mary Beck Jewish Studies Award
Tova Goldstein
Alan S. Berg Jewish Studies Award
Tamar Chaimovitch
Hy & Helen Bergel Prize in Jewish Studies
Antonina Kuznetsova
David and Lois Buckstein Bursary
Klara Ashkenazy
Canadian Friends of Hebrew University Scholarships(f.#1)
Catherine Chochinov Maytal Helfand
Mark Jesin Keren Romm
Canadian Friends of Tel Aviv University
Rebecca Wortzman
Canadian Friends of Tel Aviv University Vera Dolly Denty Award(f.#1)
Hannah Wortzman
Canadian Friends of Tel Aviv University Marnie Kimelman Award(f.#1)
Rebecca Wortzman
Canadian Friends of Tel Aviv University Louis Manpel Award(f.#1)
Desiree Abecassis
Dorot Foundation Travel Grants
Hannah Wortzman Rebecca Wortzman
Molly Eisenberg Memorial Award in Jewish Studies
Ilana Romberg
Essay Prize in Canadian Jewish Studies
Val Strawczynski
Gertrude and Jack Friedman Memorial Award
Keren Romm
Shoshana Kurtz Book Prize
James Bitton
Metro Toronto Lodge B'nai Brith Prize
Alan Naiman
Alyce Orzy Award in Jewish Teacher Education
Naomi Pfeffer
Samuel G. Rosen Memorial Prize
Charlotte Dafoe
Esther Sarick Bursary in Jewish Studies and the Arts(f.#1)
Jory Scherer
David Morris Schrage Bursary
Josh Goodman
Helen Schrage Bursary
Aliza Jesin
Abraham Isaac Silver Scholarship
Anat Davidzon
Judith Rosner Siegel Vanier Award
Allan Socken
Leonard Wolinsky Scholarships(f.#1)
Catherine Chochinov Keren Romm
Western Canada Jewish Teacher Initiative Bursaries
Ur Barzel, Edmonton Ziona Benjamin, Edmonton
Ian Brojges, Winnipeg Avraham Gislason, Winnipeg
York-Hebrew University Exchange Scholarship
Carla Girvitz
Joseph Zbili Memorial Book Prize
Sara Goldberg
[Graph Not Transcribed]
Congratulations to Prof. Eric Lawee. He received The Nahman Sokol-Mollie Halberstadt Jewish Book Award for Biblical and Rabbinic Scholarship for 2001, on June 4, 2002 at the Leah Posluns Theatre for his publication of Isaac Abarbanel's Stance Toward Tradition: Defense, Dissent and Dialogue.
(f.#1) Ontario Student Opportunities Trust Fund Scholarships
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: April 16, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 166 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (619) Ja 7'02; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5287386
LENGTH: 3948 words
HEADLINE: Most MPs pick John Manley as 'Most Valuable Politician' in land, knocking off star Paul Martin
BYLINE: Francoli, Paco
BODY:
Paul Martin watch out. Foreign Affairs Minister John Manley, Time Canada's
man of the year, was voted "the most valuable politician" in 2001 by MPs,
knocking Finance Minister Paul Martin off the prestigious ranking for the
first time in three years. Mr. Manley has momentum.
As well, for the first time ever, federal MPs cast their ballots in The Hill Times' "Fifth Annual All Politics Poll" offering their insights into the federal political scene. In previous years, political Hill staffers took part in the survey. This time, the federal legislators overlooked Mr. Martin (LaSalle-Emard, Que.), heir apparent to the Prime Minister who for the last three years owned the title as the best politician in the land, and chose Mr. Manley (Ottawa South, Ont.) instead. Mr. Manley received 21 per cent of the vote.
MPs also voted former Canadian Alliance leader Stockwell Day, (Okanagan-Coquihalla, B.C.) who was also picked the Canadian Press' newsmaker for 2001, as least valuable politician on the Hill.
These were just some of the findings drawn from the poll on the year in federal politics. Some 90 MPs took part in the survey conducted during the months of November and December. Mr. Manley got the thumbs up from friends and foes alike, drawing nearly as many votes from outside his party as from within. Mr. Manley, incidentally, won lots of votes from the Canadian Alliance caucus on Parliament Hill.
Mr. Day and his well-publicized leadership troubles, meanwhile, earned him the dubious distinction of being the "least valuable politician" of the year. The embattled former leader, who resigned to likely run again, got 22 per cent of the vote, placing well ahead of his closest rival: fellow-CA MP Rob Anders.
Consisting of 25 questions on the best and worst in federal politics in 2001, the confidential poll was conducted in person, by mail, e-mail, and phone. All parties were targeted. In all, 42 Liberal, 23 Canadian Alliance, nine Tory, seven NDP, five Bloc, and four Democratic Representative Caucus MPs participated.
Hang on to your hats. Here's a rundown of the results, replete with off-the-cuff remarks and non-partisan commentary.
Who Was The Year's Most Valuable Politician? Foreign Affairs Minister John Manley: 21%
For his skillful handling of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and for deftly filling the shoes of his predecessor, Lloyd Axworthy, Foreign Affairs Minister John Manley emerged as the year's best politician with 21% of the vote. (Interestingly, Mr. Manley knocked off veteran champion Paul Martin who won the title three years in a row and last year with 26%). Prime Minister Jean Chretien, meanwhile, secured a close second with 16%. Unlike his Liberal colleague, Mr. Chretien got most of his votes from within his caucus. Finance Minister Paul Martin and Tory Leader Joe Clark followed with 8% and 6% respectively, and Liberal Irwin Cotler and former Reform Leader Preston Manning, tied with 3%, rounding out the top five.
The Canadian Alliance proved to be the only party which didn't consider its leader to be the "most valuable." Stockwell Day, who stepped down last month but is expected to try to recapture the CA leadership at the party's convention in March, actually placed a distant third among CA MPs polled, behind Mr. Manley and Mr. Manning. Mr. Day received two votes.
Who Was The Year's Least Valuable Politician?
Canadian Alliance Leader
Stockwell Day: 22%
If Mr. Day barely registered on the radar for "most valuable," he was certainly well represented in this category, accumulating votes from all parties. (By the way, he won the same title last year with 32%). CA Rob Anders and Liberal Hedy Fry placed a distant second and third with 10% and 7% respectively. Mr. Anders, like his leader, got it from all sides, especially from Tories. Turns out his comments about Nelson Mandela , whom he said was not worthy of receiving an honorary Canadian citizenship, did little to boost his popularity. "I'm glad I'm not one of his constituents," said NDP MP Libby Davies. "The Mandela statement was probably the dumbest thing I've heard in a long time," said one Tory MP.
As for Ms. Fry, she was especially unpopular among her Liberal colleagues who saw fit to ding her with five votes. And, politicians being politicians, several MPs could not bring themselves to answer the question directly. One said the least valuable was "the last person to ask a question about Shawinagate." Finally, dishonourable mention also went to Liberal Jim Karygiannis who was singled out by three fellow Liberals for being more absent than present in the House.
Which Public Figure Do You Wish Had Run in the Last Election?
Frank McKenna: 12%
Former premiers and federal MPs were the order of the day in this category. Frank McKenna, former premier of New Brunswick and now practising lawyer in Moncton, placed first because of his strong Liberal support. (Last year, Wayne Gretzky won the title with 9%).
Along with Mr. McKenna, the only other top contender to score votes from more than one party was Jean Charest, former federal Tory and now leader of the Quebec Liberals. At 4%, he tied for third with Roy Romanow, former NDP Premier of Saskatchewan. Topping those two, but just barely, were Stephen Harper, Reform MP for Calgary West (1993-97) and retired Major-General Lewis Mackenzie, with 5% each. Mr. Harper, now running for the CA leadership, and Maj.-Gen. Mackenzie got all their votes from CA MPs.
Who is Your Favourite Up-And-Comer Politician? Canadian Alliance Transportation Critic James Moore: 13%
In a contest determined almost entirely by partisanship, CA MP James Moore bested Tory MP Peter MacKay who got 10%, and Liberals MP Stephen Owen and Martin Cauchon who attracted 9% and 5% respectively. Mr. MacKay, 37, was the only top finisher to get votes from more than two parties, drawing support from every party but the CA. (Mr. MacKay was the favourite up and comer for three years in a row and won it last year with 10%.) Mr. Moore, 25, got all his votes from within his caucus.
No fewer than 20 different Liberal MPs got votes. One Liberal commenting on his caucus, who could not settle on an answer after a long pause, summed it up best: "There are a number of up and comers and all are worthy of being recognized." So let's hear them.
Who Made the Biggest Comeback of the Year? Tory Leader Joe Clark: 32%
In wasn't even close. This is the third year in a row Joe Clark has won the title. Last year he won it with 43%. First elected way back in 1972, Joe Who is still around to the amazement of several MPs. And for managing to survive the unrelenting attacks on his leadership, Stockwell Day placed a respectable second with 21%. "I went to say goodbye to him in June because I didn't think I'd see him again in September," said Grit MP Dominic LeBlanc. Further still, was Mr. Manley at 9%. That was good enough for third-place ranking.
Who is the Political Figure You'd Most Like to See Make a Comeback? Frank McKenna: 11%
Frank's a popular one, eh? Frank McKenna, often wooed to run in the federal Liberal leadership race, was in a tight race, but won 11% of the vote. He was followed by Preston Manning who got 7% and by Stockwell Day at 5%. Former PM Brian Mulroney tied for fourth with Liberal Andy Scott at 4% each. Mr. McKenna scored votes from three different parties, while Mr. Manning from two. In regards to Mr. Manning, DRC MP Jay Hill said: "I would very much like to see him back."
Predictably, most of Mr. Day's support flowed from a single source. The poll revealed there are at least four CA MPs out there hoping the troubled former leader decides to stick around federal politics. Also noteworthy was that Stephen Harper, who will most likely be Mr. Day's toughest competition next March as he attempts to win back his leadership, drew only two votes and one of those came from the Bloc.
What Issue Have Politicians Most Shamelessly Exploited for Political Gain? Sept. 11 events: 35%
No shortage of topics to choose from here, judging by the large number aired, but in the end all things related to the Sept. 11 attacks on America provided the best fodder for MPs looking to sleaze their way to the top. While governing MPs bemoaned the lack of unity on Canada's response to the terrorist attacks, opposition MPs raged about everything from our "leaky borders" to our "cash-strapped" military.
All this is to say that for once health care, normally a favourite conversation starter among political opportunists, actually receded into the background. Last year, health care was picked as the No. 1 issue exploited, picked by 32%. But only somewhat, as it managed a respectable second with 11%. The Prime Minister's suspicious dealings in his home riding of Shawinigan, Que., dubbed the Grand Mere Affair or Shawinigate, depending on which newspaper you write for, placed third with 7%.
What is the Most Important Issue Facing the Country?
Security/ Economy: 52%
No big surprises here. Since Sept. 11, security and economic concerns have been foremost on many minds and MPs proved to be no different. Combined, they were the No. 1 choice for more than half the MPs polled. Even those who settled on a different answer, such as poverty and job losses (which combined for 12%) or the need for better relations with the U.S. (5%), managed to link their responses to the terrorist attacks fallout. At 8%, health care proved to be the only non-Sept. 11 issue that got any serious attention.
What is The Most Important Issue That Politicians Aren't Addressing?
Child Poverty/ Affordable Housing: 16%
In what quickly turned into a horse race between wildly differing issues, poverty and affordable housing edged out the environment for first place by only two percentage points. Last year, child poverty/homelessness was voted in this category by 24%. Next up was the economy at 10%, followed closely by health at 7%. Among the top finishers, Parliamentary reform brought up the rear with 4%.
Which Political Promise From the 2000 Election Campaign is Least Likely To Be Kept?
Single-tier Health Care: 13%
Two-tier health care is coming to Canada whether the Libs like it or not, according to several CA MPs who said the government will be hardpressed to keep the system as is. "Romanow's commission is another political boondoggle," said CA MP John Reynolds. At 10%, policies meant to address child poverty and the lack of affordable housing combined to rate as the second least likely campaign promise to see the light of day. This issue was of great concern to NDP MPs. Another smattering of MPs, 8% to be exact, said a deficit is looming and that the government will fail to continue balancing its books as promised.
A few brazen Liberal MPs said all campaign promises will be kept. Eight percent of them said so, in fact, while 6% of opposition MPs said the contrary. They contend none will be kept.
What Was the Best Political Book of the Year?
The Friendly Dictatorship, by Jeffrey Simpson: 16%
Globe columnist Jeffrey Simpson's latest book on Canada's de facto one-party state got the most votes by far. Although, truth be told, an equal number of MPs admitted they either don't read political books or simply have no time to fit reading into their busy schedules. Yikes. That's right, 16% of respondents gave no answer because they couldn't come up with one.
Political muckraker extraordinaire and background Grit guy Warren Kinsella came in second with 8% for his latest, Kicking Ass in Canadian Politics. The Prince of Darkness, a nickname he earned as an assistant to Jean Chretien, garnered all his support from Liberals who fancied his insider's take on the art of negative campaigning.
The Bloc, as usual, gave answers that failed to overlap with those of other MPs. This reading group was divided into camps, those (three votes) who favoured Pierre Godin's massive tome detailing the first Parti Quebecois win in 1976 to its referendum defeat in 1980, Rene Levesque: L'Espoir et le Chagrin, and those (two votes) who preferred journalist Normand Lester's Le Livre Noire du Canada Anglais, a book which got him suspended from Radio-Canada. Both make good reading for committed and aspiring separatists alike.
Who is Your Favourite Talking Head?
CTV's Mike Duffy: 19%
Not surprisingly, all the top choices work in television (remember, MPs don't read about politics much). For being a "straight shooter" and for "adding a little fun to politics," CTV's Mike Duffy proved to be best of the year, followed by his counterpart at CBC Newsworld, the more staid Don Newman, who got 12%. (Mr. Duffy will like this since he placed third last year and Mr. Newman placed first). Three MPs could not decide between the two and gave them a tie for first. Placing third with 8% was Jason Moscovitz, former chief political correspondent at CBC who left journalism after nearly 30 years to spin tales with a high- paying job at the Business Development Bank of Canada.
The top print journalist was Chantal Hebert, the national affairs columnist for both The Toronto Star and the Montreal newspaper La Presse. She got three votes total. National Post columnist Paul Wells managed two.
Which Talking Head Would You Most Like to Silence? None: 28%
Methinks the MPs held back here, but perhaps the question was a touch too petty in the more thoughtful, tragic end to 2001. A full 28% of them said they would not silence any journalist if they could. (Not sure about that). CA MP Brian Pallister put it best: "I respect free speech however ill-informed it happens to be." (Interestingly, Jason Moscovitz won this title last year with 10%).
Still, several journalists managed to raise the ire of enough MPs in 2001 to get votes, notably National Post columnist Diane Francis and the Prince of Darkness himself, Warren Kinsella. Both got 4%. Columnist Dalton Camp, who at least one MP believes is "nauseating and biased," got 3%. He tied with "too many," a response favoured by at least two NDPers.
Which Former Prime Minister Do You Most Admire? Pierre Trudeau: 39%
Pierre Trudeau's legacy of economic nationalism and centralist policies struck a chord with well over half of Liberal MPs who easily picked him as their favourite. (Trudeau won the title with 60% of the vote last year). Apart from the NDP, no other party made him their No. 1. Thanks to votes from nearly every party, the diplomatic Lester B. Pearson came in second with 12%. The CA picked John Diefenbaker as their favourite. Overall, the populist prophet from the Prairies, a.k.a., Dief the Chief, got 10%, tied with Sir Wilfrid Laurier who also got widespread support.
The Tories' No. 1 choice was Brian Mulroney, who attracted 9% in total. Also noteworthy was that three MPs gave no answer. "Not a damn one," said one CA MP, adding that Robert Stanfield would have been his choice had the Tory leader managed to form a government.
Who Was the Best Cabinet Minister in 2001?
Finance Minister Paul Martin: 41%
He did it again, but he better watch out for Mr. Manley. For the fifth year in a row, Paul Martin was picked as the best in cabinet. For having the "most difficult job in this most difficult time," according to one Liberal MP, Mr. Martin got first place, but only by a small margin. With very strong support from the CA, Foreign Affairs Minister John Manley took second place with 36%. Several MPs said Mr. Manley has shown "great leadership" in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks. (Last year, Mr. Martin won the title with 52%). Hey, Mr. Manley should sell some Lib memberships to the Alliance.
As a tandem, Messieurs Martin and Manley actually secured third with 3%. No other minister got more than one vote, except for Immigration Minister Elinor Caplan who drew two, both coming from the NDP.
Who Was the Weakest Cabinet Minister in 2001? Secretary of State for Multiculturalism and the Status of Women Hedy Fry: 34%
For her bizarre comments about crosses burning in Prince George, B.C., that weren't, and also for being "unfocused" or "without a clear vision," Junior Minister Hedy Fry was rated the weakest among Jean Chretien's finest. According to one Tory MP, she was "inexcusably weak" in 2001. With 13% of the vote, a solid second was Solicitor-General Lawrence MacAulay. Like Ms. Fry, the way Mr. MacAulay managed his department failed to inspire confidence. "He has no idea what his portfolio is," said one CA MP bluntly.
"Nobody" managed to secure 10% of the vote, thanks largely to Liberal MPs refusing to single out any of their own as the weakest. Behind "nobody," MPs placed Immigration Minister Elinor Caplan and International Development Minister Maria Minna with 8% and 6% respectively.
Which Cabinet Minister Most Respects Parliamentary Democracy?
Finance Minister Paul Martin: 23%
The MP most likely to respect Canada's version of Parliamentary democracy, where power has become increasingly concentrated into the hands of a few key people, was Finance Minister Paul Martin according to 23% of respondents. He was commended for being open and honest during budget deliberations. At 12%, Government House Leader Don Boudria tied for second with Foreign Affairs Minister John Manley, followed by Deputy Prime Minister Herb Gray at 9%. (Mr. Martin knocked Mr. Gray out of No. 1 ranking which is astounding since the longest serving MP had won the title for four years in a row).
Who Is the Most Approachable Member of Cabinet? Finance Minister Paul Martin: 16%
Although there was a clear winner, Finance Minster Paul Martin with 16%, the rest of the field was divided up between no less than a dozen ministers who each only managed to attract marginal support. Health Minister Allan Rock, scoring 9%, topped this group of contenders to the throne, followed by Solicitor-General Lawrence MacAulay with 5%.
What Is the Biggest Problem Facing Parliament Itself? Lack of Backbench Power: 48%
Judging by the number of remarks about the high concentration of power in the Prime Minister's Office and the need for some more free votes, it would seem most MPs are still just a bunch of "nobodies," as Pierre Trudeau quipped long ago. Nearly half of the respondents said MPs need a stronger voice. "Institutions are alive and well, but buried under an inch of dust," said Liberal MP Derek Lee. (Interestingly, this was the No. 1 problem facing Parliament in the last poll too with 26% of the vote).
MPs also said the lack of a strong opposition, caused in part by the disintegration of the CA, is undermining the political process. A total of 11% of respondents, most of them Liberals, noted the absence of a strong government in-waiting. Another 5% said committees lack relevance because most of their recommendations go unheeded.
What Was the Biggest Political News Story In the Year 2001? Sept. 11 Terrorist Attacks: 68%
Not surprisingly, Sept. 11 took first place by a landslide with a whopping 68% of the vote. MPs expressed concern about a litany of issues linked to the tragedy, notably problems in the Middle East and the need for better Canada-U.S. relations. The near-collapse of the CA rated as the second biggest story of the year, with 10% of the vote. Shawinigate, which reemerged as an issue before the Commons prior to the Christmas break, got 3%.
Which House or Senate Committee Is the Best on Parliament Hill?
Foreign Affairs Committee: 14%
For rising above partisan squabbles, the Foreign Affairs Committee, chaired by Bill Graham, won with 14% of the vote. Tied for second at 11% was Justice, chaired by Andy Scott, and Finance, chaired by Maurizio Bevilacqua . And tied for third at 9% was Industry, chaired by Susan Whelan, and National Defence, chaired by David Pratt.
Which House or Senate Committee is a Complete Waste of Time? Library Committee: 18%
The Library Committee, which didn't meet in 2001 or elect a chair, easily topped the list of committees that are a waste of time. Many MPs said they are not entirely sure what the committee is supposed to do, including at least one of its Liberal members who made a point of saying it should be either nixed or retooled. The Official Languages Committee, which actually has two chairs (Sen. Shirley Maheu and MP Mauril Belanger), placed second with 5%. With 4% and 3% respectively, the Human Resources Development and Environment Committees were also singled out as a waste of time.
Who in the World Would You Most Like to Invite to Dinner? Nelson Mandela: 19%
The man who spent 27 years in a South African jail for speaking out against apartheid and then became the country's first democratically elected state president easily rated the year's No. 1 dinner guest with 19% of the vote. "He's my hero," said one Liberal MP. (Mr. Mandela won the ranking last year with 10% of the vote and has won in previous years as well).
Placing far behind Mr. Mandela, Tony Blair took second with 5% of the vote. At least three romantic MPs said they would choose to take their spouse out to dinner, noting their hectic schedules do not allow them to spend as much time with their significant others as they would like. That answer tied with Bill Clinton and Pope John Paul II who got 3% as well. And finally, two MPs expressed a desire to break bread with the world's most wanted man, Osama bin Laden. NDP MP Dick Proctor said he wanted "to try to understand the depth of his hatred for us."
Who Delivered the Worst Political Line in 2001? Hedy Fry: 25%
A new question in the survey, Hedy Fry easily took first place for her strange remark about racist activities in Prince George that never happened. For the record, here's what she said one more time: "We can just go to British Columbia in Prince George where crosses are being burned on lawns as we speak," said the junior minister in House last March, adding the mayor of Prince George had informed her of the so-called fact. The mayor denied it, leaving Ms. Fry in the hot seat for weeks afterwards.
For trying to block Nelson Mandela's honourary citizenship last June, CA MP Rob Anders came in second with 9%. The Calgary MP called Mr. Mandela "a politically correct poster boy of the liberal-left movement," not to mention a Communist and terrorist afterwards when defending his outburst.
Prime Minister Jean Chretien, Tory Leader Joe Clark, and former CA leader Stockwell Day were also judged to have oratory skills that could use some work, drawing 6%, 4%, and 3% of the vote respectively.
Who Delivered the Funniest Political Line in 2001? Finance Minister Paul Martin: 8%
The MP with the best sense of humour on the Hill is Finance Minister Paul Martin. No one statement of his stuck out as the most memorable, but those who gave him their vote noted his agile mind and great sense of timing in Question Period. "He's a master of the zingers," according to a Liberal colleague. This is a new question.
Industry Minister Brian Tobin tied with Prime Minister Jean Chretien for second place with 5%. Brash Liberal Steve Mahoney's poems and limericks were good enough to garner 3% of the vote. He tied with NDPer Bill Blaikie and fellow-Liberal George Baker, who has dropped off the scene of late to the chagrin of several MPs inside and outside his party.
Led by Paco Francoli, The Hill Times survey was also conducted by Terry McDonald, F. Abbas Rana and Shaun Ziai.
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: February 20, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 167 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. A01
LENGTH: 1306 words
HEADLINE: Martin's bold start
BYLINE: Susan Delacourt, Toronto Star ; Canadian Press
HIGHLIGHT:
39-member cabinet holds meeting today March budget could set stage for April
election
BODY:
New PM plans ethics legislation
Ottawa Prime Minister Paul Martin and his new cabinet start today to build a bold new government - one with unabashedly sweeping ambitions and a hurry-up, do-it-now timetable.
"We are going to have to change the way things work in Ottawa. And what we're going to do is exactly that," Martin says.
Today, normally a non-working day in official Ottawa, will see a full meeting of the 39-member cabinet that was sworn into office yesterday morning at Rideau Hall, home of Governor-General Adrienne Clarkson.
On Monday, Martin talks with U.S. President George Bush. And already, a whole new machinery of government, with top-level operations for cities, Canada-U.S. relations, ethics and public security is being whipped into gear.
"We've got a very, very ambitious agenda. We have got an enormous amount to do," Martin told reporters yesterday at his first news conference as Prime Minister.
"I hope we haven't created too many expectations because I do believe we are going to be able to live up to them."
Martin said yesterday he expects to bring the House of Commons back from its winter break in early February.
That likely means a budget in March and an election call in April.
The emotion of yesterday was evident, among the new cabinet members who had waited so long for Martin's day to come, and for the new Prime Minister himself.
Martin, 65, actually lost his composure briefly, when he was asked at the news conference whether his thoughts had turned to his father during the swearing-in ceremonies.
Martin, son of long-time Liberal cabinet minister Paul Martin Sr., tried to explain that he had brought along a memento - the flag that flew at half-staff on Parliament Hill on Sept. 14, 1992, the day his father died.
"I don't know if you can tell. I brought a flag," he said, then paused and gulped as his eyes welled up with tears. "That's the flag that flew at half mast on the Hill," Martin said in a shaky voice. He didn't finish answering the question. His staff members, looking on from rows of seats to the side, also were wiping tears from their eyes.
Everything about Martin's new cabinet and new mandate is billed as big, significant and far-reaching.
A total of 64 MPs - more than one-third of the Liberal caucus - were sworn to official duty in Martin's new regime.
A full 38 are cabinet ministers - 22 are new faces - and another 26 are parliamentary secretaries with "honourable" status and specific assignments.
There are 11 women in cabinet, the most ever.
Martin kept 16 of former prime minister Jean Chretien's ministers, but dumped 22 of them.
He rewarded two of his closest colleagues with top posts. Anne McLellan, from Alberta, is deputy prime minister and also assumes responsibility as the new public safety minister. Saskatchewan's Ralph Goodale is the new finance minister.
Almost all the major departments have new faces in charge. Quebec's Pierre Pettigrew is the new health minister, while Irwin Cotler, from Montreal, is justice minister and attorney-general.
The GTA has a raft of new ministers. Joe Volpe (Eglinton-Lawrence) is the new top minister for Toronto, in a new job as minister of human resources and skills development. Judy Sgro (York West) is the new citizenship and immigration minister. Jim Peterson, ejected from cabinet a couple of years ago, is back in the important job of international trade minister.
Gone are most of the Chretien cast, with former industry minister Allan Rock being appointed as ambassador to the United Nations yesterday. Among the prominent GTA ministers dropped were former transport minister David Collenette and revenue minister Elinor Caplan.
Former defence minister John McCallum was demoted to veterans affairs. Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham was one of the few ministers to keep the same job.
Martin has taken on a number of important areas for himself, including a new deal for cities.
"Cities, both large and small, are the engines of our economic growth and central to our quality of life. I intend to direct this issue personally," Martin said.
Toronto MP John Godfrey (Don Valley West) has been named a parliamentary secretary with special responsibility over cities, while a secretariat is being created within the Prime Minister's Office to handle a new deal for municipalities.
Mayors across Canada, including Toronto's David Miller, have been asking for the PMO to be solely responsible for cities, because of fears that a separate department would just get lost in tradeoffs or battles between departments, or that the new deal would simply fall through the gaps between the many different sets of federal bureaucracies that have an impact on cities.
Martin has named his former communications director, Brian Guest, who also worked for Ottawa Mayor Bob Chiarelli, as his senior point person within the PMO to take charge of the new deal for cities.
The PMO also takes responsibility for science and small business and for Canada-U.S. relations and new secretariats have been established for them. Martin will chair a special cabinet committee on Canada-U.S. relations and in a surprise move yesterday, he named recent Tory defector Scott Brison to be his parliamentary secretary on Canada-U.S. issues.
Martin also is instituting a new ethics regime for ministers. Some of the new measures represent a mea culpa from Martin himself.
Ministers will not be allowed to travel on non-commercial private aircraft, as Martin has now admitted he did several times as the guest of corporate leaders while he was finance minister. Ministers will also have to disclose gifts over $1,000 - an $800 increase over the current $200 limit, but one that is expected to be heeded more. Few ministers reported gifts of any kind over the past 10 years.
Martin said he would excuse himself from cabinet discussions involving issues close to his old, private-sector career as the head of Canada Steamship Lines, which is now wholly owned by his three sons. But he predicted those occasions when he would need to absent himself from the cabinet table would be "very, very rare."
New legislation will be fast-tracked when Parliament resumes early in February, to create a new ethics commissioner in the House of Commons and an "ethics officer" in the Senate.
Meanwhile, one of Martin's new ministers - P.E.I.'s Joe McGuire - has asked conflict-of-interest commissioner Howard Wilson to decide if he erred in helping secure a federal grant involving his son, reports.
Just four days before McGuire was named to cabinet, an $800,000 grant was announced for a cultural centre whose board of directors includes his son, Matt McGuire.
Funding for the project came through the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency - the same agency that Martin appointed McGuire to head up yesterday.
McGuire admits to lobbying on behalf of the P.E.I. Folk Music Interpretive Centre, which is located in his home town of Tyne Valley, P.E.I.
But he's now second-guessing his involvement.
"There could very well be (a conflict of interest) at this point in time," McGuire told the Charlottetown Guardian.
"If there is a problem with this, whether it's real or perceived, then I'll be absenting myself from that file or any other files where there may be a perception of a conflict. I'll be taking care of that the first of the week."
The new department of public security and emergency preparedness is the major new creation in the new government. With McLellan overseeing, this new department will be responsible for the RCMP, CSIS, border and port security, as well as supervising co-ordinated responses to disasters and emergencies.
"It is clear that a more sharply co-ordinated approach to public safety is long past due," Martin said.
GRAPHIC: Jonathan Hayward/CP Sagkeeng First Nations elder Elmer Courchesne performs a "cleansing" ceremony before Paul Martin is sworn in as Canada's 21st prime minister yesterday.
LOAD-DATE: December 13, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 168 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.29(21) N 4'02 pg 31-32; ISSN: 1488-8084
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5506339
LENGTH: 1019 words
HEADLINE: Our father, who is the charter
BYLINE: Stock, Peter
BODY:
[HEADNOTE]
A Montreal conference points Canada towards something more profound than a godless public square > > by PETER STOCK
The 18th-century Irish philosopher and politician Edmund Burke once said, "Man is by his constitution a religious animal." This insight is undoubtedly shared by many of the 80% of Canadians who, according to the latest census, count themselves as having a religious affiliation. But exactly how this dimension of human nature is manifested in governance and law is becoming an increasingly vexatious question, especially so at a time when Parliament, universities and the courts are dominated by secularists intent on removing from the public square any reference to the supernatural.
To examine how Canada, as a supposedly pluralistic society, might find consensus on this question, McGill University and the Ottawa-based Centre for Cultural Renewal staged a three-day conference, entitled "Pluralism, Religion and Public Policy," in Montreal last month. No easy answers were presented to the 400 attendees, but the very fact the meeting was staged gives hope to those opposed to the atheistic, secular world view that is so prominent in Canada today.
It was no small coup on the part of conference organizers to persuade Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, of the Supreme Court of Canada, to deliver a speech on freedom of conscience and religion. Ms. McLachlin argued, "For society to function effectively, there must be some norms that can be relied upon in the law." In her view, "The Charter of Rights has articulated the core values of our society." As for the place of religion in society, Ms. McLachlin said, "The law has been charged with creating space for religion." And, she added cryptically, "There is a dialogue between religion and the rule of law."
Such comments did not satisfy many in the audience. University of Chicago religion professor lean Bethke Elshtain, who was invited to respond to the jurist's comments, observed, "The chief justice's idea of what the rule of law encompasses is far too broad. That is why we refer to the concept of limited government."
Moreover, conference attendee Ian Brodie, a University of Western Ontario political science professor, says the chief justice's notion of what constitutes a dialogue is unclear. "You have to take out your Supreme Court decoder ring to try to understand what the 'dialogue' between religion and the rule of law is."
Prof. Brodie continues, "By 'dialogue,' I'm not sure that she means what two people talking on the street would consider a dialogue to be. Rather, she seems to be hinting that if there is a conflict between the rule of law and religion, that in the end the [Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms] wins out."
He worries Madam Justice McLachlin is following in the footsteps of former chief justice Antonio Lamer, "who believed the charter established Canada as a secular society, not a religious society, so that in the public sphere there should be no mention of religion."
Rice University philosophy professor Tristram Englehardt says the disastrous result of such thinking is "that we live in a society that does its best to discount differences in an attempt to reach a consensus where none exists." He argues the secular State is not neutral on questions of morality and religion. Rather, secularists will dress up their beliefs in a new lexicon. "Secular people want to believe in something too," he says, "so they invented 'human rights.'"
In pursuing a human-rights agenda, however, Canada may have gone too far in creating a religion-free, secular society, McGill law professor and Liberal MP Irwin Cotler believes. "There has been a divorce of religious rights from human rights over the last 30 years," he says. "At the same time, there has been an exaggerated role played by the State as the guarantor of rights. Instead, the Churches should be an important mediating institution in society."
[IMAGE PHOTOGRAPH]
Chief Justice McLachlin:
A bit cryptic about freedom of religion.
Photo
[Not Transcribed]
But Prof. Bethke Elshtain says the secular crowd just does not understand what rights are all about. "States do not create rights. They either recognize the inherent rights of individuals, or they do not." She adds the secular State has based its conception of freedom on the rights it enumerates, but "as rights proliferate, human dignity begins to plummet. How do you sort out rights if religious freedom is on a long list of other rights, including the 'right' to a State-funded vacation? In fact, religious freedom is fundamental for the other rights to exist."
Indeed, Father Richard John Neuhaus, a Roman Catholic priest who is also editor-in-chief of First Things magazine, posits that the much-vaunted Charter is actually a product of the country's religious heritage. "Canada is and has been a Judeo-Christian society," he says. "Just look at the structure of our laws. Could we really say that a charter of rights could have come from any other kind of society?"
He also believes that, when secularists say they support separation of Church and State, they are actually arguing for "separation of people from politics." Nevertheless, he insists it is not the role of the Church to govern the nation. "The Church imposes nothing; it only proposes, and proposes vigorously," he says. Likewise, "It is not necessary for the State to say, 'Jesus Christ is Lord.' The role of the limited State is to respect the sovereignty of the individual, who are each, in turn, under the judgment of God."
How can this be achieved? The priest says North America needs "a desecularization of education from grade school to graduate school. If you follow the story line of world history, you see rapid de-secularization in the rest of the world." Ultimately, "The key is not pretending that our differences make no difference. Instead, we must learn how to engage one another civilly."
[COPYRIGHT]
Copyright United Western Communications Nov 4, 2002
JOURNAL-CODE: 2031
LOAD-DATE: August 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 170 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 4
LENGTH: 699 words
HEADLINE: News in brief
BYLINE: Bloomberg, Itim, Judy Siegel, Greer Fay Cashman, Ap
BODY:
Israeli-made anti-radar weapon seen in China
Washington (Bloomberg) - US intelligence agencies have spotted an Israeli-made anti-radar weapon with Chinese military forces in southern Fujian province opposite Taiwan, The Washington Times reported yesterday, citing unidentified defense officials.
The Chinese forces were engaged in large-scale exercises there, according to the report.
The officials saw several Harpy drone weapons. The Harpy is an unmanned weapon equipped with a bomb and anti- radar sensors, the Times reported. Israel has become a major supplier of weapons and weapons technology to China in recent years.
"The Chinese were observed moving them close to the coast," one official said, the Times reported.
Teenager shot and killed in Jaffa
A 17-year-old was shot and killed as he entered his home in Jaffa Monday
close to midnight. He was shot in the back by two assailants, who apparently
fled on a motorcycle. He was rushed to the hospital where he succumbed to his
wounds. No motive for the crime has yet been identified, according to police.
Itim
Blood donation up 10% a month
Feelings of solidarity during the current Palestinian terror campaign have increased blood donations at Magen David Adom facilities by 10 percent a month during the first half of this year, according to MDA.
Blood services director Dr. Eilat Shinar said she was moved to see the volunteer spirit among people coming to give blood for the wounded and sick. This helps MDA keep adequate supplies available for use at short notice, she said. Because of many soldiers on active duty, the share of voluntary blood donations from the IDF has declined, so the increase in civilian donations is helping to feel growing needs, said Shinar.
"We thank all donors with all our hearts and ask that they continue to do so during the coming summer vacation and High Holy Days afterwards," she said.
Judy Siegel
Unrefrigerated insulin issued to Clalit patients
Clalit Health Services yesterday disclosed serious shortcomings by staffers who did not prevent unrefrigerated insulin from reaching diabetic patients three weeks ago. An internal investigation found no one was harmed, but recommended procedural changes to prevent a recurrence.
The insulin was sent by the Eli Lilly pharmaceutical company unrefrigerated, a mistake, although unrefrigerated insulin can remain potent for a month, even in Israeli summer temperatures. Various individuals at the health fund missed the error; they will be disciplined; some may be dismissed, Clalit management said yesterday.
After a recall, announced on June 13, only a handful of patients returned
insulin they had received from Clalit pharmacies.
Judy Siegel
Canadian ambassador, Sharansky honor Cotler
Canadian Ambassador Michael Bell and Construction and Housing Minister Natan Sharansky Monday night paid tribute to international human rights activist Irwin Cotler, Sharansky's first lawyer when he was imprisoned by the Soviet authorities. Bell and Sharansky spoke at a Canada Day reception at the ambassador's residence in Savyon marking the 135th anniversary of Canadian confederation.
Sharansky said relations between Canada and Israel are so close that
Cotler's client had gone on to become a government minister, and Cotler a member
of the Canadian Parliament. Bell, who has been posted to Israel three times,
spoke of Canada's concern for Israel's security, and of Canada's efforts to stop the violence.
Greer Fay Cashman
Women in Black wins Italian peace prize
ROME (AP) - Luisa Morgantini was awarded an annual Italian peace prize Monday for her involvement in the Italian left-wing group Donne in Nero (Women in Black), along with Palestinian Suhad Amery and Terry Greenblatt, the director of Bat Shalom, an Israeli feminist organization.
The Golden Dove of Peace Prizes are awarded at a ceremony Wednesday by Archivo Disarmo (Disarmament Archive), the Rome-based research center said in a statement. The group has sponsored the award since 1986.
Italian journalist Ugo Tramballi of the Il Sole 24 Ore newspaper will also receive an award, for his reports from the Middle East.
LOAD-DATE: July 3, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 171 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Ja 29'03
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5533078
LENGTH: 638 words
HEADLINE: Chretien government maintains wait-and-see policy amid debate over Iraq
BYLINE: Ward, John
BODY:
OTTAWA (CP) Prime Minister Jean Chretien wasn't giving many clues
Wednesday as to whether he thinks Saddam Hussein is flouting the will of
the United Nations.
Chretien continued to say that he wants more time for UN arms inspectors to do their work in ferreting out Saddam's weaponry.
He said he wants to hear what Colin Powell, the U.S. secretary of state, has to say to the UN Security Council next week and what Hans Blix, the chief arms inspector, says in his next report to the council next month.
''Mr. Powell will be in front of the Security Council and he will table evidence,'' Chretien said in the Commons.
''We are waiting to see what is that proof.''
MPs from all parties debated the issue in the Commons late Wednesday but it was a rhetorical exercise, without a vote and unlikely to influence the government one way or another.
It came just 24 hours after U.S. President George W. Bush delivered a tough state of the union address taking clear aim at Iraq.
Use of force ''is a very last resort . . . Canada must continue to seek a peaceful resolution,'' Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham said as he opened the evening debate.
''This is not the time to abandon the UN process,'' said Graham, adding he will take that message to Powell when the two meet Thursday in Washington.
Earlier, Opposition Alliance Leader Stephen Harper pressed Chretien to say whether or not Saddam has breached the terms of resolution 1441, the key UN disarmament document.
But Chretien didn't answer directly.
''We have to follow the process of the Security Council and the UN,'' the prime minister said.
And that process is working, Chretien added.
''This is the system that we advocated last summer and we're following that to the letter.''
Asked if he wants a unanimous Security Council vote for war before committing Canada to action, Chretien equivocated:
''We're waiting to see what the Security Council will conclude. You don't take a hypothetical stand, you wait for the process. . .we will see what the Security Council has to say and we will act freely as a nation.''
Harper said he thinks Canada won't be properly prepared due to Chretien's dithering but will eventually join its allies if a war with Iraq occurs.
''It will join not as a leader, but unnoticed at the back of the parade,'' said Harper.
Conservative Leader Joe Clark, a former foreign affairs minister, agreed that indecision has cost Canada any influence it might have had with the United States.
''We have become, under this government, the invisible country,'' he said.
The government, said Clark, is hoping it can avoid making a tough decision.
''I think they're scrambling and hoping for somebody else to help them.''
Even Liberal MPs seemed confused as they emerged from a caucus meeting earlier Wednesday.
Carolyn Parrish left the meeting saying she was completely assured Canada would not participate in an Iraq invasion without UN approval.
''I'm very relaxed,'' said Parrish.
Montreal MP Irwin Cotler at first refused comment on what took place in caucus, but then conceded that Chretien ''has to consider matters as a prime minister.''
The prime minister ''did not exclude other options, let me put it that way,'' Cotler said.
''I think the jury's still out,'' said Dan McTeague, a Toronto-area MP.
Although the United States and Britain are sending troops to the Gulf region in preparation for a possible attack, it's not right for Canada to do so, Graham said.
''It's not, at this time, appropriate to send troops,'' he said.
Graham said Canada hasn't been asked to send troops but added it cannot be ruled out either.
''Not until we know exactly where the Security Council stands on this issue will we be making such a decision.''
JOURNAL-CODE: 1418
LOAD-DATE: February 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 174 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: NEWS; Pg. A12
LENGTH: 589 words
HEADLINE: CHRETEIN CONTINUES TO WAIT AND SEE OVER IRAQ
BYLINE: BY CP
DATELINE: OTTAWA
BODY:
Prime Minister Jean Chretien wasn't giving many clues Wednesday as to whether he thinks Saddam Hussein is flouting the will of the United Nations.
Chretien continued to say that he wants more time for UN arms inspectors to do their work in ferreting out Saddam's weaponry.
He said he wants to hear what Colin Powell, the U.S. secretary of state, has to say to the UN Security Council next week and what Hans Blix, the chief arms inspector, says in his next report to the council next month.
''Mr. Powell will be in front of the Security Council and he will table evidence,'' Chretien said in the Commons.
''We are waiting to see what is that proof.'' MPs from all parties debated the issue in the Commons late Wednesday but it was a rhetorical exercise, without a vote and unlikely to influence the government one way or another.
It came just 24 hours after U.S. President George W. Bush delivered a tough state of the union address taking clear aim at Iraq.
Use of force ''is a very last resort . . . Canada must continue to seek a peaceful resolution,'' Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham said as he opened the evening debate.
''This is not the time to abandon the UN process,'' said Graham, adding he will take that message to Powell when the two meet Thursday in Washington.
Earlier, Opposition Alliance Leader Stephen Harper pressed Chretien to say whether or not Saddam has breached the terms of resolution 1441, the key UN disarmament document.
But Chretien didn't answer directly.
''We have to follow the process of the Security Council and the UN,'' the prime minister said.
And that process is working, Chretien added.
''This is the system that we advocated last summer and we're following that to the letter.''
Asked if he wants a unanimous Security Council vote for war before committing Canada to action, Chretien equivocated:
''We're waiting to see what the Security Council will conclude. You don't take a hypothetical stand, you wait for the process. . .we will see what the Security Council has to say and we will act freely as a nation.''
Harper said he thinks Canada won't be properly prepared due to Chretien's dithering -- but will eventually join its allies if a war with Iraq occurs.
''It will join not as a leader, but unnoticed at the back of the parade,'' said Harper.
Conservative Leader Joe Clark, a former foreign affairs minister, agreed that indecision has cost Canada any influence it might have had with the United States.
''We have become, under this government, the invisible country,'' he said. The government, said Clark, is hoping it can avoid making a tough decision.
''I think they're scrambling and hoping for somebody else to help them.''
Even Liberal MPs seemed confused as they emerged from a caucus meeting earlier Wednesday.
Carolyn Parrish left the meeting saying she was completely assured Canada would not participate in an Iraq invasion without UN approval.
''I'm very relaxed,'' said Parrish. Montreal MP Irwin Cotler at first refused comment on what took place in caucus, but then conceded that Chretien ''has to consider matters as a prime minister.''
The prime minister ''did not exclude other options, let me put it that way,'' Cotler said.
''I think the jury's still out,'' said Dan McTeague, a Toronto-area MP.
Although the United States and Britain are sending troops to the Gulf region in preparation for a possible attack, it's not right for Canada to do so, Graham said.
''It's not, at this time, appropriate to send troops,'' he said.
GRAPHIC: photo of Jean Chretien
LOAD-DATE: March 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 176 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: EDITORIAL/OPINION; Pg. 15
LENGTH: 526 words
HEADLINE: LOVE-IN WITH HATEMONGER;
CHRETIEN WARMLY RECEIVED BY MUSLIM JEW-BAITER
BYLINE: BY EZRA LEVANT
BODY:
Malaysia's Prime Minister told an international gathering of Islamic leaders
that: "Jews rule the world by proxy. There are not many Jews in the world. But
they are so arrogant that they defy the whole world," said Mahathir Mohamad.
Thunderous applause, naturally, from the Syrias and Irans. But what of democracies? What about those nations that failed to take seriously identical Jew-baiting in Germany 70 years ago?
U.S. President George W. Bush didn't miss a beat. When he met Mahathir in Thailand at the APEC conference, he told him to his face that his speech "stands squarely against what I believe in."
Condoleezza Rice, Bush's National Security Advisor, said the remarks "were hateful, they are outrageous."
For Mahathir, though, that reaction only "shows that they [Jews] do control the world."
Mahathir has called Jews "hook-nosed monsters" who "plot" Malaysia's economic troubles.
It took courage for Bush to condemn Mahathir, and to do so publicly -- Bush is scrambling to build an international coalition, and criticizing a Muslim leader won't make that job any easier.
And Jean Chretien? He warmly greeted Mahathir, shaking his hand like an old friend.
Pressed by the Canadian media, Chretien claimed he told Mahathir that his speech was not "well received" in Canada. Chretien expressed no judgment of his own about the speech; he did not condemn it; he simply pointed out that others didn't like it -- and we all know who "they" are.
But the next day, Chretien pulled together his diplomatic fury. He took a stand and issued a formal "demand" -- that Israel stop construction of a security fence used to keep out Islamic terrorists from the West Bank.
Chretien ordered his UN ambassador to join with Mahathir's UN ambassador -- and Syria's and Iran's -- to vote for an "emergency" resolution calling Israel's security fence "illegal" and "condemning" the Jewish state for protecting itself.
Here in Canada, the Liberals love the Jewish vote and they love Jewish political donors even more. They love to call themselves tolerant, the official champions of human rights and multiculturalism. They love to call their political opponents anti-Semites and even Holocaust deniers.
But when a real anti-Semite delivers a speech that could have been written by Goebbels, when a real Holocaust-denier denounces Jews in the most barbaric language -- Mahathir actually called for a "Final Victory" over the Jews, mimicking Hitler's "Final Solution" -- Canada's ultimate Liberal seeks only to ingratiate himself with that bigot.
Chretien -- ever insulting to our allies, ever obsequious to our enemies -- shakes the hand of an anti-Semitic sewer pipe spouting conspiracy theories.
The response by Canada's next prime minister was no better. And the unexpected early retirement of the Liberals' only vocal Zionist, Montreal MP Irwin Cotler, strongly hints that Paul Martin's Middle East views are no better than Chretien's.
The only solace here is that the Liberals' foreign obscenities are as irrelevant as their domestic blunderings have become. Their decade of military neglect and diplomatic incoherence has seen to that.
LOAD-DATE: October 27, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 177 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(42) O 23'03 pg 38; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5877263
LENGTH: 647 words
HEADLINE: Parliamentarians concerned about missing Israelis (Record in progress)
BODY:
OTTAWA -- Eight members of Parliament and three senators have written
Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham to express their ''deep concern''
over the fate of Israelis missing in Lebanon.
The Oct. 6 letter says the parliamentarians ''unequivocally condemn the terrorist campaign of the Hezbollah organization based in southern Lebanon against Israel, including the kidnapping of Israeli citizens. We are alarmed that the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has been denied access to the missing Israeli citizens by Syria, Lebanon and the Hezbollah, despite continuous requests.''
The Israelis in questions are:
- Elchanan Tannenbaum (an Israeli businessman kidnapped by Hezbollah Oct. 16, 2000 in Brussels, Belgium and believed held in Lebanon).
- Sgt. Adi Avitan (abducted by Hezbollah Oct. 7, 2000 in Israel and believed held in southern Lebanon).
- Staff-Sgt. Benny Avraham (abducted by Hezbollah Oct. 7, 2000 in Israel and believed held in southern Lebanon).
- Staff-Sgt. Omar Souad (abducted by Hezbollah Oct. 7, 2000 in Israel and believed held in southern Lebanon).
- Capt. Ron Arad (captured by the Shiite group Amal Oct. 16, 1986, and traded to the Hezbollah in southern Lebanon; afterwards he was reportedly sold to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard).
- Sgt. Tzvi Feldman (taken Prisoner of War in the June 11, 1982 battle of Sultan Ya'qub in the Beq'a Valley in eastern Lebanon).
- Corporal Yehudah Katz (taken Prisoner of War in the June 11, 1982 battle of Sultan Ya'qub in the Beq'a Valley in eastern Lebanon).
- and Sgt. Zachary Baumel (taken Prisoner of War in the June 11, 1982 battle of Sultan Ya'qub in the Beq'a Valley in eastern Lebanon).
The MPs and senators say they are ''mindful of the responsibility that the occupying Syrian military forces bear for the fate and well-being of individuals held or/and lost within the Syrian area of influence in Lebanon.
''We are aware of the proxy role that the terrorist group Hezbollah plays for Syria, which has trained, funded and supported this organization on Syrian and Lebanese soil since the organization's inception and which holds many pressure points over Hezbollah's ability to conduct terrorist activities and operate.
''We join the Canadian government in welcoming the unilateral, May 23, 2000 with-drawal of Israeli military forces from southern Lebanon in accordance with the requirements of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 425 (1978). But we are cognizant that Syria is aware of the fate of the missing Israeli citizens and holds the power to their release (if alive) and to the return of their remains (if deceased) to their grieving families.''
The MPs and senators call on Graham and the government of Canada ''to forcefully raise the fate of the missing Israeli citizens with the Syrian and the Lebanese governments at every opportunity and insist on their release, as well as the return of their remains to Israel.
''We encourage the government of Canada to strongly urge countries capable of influencing Syria to put pressure on Damascus to release all information as to the whereabouts of the surviving Israeli captives and return the remains of those who have died to their families.
''Additionally, we request that the government of Canada encourage the German mediation efforts between the Hezbollah and Israel on the question of missing Israeli citizens. Finally, we suggest to the Canadian government to offer to facilitate the return of missing Israeli citizens as an important, goodwill gesture of peaceful intentions on the part of the Syrian government.''
The letter is signed by the following MPs: Carolyn Bennett, Irwin Cotler, Art Eggleton, Marlene Jennings, Anita Neville, Jim Peterson, Joe Volpe and Raymonde Folco, and the following senators: Leo Kolber, Richard Kroft and Jerry Grafstein.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: December 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 179 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: DOMESTIC NEWS
DISTRIBUTION: Attention News Editors
LENGTH: 1183 words
HEADLINE: The Privacy Commissioner of Canada, George Radwanski, today released the following statement regarding the Public Safety Act, Bill C-17
DATELINE: OTTAWA, Nov. 1
BODY:
The Privacy Commissioner of Canada, George
Radwanski, today released the following statement regarding the Public Safety
Act, Bill C-17:
Since last May, I have expressed extremely grave concerns about one provision of what was then Bill C-55, the federal Government's Public Safety Act. This same provision has now been reintroduced, with only minimal and unsatisfactory change, in the replacement legislation, Bill C-17.
The provision in question, section 4.82 of both bills, would give the RCMP and CSIS unrestricted access to the personal information held by airlines about all Canadian air travellers on domestic as well as international flights.
I have raised no objection to the primary purpose of this provision, which is to enable the RCMP and CSIS to use this passenger information for anti-terrorist "transportation security" and "national security" screening. But my concern is that the RCMP would also be expressly empowered to use this information to seek out persons wanted on warrants for Criminal Code offences that have nothing to do with terrorism, transportation security or national security.
The implications of this are extraordinarily far-reaching.
In Canada, it is well established that we are not required to identify ourselves to police unless we are being arrested or we are carrying out a licensed activity such as driving. The right to anonymity with regard to the state is a crucial privacy right. Since we are required to identify ourselves to airlines as a condition of air travel and since section 4.82 would give the RCMP unrestricted access to the passenger information obtained by airlines, this would set the extraordinarily privacy-invasive precedent of effectively requiring compulsory self-identification to the police.
I am prepared, with some reluctance, to accept this as an exceptional measure that can be justified, in the wake of September 11, for the limited and specific purposes of aviation security and national security against terrorism. But I can find no reason why the use of this de facto self- identification to the police should be extended to searching for individuals who are of interest to the state because they are the subject of warrants for Criminal Code offences unrelated to terrorism. That has the same effect as requiring us to notify the police every time we travel, so that they can check whether we are wanted for something.
If the police were able to carry out their regular Criminal Code law enforcement duties without this new power before September 11, they should likewise be able to do so now. The events of September 11 were a great tragedy and a great crime; they should not be manipulated into becoming an opportunity - an opportunity to expand privacy-invasive police powers for purposes that have nothing to do with anti-terrorism.
If we accept the principle that air travellers within Canada can in effect be forced by law to identify themselves to police for scrutiny against lists of wanted suspects, then there is nothing to prevent the same logic from being applied in future to other modes of transportation. Particularly since this provision might well discourage wanted individuals from travelling by air, why not extend the same scrutiny to train travellers, bus passengers or anyone renting a car? Indeed, the precedent set by this provision could ultimately open the door to practices similar to those that exist in societies where police routinely board trains, establish roadblocks or stop people on the street to check identification papers in search of anyone of interest to the state.
The place to draw the line in protecting the fundamental human right of privacy is at the very outset, at the first unjustifiable intrusion. In this instance, that means amending the bill to remove all reference to warrants and thus limit the police to matching passenger information against anti-terrorism and national security databases.
The concerns that I have raised in this matter since last spring have been publicly endorsed by the Information and Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia and the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario; by members of every party in the House of Commons, notably including a member of the government's own Liberal caucus who is an internationally recognized expert on human rights, Irwin Cotler; and by editorials in newspapers including the Toronto Star, the Globe and Mail, the Vancouver Sun, the Vancouver Province, the Calgary Herald and the Edmonton Journal.
These concerns have now been ignored by the Government.
The changes that have been made in this provision in the new bill do nothing to address the fundamental issues of principle that are at stake.
The Government now proposes to have regulations limiting the Criminal Code offence warrants for which the RCMP will be searching. But this does nothing to address the fundamental point of principle that the police have no business using this extraordinary access to personal information to search for people wanted on warrants for any offences unrelated to terrorism.
As well, in the new bill the Government has removed the "identification of persons for whom a warrant has been issued" as a "purpose" for accessing passenger information under the legislation. But this is meaningless - indeed disingenuous - since the RCMP would remain empowered to match this information against a database of persons wanted on warrants and to use such matches to bring about arrests. It insults the intelligence of Canadians to suggest, as the Government does in its press release accompanying the bill, that the RCMP may "incidentally" come upon individuals wanted on Criminal Code warrants - if the police are to match names of passengers against a database of individuals wanted on Criminal Code warrants, there can be nothing "incidental" about finding them.
Since the original Bill C-55 was introduced, I have used every means at my disposal to make the crucially important privacy issues that are at stake known and understood by all the Ministers and top Government officials who are involved in this matter. I regret that I have not, to date, been successful in obtaining an appropriate response from them, though I will certainly continue my efforts. It is now up to Parliament to explain to these people that privacy is a fundamental human right of Canadians that must be respected, rather than treated with the apparent indifference that the Government is showing.
VIEW ADDITIONAL COMPANY-SPECIFIC INFORMATION:
http://www.newswire.ca/cgi-bin/inquiry.cgi?OKEY=37018
CONTACT: Anne-Marie Hayden, Media Relations, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, Tel: (613) 995-0103, ahayden(at)privcom.gc.ca, www.privcom.gc.ca
LOAD-DATE: November 2, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 181 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(41) O 17'02 pg 20-21; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5486907
LENGTH: 1065 words
HEADLINE: Advocacy group marks its 30th anniversary
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
In the ultra-competitive world of Jewish organizational advocacy, Bert
Raphael runs a small shop.
While many are familiar with Canadian Jewish Congress and B'nai Brith Canada - the heavy hitters in the field - fewer have heard of the Jewish Civil Rights Educational Foundation of Canada or its sister organization, Canadian Lawyers & Jurists for World Jewry (CLJWJ), of which Raphael serves as president and chair, respectively.
Headquartered in Raphael's downtown law office, CLJWJ is marking its 30th anniversary this year. At its inception in 1972, it was called Canadian Lawyers & Jurists for Soviet Jewry, reflecting its primary focus at the time. The Educational Foundation was created seven years later as the organization's charitable arm.
While the CLJWJ's mandate has shifted in the intervening years from advocacy for Soviet Jews to the broader constituency of ''world Jewry,'' it retains its educational function and it provides what assistance it can - largely on the strength of its reputation - to Jews experiencing discrimination, Raphael said.
Most of the organization's efforts are focused on letter-writing to various media outlets and arranging for high profile speakers to address a sophisticated audience of business leaders and professionals, most often during lunches in office boardrooms.
It's a modest profile but one that has seen Raphael tackle some of the most vexing issues besetting the Jewish community and one which promises further years of new challenges for Raphael and his small group of partners in the two organizations.
As a keen observer of the political scene, Raphael was quick off the mark recently with letters to the Star and the Globe and Mail to voice concerns over the ''Concordia issue,'' which saw Arab protesters prevent former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from speaking at the Montreal university.
A human rights advocate for years, Raphael bristles at the strong-arm tactics employed by the anti-Israel protesters, which included smashing a plate glass window and assaulting elderly Jews trying to enter the lecture hall.
''If it was foreign students who did that, they should be out,'' he said. ''If they're Canadian students, I see them being a real dangerous threat to becoming terrorist cells... If they can attack a rabbi and his wife, they're dangerous people.''
Raphael believes Canadian politicians must take a stand in ensuring Canadians can enjoy their constitutional right to free expression.
Much of his energy is now directed at ''the Israel issue,'' which he said ''won't go away.''
A litigator with specialities in insurance and medical malpractice claims, Raphael said he has written to organizations that represent Arab lawyers and jurists in Ramallah, attempting to establish cordial relations and ''get a better understanding of the two nations, living side by side.''
He has also e-mailed an Islamic Centre in Toronto, hoping to find a domestic Arab lawyer's group similar to his own. Raphael said he was disappointed in not receiving replies to either inquiry.
Arranging for speakers is a main function of the Educational Foundation, and the list of those who have addressed the group is impressive.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
In the early years, Emmett Hall spoke about his experiences in the Soviet Union, as did Willard Estey, both of whom went on to serve on the Supreme Court of Canada. Beverley McLaughlin, now Chief Justice of the SCC, discussed a more recent visit to Israel and her encounters with that country's legal establishment. Other prominent jurists to speak were Justices Alvin Rosenberg, Ted Matlow and Roy McMurtry, now chief justice of Ontario. Former Attorney General Ian Scott and law professor and MP Irwin Cotler also addressed the group's luncheon meetings.
The list goes on: Refusenik Nathan Sharansky, American war crimes prosecutors Neal Sher and Eli Rosenbaum, the late Justice Jules Deschenes, and Israeli lawyer Avraham Tory, who described the horrors of concentration camps in Kovno, Lithuania.
Raphael asserts the speaking engagements, though tiny by community standards, are important in that the listeners include important figures in the legal and business communities. ''We want to inform people of influence,'' he said.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
The CLJWJ got its start when Raphael and Sam Filer, later to become a judge, visited the Soviet Union during Simchat Torah, 1972. They were startled when dozens of Jews surrounded them, asking for news about conditions in Canada and saying, '' 'you're from Canada. Help us leave, don't forget us.' ''
''If we needed any inspiration, that was it,'' Raphael said.
Moved by what they had seen, and not deterred by the KGB men who dogged them during their stay, they created the Soviet Jewry advocacy group on their return.
Assisted by the late Arthur Maloney and McMurtry, they recruited 700 lawyers and, judges to provide the organization with critical mass and some credibility. With the names of all 700 on the back of their stationery, their letters demanded immediate respect. Ambassadors, newspaper editors and politicians were targeted by the letter-writers as the group joined a massive effort to keep the plight of Soviet Jews at the top of the international diplomatic agenda.
As time passed and Soviet Jews were allowed to emigrate and practice their faith, the group expanded its focus to other issues.
At 68 and with a thriving legal practice, Raphael has no plans to slow down. ''I love what I do,'' he said, adding he has served as campaign chair of the JNF-Negev Dinner and as co-chair of the Reena Foundation's recent Answering the Challenge gala dinner.
Raphael has turned down offers to merge the CLJWJ with B'nai Brith, opting to maintain close control (along with several others) over the group's future.
And there are no shortage of neglected issues he feels need airing.
Jews have served as Chief Justices in five provinces - British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia - and many others sit on their province's Courts of Appeal. Yet only one, Bora Laskin, has been appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada. ''Why are there not more on the Supreme Court?'' he asks. No doubt a letter on that point will be in the mail sometime soon.
Helps Jews experiencing discrimination
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: April 16, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 183 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: COMMENT; Pg. C8Parliament Hill
LENGTH: 1099 words
HEADLINE: CABINET HITS - AND MISSES;
PAUL MARTIN'S FIRST MINISTRY ISN'T PERFECT, BUT IT'S BETTER THAN ANY OF JEAN
CHRETIEN'S
BYLINE: BY DOUGLAS FISHER, TORONTO SUN
DATELINE: OTTAWA
BODY:
Prime Minister Paul Martin has given us a ministry much altered in personnel,
and along with it comes considerable reorganization of departments and agencies.
It will take over a year to give his cabinet a fair appreciation because there
are so many initiatives to come.
Is there real improvement in the calibre of ministers? There should be. Simply because there are more able people in Martin's first ministry than in any of Jean Chretien's cabinets.
Remember this: from a third to a half of the ministry is temporary. This is considerably a makeshift cabinet. The one which will almost certainly figure in posterity's reckoning is that which Martin is expected to name in the summer or fall next year after his Liberals score a widely expected federal election victory.
For example, it's unlikely Lucienne Robillard, just posted to Industry, David Anderson, still in Environment, or Claudette Bradshaw, in Labour, will be a cabinet minister this time next year.
My appraisal of the ministry today is a quick run through most of the names in the list, starting with the really positive appointments and closing with those which make one wonder "Why, oh why?"
My first plus, Ralph Goodale at Finance, is a modest one. John Manley has been a competent, discreet and trustworthy holder of this task. So should Ralph.
A HARD PORTFOLIO
The next plus is Andy Mitchell at Indian and Northern Affairs, a devilishly hard portfolio and one due for much action, pushed by an impatient PM. Mitchell replaces Bob Nault, not a cipher in the post, but Mitchell should do better in the legislative game.
It was good to see Jim Peterson back in the ministry and given International Trade. Remember him? He's the lesser known Peterson, brother David having served two terms as Liberal premier of Ontario.
Stephen Owen from Vancouver at Public Works, so often the patronage department, should reassure those wanting honest government.
Albina Guarneri, associate minister of national defence, brings a sharp, critical mind to work in a fairly unusual harness with new Defence Minister David Pratt. At long last there's some hope for good change in our military fortunes.
Stan Keyes, responsible for National Revenue and for Sport, could be an inspired choice, given his high gall quotient and positive personality.
Bob Speller, at Agriculture, has some similarities in patience and modesty with the man he replaces, Lyle VanClief, and he knows his field well.
Reg Alcock of Winnipeg, at Treasury Board, is one of the two most significant plus factors in this cabinet. He should be a buzzsaw (as should Joe Volpe, minister for Human Resources and Skills Development). Both have drive, ideas, and common touches; indeed much more so than the two ministers most in the media are hailing as the big appointments in this cabinet (i.e., Goodale and Anne McLellan).
Geoff Regan from Halifax is able, patient, not too partisan, and a quick study who already knows much about his task at Fisheries and Oceans.
WATCH VALERI
Tony Valeri, from the rim of Hamilton, cannot possibly be more ineffective than David Collenette has been at Transport, and he rates close to Alcock and Volpe in strength of personality. Watch him.
David Pratt at defence, it is worth repeating, is an inspired appointment. At last someone in the role who knows the army, the navy and the air force.
Irwin Cotler from Quebec is an inspired choice as Justice minister. He's one of those rare, ultra-educated, articulate lawyers who has a modest personality and a clear desire to serve, not be served.
Judy Sgro takes up a big chore in Citizenship and Immigration, a hot potato, and I think she's more than up to it - maybe a bit too daring in the open but she seems to be a tell-it-like-it-is politician.
Helene Chalifour Scherrer from Quebec City has a chance to become the best known woman politician in Canada as Heritage minister. She has pizzazz, charm and a remarkable self-confidence.
Liza Frula from Verdun, Que. should handle well what's left of Human Resources after its "reorg." Like Scherrer, she has charm and confidence galore.
Mauril Belanger of Ottawa is deputy House leader, a significant post in the "new way" politics of Paul Martin, and he's been a splendid backbench MP.
Jacques Saada is probably the most respected Quebec MP among his Anglo colleagues in the Liberal caucus, and from what they say about him he should be a grand improvement over Don Boudria, the former House leader (who was assiduous but very undiplomatic with both his own backbench and the opposition).
Finally, on the plus side, Joe Comuzzi from Thunder Bay is a most winning personality. He represents a new Martin initiative, and that is to deal with two fronts of the U.S. government - with congressmen and senators, and not just with the executive branch. Comuzzi's role is a formal recognition there is a promising future in MPs dealing on a regular basis with their American counterparts.
Now, after these pluses just let me mention a few of the minuses of this ministry.
STUPID CHOICE
Robillard at Industry is a stupid choice, even as a stop-gap. She'll spend her months making Industry better bilingually, a theme she's pushed hard at Treasury Board.
Pierre Pettigrew at Health means some relief now that he's out of the trade portfolio. He's become almost the perfect caricature of the handsome, impeccably dressed and bilingually glib politician. But where's the weight? Where's the achievement?
It's hard to fathom why Martin continued to keep in cabinet both Denis Coderre and John McCallum. Both seem self-centred and arrogant: McCallum, one surmises, because of his economic learning; Coderre because of his successes as a tough party organizer in Quebec.
Two final knocks. In my opinion, Bill Graham has proved himself too brittle and quite ineffective at exposition and public education, a capability we really need in our foreign affairs ministers. He's still a professor, not a professional politician.
And as one who early appreciated that Anne McLellan was clever and ambitious enough to do well as a minister, I can see those aspects are still there, but she is not a good communicator. She's too impatient and snippy, and showed little in dispatch at getting things done in her runs at Health and at Justice.
If she and Goodale are to be the "powerhouses" or Martin's left and right hands for the long run, I'll be surprised. Being able doesn't mean, particularly in politics, that you have to be cold. They are. Watch for Alcock and Volpe, and maybe Pratt, to move on up the cabinet ladder.
LOAD-DATE: December 14, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 184 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(50) D 19'02 pg 9; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5535225
LENGTH: 1686 words
HEADLINE: What's the score? Assessing the efficacy of Jewish parliamentarians and other friends of Israel
BYLINE: Fogel, Shimon
BODY:
The Canadian Jewish News recently approached me with a request to provide a
year-end scorecard on the performance by Jewish parliamentarians on
Israel-related activities. One would think the task fairly easy for
someone who earns his living interacting with the Canadian political
sector on these issues. But it represents a far more difficult challenge
than might be imagined at first blush.
First, one has to ask, ''Why Jewish parliamentarians?'' Is it reasonable for the Jewish community to have special expectations of Jewish MPs and senators regarding support for Israel? And does that imply that non-Jewish parliamentarians have less of a responsibility to express support and friendship for Canada's only sister democracy in the Middle East? More insidious, even, is the possible implication that on its merits alone, Israel does not warrant support from the Hill and that only by virtue of their ethno-religious ties can the pro-Israel community harbour certain expectations of specific politicians. And, finally, who hasn't heard - or made - the argument that declarations of support for Israel or criticism of anti-Israel forces is far more effective when articulated by non-Jewish parliamentarians? So exactly what is being asked of Jewish politicians?
[Graph Not Transcribed]
Even after we consider these questions, there are more. On what basis can one evaluate the performance of a Canadian politician? There is not much room for personal expression in the parliamentary system. Rarely is Parliament asked to consider legislation that touches on the Middle East, so there are no votes to track. Party discipline mostly obliges caucus members to toe a party line, so there isn't much room for independent thinking there, either. Caucus meetings themselves are conducted in secrecy, so it's difficult for a politician to publicize his or her interventions concerning a specific issue. Thus, visible support for a cause is pretty much limited to statements, participation in rallies, speeches (generally in a riding) and public letters. Frankly, that's not much to go on!
Assuming these problems are also overcome, there is one last matter to resolve. Who is doing the assessment? As one who works daily on these issues, I have the benefit of some insight into the contributions made by various politicians. However, the Canada-Israel Committee (CIC) does not comment publicly on the performance of parliamentarians, Jewish or otherwise, though perhaps that ought to change. Nor have these comments been vetted by the CIC board or executive. Even the national chair has not seen a draft of this essay! I belabour this point only to caution that the following comments do not reflect the CIC's official position. If anything, they are a collection of my observations that may help the reader get a sense of the level of engagement of various politicians in the pro-Israel advocacy effort.
Having posed the questions and rendered the caveats, it's time to turn to the answers.
No Jew has ever been elected to Parliament simply because she or he is Jewish. More importantly, members of the Jewish community do not typically cast a ballot based solely on a candidate's position on the ''Jewish agenda.'' Yet, there is an expectation that when elected - or, in the case of the Senate, appointed - Jews will, or at least should, champion the issues central to the community's concerns. While one could debate whether such expectations are fair, it should be noted that this expectation extends beyond the Jewish community. Colleagues in a caucus take for granted that Jewish parliamentarians will serve as a conduit both to and fro, communicating sensitivities, views and concerns, and advocating for adoption of community positions. Indeed, Canadian political culture assumes this role for parliamentarians of all ethnic backgrounds. To be sure, it is not always a comfortable place to be, but it is a reality that cuts across all partisan lines.
Moreover, the question that is so often just beneath the surface - no, not that one - is: ''If support for Israel is not most evident among Jewish politicians, from where should that support flow?'' Friends of Israel on the Hill generally, though not always, look to their Jewish collagues for insight and direction on emerging developments and situations that require policy statements, and take their cue from their reactions, or, they look to their Jewish mates for leadership.
Well, one cannot find a stronger leader than Mount Royal Liberal MP Irwin Cotler. In the course of my 15 years interacting with the political sector, no one - Jewish or otherwise - approaches Cotler's level of passion, determination and efficacy in making the case for Israel. He does it publicly through statements inside the House and outside in any forum, Jewish or otherwise, in Canada. He spends countless hours in serious conversation with other parliamentarians about the issues of the day and more hours sharing his compelling observations with the media. He carries the message to conferences, bi- and multilateral meetings, and governmental organizations throughout the world. And, by virtue of his other accomplishments as a legal scholar and defender of human rights, Cotler brings an unparalleled credibility to the debate.
But style and talents are as unique as fingerprints. Few parliamentarians have the depth of Cotler's knowledge of the issues and others have various constraints on their ability to visibly demonstrate their support for Israel. Cabinet ministers are particularly handicapped in this regard.
I recall an incident a few years back, when I was trying to get a handle on a rookie MP. She had spent some time at Queen's Park, so I spoke with a valued friend who was working at that time for then-Ontario premier David Peterson. He shared the following story that has forever defined her in my eyes. When the news of Refusenik Natan Sharansky's imminent release broke, she was in the legislature. After my friend shared the news with her, she quietly stole off into a far corner. When he drew near to her, my friend found her sobbing - tears of joy for Sharansky, tears of despair for the other refusniks still imprisoned, tears of raw emotion that flow for one's own. Thornhill Liberal MP Elinor Caplan has never disappointed me since.
I cannot provide you with any information on what interventions Caplan has undertaken within Cabinet. I would never suggest that she ever acted inappropriately in her capacity as a minister by giving preferential treatment to Israel-related causes. I do, however, submit that Caplan is a cherished friend of the CIC and the pro-Israel community, despite having taken some tough lumps from elements within the Jewish community.
Other Jewish MPs, individuals such as Jacques Saada and Raymonde Folco from Quebec, and Anita Neville from Manitoba, have not enjoyed the same profile as Caplan or Cotler. But all three Liberals have shown strong support for Israel. They have always provided the CIC with ready access; have always been willing to carry our concerns to caucus and Cabinet; regularly support the efforts and activities of the Canada-Israel Parliamentary Association; eagerly seek to become fluent with the issues and developments related to the ongoing crisis; and, in the case of Neville and Saada, joined with the CIC on an unprecedented parliamentary solidarity mission to Israel earlier this year. (Folco could not attend since she was a parliamentary secretary at the time). In my experience, each of them has provided invaluable assistance during their parliamentary careers and more importantly, each has been comfortable and proud to be recognized as a Jew and a steadfast supporter of Israel.
Likewise, Jewish members of the Senate have made significant contributions to the pro-Israel advocacy effort. From Jack Austen in British Columbia to Mira Spivak in Manitoba and Jerry Grafstein in Ontario, all have been sources of support and advice. They have also been the source of occasional criticism, too - but only as individuals who share the community's concerns and want to see as effective and meaningful an effort as possible on Israel's behalf.
Before leaving the Senate, and since this is a bit of a personal commentary, I must confess a special regard for the two other Jewish senators. Leo Kolber can be a tough nut and his years of high finance and the rough texture of the political backrooms are evident. But his love for Israel and burning desire to see the strongest possible relationship between Canada and Israel is nothing short of inspirational. He was the first parliamentarian with whom I met after joining the CIC and he has been a ready font of advice, insight and encouragement ever since. Similarly, Richard Kroft has become a singular and sage resource since his appointment to the Senate in 1998. Truth be told, he was a generous friend in all the years prior to his appointment and the value of his wisdom and council are immeasurable.
So there you have it. My experience points to a desire on the part of all Jewish parliamentarians - past and present - to stand with Israel and in support of Israel. There is, however, one small codicil... They don't stand alone.
Within every party represented in the House of Commons and the Senate, there are to be found friends of Israel, great friends of Israel. Only limitations of space prevent me from naming them. But I suggest that the Jewish community be made aware of the wonderful efforts that have been undertaken by so many parliamentarians - not because they are Jews or because they have large Jewish constituencies, but because they believe in Israel and want to see that belief reflected in the nature and quality of the Canada-Israel relationship. They merit our support and appreciation and our challenge is to find ways to express that appreciation.
When Jews are elected, they are expected to champion issues central to the Jewish community's concerns
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: September 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 186 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(3) Ja 17'02 pg 1,26; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5292446
LENGTH: 1100 words
HEADLINE: Gray defends Israel visit: responds to Globe and Mail [International Conference of Jewish Ministers and Members of Parliament]
BYLINE: Csillag, Ron
BODY:
TORONTO--Deputy Prime Minister Herb Gray is strongly defending his
attendance at a meeting last week in Jerusalem of elected Jewish
politicians from around the world organized by an Israeli think-tank.
Gray was responding to issues raised in a Jan. 08, 2002 front-page story in the Globe and Mail that said an ''influential'' group of five Canadian Liberal MPs--including two cabinet ministers--and two Liberal senators was ''lending its support to Israel'' by attending the meeting.
[Not Transcribed]
The article also implied that the Canadians were compromised because the organizers of the conference, which the article identified as ''the Israeli government,'' had offered to pay their expenses.
In a telephone interview with The CJN that he initiated from Jerusalem, Gray said that ''attending the conference indicates support for Israel, but this is totally consistent with Canada's foreign policy, which supports Israel behind secure borders''.
Gray also rejected any inference that Canadian Jews, even politicians, should shrink from expressing support for Israel.
''People who are in public life in Canada, in our pluralistic and multicultural society, are very active and committed supporters of Canada,'' he said. ''At the same time, they're entitled, whatever their origins, to be in touch with their heritage, whether it's ethnic or religious.''
The Sixth International Conference of Jewish Ministers and Members of Parliament was sponsored by the Israeli Forum, a private, non-profit group that works to increase contacts between Israel and the Diaspora, not the Israeli government, as the Globe had reported.
Gray said the Israeli Forum ''is something like the Conference Board of Canada,'' a non-profit think-tank in Ottawa.
In a telephone interview from Tel Aviv, conference co-chair Irit Dortal said the Israeli government underwrote only 10 percent of the meeting's costs. She added that the Knesset also paid for a lunch and a dinner it hosted for participants.
The rest of the expenses were picked up by corporate donors, as they have been for the five previous conferences, Dortal said.
The five-day gathering drew 60 legislators from 23 countries and had the support of Israel's foreign ministry and the Knesset.
''My attendance at this meeting is totally consistent with Canadian foreign policy,'' Gray said. ''There's no doubt that Canada is a supporter of Israel and has been since 1948. Our prime minister, our foreign minister have said over and over again that we support an independent and free Israel behind secure and recognized borders.''
Gray noted that apart from attending the conference, he held one-on-one meetings with Israeli President Moshe Katsav, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Foreign Minister Shimon Peres. As well, following Israel, he visited Jordan for a meeting with King Abdullah and the country's foreign minister.
Asked who paid his tab, Gray said: ''Since I'm here on official business as part of the federal cabinet, I expect my expenses would be paid by the Canadian government, as is customary when a minister carries out official business abroad.''
The Globe story, headlined ''Israeli-backed event draws top Liberals,'' said ''the Israelis'' offered all participants five nights of free hotel accommodation, but added, ''it was not clear in all cases whether the Canadian MPs accepted that offer, or whether they are billing the Canadian government for other travel costs.''
The invitation to the conference, a copy of which was obtained by The CJN, states that the gathering was sponsored and organized by the Israeli Forum ''in cooperation with'' the ministry of foreign affairs, the Knesset and the Jewish Agency for Israel.
The invitation states that organizers would cover expenses, including accommodation, transport, touring and social programs.
Dortal said most participants ''paid from their own pockets.'' The only delegates to have their expenses covered by the Israeli government, she said, were those from Argentina, which is undergoing a wrenching economic crisis.
The Globe story quoted an aide to Immigration Minister Elinor Caplan as saying that the Canadian government paid all her expenses, including hotel bills.
The article also noted that the airfare of Montreal MP Irwin Cotler was paid by the organizers of an academic meeting to which he spoke on the same trip.
An aide to rookie Winnipeg MP Anita Neville told The CJN that Neville attended only three days of the conference, and then left to accompany Caplan on her official trip to Egypt.
The other Canadians attending the conference were Quebec MP Raymonde Folco and senators Sheila Finestone and Jerry Grafstein.
Jacques Saada, the only Jewish Liberal MP who did not attend the conference, called the Globe article ''ludicrous.''
''Taking sides...what does that mean? Are we [MPs] free to agree or disagree?'' Saada, a Quebec MP, said many countries host meetings for parliamentarians from the around the world, some all-expenses paid, ''but that doesn't mean we endorse or don't endorse their policies.''
In an editorial the next day (Jan. 9) on Israel's seizure of an arms-laden ship allegedly bound for the Palestinians and the importance of world public opinion in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Globe stated that ''Jewish politicians from the around the world are currently being feted by the Israeli government.''
Contacted by The CJN, the Globe's foreign editor, John Stackhouse, said there would be a ''small'' clarification printed. The issues raised in the article were ''a little more complicated than I had imagined,'' Stackhouse conceded.
The clarification appeared this past Monday.
It said the Jan. 8 article ''should have read that a conference of Jewish politicians, including five Canadian MPs, held in Jerusalem this week (sic) was organized only in part by the Canadian government.''
Joseph Wilder, national chair of the Canada-Israel Committee, said he can understand the newspaper reporting on the conference, ''but this is not front-page news. The whole thing leaves a bad taste. It's unbecoming of the Globe.''
Gray noted that he attended the same conference in 1996. He said he regards this visit as a ''useful followup'' to the two trips to Israel made last year by Foreign Affairs Minister John Manley.
While in Israel, Gray also held talks with Sari Nusseibeh, the head of Al-Quds University, and who was appointed last year by Palestinian Authority president Yasser Arafat as the PA's top politician in Jerusalem.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: July 26, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 187 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(43) O 31'02 pg 7; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5500793
LENGTH: 822 words
HEADLINE: Former premier warns against rise of anti-Semitism
BYLINE: Lungen, Paul
BODY:
With the collapse of Nazi Germany in 1945, civilized people believed the
most vicious expressions of anti-Semitism were discredited for all time.
But today, said former Ontario premier Bob Rae, you can find numerous manifestations of anti-Jewish stereotyping in the mainstream media.
[Graphs Not Transcribed]
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has been depicted in a London newspaper with a big hooked nose; in an Italian publication, a cartoon showed the baby Jesus facing Israeli tanks, while in the Arab world the television media present a barrage of images of Jews as inhuman, unfeeling tyrants.
It is unclear whether today's manifestations of anti-Semitism mark a return to the 1930s, but, said Rae, ''we face a particular spectre and challenge that we must face up to and take seriously and ask our government to take seriously.''
Rae recently delivered a stirring address about the dangers of contemporary anti-Semitism at a public lecture attended by an audience of 550 at the University of Toronto. The event was sponsored by Canadians Against Anti-Semitism. Prof. Ed Morgan served as moderator.
Rae, the former Ontario New Democratic Party (NDP) leader, was the keynote speaker discussing the riot at Concordia University on Sept. 9 at which anti-Israel protesters prevented former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from speaking.
''I wanted to be here tonight because... I've been deeply troubled by the way in which the tragic conflict in the Middle East has... given rise to what we can feel and sense is a dramatic increase in anti-Semitism in Canada and the world,'' Rae said.
Rae acknowledged the right to advance criticism of Israeli policies and leaders. But, he continued, ''that's not what's happening.''
Instead, he said, many opponents of Israel are taking the position ''that Israel does not have a right to exist as a member of the world order and that Jews do not have the right to their own state. Don't tell me that isn't anti-Semitism, because I can think of no greater threat to the life of the Jewish people.''
Earlier this year, Rae came down harshly on NDP foreign affairs critic Svend Robinson when he attempted to walk past an Israeli cordon and visit Yasser Arafat in his besieged compound in Ramallah.
At the U of T last week, Rae also was critical of the CBC for reporting on the so-called ''Jenin massacre'' and for not admitting it had been duped about the story. ''Don't jump on every bandwagon every time there's a headline that an atrocity has been committed,'' he said. Rae was followed onstage by McGill student Yoni Petel, who was a member of the Hillel organizing committee that invited Netanyahu to speak at Concordia.
The riot, he said, grew out of a pre-existing climate of intimidation on campus. ''What happened on Sept. 9 has to be seen in that context,'' he said.
Chants of ''kill the Jews'' can be heard at anti-Israel protests, while posters critical of Israel are found around Concordia. Information tables (which are now banned at Concordia) have carried ''disinformation'' claiming Palestinians were subject to genocide and that Israel is an apartheid state, he said.
In another address, Globe and Mail columnist Margaret Wente asked, ''Why is it that without anyone paying attention, Israel-bashing has become so popular, especially among our academic elites?''
Though tolerance and diversity are valued on campus, ''the only hate speech on campus that is tolerated is hate speech about Israel and America, and they are linked.''
Wente attributed the anti-Israel ''vitriol'' to ''the way the left has constructed its view on the world and its need for villains.''
The left, she continued, ignores oppression by non-whites and paints privileged white people as the only oppressors. Israel, full of muscular, privileged white people who are friends of the United States, now has replaced South Africa as its chief villain while the Palestinians now stand-in for blacks.
Montreal MP Irwin Cotler, a professor of law, outlined his perspective on ''a global, violent and lethal anti-Semitism.''
Cotler, who surveyed various manifestations of anti-Semitism around the world, argued that traditional anti-Semitism - the denial of the right of Jews to live openly in society - is in decline. But it has been replaced by a new anti-Semitism. It denies ''the rights of the Jewish people to live as equal members in the family of nations.'
The new anti-Semitism also contains a genocidal element, little reported in the media, in which Hamas and other Islamic extremists call for the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews.
Nevertheless, he said, ''2002 is not 1942.'' A Jewish state exists today and Jews have moral and intellectual resources at their disposal. Furthermore, he added, ''there are non-Jews who are prepared to stand by and be counted.''
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: April 16, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 189 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.33(26) Je 26'03 pg 29; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5643850
LENGTH: 841 words
HEADLINE: International anti-Semitism conference a milestone
BYLINE: Gruber, Ruth E
BODY:
VIENNA -- There was no escaping the irony. Sixty-five years ago, Adolf
Hitler stood on a balcony in Vienna's Heldenplatz and triumphantly
addressed hundreds of thousands of cheering Austrians after Nazi Germany
annexed Austria into the Third Reich.
Last week, within earshot of that balcony, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe held the first-ever international governmental conference exclusively about anti-Semitism.
The two-day meeting brought together nearly 400 delegates from the 55 member states of the OSCE, an international body founded in 1995 that grew out of the Cold War era's ''Helsinki process'' of human rights monitoring and conflict resolution.
The forum produced no concrete actions or resolutions. But the very fact it took place and recognized anti-Semitism as a unique form of prejudice that needs to be addressed on its own in an international context made it historic.
''We are making a statement that the time of denial is over,'' Hebrew University professor Robert Wistrich said.
Even more important, delegates said, was the prospect the issue would be addressed on an ongoing basis, thanks in part to an offer by Germany to hold a followup session next year in Berlin.
Former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, who headed a large U.S. delegation that included Jewish leaders and members of Congress, said he was ''delighted and heartened'' by Germany's invitation.
''It would be a shame to take a historic conference like this and to turn it into a one-off event,'' he said. ''And what could be more historic than organizing a first meeting in Austria and following it up in Berlin?''
The conference stemmed from a decision by the OSCE foreign ministers' meeting last year and will be followed by another meeting this fall on discrimination, racism and xenophobia.
The United States pushed for the meeting - at times in the face of reluctance by some European states, who insisted anti-Semitism should be addressed along with more general human rights and discrimination issues.
This remains the European Union's position. Its delegate repeated that ''the EU stresses the importance of addressing racism, xenophobia, discrimination and anti-Semitism under a common, unified approach, using the experience and initiatives on the various issues to support action across the board.''
The conference format left little room for debate on issues that were emotional and at times highly politicized.
Members of government delegations and non-governmental organizations gave brief statements on specific areas of concern: legal and institutional mechanisms to combat anti-Semitism; and the role of governments, civil society, the media and education.
History loomed large as speaker after speaker referred to the ghost of Hitler and the legacy of the Holocaust. Several Jewish delegates referred to how their own families were persecuted.
But present dangers - and future uncertainties - loomed even larger.
In effect, the conference became a forum to describe pernicious new mutations of what Giuliani termed ''the Western world's oldest and most persistent species of hatred.''
This included what many described as a new form of anti-Semitism that, while drawing on traditional anti-Jewish stereotypes, has increasingly shifted the target of hatred to Israel as the collective embodiment of the Jewish people.
This was linked partly to fallout from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and partly to an increasing identification of Jews and Israel with the United States in a confluence of anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism and anti-Americanism.
Speakers described a spike in violence against Jews and Jewish institutions in some countries since the start of the latest Palestinian intifadah, many of them attacks carried out by disaffected Muslim youth.
They also described a wave of hate mail and anti-Semitic Web sites, and a demonization of Israel in the media and the political arena.
This, speakers said, was accompanied by an erosion of post-Holocaust taboos that allows criticism, even legitimate, of Israel's actions against the Palestinian intifadah to legitimize traditional anti-Semitic expression.
Canadian MP and human rights lawyer Irwin Cotler described an ''old-new escalating global and even lethal anti-Semitism carried on the new superhighway of the Internet.''
The world has ''seen the emergence of Israel as the collective Jew among nations,'' he said. ''Traditional anti-Semitism rejects the right of Jews to exist in the Diaspora. The new anti-Semitism rejects the right of Israel and the Jewish people to live in the family of nations.''
Part of this, he said, was an ideological anti-Semitism ''that masks itself under the banner of anti-racism. In this form, Israel becomes 'racist' and Zionism is 'racism,' and Israel emerges as the enemy of all that is good and the embodiment of all that is evil.''
Using this reasoning, he said, ''the dismantling of Israel becomes held out as a moral imperative.''
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: November 12, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 190 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (679) Mr 24'03; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5580736
LENGTH: 897 words
HEADLINE: Iraq war dominates agenda on the Hill (Record in progress)
BYLINE: Francoli, Paco
BODY:
OTTAWA -With Parliament Hill gripped by the events in Iraq, backbench MPs
from both the government and opposition benches expressed concerns over
the way the war has overshadowed all other Parliamentary business.
Opposition MPs are especially fretful the war in Iraq would create an
environment where the government can act unchecked.
Last week, debate on the war dominated business in both Chambers, and party leaders staged a number of media events to voice their positions on the matter - some of which delayed House business. On Thursday, the House started 30 minutes late to allow the leaders to speak out in the foyer outside the Commons.
Some committee business has also been affected with MPs opting to adjourn early, for example, last Thursday when MPs returned to the Chamber to debate last Thursday's Bloc opposition day motion that the government should not participate in the military intervention initiated by the United States in Iraq.
The vote won handily by a 153-50 margin with Alliance and Tory MPs voting against it.
The situation means MPs such as the Alliance's John Williams, whose high-profile Public Accounts Committee is used to being in the public eye, found themselves fighting for the national media's attention. The Alberta MP said he expects the war will give the Liberals, which have been under steady fire for months over various ethics and mismanagement scandals, a much-needed reprieve.
"The other work that we do to keep the government on their toes, to ensure they are honest, open and transparent, and the democracy is working as well as it is allowed to here in Canada, is on the backburner [and] buried in the news and therefore the government is likely to slip a few things in," he said last Thursday the day after the war started.
Mr. Williams' committee is currently in the midst of two major probes -- one on the troubled gun registry and the other on the GST fraud -- and heard from several high-profile witnesses last week on both issues. The committee also tabled its long-awaited final report on the government's sponsorship program on Thursday.
But last week, the committee's work was largely overlooked or buried by the media.
"Those things seem to be in the background now. Everything has to do with what is taking place between Canada and the U.S.A. and the stand the government has taken on Iraq," admitted Tory MP Elsie Wayne, her party's defence critic.
Ms. Wayne added that she didn't bother to bring up some of the issues that are important to her which are happening in her riding of Saint John, N.B., preferring to hold off until things calm down.
Some MPs also worried that their individual work will be overlooked.
Although the breakout of war didn't stop Liberal MP David Pratt, chair of the House's Defence Committee, from introducing a private member's bill he's been working on for weeks, he admitted that the timing could have been better. His bill would commit Canada to create a foreign intelligence agency and has received strong support from both the government and opposition benches.
The Nepean-Carleton, Ont., MP seemed uncertain if his bill will create the amount of debate he had hoped for, acknowledging that this is the real reason he introduced his bill.
"There's a lot of private members out there and there's only so much House time. These bills and motions are intended largely, I think, to provoke discussion on a particular issue on whether or not this is something we need," he said.
Others commented on how the war has made it difficult to concentrate on the normal routine of life on the Hill. Tory MP Bill Casey, his party's foreign affairs critic, commented on how difficult it has been keeping his mind on anything else but the hostilities in the Persian Gulf.
"The way it's affected me is that I'm really anxious to be kept up to date on the events in the war," he said. "It's hard to understand how the other night in the house we were so safe here, we were so protected, and at the very same time we were debating it, bombs started to fall on Iraq. It does have a big psychological impact."
Meanwhile the war has thrown some MPs into the spotlight.
Quebec Liberal Irwin Cotler, a McGill University law professor and an expert in international law, has been sought after for his views on whether the U.S.-led intervention is illegal.
The backbencher from Montreal said the war violates the UN Charter, and attached his name to a letter signed by 31 of Canada's professors of international law from 15 law faculties saying the attack "would be a fundamental breach of international law."
Meanwhile, the House Speaker's Office issued a notice to all MPs last Wednesday to be more vigilant and to make sure to wear their passes at all times. Heather Bradley, the Speaker's director of communications, would not say whether increased security measures had been taken, but some MPs noted that there seems to be more guards on staff.
As for the RCMP, which is responsible for security of the Parliamentary Precinct, RCMP spokesperson Natalie Des Chenes confirmed that no new measures have been taken since the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S.
"We have been maintaining those security measures and that's what we have today. So we are satisfied with the measures we have," she said.
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: November 20, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 191 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. A10
LENGTH: 804 words
HEADLINE: Martin's problem: too much Quebec cabinet material
BYLINE: PETER BLACK
BODY:
Joe Clark had a relatively easy time of it picking cabinet ministers from
Quebec in 1979. That's because the newly elected Tory prime minister had a
talent pool of exactly two invincible war-horses from which to choose (Roch
LaSalle and Heward Graffety, for those who need to know.) Even at that Clark had to raid the Senate for Quebec bodies, plus appoint another unelected individual (the late Robert de Cotret).
Paul Martin has the opposite problem; he already has an embarrassment of candidates for seats around the table. If, as expected, he cleans up in Quebec in an election next spring, he'll have even more hungry egos to feed.
With the date for the swearing-in now fixed for less than a month hence, at least two dozen MPs in the Quebec Liberal caucus will make damned sure their cell phone batteries are charged waiting for a call from The Paul. Many, though, would prefer not to take a certain call knowing their days as a favoured centurion under the slain Caesar have come to an end.
At the moment, the federal cabinet includes five full-fledged Quebec ministers and two secretaries of state. That's not including Jean Chretien whom Martin would replace anyway as top-ranking Quebec MP. Of those, two would have to be considered expendable with little political pain: Immigration Minister Denis Coderre because of his closeness to Chretien, and Treasury Board President Lucienne Robillard because she is not particularly ambitious or high profile and might be ready for a change of scene.
It gets trickier after that. Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Stephane Dion says he's still interested in sticking around Ottawa and as a hero in the Liberal caucus for his work on the Clarity Act he may be immune.
International Trade Minister Pierre Pettigrew, despite being foiled so far on trade issues with the U.S. such as softwood, probably rates a second look from Martin. One report on cabinet rumours says Pettigrew is already on the Martin protected list.
Justice Minister Martin Cauchon -- the political minister for Quebec -- may be spared the ax, regardless of his support for one-time leadership candidate Finance Minister John Manley. Cauchon's performance in a hot portfolio has earned him praise and he may have earned the green light to continue his work of pot law reform and same-sex marriage.
Assuming there are two or three empty Quebec chairs in the cabinet room, the line-up of possible replacements begins somewhere on Sparks Street.
One MP who seems to be a sure bet is former Bourassa minister and TV talk show host Liza Frulla. Though Chretien engineered her move to Ottawa in a contrived Montreal byelection in May, 2002, the trilingual Frulla is an unabashed Martinite and even got into hot water by suggesting openly it was time for Chretien to quit for the good of the party. She proved to be more prophetic than traitorous -- Chretien announced his retirement three weeks after Frulla's musings.
Frulla's partner, Andre Morrow, a longtime Liberal communications advisor, is a member of Martin's Quebec campaign team.
Another strong possibility would be Georges Farrah, the MP representing Gaspe and the Magdalen Islands -- also a former Quebec minister, albeit briefly, under premier Daniel Johnson Jr. Farrah would provide Martin with an experienced MP from a region notorious for wavering political loyalties. Farrah currently is parliamentary secretary to Fisheries and Oceans Minister Robert Thibault, so that portfolio might be a logical promotion for him.
Beyond those two, the list of possible Quebec ministers includes a number of eclectic candidates. Martin may have to address the 10-year absence of a minister from Quebec City.
That would be good news for Helene Scherrer, an outspoken Martin supporter. However, Scherrer may have a lot on her plate at the moment, since Martin has named her one of the co-chairs of the Liberal's national campaign.
Then there's former party president, Tunisian-born Jacques Saada, human rights advocate Irwin Cotler (a choice likely to get Bono's thumbs-up) or Marlene Jennings, although a Chretien loyalist, is also a black woman in English Montreal, a demographic triple-whammy. Dr. Gilbert Normand, whom Chretien dumped as junior science minister reportedly because of his Martin sympathies, holds a riding east of Quebec City, and is therefore another possibility.
Whomever Martin names to his cabinet from Quebec on Dec. 12 may be subject to revision in a matter of months. Depending on what star candidates he recruits for the next election, Martin may be faced with the same Quebec dilemma. But then he may have up to 60 Quebec MPs waiting for a call, not the 37 currently in the caucus.
Joe Clark had it easy.
Peter Black is a Quebec City-based journalist. His column appears each Thursday.
LOAD-DATE: November 27, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 193 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(48) D 5'02; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5518862
LENGTH: 1064 words
HEADLINE: Failure to list Hezbollah prompts court action (Record in progress)
BYLINE: Csillag, Ron
BODY:
Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad added to list of outlawed terrorist
organizations
The federal government has omitted Hezbollah from its newly expanded list of illegal terrorist groups, despite earlier warnings from its own spy agency that the organization has been active in Canada.
Ottawa last week revised its list of outlawed terrorist organizations to include Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which have both claimed responsibility for suicide bombings against Israelis. Four other radical Islamic groups have also been added to the new list, but Hezbollah's absence has been blasted by Jewish groups, the Opposition and one Liberal MP as outrageous and inexplicable.
While membership alone in the listed groups is not illegal, providing them with material assistance now carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison.
The government said raising money for Hezbollah's military wing has been prohibited in this country since last year's passage of Canada's anti-terrorism law, Bill C-36. ''So it is, in fact, listed,'' Solicitor-General Wayne Easter said last week in announcing the revised List of Terrorist Entities.
But with Hezbollah's exclusion, Canadians can still assist or finance the militant Shiite group's so-called social wing, which is said to conduct charitable and humanitarian activities. (By contrast, the United States has criminalized support for all of Hezbollah's activities.)
B'nai Brith Canada announced last Friday that it is taking the government to court over the new list. At a press conference in Ottawa, B'nai Brith senior legal counsel David Matas said he had filed an application in Federal Court seeking to overturn the decision because it is wrong in law, discriminatory and violates several international statutes.
In drafting the new list, the Liberals ignored repeated pleas from Canadian Jewish Congress to abandon what CJC has termed a ''specious'' distinction between Hezbollah's military and socio-political arms. Congress and others have long argued that funds flow freely between Hezbollah's various arms.
Apparently, the government has also ignored a 1997 warning by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) that Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Party of God, had established an infrastructure in Canada ''that can assist and support terrorists seeking a safe haven in North America. Hezbollah members in Canada receive and comply with direction from the Hezbollah leadership hierarchy in Lebanon.''
Those allegations were made in a 19-page summary of evidence filed in Federal Court to support the government's efforts to deport Hani Abd Rahim al-Sayegh, who was accused of helping carry out the 1996 truck bombing that killed 19 Americans in Saudi Arabia.
Published reports have also shown extensive fundraising by Hezbollah in this country. As recently as two years ago, agents in Vancouver, Montreal and Toronto reportedly moved hundreds of thousands of dollars through various Canadian banks and purchased a range of military supplies that were then shipped to Lebanon.
Canadian Jewish officials are also keeping a close eye on the case of Fawzi Ayub, a senior Hezbollah operative who has been in Israeli custody since June. Ayub, 38, is a Canadian citizen who is alleged to have planned the Nov. 15 terrorist attack in Hebron that killed 12 Israelis. He reportedly flew to Athens on a valid Canadian passport, and then to Tel Aviv using forged American documents.
The Canada-Israel Committee took the government to task not only for failing to include Hezbollah on the list, but also for omitting the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the Al-Aqsa Martyr's Brigades and Tanzim arms of Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat's Fatah movement.
''All of these groups are directly responsible for the murders of scores of innocent Israelis and have publicly proclaimed their determination to continue to use terror [to destroy] the Jewish state,'' the CIC said.
While welcoming the inclusion on the list of Hamas and Islamic Jihad, Congress said it finds the government's reasoning on Hezbollah ''more and more perplexing.''
In a statement, Stockwell Day, the Canadian Alliance's foreign affairs critic, said the ''decision to allow this terrorist organization to carry out its CSIS-documented activities in Canada is outrageous.''
Mount Royal Liberal MP Irwin Cotler called his government's failure to name Hezbollah ''inexplicable and, given [its] murderous ideology, unconscionable.''
Cotler said the first group on the list should be Hezbollah.
Hezbollah and its affiliates have been linked to a lengthy series of terrorist attacks against the United States, Israel, and other Western targets. These include:
- a series of kidnappings of Westerners, including several Americans, in the 1980s;
- the suicide truck bombings that killed more than 200 U.S. Marines at their barracks in Beirut in 1983;
- the 1985 hijacking of TWA flight 847;
- and two major attacks on Jewish targets in Buenos Aires: the 1992 bombing of the Israeli embassy, killing 29, and the 1994 bombing of a Jewish community centre, killing 95.
Over the past few months, Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham has argued that an outright ban on all Hezbollah activities would hinder the work of many innocent doctors, lawyers and social workers in Lebanon, where the organization has 12 members in parliament and runs clinics, schools and charities. Outlawing all the group's activities would also harm Canada's role as a neutral broker in the international political arena, Graham has said.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
''We're not going to take that step'' of an outright ban, ''as it would interfere with our ability to conduct peace negotiations in the Middle East,'' Graham said recently in the House of Commons.
In placing Hamas on the list, Ottawa has concluded that money donated to social charities operated by the group had ''leaked to the terrorist apparatus,'' which apparently distinguishes it from Hezbollah.
Easter refused to explain the decision on Hezbollah, but called Canada's list a ''work in progress.'' In any event, he said more groups would be named under Bill C-36.
Being named under the law ''is a very, very serious matter,'' Easter stated. ''They can have their assets seized and frozen.''
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: January 13, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 194 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(1) Ja 3'02 pg 16; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5281190
LENGTH: 735 words
HEADLINE: Longtime volunteer goes professional at Bar-Ilan University [New executive director] (Record in progress)
BYLINE: Kraft, Frances
BODY:
Toronto--Dov Altman, new executive director of Canadian Friends of Bar-Ilan
University, freely admits that until recently he had had no clue what went
on at the Ramat Gan-based campus.
[Not Transcribed]
A longtime, high-level volunteer in the Jewish community, Altman, 42, figured if he didn't know about Bar-Ilan, chances were good a lot of other people were equally uninformed.
In addition to focusing on fund-raising, he wants to raise awareness and build the profile of Bar-Ilan in Canada. The organization has offices in Toronto and Montreal, but its mandate is national, said Altman.
The university, which has 30,000 students and a wide range of programs including law and business, is the only one in Israel where all students are required to take Jewish studies.
Although it is commonly perceived as an ''Orthodox'' institution, Altman said 50 percent of the students are secular. In fact, he noted, there is a higher percentage of Arab women at the institution than at any other Israeli university.
The university ''encourages dialogue and learning together between secular and Orthodox.''
The largely modern Orthodox base of Bar-Ilan supporters here is not as diverse as the university's student body, however, admits Altman, who took on his new role Nov. 19. ''That's one of the tasks at hand right now--to broaden that base.''
Although his professional experience is in commercial leasing--he spent the past four years as leasing director at O & Y Enterprise Commercial Management--Altman's background as a volunteer is focused mainly on fund-raising.
He became involved in that field--indirectly--through the involvement of his wife, lawyer Elana Fleischmann, on a federation subcommittee a number of years ago.
Most recently, he was chair of canvasser training and motivation for UJA Federation of Greater Toronto's 2002 campaign. He has also trained more than 500 canvassers for solicitation of major gifts.
Altman used to look forward to his evening volunteer work when he was working at his day job, he recalls. Many people have been rethinking their lives since the terror attacks of Sept. 11, he noted, and those events may have been a catalyst for his decision to change course.
During the High Holy Day period he made up his mind to look for work in the Jewish community where he could ''feel fulfilled, and [feel] that I was making a difference to the community and the lives of Jews. No one was really surprised. People were surprised I didn't do it before.''
His work for UJA Federation and Bar-Ilan stems from his strong Jewish identity and love for Israel, which he first visited in 1978. ''I really believe that strong institutions in Israel will make the country strong.''
He became involved in community leadership as a member of B'nai Brith Youth Organization. when he was a student at William Lyon Mackenzie Collegiate Institute. Within a year of joining at age 15, the Toronto native became chapter president. He then served as president of his region, and of his district.
More recently, he has served on the boards of Canadian Shaare Zedek Hospital Foundation and Mount Sinai Hospital Foundation.
''I don't enjoy being an observer or a participant. I like to be part of the team that's leading,'' said Altman. ''I grew up in a family of organizers.''
His mother, Jean, was a chapter president of B'nai Brith Women (now Jewish Women International) and their home was often the hub of events for extended family.
Altman's late father, Joseph (a co-owner of Sunnybrook Foods, where Dov worked in the kosher meat department while in school), taught him ''a deep respect for other people ... He didn't like to see anyone go without.''
Altman would like to impart to his own children, a 9-year-old son and 5-year-old daughter, the importance of his work in the Jewish community and makes a point of bringing them along when appropriate. ''They're very at home in the Lipa Green building,'' he said.
The adjacent Leah Posluns Theatre will be the location for the next major Canadian Friends event, a Sunday evening BESA (Begin-Sadat) Centre conference featuring MP Irwin Cotler and Bar-Ilan professors from the university's Begin-Sadat Centre for Strategic Studies, to be held Jan. 27.
''I think the community's going to be hearing a lot more about Bar-Ilan,'' said Altman.
[Not Transcribed]
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: February 20, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 195 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(4) My'03 pg 7; ISSN: 0703-8668
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5615787
LENGTH: 890 words
HEADLINE: Mending a sick society [Bill C-250]
BYLINE: Robinson, Svend
BODY:
Current situation in 2003:
The House of Commons Justice Committee is currently studying my Private Member's Bill C-250, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, that seeks to add ''sexual orientation'' to the list of included grounds under hate propaganda legislation in Canada. Currently the grounds included are race, religion, colour and ethnic origin. This bill received agreement in principle in the House with the support of all parties except the Canadian Alliance. The Committee will decide whether people who are victims of propaganda promoting hatred, violence or even genocide directed at gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered people should have equal protection under the Criminal Code. This month will decide whether or not this bill becomes law.
We are in danger of losing this bill because of the flood of e-mails and letters coming in to MPs from those who oppose the bill, mainly from the religious right. Canadian Alliance MPs are fanning the flames with outrageous attacks on the bill. They claim that the bill would make religious texts like the Bible illegal. This is absolutely false: both the Charter of Rights and the Criminal Code already protect freedom of religious expression.
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the Keegstra case that ''the act to be targeted is the intentional fostering of hatred against particular members of our society, as opposed to any individual. Hatred implies that those individuals are to be despised, scorned, denied respect and made subject to ill-treatment on the basis of group affiliation.'' A senior researcher of the Library of Parliament wrote: ''the design of the hate propaganda provisions set out in the Code, including a requirement of specific intent, the definition by the courts of what the promotion of hatred means, the special defences, and the requirement for the provincial Attorney General to consent to a prosecution, all ensure that such prosecutions will occur in only the most egregious situations and have ensured that the law is Charter of Rights-compliant.''
Unfortunately, many MPs have been swayed by the campaign of misinformation and fear and have heard very little from those who support the bill.
In early May, the Committee will vote on whether to support the bill and send it back to the House. Currently on the Justice Committee, all four Canadian Alliance members oppose the bill, all four of the other opposition members (Bloc Quebecois, Conservative, and NDP) support the bill, and the Liberal position is unclear. The fate of the bill depends on how they will vote.
I am urgently requesting you to take a few moments to send a message to your own MP as well as to the Liberal MPs on the Justice Committee. Tell them that you believe that hate propaganda targeting gay and lesbian people must be stopped. Tell them that it is not fair or just to deny protection to gay and lesbian people.
An American named Fred Phelps runs a web-site called www.godhatesfags.com
When Fred Phelps wanted to come to Canada to pursue his campaign of hatred, the RCMP said that they would like nothing better than to have the tools to stop him from entering our country, but they were unable to do so. Sergeant Pat Callaghan, head of the hate crimes unit of the Ottawa-Carleton Police Department, had this to say about Phelps' activities in Canada:
''If this was done against a Catholic, a Jew or a black person, charges could be laid. If we had that legislation, we could have told him, 'If you show up and start spreading this hate, we'll arrest you.' ''
The Attorney General of Alberta, Dave Hancock, pointed out that protecting gays from hateful propaganda has nothing to do with endorsing homosexuality. He said, ''I support the hate crime legislation which prohibits people from spewing hate against anybody for any reason. It doesn't matter what you believe about sexual orientation.''
Please take a few minutes to respond to this urgent call to action. Your voice could help pass this bill, and save the lives of gay and lesbian people targeted by hate-mongers. Please send your message as soon as possible, and forward a copy to my office so we can keep you posted on the progress of the bill.
Your voice could make the difference.
Svend J. Robinson is NDP MP from Burnaby-Douglas. His e-mail address is [email protected].
Here are the names and contact information for the Liberal MPs on the Justice Committee: Andy Scott, 613-992-1067, [email protected] - John McKay, 613-992-1447, [email protected] - Marlene Jennings, 613-995-2254, [email protected] - Irwin Cotler, 613-995-0121, [email protected] - Hedy Fry, 613-992-3213, [email protected] - Joe Peschisolido, 613-995-2021, [email protected] - Derek Lee, 613-996-9681, [email protected] - Paul Macklin, 613-992-8585, [email protected] - John Maloney, 613-995-0988, [email protected] - Pat O'Brien, 613-995-2901, [email protected]
JOURNAL-CODE: 0839
LOAD-DATE: August 5, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 196 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: DOMESTIC NEWS
DISTRIBUTION: Attention Business And Technology Editors Attention News/Women's Issues Editors
LENGTH: 1563 words
HEADLINE: Fonterra Signs NZ$590 Million IT Outsourcing Contract with EDS Seven-year agreement covers 327 offices in 34 countries Grant to help raise awareness of female genital mutilation in Quebec
DATELINE: AUCKLAND, New Zealand, Dec. 7 OTTAWA, Dec. 8
BODY:
Fonterra
Co-operative Group and EDS (NYSE: EDS) (today signed a seven-year, NZ$590
million (USD$380 million at the current currency conversion rate) IT
infrastructure outsourcing contract to help streamline the co-operative's
global infrastructure and generate cost-savings for its shareholders.
Fonterra's Chief Development Officer, Alexander Toldte said outsourcing enabled Fonterra to achieve its IT vision to establish and manage Fonterra's IT infrastructure as an effective, integrated global services utility, operated on a "pay as you use" basis that would reduce costs and improve IT reliability.
"It delivers a large leap forward in terms of our global IT infrastructure service without a significant capital outlay. This infrastructure will be one of the major tools to support our business and our strategies."
Mr Toldte said that the terms of the contract represented significant cost savings for Fonterra over the seven-year term.
"This is very much in line with our overall programme to reduce costs and working capital. The process we followed with constructing our financial base case and the rigorous response to our RFP makes us totally confident this represents a very good outcome for Fonterra."
The contract covers 327 offices in 34 countries in New Zealand, Australia, Europe, Asia, the Middle East, North and South America, and Africa. It encompasses all of Fonterra's IT processes including LAN, midrange servers, networks (voice and data), desktops and laptops, helpdesk services and utility software such as Microsoft Office and e-mail systems such as GroupWise and Lotus Notes. The global outsourcing programme covers over 1,000 utility and application servers.
Mr Toldte said the outsourced infrastructure would replace systems that represented a fixed cost for the co-operative and lagged behind in terms of service requirements and operational economies of scale. The contract ends a year-long process through which Fonterra examined the benefits of outsourcing and the capability of suppliers to meets its global needs.
"EDS was selected for the work after a rigorous, competitive process because it had proven experience and skill in integrating and operating global IT systems, and because it had a complementary global footprint," said Marcel van den Assum, Fonterra's Chief Information Officer.
Under the contract, 127 Fonterra staff and 10 contractors are expected to transition to EDS from March 1 in New Zealand and its offshore operations. EDS New Zealand managing director Rick Ellis said that EDS is pleased about the opportunity to assist New Zealand's largest global company to achieve its objectives through delivering an improved result for its stakeholders.
"The contract recognizes the strength of EDS's global IT service capabilities to deliver to Fonterra's growing global presence, while also acknowledging the company's significant operational base in New Zealand," said Ellis.
About Fonterra
Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd is a leading multinational dairy company, owned by 13,000 New Zealand dairy farmers. It is the world's largest exporter of dairy products, exporting 95 percent of production to customers and consumers in 140 countries. Its ingredients business is the largest dairy ingredients operation in the world, manufacturing and marketing 2.3 million metric tonnes in the year to May 31, 2003. New Zealand Milk Limited, the co- operative's consumer business has some of the world's best-known dairy brands, including ANCHOR, ANLENE, ANDEX, ANMUM, CHESDALE, FERNLEAF, MEADOWFRESH and MAINLAND.
About EDS
EDS, the world's most experienced outsourcing services company, delivers superior returns to clients through its cost-effective, high-value services model. EDS' core portfolio comprises information-technology and business process outsourcing services, as well as information-technology transformation services. EDS' two complementary, subsidiary businesses are A.T. Kearney, one of the world's leading high-value management consultancies, and UGS PLM Solutions, a leader in product data management, collaboration and product design software. With 2002 revenue of $21.5 billion, EDS is ranked 80th on the Fortune 500. The company's stock is traded on the New York (NYSE: EDS) and London stock exchanges. Learn more at eds.com.
The statements in this news release that are not historical statements, including statements regarding the amount of new contract values, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond EDS' control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. For information concerning these risks and uncertainties, see EDS' most recent Form 10-Q. EDS disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CONTACT:
Terry Balluck
EDS
+1 972 797 8751
[email protected]
Gareth Johnstone
Fonterra
+64 21 507 072
[email protected]
AP Archive: http://photoarchive.ap.org
PRN Photo Desk, [email protected] /
Femmes Africaines Horizon 2015 will receive $61,620 for an 8-month initiative to raise awareness, and to work toward the elimination of the practice of female genital mutilation in Quebec. Irwin Cotler M.P. (Mount Royal) announced the grant today on behalf of the Honourable Jean Augustine, Secretary of State (Multiculturalism) (Status of Women).
"It is a lack of understanding and an unwillingness to discuss the issue that is slowing the process toward eliminating female genital mutilation," said Mr. Cotler. "The incredible silence serves only to ensure that women who are subjected to these practices continue to suffer without their country's support. This initiative is ensuring that the issue is brought to society's attention and placed on the public agenda."
"Femmes Africaines Horizon 2015 is fighting to eliminate a practice that affects women in Quebec, in Canada, and throughout the world," said Secretary of State Augustine. "The global issue of female genital mutilation can not be divorced from its physical, psychological, social, and cultural consequences. This initiative will introduce an awareness and sensitivity towards the women directly affected by these practices."
The initiative, "Mobilizing the community for the prevention of the female genital mutilations in Quebec," involves a seven-day forum on female genital mutilation with seven target audiences, including Quebec women originally from Africa, female health care workers, female community stakeholders, and the public at large. One of the main goals of the initiative is to publicize the issue in order to raise awareness, to inform and to bring together the community in Quebec and, finally, to dispel the taboos surrounding these practices.
An action research will be started in order to paint a realistic portrait of the situation in Quebec, to better respond to the needs of women who have been subjected to female genital mutilation, and to prevent the mutilation of young women in Quebec or when they travel abroad.
Femmes Africaines Horizon 2015 is a network of African and Quebec women working for the full integration of African women in Quebec and Canadian society. The organization works with youth of African descent to help them develop a sense of belonging in Quebec society while maintaining pride in their African heritage. Their goal is to achieve the elimination of female genital mutilation by the year 2015.
Status of Women Canada is the federal government department working to promote gender equality and the full participation of all women in the economic, social, cultural and political life of Canada.
Funding for this initiative was provided for in the February 2003 budget and is therefore built into the existing fiscal framework.
No. 03/023
Ce texte est Degalement disponible en francais.
VIEW ADDITIONAL COMPANY-SPECIFIC INFORMATION:
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/orgDisplay.cgi?okey=25668
CONTACT: Terry Balluck of EDS, +1-972-797-8751, terry.balluck(at)eds.com;
or Gareth Johnstone of Fonterra, +64-21-507-072, gareth.johnstone(at)fonterra.com/
(EDS) CO: Electronic Data Systems Corporation, EDS ST: Texas, New York, Canada
IN: CPR MLM SU: CON -30- CNW 23:57e 07-DEC-03
CONTACT: Anne Schroder, Status of Women Canada, (613) 943-1729; Adam Burns, Office of the Secretary of State (Multiculturalism) (Status of Women), (819) 997-9900. This release is also available on our Web site: http://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/
LOAD-DATE: December 9, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 197 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: (633) Ap 22'02 pg 1,12; ISSN: 0848-0427
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5410037
LENGTH: 997 words
HEADLINE: More MPs heading to Mideast: some say Parliament should fund a fact-finding trip
BYLINE: Curry, Bill
BODY:
A second group of Canadian MPs is heading to the Middle East to see the
situation first hand and report back to their fellow Parliamentarians.
The group is leaving this Friday, April 26 and will be back the morning of Tuesday, April 30, a schedule which Alliance MP and participant Monte Solberg (Medicine Hat, Alta.) admitted will be ''gruelling.''
The trip is being paid for and organized by the Canada-Israel Committee and is separate from another trip that nine MPs are taking from May 11 to May 18. The trip in May will be paid primarily by Palestine House, an association of Palestinian-Canadians based in Mississauga, Ont.
''One of the things we immediately asked about was whether or not we'd have a chance to meet with Palestinians,'' said Mr. Solberg. ''We've been assured that we will get both sides of the story and that makes me feel better about going.''
When news of the Palestine House trip was first reported in The Hill Times, Liberal backbencher Joe Volpe (Eglington-Lawrence, Ont.) was quoted the next day in the Ottawa Citizen and the National Post as saying: ''My colleagues are allowing themselves to be used as political pawns in a game that is clearly, at this stage, in spin mode.''
Mr. Volpe was in China last week and couldn't be reached for comment on the second trip by MPs.
But Liberal MP Carolyn Bennett (St. Paul's, Ont.), who is one of the MPs involved in planning the Canada-Israel trip, said she's been in constant contact with her colleague Carolyn Parrish (Mississauga Centre, Ont.), who is planning the Palestine House trip. The goal, she said, is for MPs on both trips to hear both sides of the conflict and, ideally, to report back together to the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
''We really are keen to have this not look like duelling trips,'' she said. ''Carolyn and I have been meeting to make sure this is a solid effort to increase peace in the region.''
Ms. Bennett said only MPs who have been to the Middle East before have been invited because it is a short trip and it allows the organizers to skip the regular orientation briefing. As for who's funding the trips, Ms. Bennett said she was surprised at the level of controversy over the fact that Palestine House was funding a trip to the Middle East.
[Graph Not Transcribed]
''As Canadian Parliamentarians, we do not have the huge Members' operating budgets that American Congressmen do to be able to fund these trips on our own, and also, other than the distinct Parliamentary associations, the rest of the friendship groups are not funded by Parliament and therefore I think, whether it's Taiwan or whether it's Israel, there's usually been some sort of host that has funded the trip,'' she said.
Ms. Bennett's been on two previous trips funded by the Canada-Israel Committee, she said, and that the group went out of its way to arrange meetings with senior Palestinian officials, even during volatile times.
''I felt they were very, very committed to make sure that we heard the Palestinian version and I was very, very impressed with the meeting we had with Saeb Erekat, who's a PhD in peace and conflict studies and I think very articulate about the need for peace in the region.''
At press time, it was unclear how many MPs will be going on the Canada-Israel Committee (CIC) trip because final arrangements were still being worked out. The CIC refused to comment about the trip.
According to their website, the CIC is the official representative of the Canadian Jewish community on matters pertaining to Canada-Israel relations and its major sponsors are B'nai Brith Canada, Canadian Jewish Congress, Canadian Zionist Federation, UIA Federations Canada and the Jewish communities of Canada.
Liberal MP Sarkis Assadourian (Brampton Centre, Ont.), who chairs the Canada-Arab Parliamentary Friendship Group, said he has no problem with either trip, but was upset by the negative reaction to the fact that Palestine House was sending MPs.
''What's good for the goose must be good for the gander,'' he said. ''The Canada-Israel Committee has been sending delegations for the last 20 or 30 years, I think... I don't think we should apply two standards for two different ethno-cultural groups. Point one. And second, I think it would be very constructive if the House of Commons sent an all-party delegation funded by Parliament to the Middle East to both Israel and the Palestinian Authority for a fact-finding mission. That would solve the problem of shooting arrows at each other. I don't think it's constructive.''
For his part, human rights expert and Liberal MP Irwin Cotler (Mount Royal, Que.) said it's important that the divisions of the Middle East not be transferred to Canada or the Liberal caucus.
''We don't want to see the importation of hatred,'' he said, pointing out that his riding office was taken over last week by pro-Palestinian students who tried to kick out his staff. The police were called and removed the protesters. In a statement in the House the next day on April 19, he said that while he and others have spoken out against anti-Arab sentiment in recent weeks, there is now a growing need to speak out against the rise in anti-Semitic behaviour.
Mr. Cotler also pointed out that he and fellow Liberal MP Mac Harb (Ottawa Centre, Ont.) have been delivering joint statements in the House about the situation and the steps required for conciliation.
With respect to the trips to the Middle East, Mr. Harb praised MPs going on both trips.
''There's no doubt in my mind that my colleagues will do everything they can to push the agenda of peace forward,'' he said. ''I can't see a Canadian Member of Parliament who would go to that part of the world without being passionate about peace. They are all passionate about peace and they all want to see a resolution. I think in this case, everybody is going in the same direction. So it's very useful.''
JOURNAL-CODE: 1075
LOAD-DATE: November 5, 2002
LEVEL 1 - 198 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: Pg. 18
LENGTH: 1505 words
HEADLINE: SAVING THE JEWISH PEOPLE?
BYLINE: Yael Kliers
BODY:
A costly new think tank claims it is uniquely capable of planning for the
long-term vital interests of Israel and world Jewry
In early August, Natan Sharansky, the government minister for Diaspora affairs, and Uri Lupoliansky, the mayor of Jerusalem, announced that they had commissioned a new research organization, the grandly titled Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, to draw up an ambitious project for "strengthening the status of Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish people."
Two blocks from the JPPPI's spacious offices in upscale Talbiyeh, another institute devoted to the research and policy planning of Jerusalem has been operating for the past 25 years: the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies. Hearing for the first time, from The Report, that a new think tank had been charged with a project overlapping its own field of expertise, the Jerusalem Institute's director, Ora Ahimeir, was patently horrified. "This is the first I've heard of it," she said. "I am very surprised that our organization was not included. Very surprised. They cannot possibly work on this project without using our material." (The head of the Institute, Prof. Yaakov Bar Siman-Tov, had never heard of the JPPPI or the new project.)
Founded last year but only formally opening its doors in September, the JPPPI has a $ 2 million annual budget guaranteed for the next three years, with 50 percent provided by the Jewish Agency (and the rest from private bodies). Chaired by president Clinton's former Middle East special envoy Dennis Ross, its mission statement says it is devoted to assuring a "thriving future for the Jewish people and Judaism," and promises to issue "alerts" to new opportunities and threats, to assess "important current events," to offer policy options for decision-makers and to organize retreats to facilitate "informed Jewish people discourse on critical issues."
But the JPPPI is entering a field already crowded with organizations performing and/or seeking similar roles - including an alphabet soup of international Jewish and Israeli bodies, not to mention the Agency's own Research Department. What's more, as the JPPPI's own founding president, Yechezkel Dror, Emeritus Professor of Public Administration at the Hebrew University, readily acknowledges, the new institute does not intend to do any of its own field work. Rather, it is engaged in producing "analyses of the situation based on existing studies." In other words, it seems, it will rely for its basic material on the work done by academics and the very institutions and think-tanks into whose crowded territory it has just been pitched.
Interviewed by The Report, Dror, 75, insists the JPPPI nevertheless has a vital, unique, and hitherto dangerously neglected role to play. While there is no shortage of organizations responding to current events, none of them provides "long range understanding of fundamental problems," charges Dror in his German-accented English, speaking in his still-empty office.
To achieve this, he goes on, the JPPPI has recruited a professional staff of 10, overseen by a board that includes Ya'acov Amidror, the former head of research in Military Intelligence, Uzi Arad, former deputy head of the Mossad and senior adviser to prime minister Netanyahu, and Yossi Kucik, director general of the Prime Minister's Office under Ehud Barak.
For the Jerusalem project, the JPPPI has been charged with detailing the activities of Jewish organizations already present in the city, conceiving programs to boost Jewish cultural, artistic and sporting activities, promoting dialogue on Jewish values, bolstering Jerusalem as a center for Jewish studies, and much more. JPPPI Managing Director Avinoam Bar-Yosef is unfazed by the fact that the nearby, privately funded Jerusalem Institute, which was founded by the Jerusalem Foundation, would consider itself better qualifed. The minister and the mayor, he says shortly, "came to us, not them." And he gives no indication that he intends to contact that Institute over the project in the future.
In similar vein, the JPPPI says it is working to analyse "the implications of the Iraq war and the new geo-political situation on the Jewish people." But so is Dr. Ephraim Kam, deputy head of Tel Aviv University's Jaffee Center of Strategic Studies. For the past year, Kam has been examining the implications of the ousting of Saddam on the Middle East, Israel specifically and the U.S. His papers have not focused on the implications for the Jewish people beyond Israel, because he doubts there are many. "The Iraqi war had a big impact on Israel and on the United States, but the place of the Jewish people in this discussion is unclear, and seems unimportant," he says flatly.
Kam, too, has not been contacted by the JPPPI over its project in his field. Still, he is not dismissive of the JPPPI's possible input. "There are no institutes which really deal with the global issues of the Jewish people from a policy perspective," he says, echoing Dror. "The question is whether they can do what they say. And that remains to be seen."
An early indication of JPPPI's uphill struggle came at the end of July. Minister Sharansky convened a forum of forty of the most prominent Jewish professionals and lay-leaders engaged in confronting anti-Semitism around the world. Behind closed doors, they discussed how to grapple with what they agreed was an escalating danger.
The first of the two "Alert Papers" issued to date by the JPPPI was devoted to the "New Anti-Jewishness." Written by JPPPI board member Irwin Cotler, a Canadian parliamentarian, law professor and human rights activist, it examined the way in which "Israel and the Jewish people have been singled out for differential and discriminatory treatment... singled out for destruction," and warned that "the time has come to sound the alarm."
But although Cotler himself participated in the forum's discussions, his JPPPI paper was not even raised, according to David Weinberg, who is coordinating the ongoing work of the forum. The JPPPI distributed its "alert paper," Weinberg went on, "but everyone else there distributed their own papers as well. Professor Dror and Avinoam Bar-Yosef were invited," he added, "as a courtesy. They were not central in this conference."
Says Bar-Yosef: Anti-Semitism "is not one of our main focuses. The paper was a biproduct of a seminar we held."
Chairman Dennis Ross is due here in early September to formally open the JPPPI offices, which occupy one of Jerusalem's most luxurious villas, located across from the Jerusalem Theater, on Pinsker Street. Featuring colorful mosaics above the entrance and in the entrance hallway, it was built in the 1950s by Miles Sherover, a steel magnate, and his Israeli wife Gita, as their Jerusalem residence. Lately, it had fallen into some disrepair. Indeed, homeless people had to be evicted when the renovators arrived to prepare it for JPPPI, which rents it, says Bar-Yosef, for $ 5,000 a month.
Bar-Yosef says he, Dror and Steve Hoffman, CEO of the New York-headquartered United Jewish Communities, provided the impetus for the JPPPI, with the aim of strengthening the Jewish people and Israel's place at its center. Bar-Yosef was until recently a senior adviser to Salai Meridor, chairman of the Jewish Agency.
Not only is the Agency providing half of the annual budget, but the JPPPI's letterhead and the covers of its "alert papers" highlight that the Institute has been "established" by the Agency. And it will be the Agency's board of governors who will effectively determine whether it has a future beyond the three guaranteed years.
The Agency is also commissioning work from the Institute that it says it cannot do itself. Alan Hoffman, head of the Agency's Education Department, says he is "considering asking them to work on the question of the effectiveness of Jewish education, and of the place of Israel in the education of the Diaspora Jewish community." Although the Agency has its own research department, he says, it does not have the tools to examine such macro questions.
At the same time, both JPPPI and Agency officials insist the new institute is autonomous of the Agency, and indeed that its independence is crucial to its credibility. But one academic approached by the JPPPI to assist in a project, who asks to remain anonymous, has no doubt the institute is an Agency tool, pure and simple, to boost its image and attract funding: "It's a new toy to dangle in front of the donors and federations, to get them to give more money, no strings attached."
That's certainly not Dror's vision. "The future of the Jewish people is unclear," he declares. "At the moment, some of the negative historical trends are worrisome. If we want to increase the probability of Israel surviving as a Jewish state, something must be done." And for that vital planning ahead, he concludes, "there is nothing comparable to the institute."
LOAD-DATE: September 21, 2003
LEVEL 1 - 199 OF 199 STORIESSECTION: v.32(49) D 12'02 pg 5; ISSN: 0008-3941
CBCA-ACC-NO: 5518934
LENGTH: 1016 words
HEADLINE: CJC blames PM for delay in banning Hezbollah
BYLINE: Csillag, Ron
BODY:
Along with Foreign Minister Bill Graham, Prime Minister Jean Chretien is
''holding things up'' in the effort to outlaw the activities of Hezbollah
in this country, charges the president of Canadian Jewish Congress.
Keith Landy told The CJN last week there ''seems to be a split at the cabinet table'' on whether to ban the activities of all of Hezbollah, not just its military wing.
''It's Graham versus the rest,'' Landy speculated. Asked where he feels Chretien stands, Landy said, ''I think he's holding things up. There's realpolitik at work'' relating to Canada's efforts to upgrade bilateral relations with Lebanon, a fellow member of the Francophonie.
The Liberals have come under intense pressure recently from fellow and opposition MPs and Jewish groups to ban all of Hezbollah's activities in Canada.
Last month, Canada added six radical Islamic groups to its list of 13 banned terrorist organizations, but failed to include Hezbollah by again citing a distinction between the organization's military wing and its humanitarian arm.
Pressure to ban all of Hezbollah's activities intensified last week after an address on Lebanese television by Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah in which he reportedly urged that suicide attacks ''should be exported outside Palestine. I encourage Palestinians to take suicide bombings worldwide. Don't be shy about it.''
According to the Washington Times, Nasrallah repeated the message in a second speech, telling gun-toting commandos that ''we will act everywhere around the world'' if the Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem is damaged.
Calls to the Prime Minister's Office were referred to Graham's office.
Spokesperson Isabelle Savard refused to comment on cabinet discussion of the issue, but she said Graham's comments to reporters last week, in which he strongly condemned Nasrallah's remarks and said Ottawa is considering a complete ban on the Lebanese-based Muslim group, show ''he's following the situation'' as it evolves.
''Hezbollah as an entity clearly is indicating that it does not intend to be governed by the rules of civilized conduct,'' Graham told reporters. ''The last statement by the leader of Hezbollah is clearly an indication his party is advocating a form of conduct which we do not approve and would be contributing to global terrorism.''
After the revised terror list was unveiled last month, B'nai Brith Canada announced it's suing the government to force cabinet to place all of Hezbollah on Canada's list of ''Terrorist Entities'' whose assets must be frozen.
Landy said ''while it's commendable that Canada is playing a role to help Lebanon return to democracy, these things come with a price, and one of the prices is not taking steps against Hezbollah.''
Hezbollah, the Iran-backed Party of God, has 12 seats in the Lebanese parliament and is a prominent political and social force in the country. A foreign affairs spokesperson in Ottawa was quoted last week as saying Hezbollah is ''a significant political party in Lebanon.''
Ottawa committed new aid to Lebanon after the Francophonie summit this fall in Beirut, after which Chretien was excoriated for speaking to an audience of dignitaries that included Hezbollah's leader Nasrallah.
In a Nov. 7 handwritten note to Landy, released to The CJN, Chretien said he ''worked very hard to make sure this meeting in Beirut did not turn into another Durban,'' referring to last year's UN-sponsored anti-racism summit in Durban, South Africa, which saw several days of Israel-bashing and overt anti-Semitism.
Landy suggested one way to pressure Chretien on Hezbollah: ''I think he has to be embarrassed. I think if he sees Canada standing alone among nations in the outlawing of all of Hezbollah's activities, he'll be embarrassed.''
Published reports in Canada last week said Ottawa will eventually outlaw Hezbollah, but that a decision to do so could take several more weeks because of ongoing investigations into the group's intelligence activities.
Opposition foreign affairs critic Stockwell Day seized on Nasrallah's remarks, telling the House of Commons that ''it is crystal clear Hezbollah is committed to attacks beyond Israel and on to western countries.''
In his response, solicitor-general Wayne Easter left the door open to eventually banning Hezbollah, saying, ''we have to make our decisions based on the facts. It is spelled out very clearly that we must take into consideration the criminal and the security intelligence reports. That is what we will do, and we will come forward with other listings in the future.''
Easter assured MPs Canada won't be a base for future terrorist acts involving Hezbollah.
National Revenue Minister Elinor Caplan, whose Thornhill riding has a large Jewish population, has reportedly been working to have Hezbollah added to the terrorist list. She declined comment last week, saying, ''I will have my say at the cabinet table.''
Mount Royal MP Irwin Cotler, an outspoken critic of his government on this issue, said he will soon present ''clear and unmistakable'' evidence to Graham and Easter of a link between Hezbollah and the Al Qaeda terror network. He said not listing Hezbollah is ''inexplicable'' and ''unacceptable,'' and ''an affront to the diplomatic, moral and financial war against terrorism.''
In a Dec. 2 letter to Chretien, Landy said ''Canada is making a serious error in adhering to the untenable notion that Hezbollah comprises autonomous military and civilian component organizations subject to differential treatment under Canadian law and policy. Hezbollah must rather be regarded as a single house with different rooms under the same roof, all to be dealt with in exactly the same fashion.''
Last year, Ottawa put Hezbollah's military arm on a list of groups whose assets are subject to seizure. In adding Hamas to the list of banned groups last month, Ottawa concluded money donated to social charities operated by Hamas had ''leaked to the terrorist apparatus,'' which apparently distinguishes it from Hezbollah.
JOURNAL-CODE: 0561
LOAD-DATE: September 5, 2003
****------------------------------****