*************************************************************************** Will Zuzak; DESCROCK.002 = Gazette article 1994-01-26; 1994-01-26 *************************************************************************** Dear Subscribers: The following letter appeared in today's Gazette: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- War-crimes case of Windsor, Ont., man moves to Budapest to videotape elderly witnesses by STEHEN BINDMAN, SOUTHAM NEWS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OTTAWA - The war-crimes case against an elderly Windsor, Ont., man is moving to an unusual locale next month - the Canadian embassy in Budapest. Justice Department prosecutors and lawyers for 82-year-old Radislav Grujicic will travel to the Hungarian capital to videotape the testimony of 17 elderly witnesses. Some of the testimony, which will be supervised by a retired Canadian judge, may be played back at Grujicic's jury trial scheduled to begin in April. "If the witnesses are available, then obviously we're not going to use the video," said chief prosecutor Ivan Whitehall. "But some of the witnesses indicated that they would not come or cannot come to Canada because of their age. Others may want to come but all of these people are old people and therefore I want to make sure that should something happen between now and then, I have their evidence. It's insurance." Although all of the witnesses are from the former Yugoslavia, Budapest was chosen "for the mutual convenience of all concerned," Whitehall said. "There are a variety of factors but obviously the current situation in Yugoslavia is one of them." The federal government will pay all the costs of the trip, which could last two to three weeks. Permission to take evidence abroad was given by an Ontario judge despite objections from Grujicic's lawyer. In 1991, the war-crimes case against a Renfrew, Ont., man crumbled after another judge twice refused permission to send a special commission to the former Soviet Union and Germany to videotape evidence. The judge ruled Michael Pawlowski would not receive a fair trial if the videotaped testimony of 12 witnesses was played before a Canadian jury. Grujicic, who also uses the name Marko Jankovic, was charged in December 1992 with war crimes committed in German-occupied Yugoslavia during World War II. The retired book-seller, who came to Canada in 1948, has pleaded not guilty to 10 counts of murder and one count each of conspiracy to commit murder and kidnapping. He is alleged to have been a senior member of the Belgrade Special Police and accused of participating with Nazi occupation forces in the roundup of suspected communists and communist sympathizers. They were either murdered or sent to forced labor camps in Germany between 1941 and 1944. The Justice Department's war-crimes unit has faced heavy criticism from Jewish groups for its slowness in launching prosecutions since 1987 Criminal Code amendments allowed Canadian courts to try charges related to war crimes committed elsewhere. Grujicic was the first person charged by the Nazi-hunters in almost three years. All previous prosecutions ended in failure - two sets of charges were dropped while the jury acquittal of retired Toronto restaurateur Imre Finta has been appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gazette, Montreal, Wednesday, January 26, 1994 - B4 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note that the article does not give the name of the Ontario judge, who gave permission to take evidence abroad (contrary to to previous rulings by Justice James Chadwick), nor does it name the retired Canadian judge who will be supervising the proceedings. The situation reminds me of the Otto Horn testimony in the Demjanjuk case, which with appropriate OSI coaching turned into a positive identification from what had originally been a negative one. Staged dress rehearsals may be useful in the movie and entertainment businesses, but it is completely inappropriate in the field of justice. As you may have guessed from my previous postings, I am categorically opposed to the "mail-order" justice the above scenario implies. If the witnesses are well enough to travel to Budapest, then they are well enough to travel to and testify in Canada. *************************************************************************** Will Zuzak; DESCROCK.002 = Gazette article 1994-01-26; 1994-01-26 ***************************************************************************