Home > Holodomor
| Ukrainophobia
| Demjanjuk
| d&d (Furman, Odynsky, Katriuk) | Zuzak Letters |
Algemeiner | 06Feb2013 | Oleksandr Feldman
http://www.algemeiner.com/2013/02/06/first-they-came-for-mila-kunis/
http://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/op-ed/the-algemeiner-first-they-came-for-mila-kunis-319929.html
First They Came for Mila
Kunis
[W.Z.
The perfectly innocuous word Zhyd to denote a Jew (Zhydivka to
denote a female Jew or Jewess) has been used for centuries in Ukraine
and other countries in the area. Only in the latter part of the 19th
century did the Russians start using the term Yevrei, as explained in
the comments to a 05Dec2012 article on the subject in the Kyiv Post.
Question: Why was the Ukrainian word "Zhyd" replaced by the Russian word "Yevrei"
in Ukraine?
Answer: Because of Russification policies practiced by the the
Soviet government.
It is
understandable that Ukrainians developed a split categorization of the
two terms: "Zhydy" were the people who had lived for centuries amongst
them; "Yevreii" were the Russified Jews sent or recruited by Moscow to
subjugate Ukrainians to Muscovite rule. Is it any
wonder that patriotic Ukrainians resent being forced to use the Russian
term Yevrei and are penalized/demonized for using the age-old Ukrainian
term Zhyd? Why not use Zhyd when speaking Ukrainian, and Yevrei when
speaking Russian? In my opinion, for a Ukrainian to use the term Yevrei
is to show disrespect toward the Ukrainian language and Ukrainian
independence. To use the term Yevrei is to condone the anti-Ukrainian
and Russification policies imposed by Moscow for so many years.
The
Jewish inhabitants of Ukraine are, thus, faced with a dilemma: Do they
support the Ukrainian language and independent Ukraine with aspirations
towards democratic European values? Or do they support continued
Russification and an enslaved Ukraine under the domination of the
Muscovite dictatorship? Mr. Feldman and his Party of Regions with their
Ukrainophobic policies in the Verkhovna Rada obviously fits in this
latter category.]
One of the most recognizable figures of Ukrainian Jewish
descent, the beautiful and talented actress Mila Kunis, recently fell
victim to the hatred of a Member of the Ukrainian Parliament from the
far-right Svoboda Party -- a party which is notoriously known for
regularly injecting anti-Semitism into their speeches and public
pronouncements. He sneeringly proclaimed that she was not “Ukrainian
but a zhydovka.” This deeply hurtful slur for a Jew was an
alarming gutter effort to inject Jew-hatred into the acceptable bounds
of mainstream Ukrainian discourse.
[W.Z. There is absolutely nothing derogatory about
the Ukrainian words "zhyd" or "zhydivka", but it is certainly
Ukrainophobic to replace the Ukrainian word "zhydivka" (which is
presumably the term used by Mr. Miroshnichenko in his Facebook note) with the Russian word
"zhydovka" and the Ukrainian name "Ihor" with the Russian name "Igor".]
Despite the widely accepted notion that we live in an
ever-more globalized world, too many people are skeptical that what
happens in the halls of some far-off parliament on the other side of
the world bears any impact on our way of life. On the
contrary, I fear that events now developing here in Ukraine should
remind us that our world is now inextricably intertwined. Every person
who dreams of a more tolerant and peaceful international community is
obliged to sit bolt upright and take notice.
I speak directly to this growing trend, wherein an
anti-Semitic collection of hate-mongers are abusing the democratic
Parliament of Ukraine to spew messages and incite violence, in ways
that we had hoped were relegated to the distant past. In our
recent elections, I was horrified to witness Svododa gain over 10
percent of the national vote. Like all ultra-nationalist
parties, they campaigned and were elected on a message intended to
inject fear into society. They shrilly warn that foreigners and
minorities are positioned to take over the country. Idolizing some of
the most virulently anti-freedom icons of generations past, including
most prominently the architect of Nazi propaganda, Joseph Goebbels,
Svoboda works hard to make hatred commonplace -- and acceptable --
throughout Ukrainian society.
Regrettably, Svoboda Party leaders realize that they have
fertile ground on which to harvest such a dangerous agenda.
While it has been on the decline in recent decades, there is no
disputing that anti-Semitism, particularly among the less educated
sectors of our society, remains ingrained in the minds of all too
many. Svoboda has rallied behind this recognition and
exploited mistrust of Jews to gain popularity among some in the lower
class who painfully welcomed the chance to be a part of campaigns of
hate.
I am wholly aware of the fact that if Svoboda’s growing
popularity goes unnoticed outside of my country’s borders, we may
quickly reach a point of no return. At that time, the idea of
the party enjoying broad legislative powers to limit freedoms of
expression amongst those who think unlike them would serve to reduce or
prevent completely any immigration from nations they view as
un-Ukrainian. All this could happen despite the decisive steps of the
current government in Kiev to staunchly oppose inroads made by
Svoboda. One would have to be utterly ignorant of the history
of this region to be unaware that campaigns born ostensibly in the
guise of populism and democracy can quickly decline into mass chaos,
violence and yes, even genocide.
Thankfully, we are not anywhere near that point and I don’t
intend to call for panic. I am in fact confident that the
international institutions in place in the 21st
century are strong enough to notice the rise of this devil at an early
stage. Once not long ago in history, the international
community looked on in silence as Hitler and the Nazis deluded the
world into thinking that their Jew-hatred was not worthy or “dangerous
enough” to warrant global condemnation.
When the world finally did take notice, it was too late.
That is the lesson that I feel strongly IS worthy of taking
notice. Anti-Semitism and xenophobia are the most insidiously
contagious social diseases humanity has ever experienced.
Civilized societies become infected with these sicknesses before they
even pause and assess the damages that the illness is sure to impose.
This is an issue that cries out for the sincere attention of
the international community, and most notably the leadership of the
American Jewish community and the government of the United States of
America. Ukraine and the USA have developed a strong alliance
defined by economic partnerships and a specific diplomatic vision that
there is much that unites us in how to work together to address threats
and cultivate opportunities. Should Svoboda continue to
expand, let no one deny this will harm regional and international
agreements and impose instability on our mutual markets.
If history has taught us anything it is that hatred never ends
with speech but will soon escalate to far more violent
expressions. Nor can hatred be contained to any national
borders, particularly in today’s world of social media and instant
communication.
[W.Z.
It is Mr. Feldman who is expressing and promoting hatred and
bigotry against Ukrainians, the Ukrainian language and the Svoboda
party.]
I appeal to all peaceful and caring leaders around the world
to notice this phenomenon and join me in opposing everything that
Svoboda represents. Because we all know that the stakes are
far too high for the world to be able to say, “We did not know and
therefore we did not act.”
Oleksandr Feldman is a member of the Parliament of
Ukraine and President of the Ukrainian Jewish Committee.
This article was originally published by the
Gatestone Institute.
COMMENTS:
Yoel Nitzarim: 07Feb2013
at 11:03 AM
Mr. Feldman, I have read your every word very carefully. Your
honesty, sincerity, and admonition should be taken seriously, lest the
past again be a prologue revisited. My main theme in my composition
classes at a local community college in northern Illinois is
“tolerance.” Mention of this particular instance of anti-Semitism will
be cited later this spring semester in the Holocaust unit. Thank you
very much for speaking up and making those living outside of Ukraine
aware of those who would admire Josef Goebbels and refer to a decent
Jew by the epithet “zhydovka.”
Victor: 06Feb2013 at 9:20
PM
Mr Feldman. Your conclusions are incorrect. You really need to review
the differences between the Ukrainian language and Russian. The word Zhyd,
as in all other slavic languages such as Polish, Czech, Slovak etc
except Russian is the standard ethnonym for Jew in Ukrainian. It has a
different usage as opposed to Russian cognate which uses the word
Yevrey, and reserves the ethnonym Zhid exclusively as an anti-Jewish
slur.
Beba Marantz: 07Feb2013
at 11:44 AM
Dear Victor,
Regardless of whether this term is pejorative or not, Ms Kunis
has been discriminated as not being a Ukrainian BUT a Jew.
Victor: 08Feb2013 at
10:32 AM
I disagree. I do not see any discrimination here at all. Mila
identifies with her Jewish roots, and has been recognized as
identifying and celebrating her ethnic Jewish roots as opposed to
Ukrainian ethnic roots or association with any other of the ethnic
groups that live in Ukraine today. She is an American actress, an
American national, not Ukrainian, who left Ukraine at the age of 7. I
doubt if she personally felt any discrimination at the age of 7. I also
doubt that she speaks any Ukrainian.
The article is a poor attempt to make a mountain out of
nothing. There are more pressing things one can turn his attention to.
Andriy: 06Feb2013 at 7:56
PM
Mr. Feldman, you really do not understand Ukrainians.
Yes, the “First They Came For …” speech is very effective. But
before anyone applies it to Mila Kunis -- whether the stab at Svoboda
is
justified or not -- let us examine the land that Mila has so much
trouble understanding, let alone calling home.
First THEY -- Russians, Poles, Germans, Lithuanians, Austrians,
Hungarians, Turks, Tatars, take your pick of conquerer, invader,
colonizer, occupier -- first THEY came for the Ukrainians, then their
land, then their religion, then their culture, then their language, and
so on. And let us not limit the list of “Those Who Came For” to be
filled only with geo-political states and empires -- let us remember
that Ukrainians were targeted by identifiable Ukrainophobic groups
which had foundations in aggressive economic, cultural and religious
sources.
Let us curb the anti-Svoboda, anti-nationalistic,
anti-patriotic, anti-Kozak, anti-Ukrainian hysteria and regain some
perspective.
Alex Kaganovsky:
06Feb2013 at 7:35 PM
Thank you Alexandr Borisovich!
Andriy: 06Feb2013 at 5:58
PM
Yes, the “First They Came For …” speech is very effective. But
before anyone applies it to Mila Kunis -- whether the stab at Svoboda
is justified or not -- let us examine the land that Mila has so much
trouble understanding, let alone calling home.
First THEY -- Russians, Poles, Germans, Lithuanians,
Austrians, Hungarians, Turks, Tatars, take your pick of conquerer,
invader, colonizer, occupier -- first THEY came for the Ukrainians,
then their land, then their religion, then their culture, then their
language, and so on. And let us not limit the list of “Those Who Came
For” to be filled only with geo-political states and empires -- let us
remember that Ukrainians were targeted by identifiable Ukrainophobic
groups which had foundations in aggressive economic, cultural and
religious sources.
Let us curb the anti-Svoboda, anti-nationalistic,
anti-patriotic, anti-Kozak, anti-Ukrainian hysteria and regain some
perspective.