Home > Holodomor
| Ukrainophobia
| Demjanjuk
| d&d (Furman, Odynsky, Katriuk) | Zuzak Letters |
Blogspot | 10May2012 | blackrod
http://blackrod.blogspot.ca/2012/05/us-special-envoy-stirs-up-hatred.html
U.S. special envoy stirs
up hatred against Canada's Ukrainians
A special envoy for U.S. President Barack Obama was
in Winnipeg on Monday to reignite the hate campaign against Canada's
Ukrainian community on behalf of the Asper-led Canadian Museum for
Human Rights.
Hannah Rosenthal, described as Obama's envoy to "monitor and combat
anti-semitism" was here as a speaker at the "first annual Shindleman
Family lecture at the Canadian Institute for the Study of
Anti-semitism".
CISA, you'll remember, is the front group created and financed by
supporters of the museum with the task of smearing as anti-semitic
anyone who challenges the Asper Family's plan for the CMHR.
Rosenthal, reiterating she was here "as a representative of the United
States government", praised CISA for being "one of only six
institutions in the entire world dedicated to the scholarly study of
anti-Semitism."
She failed to mention that CISA is a one-woman show --- director and
energizer bunny Catherine Chatterley --- a sessional lecturer at the
University of Manitoba who has failed to win a full professorship at
any university since getting her doctorate five years ago. But she's
been successful in getting a lot of academics to add their names to her
institute's "distinguished academic council". Prof. Elie Wiesel tops
the programme as "honorary chairman". Chairman of the Board of
Directors is Sandy Shindleman, who has given his family name to the
lecture series that sponsored Hannah Rosenthal.
[W.Z.
See articles by David Hirsh, Rhonda Spivak and Dovid Katz on the
background Ukrainophobia of Catherine Chatterley.]
Rosenthal delivered a speech that parroted word for word CISA's first
official act upon its creation in 2010, an attack on the Ukrainian
Canadian Civil Liberties Association for daring to challenge the plan
to give the Jewish Holocaust special and exalted status within the
Canadian Museum for Human Rights.
She did note that the museum would "have a permanent exhibit on the
Holocaust and a temporary exhibit on the Holodomor -- a tragic Soviet
starvation campaign that cost the lives of millions." She forgot to
mention that the museum has no money to build the temporary gallery
where that temporary exhibit on the Holodomor would, theoretically, be
situated.
Rosenthal then accused the Ukrainian association of distributing
"offensive postcards across Canada that could be construed as
characterizing the supporters of the permanent Holocaust exhibit as
pigs."
Uh, no.
She was right that the postcard depicted a pig whispering into the ear
of a sheep and saying, “All galleries are equal but some galleries are
more equal than others.” It cleverly plays off the central,
anti-Communist message of the book that the Red slogan "all are equal"
is perverted in practice to "but some are more equal".
http://pics.livejournal.com/ucclanews/pic/000052wz/
But the idea that
the pigs were Jews was the sole interpretation of Catherine Chatterley
who had to find some reason to attack the Ukrainians who had been
meticulous never to mention or even to hint at the ethnicity of the
family that conceived the CMHR.
And by buying into that interpretation, Rosenthal joined Chatterley in
demonstrating her ignorance of literature. You see, George Orwell's
novel Animal Farm was set --- wait for it --- on a farm. And the
characters
were -- wait -- farm animals. And the animals that made the infamous
statement that all the animals were all equal, except that some were
more equal than others were -- wait, wait -- pigs.
So, to claim to see the pigs as Jews is a deliberate misinterpretation
by someone with an agenda --- an agenda bought into by the special
envoy
to U.S. President Barack Obama.
[W.Z.
An illuminating background to the Ukrainian-language version of George
Orwell's Animal
Farm (
Колгосп Тварин ) is given in the article by Andrea Chalupa titled
How 'Animal Farm' Gave
Hope to Stalin's Refugees .]
There can be no mistaking that Rosenthal came to join the smear
campaign against Canada's Ukrainian community. After regurgitating
Chatterley's anti-Ukrainian spin in defence of the CMHR, Rosenthal
threw in a gratuitous attack on the Ukrainian Canadian Congress.
"In 2010, the Ukrainian Canadian Congress called on the government to
amend Canada’s war veteran’s allowance legislation to designate
Ukrainian resistance groups as allied veterans and extend benefits to
their surviving members. While these groups fought against the Soviets
during World War II, some members were also complicit in Nazi crimes.
In response, 100 international scholars sent an open letter to the
Ukrainian Canadian Congress, criticizing the proposal."
"History must be precise," she lectured.
Well.....we did some historical research of our own.
We discovered that Obama's special envoy has a biased and prejudicial
definition of "precise."
While she pretends to be fair and to accuse only "some" Ukrainians of
being complicit in Nazi crimes, she ignores the fact that "some"
European Jews were also "complicit in Nazi crimes."
Apparently 'some' has a different meaning depending on whether you're
trying to smear a national group or not.
There's still a debate over how much blame to assign to the Judenrate,
the Jewish councils that administered Jewish ghettos for the Nazis.
With their own Jewish police to keep order, they delivered Jews to the
Nazis either for forced labour or to be deported to concentration camps
and death camps. Complicity indeed.
Perhaps the most famous of these council leaders is Mordechai Chaim
Rumkowski, the head of the Judenrat (spelling
of a singular council) in the Lodz ghetto,
who collaborated with the Nazis when they demanded he hand over 20,000
children and elders to certain death. His infamous chilling speech to
the ghetto residents was preserved for history.
"A grievous blow has struck the ghetto. They are asking us to give up
the best we possess -- the children and the elderly. I was unworthy of
having a child of my own, so I gave the best years of my life to
children. I've lived and breathed with children, I never imagined I
would be forced to deliver this sacrifice to the altar with my own
hands. In my old age, I must stretch out my hands and beg: Brothers and
sisters! Hand them over to me! Fathers and mothers: Give me your
children!"
The Chief Rabbi in Berlin compiled lists of Jews for deportation. Jakob
Gens headed the Judenrat in Vilna. He selected people for
extermination. He roused the people against the resistance. He
personally arrested a resistance leader and turned him over to the
Nazis. And sources say his police were the only ones known to have
joined firing squads killing Jews.
“It is true that our hands are smeared with the blood of our brethren,
but we had to accept this horrible task. We are innocent before
history." Gens said.
Other Jews joined the Nazis as "catchers", human bait who lured out
Jews who were hiding from the Nazis in Berlin and Vichy France so that
they could be arrested and ultimately killed.
In Berlin alone, catchers are credited with rounding up
almost all of the estimated 15,000 Jews living underground during the
war. Only about 1500 survived.
"Some" Jews served as kapos in the death camps. Kapos were camp
trustees who kept the other inmates of a concentration camp in line,
delivering full cooperation to the Nazi commandants even when it meant
the deaths of their fellow Jews.
Its fascinating, though, to see how sympathetically Jewish historians
treat their collaborators. They faced a "terrible choice" and their
policies were "the only one that afforded hope and some prospect of
survival."
These words are
never used by people like Hannah Rosenthal when discussing other
victims of the Nazis like Ukrainians who also faced "terrible choices"
during the war.
One person who could teach Hannah Rosenthal a lesson is Nazi hunter
Simon Wiesenthal, certainly a more knowledgable and more respected
Holocaust expert than Catherine Chatterley.
Wiesenthal was interviewed by author Alan Levy for his 1993 book The
Wiesenthal File, and he told the story of being attacked by a fellow
Jew, David Zimmet, who had been a Kapo in Mauthausen.
"By 1946, Zimet (sic) was
a DP in Austria and was recognized by several survivors from Tarnów.
Wiesenthal was still collecting testimony about him in the DP camp when
Zimet learned that Simon was, as he puts it, ‘occupied with his case,
so at seven o’clock in the morning he is coming to my office there with
a knife. He was a big, strapping healthy man back in ’46 while we were
all still so thin. He had lived good in the ghetto and, in the
crematorium at Mauthausen, they were all given double food … I pick up
the inkwell from my desk and throw it at his face to protect myself and
I shout so loud that people come running to help me and his is
arrested. Zimet was four weeks in jail for this. But then, because he
had worked in the crematory, they need him for the Mauthausen trial and
bring him to Germany as a witness. From Germany, he emigrates to
Canada.’
Years later, Wiesenthal was looking over a confidential list of cases
being investigated by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, when he read:
ZIMET, David.
A policeman in ghetto in Tarnów. Witnesses have attested to his
brutality. ‘Zimet!’ Wiesenthal exclaimed. ‘This is my old case!’ He
informed the Canadian authorities of his evidence against Zimet, but
they proved unwilling to prosecute a Jew for Nazi crimes. The Canadian
Jewish Committee intervened and Zimet agreed to submit to a council of
arbitration established by the committee.
‘Nothing ever came of it,’ says Wiesenthal, ‘because the Jewish
community was reluctant to publicize the case since Zimet was himself
Jewish.’ This is so terrible! Through this false attitude that we must
ignore Jewish helpers of the Nazis, we are losing credibility when we
say we are acting against all people that commit crimes. If everybody
could see that we are not looking only for Germans and Ukrainians, but
even for our own Jewish criminals, then we would have much less
opposition'."
Rosenthal no doubt thought she was being clever when she concluded her
speech saying:
"Where there is hatred whipped up by irresponsible leaders, we must
call them out and answer as strongly as we can -- and make their
message
totally unacceptable to all people of conscience."
Well, we're calling out Hannah Rosenthal for whipping up hatred against
Canada's Ukrainian community. Did she make Obama proud?