Globe and Mail | 16Apr2011 | James Adams
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/prairies/discord-accusations-taint-human-rights-museum-debate/article1987877/
Discord, accusations taint human
rights museum debate
The debate over how a Canadian human rights museum should
recognize the sufferings of Jews, Ukrainians and other groups in Canada
and elsewhere has drawn the attention of prominent international
scholars who, in an open letter this week to European newspapers, are
accusing two Ukrainian Canadian organizations of “dishonesty” and
“distortion.”
The seven-paragraph letter -- bearing more than 100 names,
including those of at least nine Ukrainian Canadians -- says the
Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the Ukrainian
Canadian Congress are “distorting historical accounts of the Holodomor
[the death by famine of millions of Ukrainians in Soviet-occupied
Ukraine in 1932-33] while ... refusing to acknowledge the role [of
Ukrainian nationalist movements] in the Holocaust.”
The two organizations have helped create “a competition of
suffering,” the letter concludes, adding that because of their failure
to “confront the historical record openly and honestly,” both should
“stay out of” the debate about the Canadian Museum for Human Rights.
The text of the letter was
prepared by “seven or eight
scholars,” all Canadian or with Canadian associations, according to one
of its draftees, University of Alberta history and classics professor
John Paul Himka. Seeking international support was necessary, Mr. Himka
said, because “in Canada, everybody’s a prisoner of their ethnic
minority.”
[W.Z.
The link at
http://engageonline.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/no-place-for-a-gallery-on-the-holocaust-in-the-new-canadian-museum-of-human-rights/
by
David Hirsh dated 08Apr2011 indicates that Per Anders Rudling and
Christine Chatterley were especially involved in formulating this
scurrilous attack on the Ukrainian community.]
The UCCLA and the UCC have been vociferous and steadfast
opponents of the plan for the museum, now under construction in
Winnipeg, to have a “zone” dedicated to the Holocaust. They claim such
a “zone” in a federally funded museum – it was established as a Crown
corporation by the Harper government in 2008 -- “elevates” the
Holocaust
over other genocides and mass atrocities. The UCC has been pressing for
the creation of a Holodomor gallery that receives “no less coverage”
than the Holocaust, while the UCCLA feels all genocides should be
explored throughout the entire museum in what it calls a “comparative,
thematic and inclusive manner.”
The letter, which the UCC was quick to condemn on Friday on
its website as “malicious” and rife with “prejudicial remarks,” claims
the congress “at times [has] inflated the number of [Holdomor] victims
to seven or even 10 million” when “all demographic studies place the
number of famine deaths ... in the range of 2.6 to 3.9 million.” While
a “grievous toll,” the UCC total has an obvious implication, the letter
states: “seven or 10 million is more than six million [the generally
agreed death count of the Holocaust]; [therefore] the Holodomor
deserves more attention than the Holocaust.”
The letter, whose signatories include British Hitler
biographer Sir Ian Kershaw, Israeli Holocaust studies professor Yehuda
Bauer and U.S. “Final Solution” expert Christopher Browning, goes on to
say both groups haven’t “fully acknowledged” the part the Organization
of Ukrainian Nationalists, the Ukrainian Insurgent Army and the Galicia
Division, the last formed by the Nazis in 1943, played in the Holocaust
and other “anti-civilian operations.” Indeed, some Ukrainian Canadians
“revere” their members as “champions.”
A representative of the UCCLA said on Friday that his
organization would reply to these assertions next week. However, in a
brief interview, the association’s research director Lubomyr Luciuk
said the letter incorrectly claims that his group and the UCC are
“campaigning against ... a permanent Holocaust gallery.” While the
UCCLA and the UCC differ on how the Holocaust should be represented,
neither says it shouldn’t be “a major component. Of course, it must be.”
In the meantime, the UCC online said its position on the
Holodomor is that “many millions died ... The exact number is less
important than the scale and nature of this genocide.” At the same
time, it notes that the government of Ukraine officially claims the
famine “took from seven to 10 million innocent lives.” As for the
military units cited in the letter, the UCC says the 1985-86 Canadian
Commission of Inquiry on War Criminals “formally cleared [them] of war
crimes.”
Selected Comment of Per
Anders Rudling:
[W.Z.
Mr. Rudling obtained his Ph.D. at the University of Alberta in 2009
under the tutelage of a nest of Ukrainophobes, including
John-Paul Himka, that has been supporting attacks on the Ukrainian
community for the past two decades.]
Here, it may be important to remind the readers about the reasons for
the debate. Lubomyr Luciuk's UCCLA sent out postcards which presented
the supporters of the Holocaust exhibit as fat pigs with bullwhips,
presenting the Holocaust exhibit in the CMHR as a tool of domination
and oppression. The postcard was sent out to several Jewish
organizations, caused deep offense and were widely perceived as being
anti-Semitic. Now, had this been an isolated incident, it could perhaps
been dismissed as yet another example of bad taste and poor judgment.
Therefore, some intellectual background to Luciuk's activism. For
decades, Luciuk has been involved in apologetic representations of the
wartime activities of the Ukrainian extreme right. On July 4, 1983, in
the OUN paper Homin Ukrainy, Luciuk defended the Ukrainian Waffen-SS
Division Galizien, a deeply anti-Semitic organization under the command
of Heinrich Himmler, whose officers were trained in the Dachau
concentration camp, took personal oaths to Adolf Hitler, and units of
which partook in war crimes, the most infamous one being the slaughter
and burning of the Polish village of Huta Pienacka on February 28,
1944. Luciuk maintains that "membership in the Division has never been
regarded as a cause of shame." The Ukrainian Waffen-SS veterans in
Canada are constituent members of the UCC, under the euphemism The
First Division of the Ukrainian National Army. They were saluted by the
UCC last Remembrance Day. Last January, the UCC proposed recognition of
the veterans of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and its
armed wing the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (OUN and UPA). The OUN was the
leading Ukrainian fascist movement. It endorsed the Führerprinzip,
totalitarianism, anti-Semitism, terrorism, and racism. Its leaders
enthusiastically endorsed the Holocaust and its members organized
pogroms in Western Ukraine in 1941. In 1943-44, the UPA murdered around
100,000 Polish nationals and thousands of Jews in Volhynia and Galicia.
Last year, the UCC wanted the OUN and UPA veterans recognized in
Canada. Whereas Luciuk endorses a narrative of diminishing or denying
the crimes of the Ukrainian nationalists, he is very fond of linking
communism and Soviet crimes to Jews. As late at April 2, 2011, in the
Winnipeg Free Press, Luciuk mused on the overrepresentation of Jews in
the Communist party, "and particularly in its secret police and Gulag
concentration camp system." As if the people who took part in the
Stalinist system of government did so as Jews. The idea of the Jewish
communists is a cornerstone in the Ukrainian nationalist tradition. It
should be remembered that it was for their alleged association with
communism the OUN(b) in 1941 demanded their extermination.
When Luciuk now is trying to
down-play the maliciousness of his campaign in the language that
appeals to fatuous pluralist inclinations, Canadians need to be
reminded of the reasons for the concerns of these now 103 scholars.
GS:
"UCCLA sent out postcards which
presented the supporters of the Holocaust exhibit as fat pigs with
bullwhips..."
------
No they didn't. They sent out a postcard showing the original cover of
the Ukrainian publication of "Animal Farm" which George Orwell wrote as
a critique of stalinism.
Everybody knows that.
Furthermore, it was clearly marked on the postcard that this was the
cover art of "Animal Farm."
I've seen photos of this card, and to argue that it intended to insult
supporters of a separate permanent Holocaust exhibit withint the CMHR
is simply ridiculous.
Marsha S:
P Rudling's post is filled with the sort of racist hate that came out
of the Soviet Union after WWII. I suspect this is a crafty individual
who well knows the harm he is causing. Shame on him.
Jews and Ukrainians were targeted by both the Soviets and the Nazis. We
have more in common than this individual cares to admit.
This post also shows why it is so important to make sure the CMHR is
not
one-sided.
Arzed:
Per Rudling is a hatemonger. If
you have evidence of war criminals in Canada, you should inform the
government. If not, you should not engage in smearing entire ethnic
groups with hate speech.
Selected Comment of KMB47:
KMB47 2:08 PM on April 17, 2011
Why are you so surprised, Roman Serbyn?
Why attack Dr. Per Rudling, who is fluent in Ukrainian, Russian, and German, and
who has devoted many years of research to examining the archives and testimony
pertaining to the crimes committed by the OUN and UPA? As one of the signatories
of the open letter, I can assure you that I support an open and honest
confrontation with the historical record, which is why those who have a vested
interest in denying or obfuscating the role of Ukrainian nationalists in the
mass murder of Jews and Poles do not have a legitimate voice in a debate about
the representation of human rights. I suspect that Canadian WWII veterans and
their families would not be pleased to know that their tax dollars have paid
your salary as a professor and funded your obsessive activism in defense of the
UPA and the Galician division of the SS. There are records of your statements to
the effect that membership in the SS is no cause for shame. While I strongly
believe that Canadians should be talking about how to represent Canada's
relationship to the history of human rights, I also hope that people will
recognize that Roman Serbyn and Luciuk have vested interests in diminishing the
Holocaust's significance because they want to deflect public attention from
Ukrainian nationalist involvement in genocide. If readers of this newspaper
would look into their backgrounds, it would become immediately clear that
Serbyn's and Luciuk's interventions in this campaign are not based on a desire
for fair representation, but on fanatical, life-long investment in denigrating a
genocide that they blame on its victims.