HOME  DISINFORMATION  PEOPLE  RAMBAM  KLAUSNER  DUNN  L.A. JUSTICE
Prytulak to Clarke:  Court door slammed in my face


Lubomyr Prytulak
[Address]
[Telephone]
[Email]

20 September 2002


John A. Clarke
Executive Officer/Clerk
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
P.O. Box 151
Main Post Office
Los Angeles, California
USA       90053

Re: Rambam vs Prytulak   BC271433

John A. Clarke:

Defendant Prytulak's motion to quash was delivered to the Los Angeles Superior Court on 30-Aug-2002.  The motion was accompanied by payment of filing fee, by proof of service on plaintiff, and incorporated an argument for extension of time.  Today, 21 days later, Judge James R. Dunn appears to have neither granted that motion nor denied it.  Indeed, the motion has not even appeared as filed in the Case Summary on the LASC web site.  Nor has the Court provided Defendant feedback as to any defects that might need to be removed to render the motion fileable.  And neither has the Court returned the filing fee.  Defendant, in other words, has had the Court door slammed in his face, and has been left sitting in the dark and without recourse.

If filing of the motion has been blocked, then Defendant Prytulak's minimal request is that he be told the name of the individual who takes responsibility for this blocking, and as well under what authority that blocking has been carried out.

On its web site, the Los Angeles Superior Court enunciates that it is dedicated to upholding certain values, among which are:

Accessibility � Equally serve all people and consistently work to identify and remove barriers to access.

Responsiveness and Responsibility � Address the public's needs in an efficient, effective, courteous way, using innovative methods and maintaining accountability.
However, Defendant's experience with the Los Angeles Superior Court so far has been that the Court is the opposite of what it represents itself as striving to be � that is, Defendant has found the Court to be inaccessible, discriminatory, unresponsive, irresponsible, and unaccountable.  The only competence and enthusiasm that the Court has shown is for blinding itself to the recognition that it has exceeded its jurisdiction and that all of its actions are nullities.

On the possibility that it may both facilitate and speed your review of the question of filing, Defendant provides the option of reviewing some of the relevant materials online:




Lubomyr Prytulak

cc:

G. Beavers, Deputy Clerk
Los Angeles Superior Court
PO Box 151, Main Post Office
Los Angeles, CA
USA     90053

V. Ponce, Assistant Clerk
Los Angeles Superior Court
PO Box 151, Main Post Office
Los Angeles, CA
USA     90053

Gary Kurtz, Esq.
20335 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 200
Woodland Hills, CA
USA     91364

James A. Bascue
Presiding Judge
Los Angeles Superior Court
111 North Hill Street
Los Angeles, CA
USA     90012
S. James Otero
Assistant Supervising Judge
Los Angeles Superior Court
111 North Hill Street
Los Angeles, CA
USA     90012
Robert A. Dukes
Assistant Presiding Judge
Los Angeles Superior Court
111 North Hill Street
Los Angeles, CA
USA     90012


HOME  DISINFORMATION  PEOPLE  RAMBAM  KLAUSNER  DUNN  L.A. JUSTICE