Ukrainian Graduates of Detroit and Windsor | 01Nov2009 | Dr. Uli Busch
Uli Busch on the Demjanjuk
situation
My
English
is not so good. But I presume, that my English is still better than
your good
German. So I decided, not to torture you with my good German, but to
bother you
with my bad English. Anyway you are lucky, that I do not try my
Ukrainian. It
would be a poor speech: Tscho, tscho? Ja ne rosumiyu. Pohano. Dobre.
Pa, Pa.
I
congratulate Vera on having the honor of being “Ukrainian of the Year”.
She
really earned it. Vera put a lot of energy into her project of
humanitarian
help for Ukraine.
I
am the
best wittness for that, because I enjoyed supporting her in most of her
activities.
Of course, sometimes
it was not so easy. For example: it was difficult for me and my
clients, when my
office was changed into a storage house
for 2000 care packages for Rohatyn and the village school children of
Jesupil.
The smell of the excellent garlic kobasa in the packages from Aldi
supermarket
was still in the office after weeks and my clients really believed,
that I
produce my own sausage.
Vera
always
said, “We have to help. It is the first time in Ukrainian history, that
the
country has a fair chance.”
I
am very
proud of Vera and her excellent results, supporting the development of
a free
and independent Ukraine, especially by bringing help to the future of
the country,
the children. I never regret, that I have to share her love with
Ukraine.
And now the
bad news:
John Demjanjuk
will be tried by a German court in Munich, beginning the 30th of
November 2009.
He is accused of assisting the Nazis in cruelly killing about 27,000
Jews, by
working in the death factory in Sobibor, Poland in 1943, sixty six
years ago.
John’s
fate,
John’s life, is a human tragedy:
Holodomor,
World War II, Red Army soldier, war injury, POW in a Nazi POW camp,
loss of US
citizenship, extradition to Israel, death sentence in Jerusalem, seven
and a
half years in prison, 5 years in a death cell, deportation to Germany,
trial in
Germany.
Each
of
these events means massive illegal and inhuman treatment. For example:
In the
German POW camps for Red Army soldiers 3.5 million men out of 5.3
million died
from starvation, cannibalism and epidemics. Among them there were many
more
than a million victims of Ukrainian descent. The POW camps were nothing
else
than death camps, the Red Army soldiers were criminals in the eyes of
the SS
and the Wehrmacht, the German Army.
The
latest
terrible and inhuman treatment is the deportation of John to Germany
and the
trial in Munich. I will tell you why:
The
deportation was chosen by the United States and Germany to avoid the
principle
of double jeopardy. An extradition, the legal way, was forbidden by
Israelian,
German and American law. Only the illegal deportation opened the
possibility to
reopen the Israelian trial and to overrule the decision of the Supreme
Court to
drop the case, as far as Sobibor was concerned and also as far as
Sobibor was a
part of the indictment.
The
deportation itself is already a conviction, a life sentence: John has
to stay
in Germany until death under complete isolation and welfare conditions.
He has
no rights and no way to return to his wife and children. For John there
will be
no difference between a small cell in a nursery home and a prison cell.
The deportation
already destroyed his life completely.
John’s
legal situation after the deportation: already a life punishment,
before the
trial starts. Guilty, if innocent or not.
And
his
personal situation:
I
say it in
his words:
“I
lost
everything and all my hopes. They took my little future away. I never
gonna
make it.”
For
the
first time in his life he is no longer fit to fight and defend himself:
Physically:
Deadly sick, precancer, beginning leukemia, pain all over, gout,
serious kidney
problems, back and knee problems.
Mentally:
Without
any hope, depressed, sad, crying, desperate.
Germany
against John: An unfair and inhuman trial of a government against a
man, who
has a life expectation of months, not years.
Let’s
assume John would still be fit for trial: Is the trial then a fair one?
Let’s
go to
Moscow, back in 1979:
It
was the
KGB, which offered copies of so called evidence, which was produced in
secret
trials and under torture of their victims. The “Dienstausweis”, the
service
card, was declared a fake of the KGB by the world’s most famous expert,
Dr.
Grant. The German head office for criminal research,
“Bundeskriminalamt”,
estimated the service card as a very simple falsification of the KGB.
We all
know, that the Soviet law and court system and all the KGB activities
never
intended to achieve justice, they only served and supported the ruling
dictator
and mass murderer Stalin and his successors. The prosecutors and courts
were
political instruments, used to liquidate opponents and the freedom of
people in
subjugated sattelite states like Ukraine.
Let’s
go to
Jerusalem, back in 1986 -1993:
What
do you
think is the most remarkable event in the Israel trial against John
Demjanjuk?
I am sure, you all will say the aquittal of John by the Supreme Court
from
being Ivan the Terrible. What a great court! Excellent judges!!
Hosianna!
I
contradict: For me the most remarkable event in Israel was the death
sentence
of the District Court against an innocent man. This result shows clear
evidence
of the weakness, of the mistakes and the errors of human court systems
and their
judges. The judges in Israel wanted to believe in the guilt of John as
Ivan the
Terrible. The world’s mass media asked hysterically for a death
sentence and
there was only John, his son, his son in law and his lawyer, Sheftel,
who
believed in John’s innocence.
And
there
was the criminal and fraudulent misleading of the American and
Israelian
courts. Since 1979 the Office of Special Investigation from the US
Department
of Justice, called OSI, and
the Israelian
prosecutor withheld the existing evidence, that John was not Ivan the
Terrible.
OSI wanted the death sentence against a man, of whom they definitely
knew, that
he was innocent and not Ivan Grosny.
And
it
worked. They got, what they strictly wanted, the death sentence, by
withholding
the so called Danilchenko statements. Danilchenko was a Trawniki man,
who was
forced by the Nazis to be a guard in Sobibor. After the war he was
repatriated
to the Soviet Union and was there convicted as a traitor of his
motherland and
sentenced to 25 years in the Gulag.
After
the manipulation
was discovered, after it was established, that there was more material
in the
archives of the Russian KGB, the defense was able to find 36 statements
of
Treblinka guards, that Ivan Marschenko and not John Demjanjuk, was Ivan
Grosny.
The discovery of the manipulation was the reason for finding so much
exculpatory material, that John had to be aquitted from being Ivan the
Terrible.
But for 5 years there was only an inch between John and the gallows.
Now
let’s
go to Munich:
The
world
and German mass media have already convicted John: The Nazi monster,
the top of
the list Nazi criminal, the mass murderer, Hitler, Eichmann, Demjanjuk,
all the
same.
The
German
prosecutor is now using the contents of the Danilchenko statement. For
the
prosecutor it is the most important piece of evidence, that John was
serving in
the death factory, that John was part and member of the joint criminal
enterprise called Sobibor.
But
the
statement is only a piece of paper. Danilchenko and all the witnesses
on behalf
of Sobibor are dead. Danilchenko’s statement is the only one, which
somehow brings
John to Sobibor. All the survivors, all the other private guards, gave
statements, that they never saw John in the death camp of Sobibor.
A
piece of paper
is no evidence of the truth of its content. You need the man, who gave
the
statement in the witness stand, to find out, if it is true what he said
in the
paper. If a man lies or not, if his statement was produced under
torture in the
KGB cellars or not, you can only find out, if you see the person, his
face and
his eyes, if you hear, what he has to say.
Danilchenko
died in 1985. Twenty four years ago.
It
is the
fundamental and essential principle in all western criminal codes, that
evidence
from a simple statement on a piece of paper is not a legal possibility
to prove
guilt, if the accused and his lawyers did not have the chance to cross
examine
the witness. And that is exactly the case here.
It
takes us
back to the OSI manipulation, to withhold the Danilchenko statements
for years.
John’s lawyers would have had the right and the chance from 1979 until
1985, to
cross examine Danilchenko, if OSI would not have withheld the
statements from
the defense and the courts. Because of the OSI manipulation John and
his
defense never had the chance, to prove, what was right and what was
wrong in
Danilchenko’s statements. For that the OSI is forever responsible and
guilty. On
purpose OSI destroyed the right of the defense to prove, that
Danilchenko’s
statement is not true or is a fake or was produced under torture of the
KGB.
The
withholding of the Danilchenko statement for more than 6 years - the
same
manipulation of OSI, which brought John into a death cell in Jerusalem
for 5
years, now works in the German trial and is misused by the German
prosecutor.
The Danilchenko statements are the foundation for the indictment and
the basis
of John’s imprisonment, whose cell in Munich is probably his final, his
second
death cell...
The
manipulation leads directly to the loss of the guarantee of a fair
trial,
protected in Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights.
Let
me come
to a conclusion:
Germany
against John Demjanjuk is not a fair trial at all. It is a political
show, in
which John is the victim. OSI wants the trial to show that John was not
Ivan
the Terrible, but a terrible Ivan.
Germany
has
already been trying for a long time to share the guilt for the
Holocaust with
other nations and Europe. Demjanjuk is their last possibility, the last
face
and the last name to make other nations, especially Ukraine,
responsible for
the incredible crimes of German Nazis and the Holocaust.
And
the
trial should satisfy those Jewish organizations which always wanted to
see John
-- if found guilty or not -- on the gallows.
My
claim:
America
and
Germany: Stop this unfair trial. Bring John home. Let him die in peace
in the
bosom of his family.
Thank you
for supporting John and the defense so strongly on this day.
Dr.
Ulrich
Busch
Attorney-at-Law
November 1,
2009